|
|
|
Size
|
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:23:55 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:10:19 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:10:25 +0200 |
109 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
Alan Kent |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:36:59 +1000 |
70 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:57:04 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 22:19:52 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 22:00:42 +0200 |
46 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:56:50 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
Heikki Levanto |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 21:46:09 +0200 |
23 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 20:29:59 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 21:36:37 +0200 |
70 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 21:01:50 +0200 |
64 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 19:31:37 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:31:37 -0400 |
55 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:27:52 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:18:39 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 18:54:53 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:58:28 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
Heikki Levanto |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 19:35:55 +0200 |
30 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:42:27 -0400 |
96 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 19:38:36 +0200 |
82 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:11:16 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:10:35 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:58:56 -0400 |
78 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:35:48 -0400 |
54 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:11:24 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:11:41 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:06:40 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:43:09 -0400 |
67 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 23:29:42 +0200 |
44 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:36:14 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 20:53:07 +0100 |
55 lines |
"I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:28:32 +0100 |
80 lines |
Re: 'matches' was: assumptions
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Tue, 8 Oct 2002 07:30:08 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: 'matches' was: assumptions
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:23:49 +0100 |
27 lines |
<No subject>
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 17:09:20 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: fwd: Again: Grammar Tweaks
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:56:50 +0100 |
71 lines |
fwd: Again: Grammar Tweaks
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:41:19 -0500 |
96 lines |
Re: Again: Grammar Tweaks
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:30:23 -0500 |
73 lines |
Re: Again: Grammar Tweaks
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:15:23 +0000 |
38 lines |
Again: Grammar Tweaks
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:11:13 GMT |
135 lines |
Re: another approach
|
Alan Kent |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:21:36 +1000 |
29 lines |
Re: another approach
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 00:42:41 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: another approach
|
Alan Kent |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:39:12 +1000 |
34 lines |
Re: another approach
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 8 Oct 2002 16:35:12 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: another approach
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:29:55 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: another approach
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 8 Oct 2002 09:59:39 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: another approach
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Tue, 8 Oct 2002 07:53:39 -0400 |
62 lines |
Re: another approach
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 8 Oct 2002 12:25:29 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: another approach
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:57:19 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: another approach
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:30:25 +0100 |
43 lines |
another approach
|
Theo van Veen |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 17:05:28 +0100 |
34 lines |
Arrgh! (Was: serverChoice relation)
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:12:47 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: assumptions
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:04:25 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: assumptions
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 15:07:44 -0400 |
21 lines |
Re: assumptions
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:43:50 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: assumptions
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:20:03 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: assumptions
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 12:39:06 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: assumptions
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 15:49:24 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: assumptions
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:05:15 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: assumptions
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 09:05:05 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: assumptions
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 08:51:50 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: assumptions
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 12:51:32 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: assumptions
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:53:39 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: assumptions
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:49:36 +0100 |
68 lines |
Re: assumptions
|
Robert Sanderson |
Sat, 5 Oct 2002 19:09:10 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: assumptions
|
Ray denenberg |
Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:13:38 -0400 |
84 lines |
Re: assumptions
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 22:47:07 +0100 |
72 lines |
assumptions
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:57:56 -0400 |
58 lines |
Re: Attn Matthew: WSDL questions
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 1 Oct 2002 11:00:48 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: Bath Qualifiers
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:52:25 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: Bath Qualifiers
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:32:30 +0100 |
83 lines |
Re: Bath Qualifiers
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:26:23 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: Bath Qualifiers
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:40:19 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: Bath Qualifiers
|
Larry E. Dixson |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:51:09 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Bath Qualifiers
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:12:40 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: Bath Qualifiers
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 19:48:43 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: Bath Qualifiers
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:48:49 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: Bath Qualifiers
|
Larry E. Dixson |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:41:55 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: Bath Qualifiers
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:15:16 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Bath Qualifiers
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:40:26 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: Bath Qualifiers
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:41:33 -0400 |
26 lines |
Bath Qualifiers
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:38:28 +0100 |
53 lines |
Betr.: Re: another approach
|
Theo van Veen |
Tue, 8 Oct 2002 16:45:10 +0100 |
69 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: another approach
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:08:39 +0100 |
64 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: another approach
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:01:03 +0100 |
40 lines |
Betr.: Re: another approach
|
