LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PCCLIST Archives

PCCLIST Archives

PCCLIST Archives


February 2000


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Independent" pcc members (3 messages)
667 vs. 680 (19 messages)
667 vs. 680 -- friday (1 message)
<No subject> (1 message)
Apologies to the List (1 message)
BFM (1 message)
BIBCO-At-Large Meeting notes posted (1 message)
CONSERline No. 15 (1 message)
Cross Reference Task Group final report available for comment (1 message)
Dates on personal name headings (6 messages)
Digest form vs. individual messages (was:Re: 667 vs. 680) (1 message)
Digest vs. individual--my mistake (1 message)
Final report of the SCA TG on Aggregators now available for comment (1 message)
LC copy following upon BIBCO (2 messages)
New on the PCC web site (1 message)
Order of notes (1 message)
PCC Participants Meeting Summary From ALA Mid-Winter, San Antonio now available (1 message)
Possible agenda item for BIBCO OpCo (10 messages)
Standing Committee on Training (1 message)
Use of field 680 (3 messages)
LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives
PCCLIST Home

PCCLIST Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

Date

Size
New Thread

"Independent" pcc members

Re: "Independent" pcc members

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 13:27:42 -0500

78 lines

Re: "Independent" pcc members

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 19:22:09 -0700

54 lines

Re: "Independent" pcc members

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 17:05:05 -0800

180 lines
New Thread

667 vs. 680

Re: 667 vs. 680

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 08:43:50 -0500

69 lines

Re: 667 vs. 680

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 16:33:17 -0500

61 lines

Re: 667 vs. 680

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 13:33:51 -0800

178 lines

Re: 667 vs. 680

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 16:00:43 -0500

44 lines

Re: 667 vs. 680

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 13:28:38 -0500

139 lines

Re: 667 vs. 680

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 11:41:45 -0600

64 lines

Re: 667 vs. 680

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 12:04:30 -0500

69 lines

Re: 667 vs. 680

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 15:20:40 -0500

176 lines

Re: 667 vs. 680

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 13:01:50 -0700

49 lines

Re: 667 vs. 680

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 11:54:57 -0800

182 lines

Re: 667 vs. 680

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 14:28:21 -0500

134 lines

Re: 667 vs. 680

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 13:37:03 -0500

55 lines

Re: 667 vs. 680

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 09:09:42 -0800

51 lines

Re: 667 vs. 680

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 11:29:46 -0500

112 lines

Re: 667 vs. 680

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 09:24:06 -0600

69 lines

Re: 667 vs. 680

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 08:50:17 -0500

62 lines

Re: 667 vs. 680

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 08:20:24 -0500

59 lines

Re: 667 vs. 680

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 07:12:40 -0500

28 lines

667 vs. 680

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 15:14:06 PST

29 lines
New Thread

667 vs. 680 -- friday

Re: 667 vs. 680 -- friday

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 13:31:16 -0800

34 lines
New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 09:31:55 -0600

10 lines
New Thread

Apologies to the List

Apologies to the List

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 14:01:26 -0500

20 lines
New Thread

BFM

BFM

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 14:05:02 -0500

46 lines
New Thread

BIBCO-At-Large Meeting notes posted

BIBCO-At-Large Meeting notes posted

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 11:19:33 -0500

30 lines
New Thread

CONSERline No. 15

CONSERline No. 15

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 15:11:12 -0500

28 lines
New Thread

Cross Reference Task Group final report available for comment

Cross Reference Task Group final report available for comment

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 18:48:17 -0500

26 lines
New Thread

Dates on personal name headings

Re: Dates on personal name headings

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 14:43:48 -0800

37 lines

Re: Dates on personal name headings

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 14:33:32 -0500

37 lines

Re: Dates on personal name headings

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 10:45:18 -0800

33 lines

Re: Dates on personal name headings

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 12:59:13 -0500

35 lines

Re: Dates on personal name headings

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 12:12:38 -0500

158 lines

Dates on personal name headings

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 07:43:43 -0800

132 lines
New Thread

Digest form vs. individual messages (was:Re: 667 vs. 680)

Digest form vs. individual messages (was:Re: 667 vs. 680)

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 10:46:07 -0500

41 lines
New Thread

Digest vs. individual--my mistake

Digest vs. individual--my mistake

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 12:04:00 -0500

36 lines
New Thread

Final report of the SCA TG on Aggregators now available for comment

Final report of the SCA TG on Aggregators now available for comment

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 11:03:28 -0500

30 lines
New Thread

LC copy following upon BIBCO

Re: LC copy following upon BIBCO

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 14:52:55 -0500

75 lines

LC copy following upon BIBCO

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 08:52:53 -0700

44 lines
New Thread

New on the PCC web site

New on the PCC web site

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 18:33:39 -0500

26 lines
New Thread

Order of notes

Order of notes

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 19:00:33 -0800

32 lines
New Thread

PCC Participants Meeting Summary From ALA Mid-Winter, San Antonio now available

PCC Participants Meeting Summary From ALA Mid-Winter, San Antonio now available

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 13:27:33 -0500

38 lines
New Thread

Possible agenda item for BIBCO OpCo

Re: Possible agenda item for BIBCO OpCo

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 08:31:40 -0500

58 lines

Re: Possible agenda item for BIBCO OpCo

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 07:11:58 -0600

63 lines

Re: Possible agenda item for BIBCO OpCo

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 07:45:23 -0500

100 lines

Re: Possible agenda item for BIBCO OpCo

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 18:31:34 -0700

73 lines

Re: Possible agenda item for BIBCO OpCo

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 15:31:46 -0800

55 lines

Re: Possible agenda item for BIBCO OpCo

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 16:05:18 -0600

31 lines

Re: Possible agenda item for BIBCO OpCo

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 16:13:06 +0500

46 lines

Re: Possible agenda item for BIBCO OpCo

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 14:04:23 -0600

39 lines

Re: Possible agenda item for BIBCO OpCo

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 11:01:36 -0800

50 lines

Possible agenda item for BIBCO OpCo

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 10:50:32 -0500

42 lines
New Thread

Standing Committee on Training

Standing Committee on Training

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 07:57:32 -0800

18 lines
New Thread

Use of field 680

Re: Use of field 680

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 09:02:34 -0500

59 lines

Re: Use of field 680

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 08:12:41 -0500

48 lines

Use of field 680

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 17:09:46 -0800

36 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In
Get Password

Get Password
Search Archives

Search Archives
Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Archives

January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager