|
|
Size
|
Re: "Independent" pcc members
|
Thu, 3 Feb 2000 13:27:42 -0500 |
78 lines |
Re: "Independent" pcc members
|
Wed, 2 Feb 2000 19:22:09 -0700 |
54 lines |
Re: "Independent" pcc members
|
Wed, 2 Feb 2000 17:05:05 -0800 |
180 lines |
Re: 667 vs. 680
|
Wed, 9 Feb 2000 08:43:50 -0500 |
69 lines |
Re: 667 vs. 680
|
Tue, 8 Feb 2000 16:33:17 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: 667 vs. 680
|
Tue, 8 Feb 2000 13:33:51 -0800 |
178 lines |
Re: 667 vs. 680
|
Tue, 8 Feb 2000 16:00:43 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: 667 vs. 680
|
Tue, 8 Feb 2000 13:28:38 -0500 |
139 lines |
Re: 667 vs. 680
|
Fri, 4 Feb 2000 11:41:45 -0600 |
64 lines |
Re: 667 vs. 680
|
Fri, 4 Feb 2000 12:04:30 -0500 |
69 lines |
Re: 667 vs. 680
|
Thu, 3 Feb 2000 15:20:40 -0500 |
176 lines |
Re: 667 vs. 680
|
Thu, 3 Feb 2000 13:01:50 -0700 |
49 lines |
Re: 667 vs. 680
|
Thu, 3 Feb 2000 11:54:57 -0800 |
182 lines |
Re: 667 vs. 680
|
Thu, 3 Feb 2000 14:28:21 -0500 |
134 lines |
Re: 667 vs. 680
|
Thu, 3 Feb 2000 13:37:03 -0500 |
55 lines |
Re: 667 vs. 680
|
Thu, 3 Feb 2000 09:09:42 -0800 |
51 lines |
Re: 667 vs. 680
|
Thu, 3 Feb 2000 11:29:46 -0500 |
112 lines |
Re: 667 vs. 680
|
Thu, 3 Feb 2000 09:24:06 -0600 |
69 lines |
Re: 667 vs. 680
|
Thu, 3 Feb 2000 08:50:17 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: 667 vs. 680
|
Thu, 3 Feb 2000 08:20:24 -0500 |
59 lines |
Re: 667 vs. 680
|
Thu, 3 Feb 2000 07:12:40 -0500 |
28 lines |
667 vs. 680
|
Wed, 2 Feb 2000 15:14:06 PST |
29 lines |
Re: 667 vs. 680 -- friday
|
Thu, 3 Feb 2000 13:31:16 -0800 |
34 lines |
<No subject>
|
Thu, 3 Feb 2000 09:31:55 -0600 |
10 lines |
Apologies to the List
|
Thu, 3 Feb 2000 14:01:26 -0500 |
20 lines |
BFM
|
Mon, 14 Feb 2000 14:05:02 -0500 |
46 lines |
BIBCO-At-Large Meeting notes posted
|
Tue, 8 Feb 2000 11:19:33 -0500 |
30 lines |
CONSERline No. 15
|
Wed, 16 Feb 2000 15:11:12 -0500 |
28 lines |
Cross Reference Task Group final report available for comment
|
Thu, 3 Feb 2000 18:48:17 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: Dates on personal name headings
|
Mon, 7 Feb 2000 14:43:48 -0800 |
37 lines |
Re: Dates on personal name headings
|
Mon, 7 Feb 2000 14:33:32 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: Dates on personal name headings
|
Mon, 7 Feb 2000 10:45:18 -0800 |
33 lines |
Re: Dates on personal name headings
|
Mon, 7 Feb 2000 12:59:13 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: Dates on personal name headings
|
Mon, 7 Feb 2000 12:12:38 -0500 |
158 lines |
Dates on personal name headings
|
Mon, 7 Feb 2000 07:43:43 -0800 |
132 lines |
Digest form vs. individual messages (was:Re: 667 vs. 680)
|
Wed, 9 Feb 2000 10:46:07 -0500 |
41 lines |
Digest vs. individual--my mistake
|
Wed, 9 Feb 2000 12:04:00 -0500 |
36 lines |
Final report of the SCA TG on Aggregators now available for comment
|
Wed, 2 Feb 2000 11:03:28 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: LC copy following upon BIBCO
|
Thu, 17 Feb 2000 14:52:55 -0500 |
75 lines |
LC copy following upon BIBCO
|
Thu, 17 Feb 2000 08:52:53 -0700 |
44 lines |
New on the PCC web site
|
Fri, 25 Feb 2000 18:33:39 -0500 |
26 lines |
Order of notes
|
Wed, 9 Feb 2000 19:00:33 -0800 |
32 lines |
PCC Participants Meeting Summary From ALA Mid-Winter, San Antonio now available
|
Tue, 8 Feb 2000 13:27:33 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: Possible agenda item for BIBCO OpCo
|
Thu, 10 Feb 2000 08:31:40 -0500 |
58 lines |
Re: Possible agenda item for BIBCO OpCo
|
Thu, 10 Feb 2000 07:11:58 -0600 |
63 lines |
Re: Possible agenda item for BIBCO OpCo
|
Thu, 10 Feb 2000 07:45:23 -0500 |
100 lines |
Re: Possible agenda item for BIBCO OpCo
|
Wed, 9 Feb 2000 18:31:34 -0700 |
73 lines |
Re: Possible agenda item for BIBCO OpCo
|
Wed, 9 Feb 2000 15:31:46 -0800 |
55 lines |
Re: Possible agenda item for BIBCO OpCo
|
Wed, 9 Feb 2000 16:05:18 -0600 |
31 lines |
Re: Possible agenda item for BIBCO OpCo
|
Wed, 9 Feb 2000 16:13:06 +0500 |
46 lines |
Re: Possible agenda item for BIBCO OpCo
|
Wed, 9 Feb 2000 14:04:23 -0600 |
39 lines |
Re: Possible agenda item for BIBCO OpCo
|
Wed, 9 Feb 2000 11:01:36 -0800 |
50 lines |
Possible agenda item for BIBCO OpCo
|
Wed, 9 Feb 2000 10:50:32 -0500 |
42 lines |
Standing Committee on Training
|
Fri, 18 Feb 2000 07:57:32 -0800 |
18 lines |
Re: Use of field 680
|
Wed, 2 Feb 2000 09:02:34 -0500 |
59 lines |
Re: Use of field 680
|
Wed, 2 Feb 2000 08:12:41 -0500 |
48 lines |
Use of field 680
|
Tue, 1 Feb 2000 17:09:46 -0800 |
36 lines |