Theo van Veen |
Tue, 8 Oct 2002 01:13:42 +0100 |
75 lines |
Betr.: Re: another approach
|
Theo van Veen |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 18:17:56 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:12:03 +0000 |
31 lines |
Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:40:30 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:44:15 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:48:46 +0000 |
51 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:40:41 +0100 |
92 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation
|
Sebastian Hammer |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:29:20 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:26:19 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:48:14 +0000 |
76 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:54:03 +0100 |
65 lines |
Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation
|
Theo van Veen |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:12:26 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:44:29 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:39:52 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:51:49 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:19:52 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:07:24 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:15:54 +0200 |
42 lines |
Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation
|
Theo van Veen |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:55:55 +0100 |
34 lines |
Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation
|
Theo van Veen |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:02:06 +0100 |
53 lines |
Betr.: Re: SRW Query represented as strings and/or XCQL structures
|
Theo van Veen |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:29:08 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: task list -- retrieval records
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:36:43 +0000 |
56 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: task list -- retrieval records
|
Matthew Dovey |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:49:31 -0000 |
36 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: task list -- retrieval records
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:35:35 -0500 |
18 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: task list -- retrieval records
|
Sebastian Hammer |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:31:21 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: task list -- retrieval records
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:08:48 +0000 |
27 lines |
Betr.: Re: task list -- retrieval records
|
Theo van Veen |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:21:09 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: Betr.: record schemas
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:24:30 -0500 |
35 lines |
Betr.: record schemas
|
Theo van Veen |
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:33:43 +0100 |
30 lines |
Betr.: ServerChoice Relation for Implementors
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:04:44 +0100 |
113 lines |
Re: Betr.: what record schemas are permissable?
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:32:33 +0000 |
38 lines |
Betr.: what record schemas are permissable?
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:26:56 +0100 |
66 lines |
Re: bib-1 or AA?
|
Janifer Gatenby |
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:52:40 +0200 |
94 lines |
Re: bib-1 or AA?
|
Alan Kent |
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:33:20 +1000 |
21 lines |
Re: bib-1 or AA?
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 18:47:45 +0100 |
69 lines |
Re: bib-1 or AA?
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 13:51:08 -0400 |
50 lines |
bib-1 or AA?
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:26:40 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: bnf style question
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 13:56:10 -0400 |
97 lines |
Re: bnf style question
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 18:19:46 +0200 |
57 lines |
bnf style question
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:53:20 -0400 |
75 lines |
CQL (FWD for Mike)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Sat, 19 Oct 2002 18:11:17 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: cql bnf last call
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:29:04 +0100 |
54 lines |
Re: cql bnf last call
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 21 Oct 2002 22:13:43 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: cql bnf last call
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 21 Oct 2002 16:44:22 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: cql bnf last call
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 21 Oct 2002 20:04:34 +0100 |
55 lines |
cql bnf last call
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 21 Oct 2002 14:17:24 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: CQL datatype (still waiting)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 14 Oct 2002 16:09:41 +0100 |
30 lines |
CQL datatype (still waiting)
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Mon, 14 Oct 2002 11:09:50 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: cql relation proposal
|
Thomas Place |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 00:16:36 +0200 |
174 lines |
Re: cql relation proposal
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:00:40 -0400 |
117 lines |
Re: cql relation proposal
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 18:40:28 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: cql relation proposal
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 13:44:00 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: cql relation proposal
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 18:12:15 +0100 |
89 lines |
Re: cql relation proposal
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 12:52:16 -0400 |
70 lines |
Re: cql relation proposal
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 16:59:10 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: cql relation proposal
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:45:02 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: cql relation proposal
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 1 Oct 2002 11:34:50 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: cql relation proposal
|
Alan Kent |
Tue, 1 Oct 2002 18:42:34 +1000 |
71 lines |
Re: cql relation proposal
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 1 Oct 2002 08:36:25 +0100 |
46 lines |
CQL Sample Queries
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:11:11 -0500 |
18 lines |
CQL2 (fwd for Mike)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Sat, 19 Oct 2002 18:12:14 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 17:04:45 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 10:03:11 -0400 |
99 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 22:54:43 +0100 |
59 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 22:33:54 +0200 |
87 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 15:37:26 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 17:41:23 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 17:33:22 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:25:40 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:17:04 +0100 |
82 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 17:10:22 +0200 |
107 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 15:02:07 +0100 |
77 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Rob Koopman |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:09:03 +0200 |
30 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:42:34 +0100 |
65 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:45:55 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Rob Koopman |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 15:26:35 +0200 |
36 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:58:46 +0100 |
96 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:40:12 +0100 |
129 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:22:31 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:18:16 +0200 |
275 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:42:19 +0100 |
63 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:35:32 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:31:17 +0100 |
61 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 08:18:43 +0200 |
85 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Alan Kent |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:13:01 +1000 |
49 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Alan Kent |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:10:04 +1000 |
75 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:43:56 +0200 |
56 lines |
Re: cql: anything else?
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 22:52:32 +0100 |
66 lines |
cql: anything else?
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:38:03 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: cql: identifer and term
|
Alan Kent |
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:30:41 +1000 |
51 lines |
Re: cql: identifer and term
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:00:15 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: cql: identifer and term
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:55:08 -0400 |
82 lines |
Re: cql: identifer and term
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 16:44:58 +0200 |
64 lines |
cql: identifer and term
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:57:53 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: CqlType
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:56:04 +0200 |
41 lines |
Re: CqlType
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 15:30:11 +0200 |
51 lines |
Re: CqlType
|
Alan Kent |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 05:24:47 +1000 |
32 lines |
Re: CqlType
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:12:40 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: CqlType
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:45:04 -0400 |
62 lines |
Re: CqlType
|
Alan Kent |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:46:54 +1000 |
38 lines |
Re: CqlType
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Tue, 8 Oct 2002 21:16:09 +0200 |
136 lines |
CqlType
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Tue, 8 Oct 2002 14:36:36 -0400 |
122 lines |
Re: cqlType?
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 09:51:03 -0400 |
25 lines |
cqlType?
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 09:45:47 -0400 |
12 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:05:02 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:02:56 +0200 |
56 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:54:16 +0200 |
64 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:43:28 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:53:09 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:48:37 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:20:25 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:35:51 +0100 |
64 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:12:30 +0100 |
69 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:33:39 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:08:00 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:20:36 +0200 |
141 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:20:58 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 20:22:26 +0100 |
120 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 18:23:43 +0200 |
106 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:55:53 +0100 |
63 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:47:15 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:53:15 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Mon, 14 Oct 2002 10:18:33 +0200 |
115 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Sat, 12 Oct 2002 00:54:51 +0200 |
33 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 17:57:23 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 23:02:32 +0200 |
78 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:01:17 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: degenerate description
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:47:12 -0400 |
33 lines |
degenerate description
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:42:30 -0400 |
19 lines |
Re: Explain
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:27:17 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: Explain
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:54:45 -0400 |
26 lines |
Re: Explain
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:07:55 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: Explain
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:02:47 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: Explain
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:37:26 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: Explain
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:02:24 -0400 |
71 lines |
Re: Explain
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:41:50 +0100 |
54 lines |
Re: Explain
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:17:28 -0400 |
51 lines |
Explain
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:43:09 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: Explain?
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:44:54 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: Explain?
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:27:18 +0100 |
101 lines |
Re: Explain?
|
Alan Kent |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:30:56 +1000 |
83 lines |
Re: Explain?
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 19:21:13 +0100 |
62 lines |
Explain?
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:05:59 -0400 |
16 lines |
Re: getExplain
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:36:38 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: getExplain
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:17:06 +0000 |
89 lines |
Re: getExplain
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:43:21 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: getExplain
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:28:25 +0000 |
53 lines |
Re: getExplain
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:38:04 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: getExplain
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:37:37 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: getExplain
|
Matthew Dovey |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 10:05:14 -0000 |
65 lines |
Re: getExplain
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 23:37:13 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: getExplain
|
Matthew Dovey |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 23:03:14 -0000 |
41 lines |
Re: getExplain
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:38:09 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: getExplain
|
Matthew Dovey |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:52:10 -0000 |
39 lines |
Re: getExplain
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:32:49 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: getExplain
|
Sebastian Hammer |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 23:36:54 +0100 |
31 lines |
getExplain
|
Matthew Dovey |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:19:33 -0000 |
42 lines |
Re: identifer and term
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:34:31 -0400 |
68 lines |
Re: identifer and term
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:07:16 -0400 |
59 lines |
Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:38:34 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits
|
Matthew Dovey |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:44:01 -0000 |
50 lines |
Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:27:43 +0000 |
121 lines |
Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:19:51 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:13:54 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits
|
Matthew Dovey |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:52:11 -0000 |
24 lines |
Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits
|
Matthew Dovey |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:52:10 -0000 |
57 lines |
Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:06:23 +0000 |
30 lines |
Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits
|
Matthew Dovey |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:19:45 -0000 |
59 lines |
Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:20:42 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits
|
Sebastian Hammer |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:20:00 +0200 |
31 lines |
Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:57:10 +0100 |
80 lines |
List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits
|
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Poul_Henrik_J=F8rgensen?= |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:53:08 +0200 |
76 lines |
Re: MARC encoding
|
Thomas Place |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 13:19:45 +0200 |
41 lines |
Re: MARC encoding
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:42:43 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: MARC encoding
|
Alan Kent |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 17:02:09 +1000 |
43 lines |
Re: MARC encoding
|
Robert Sanderson |
Sat, 5 Oct 2002 20:09:01 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: MARC encoding
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Sat, 5 Oct 2002 21:07:57 +0200 |
86 lines |
Re: MARC encoding
|
Thomas Place |
Sat, 5 Oct 2002 13:48:00 +0200 |
44 lines |
MARC encoding
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:45:09 +0200 |
22 lines |
Re: Method for moving forward proposal... XCQL based
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 18:03:19 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: Method for moving forward proposal... XCQL based
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 18:49:02 +0200 |
88 lines |
Re: Method for moving forward proposal... XCQL based
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 17:31:26 +0100 |
82 lines |
Re: Method for moving forward proposal... XCQL based
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 16:50:15 +0100 |
77 lines |
Re: Method for moving forward proposal... XCQL based
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 17:15:42 +0200 |
45 lines |
Re: Method for moving forward proposal... XCQL based
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 10:27:41 -0400 |
56 lines |
Method for moving forward proposal... XCQL based
|
Alan Kent |
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:14:06 +1000 |
88 lines |
Re: Multiple Relation Qualifiers
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:55:55 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: Multiple Relation Qualifiers
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:58:35 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Multiple Relation Qualifiers
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:06:28 -0400 |
26 lines |
Multiple Relation Qualifiers
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:24:19 +0100 |
36 lines |
Off topic (XML vs SGML)
|
Matthew Dovey |
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:57:32 -0000 |
33 lines |
Re: Open Source Repository
|
Roelant Ossewaarde |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 19:32:04 +0200 |
34 lines |
Re: Open Source Repository
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:31:12 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: Open Source Repository
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 21 Oct 2002 23:09:12 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: Open Source Repository
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 21 Oct 2002 18:11:34 -0400 |
19 lines |
Re: Open Source Repository
|
Sebastian Hammer |
Mon, 21 Oct 2002 23:49:17 +0200 |
37 lines |
Open Source Repository
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 21 Oct 2002 14:57:05 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: order of proximity qualifiers
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:05:03 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: order of proximity qualifiers
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:14:13 +0000 |
31 lines |
order of proximity qualifiers
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:00:33 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: parentheses
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Sat, 19 Oct 2002 14:55:22 +0200 |
42 lines |
Re: parentheses
|
Ray denenberg |
Sat, 19 Oct 2002 07:56:41 -0400 |
21 lines |
Re: parentheses
|
Heikki Levanto |
Sat, 19 Oct 2002 12:51:18 +0200 |
34 lines |
Re: parentheses
|
Robert Sanderson |
Sat, 19 Oct 2002 00:13:54 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: parentheses
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 16:52:34 -0400 |
26 lines |
Re: parentheses
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 20:13:11 +0200 |
40 lines |
Re: parentheses
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 18:12:13 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: parentheses
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 18:33:01 +0200 |
61 lines |
Re: parentheses
|
Ray denenberg |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:57:09 -0400 |
19 lines |
Re: parentheses
|
Ray denenberg |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:54:50 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: parentheses
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 01:12:46 +0200 |
61 lines |
Re: parentheses
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 23:56:00 +0100 |
49 lines |
parentheses
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 18:09:21 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: phrase and string
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:46:48 -0400 |
20 lines |
phrase and string
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:27:29 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: Place for database resource?
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 15:37:59 +0200 |
18 lines |
Re: Place for database resource?
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:28:11 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: Place for database resource?
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 08:58:49 -0400 |
45 lines |
Place for database resource?
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:08:01 +0200 |
31 lines |
prox
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:25:29 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: Prox and Relations (part 2)
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:41:03 +0200 |
34 lines |
Prox and Relations (part 2)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:01:21 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: prox bnf
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 23:25:21 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: prox bnf
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:06:30 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: prox bnf
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 22:45:22 +0200 |
61 lines |
Re: prox bnf
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 18:40:18 +0100 |
52 lines |
Re: prox bnf
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:55:01 +0100 |
42 lines |
prox bnf
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:49:12 -0400 |
14 lines |
Re: prox bnf (fwd)
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:28:27 -0400 |
18 lines |
Re: prox bnf (fwd)
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 19:19:53 +0200 |
46 lines |
Re: prox bnf (fwd)
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:54:36 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: prox bnf (fwd)
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:29:41 +0200 |
46 lines |
Re: prox bnf (fwd)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:10:35 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: prox bnf (fwd)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:09:05 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: prox bnf (fwd)
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:22:09 +0200 |
49 lines |
Re: prox bnf (fwd)
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:14:31 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: prox bnf (fwd)
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:07:58 +0200 |
57 lines |
Re: prox bnf (fwd)
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:26:21 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: prox bnf (fwd)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:01:41 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: prox bnf (fwd)
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:59:07 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: prox bnf (fwd)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 00:36:06 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: Proximity
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:43:58 -0400 |
110 lines |
Re: Proximity
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:20:24 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: Proximity
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:48:56 +0100 |
45 lines |
Proximity
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:11:15 +0100 |
102 lines |
Re: Qualifiers at higher level
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 00:44:37 +0200 |
110 lines |
Re: Qualifiers at higher level
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 15:29:51 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Qualifiers at higher level
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 17:21:31 +0100 |
66 lines |
Re: Qualifiers at higher level
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 11:40:49 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Qualifiers at higher level
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 11:00:27 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Qualifiers at higher level
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:49:44 -0400 |
62 lines |
Qualifiers at higher level
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:41:04 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: Qualifiers at higher level and XCQL
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:06:13 +0100 |
60 lines |
Re: Qualifiers at higher level and XCQL
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:02:13 +0100 |
61 lines |
Re: questionable things
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:42:30 +0200 |
49 lines |
Re: questionable things
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:54:26 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: questionable things
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:59:57 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: questionable things
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:57:55 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: questionable things
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:58:13 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: questionable things
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:16:13 +0100 |
39 lines |
questionable things
|
Rob Koopman |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:57:50 +0200 |
24 lines |
Re: record schemas
|
Matthew Dovey |
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:00:27 -0000 |
27 lines |
Re: record schemas
|
Matthew Dovey |
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:00:27 -0000 |
46 lines |
Re: record schemas
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:36:28 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: record schemas
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:47:29 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: record schemas
|
Matthew Dovey |
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:28:32 -0000 |
30 lines |
record schemas
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:09:52 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: Relation Modifiers and Explain
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:02:26 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: Relation Modifiers and Explain
|
Alan Kent |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:16:52 +1000 |
31 lines |
Re: Relation Modifiers and Explain
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 00:33:35 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: Relation Modifiers and Explain
|
Alan Kent |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:11:25 +1000 |
31 lines |
Re: Relation Modifiers and Explain
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Tue, 8 Oct 2002 08:34:55 -0400 |
58 lines |
Relation Modifiers and Explain
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:13:37 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: Relations
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:51:56 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: Relations
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 22:22:12 +0100 |
71 lines |
Re: Relations
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 21:59:30 +0200 |
240 lines |
Re: Relations
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 21:53:30 +0200 |
67 lines |
Re: Relations
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:52:19 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: Relations
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 19:52:06 +0100 |
167 lines |
Re: Relations
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:47:26 +0100 |
23 lines |
Re: Relations
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:46:36 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: Relations
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 18:11:23 +0200 |
60 lines |
Re: Relations
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:54:02 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: Relations
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:52:30 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: Relations
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:53:44 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: Relations
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:05:22 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: Relations
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:51:14 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: Relations
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:30:44 -0400 |
36 lines |
Relations
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:57:51 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: relations redrafted
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 12:47:02 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: relations redrafted
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:40:04 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: relations redrafted
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:45:04 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: relations redrafted
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:43:21 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: relations redrafted
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:54:28 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: relations redrafted
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:50:04 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: relations redrafted
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:42:53 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: relations redrafted
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 11:23:22 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: relations redrafted
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 11:21:27 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: relations redrafted
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:24:27 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: relations redrafted
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:15:54 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: relations redrafted
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:11:21 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: relations redrafted
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 09:43:51 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: relations redrafted
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 14:38:51 +0100 |
116 lines |
Re: relations redrafted
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 13:48:07 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: relations redrafted
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 08:58:41 -0400 |
79 lines |
Re: relations redrafted
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 08:45:32 -0400 |
72 lines |
relations redrafted
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:55:48 -0400 |
59 lines |
Re: reserved words
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 14:20:38 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: reserved words
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 14:28:14 -0400 |
26 lines |
Re: reserved words
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 14:17:57 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: reserved words
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 18:47:07 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: reserved words
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 13:54:45 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: reserved words
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 13:14:41 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: reserved words
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:00:40 -0400 |
64 lines |
Re: reserved words
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:40:04 +0100 |
55 lines |
reserved words
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:44:54 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:49:48 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Alan Kent |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:57:34 +1000 |
47 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:01:58 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Alan Kent |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:23:28 +1000 |
25 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 06:52:34 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:18:22 +0100 |
60 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 10:15:12 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 10:09:31 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 10:07:41 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 10:06:30 +0200 |
59 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 22:54:02 -0400 |
36 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 22:52:06 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 01:09:34 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 02:03:11 +0200 |
25 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:29:49 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:26:01 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 22:05:46 +0200 |
45 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:05:47 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:04:40 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:02:32 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 20:22:44 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Alan Kent |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 05:30:51 +1000 |
25 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:30:35 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:27:20 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 21:03:00 +0200 |
46 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:41:21 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:38:53 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:20:39 -0400 |
107 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:01:17 +0100 |
59 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:09:22 -0400 |
71 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:02:53 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:56:03 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:22:12 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:07:28 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:46:52 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Janifer Gatenby |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:35:21 +0200 |
32 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:36:12 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:30:46 +0100 |
23 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:28:31 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:10:30 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Janifer Gatenby |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:05:25 +0200 |
66 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:40:53 +0100 |
57 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:12:42 +0100 |
66 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:02:44 +0100 |
57 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:31:20 +0100 |
104 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:15:04 +0100 |
106 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:30:33 +0100 |
90 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:58:21 +0100 |
64 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:59:53 +0100 |
82 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Ray denenberg |
Tue, 8 Oct 2002 21:44:31 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: revised cql
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 00:26:13 +0100 |
58 lines |
revised cql
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 8 Oct 2002 17:27:57 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 23:12:10 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 18:02:21 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:43:27 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:05:28 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:58:07 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:36:28 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:59:36 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:43:40 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:00:17 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:04:48 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:26:59 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:32:27 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:42:24 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:37:37 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:04:07 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:43:07 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 00:08:27 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:57:07 +0200 |
56 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:15:29 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:43:51 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:03:56 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:44:57 +0200 |
50 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:39:10 +0100 |
23 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:10:26 +0100 |
60 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:18:19 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:06:19 +0200 |
62 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:20:53 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:34:24 +0200 |
69 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:11:22 +0100 |
59 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:54:23 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:45:32 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:00:37 +0200 |
39 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:42:53 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:52:54 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:48:11 +0100 |
92 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:12:27 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:41:41 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:34:59 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:40:50 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:16:27 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:15:13 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:51:36 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:21:22 +0100 |
39 lines |
serverChoice relation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 21 Oct 2002 22:46:45 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: serverChoice relation (exaggeration)
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 22:21:25 +0200 |
20 lines |
Re: ServerChoice Relation for Implementors
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:18:28 +0100 |
60 lines |
Re: ServerChoice Relation for Implementors
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:09:53 +0000 |
42 lines |
ServerChoice Relation for Implementors
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:52:31 +0100 |
102 lines |
SOAP/CQL (fwd for Mike)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Sat, 19 Oct 2002 18:12:53 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: SRW and Web Service Interoperability Initiative
|
Matthew Dovey |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:53:49 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: SRW and Web Service Interoperability Initiative
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:43:23 +0100 |
30 lines |
SRW and Web Service Interoperability Initiative
|
=?windows-1252?Q?Poul_Henrik_J=F8rgensen?= |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:36:12 +0200 |
53 lines |
Re: SRW Calendar
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:44:12 -0400 |
19 lines |
Re: SRW Calendar
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 14 Oct 2002 18:21:00 +0100 |
46 lines |
SRW Calendar
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Mon, 14 Oct 2002 13:21:01 -0400 |
15 lines |
Re: srw or zing?
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:42:10 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: srw or zing?
|
Alan Kent |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:54:30 +1000 |
21 lines |
Re: srw or zing?
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:50:28 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: srw or zing?
|
William E. Moen |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:25:07 -0500 |
100 lines |
Re: srw or zing?
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:13:20 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: srw or zing?
|
Janifer Gatenby |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:15:53 +0200 |
46 lines |
Re: srw or zing?
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:10:29 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: srw or zing?
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:49:00 +0100 |
48 lines |
srw or zing?
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:32:31 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: SRW Query represented as strings and/or XCQL structures
|
Matthew Dovey |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:17:33 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: SRW Query represented as strings and/or XCQL structures
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:12:14 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: SRW Query represented as strings and/or XCQL structures
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 08:05:28 -0400 |
157 lines |
Re: SRW Query represented as strings and/or XCQL structures
|
=?windows-1252?Q?Poul_Henrik_J=F8rgensen?= |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:00:13 +0200 |
139 lines |
Re: SRW Query represented as strings and/or XCQL structures
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:58:39 +0100 |
20 lines |
Re: SRW Query represented as strings and/or XCQL structures
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 07:46:42 -0400 |
123 lines |
SRW Query represented as strings and/or XCQL structures
|
=?windows-1252?Q?Poul_Henrik_J=F8rgensen?= |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:45:23 +0200 |
108 lines |
Re: SRW service available for testing
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:43:49 +0200 |
46 lines |
Re: SRW service available for testing
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 18:25:06 +0200 |
36 lines |
Re: SRW service available for testing
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:43:27 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: SRW service available for testing
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 15:46:18 +0100 |
38 lines |
SRW service available for testing
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:59:58 +0200 |
27 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:52:27 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
Matthew Dovey |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 10:05:14 -0000 |
116 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:55:21 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
Matthew Dovey |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:52:08 -0000 |
48 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:27:09 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
Matthew Dovey |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 19:17:52 -0000 |
111 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:45:30 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:44:13 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:38:03 -0500 |
73 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:04:06 +0000 |
90 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
Matthew Dovey |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:39:49 -0000 |
76 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
Sebastian Hammer |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:17:49 +0100 |
61 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
Matthew Dovey |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:06:38 -0000 |
32 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
Sebastian Hammer |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:43:54 +0100 |
63 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
Matthew Dovey |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:19:45 -0000 |
116 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:17:42 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Poul_Henrik_J=F8rgensen?= |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 20:15:05 +0200 |
170 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:03:29 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:46:39 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:36:39 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:16:52 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
=?windows-1252?Q?Poul_Henrik_J=F8rgensen?= |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:16:21 +0200 |
47 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
Matthew Dovey |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:56:15 +0100 |
23 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Poul_Henrik_J=F8rgensen?= |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:36:37 +0200 |
180 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 06:55:09 -0400 |
86 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
Matthew Dovey |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:32:26 +0100 |
128 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:22:41 +0200 |
97 lines |
SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications
|
=?windows-1252?Q?Poul_Henrik_J=F8rgensen?= |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 02:06:52 +0200 |
65 lines |
Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications (fwd)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:39:17 +0000 |
41 lines |
SUN joins WS-I
|
=?windows-1252?Q?Poul_Henrik_J=F8rgensen?= |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:07:42 +0200 |
51 lines |
Re: task list
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:23:54 +0100 |
29 lines |
task list
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 21 Oct 2002 17:13:59 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: task list -- retrieval records
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:35:10 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: task list -- retrieval records
|
Sebastian Hammer |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:13:00 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: Towards a CQL Tutorial
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:16:17 -0400 |
18 lines |
Towards a CQL Tutorial
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:36:38 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: URIs
|
Matthew Dovey |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:19:57 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: URIs
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:13:38 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: URIs
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:03:50 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: URIs
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:56:42 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: URIs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 20:01:29 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: URIs
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:24:55 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: URIs
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:58:43 +0100 |
33 lines |
URIs
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:50:19 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: what record schemas are permissable?
|
Matthew Dovey |
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:57:32 -0000 |
24 lines |
Re: what record schemas are permissable?
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:59:37 +0000 |
70 lines |
Re: what record schemas are permissable?
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:42:12 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: what record schemas are permissable?
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:06:37 +0000 |
71 lines |
Re: what record schemas are permissable?
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:30:57 -0500 |
72 lines |
Re: what record schemas are permissable?
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:22:20 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: what record schemas are permissable?
|
Matthew Dovey |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:40:18 -0000 |
49 lines |
what record schemas are permissable?
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:27:46 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: what record schemas are permissible?
|
Matthew Dovey |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:24:09 -0000 |
51 lines |
Re: what record schemas are permissible?
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:43:50 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: what record schemas are permissible?
|
Matthew Dovey |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:44:00 -0000 |
24 lines |
Re: what record schemas are permissible?
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:17:54 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: what record schemas are permissible?
|
Matthew Dovey |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:14:45 -0000 |
42 lines |
Re: what record schemas are permissible?
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:15:42 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: what record schemas are permissible?
|
=?windows-1252?Q?Poul_Henrik_J=F8rgensen?= |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:56:18 +0100 |
68 lines |
XCQL
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:55:43 -0400 |
17 lines |
Re: XCQL Schema/Example
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:42:18 +0100 |
39 lines |
XCQL Schema/Example
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:40:12 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: XCQL: relation/boolean
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 17:54:42 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: XCQL: relation/boolean
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 17:16:24 +0100 |
36 lines |
XCQL: relation/boolean
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 22:32:33 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: your mail
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 18:10:00 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: [Fwd: Explain updates]
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 22:50:52 +0000 |
20 lines |
[Fwd: Explain updates]
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:59:08 -0500 |
301 lines |
Re: ^
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:57:24 +0100 |
18 lines |
Re: ^
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:56:05 +0100 |
60 lines |
Re: ^
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:28:46 -0400 |
73 lines |
^
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:51:57 -0400 |
48 lines |