LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ZNG Archives


ZNG Archives

ZNG Archives


October 2002


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity) (33 messages)
'matches' was: assumptions (2 messages)
<No subject> (1 message)
Again: Grammar Tweaks (5 messages)
another approach (11 messages)
Arrgh! (Was: serverChoice relation) (1 message)
assumptions (16 messages)
Attn Matthew: WSDL questions (1 message)
Bath Qualifiers (13 messages)
Betr.: Re: another approach (5 messages)
Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation (18 messages)
Betr.: Re: SRW Query represented as strings and/or XCQL structures (1 message)
Betr.: Re: task list -- retrieval records (6 messages)
Betr.: record schemas (2 messages)
Betr.: ServerChoice Relation for Implementors (1 message)
Betr.: what record schemas are permissable? (2 messages)
bib-1 or AA? (5 messages)
bnf style question (3 messages)
CQL (FWD for Mike) (1 message)
cql bnf last call (5 messages)
CQL datatype (still waiting) (2 messages)
cql relation proposal (11 messages)
CQL Sample Queries (1 message)
CQL2 (fwd for Mike) (1 message)
cql: anything else? (28 messages)
cql: identifer and term (5 messages)
CqlType (8 messages)
cqlType? (2 messages)
degenerate description (25 messages)
Explain (9 messages)
Explain? (5 messages)
getExplain (14 messages)
identifer and term (2 messages)
List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits (13 messages)
MARC encoding (7 messages)
Method for moving forward proposal... XCQL based (7 messages)
Multiple Relation Qualifiers (4 messages)
Off topic (XML vs SGML) (1 message)
Open Source Repository (6 messages)
order of proximity qualifiers (3 messages)
parentheses (13 messages)
phrase and string (2 messages)
Place for database resource? (4 messages)
prox (1 message)
Prox and Relations (part 2) (2 messages)
prox bnf (6 messages)
prox bnf (fwd) (13 messages)
Proximity (4 messages)
Qualifiers at higher level (7 messages)
Qualifiers at higher level and XCQL (2 messages)
questionable things (7 messages)
record schemas (6 messages)
Relation Modifiers and Explain (6 messages)
Relations (16 messages)
relations redrafted (18 messages)
reserved words (9 messages)
revised cql (52 messages)
serverChoice relation (44 messages)
serverChoice relation (exaggeration) (1 message)
ServerChoice Relation for Implementors (3 messages)
SOAP/CQL (fwd for Mike) (1 message)
SRW and Web Service Interoperability Initiative (3 messages)
SRW Calendar (3 messages)
srw or zing? (9 messages)
SRW Query represented as strings and/or XCQL structures (7 messages)
SRW service available for testing (5 messages)
SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications (28 messages)
SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications (fwd) (1 message)
SUN joins WS-I (1 message)
task list (2 messages)
task list -- retrieval records (2 messages)
Towards a CQL Tutorial (2 messages)
URIs (8 messages)
what record schemas are permissable? (8 messages)
what record schemas are permissible? (7 messages)
XCQL (1 message)
XCQL Schema/Example (2 messages)
XCQL: relation/boolean (3 messages)
your mail (1 message)
[Fwd: Explain updates] (2 messages)
^ (4 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ZNG Home

ZNG Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:23:55 -0400

46 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:10:19 -0400

25 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:10:25 +0200

109 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Alan Kent

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:36:59 +1000

70 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Mike Taylor

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:57:04 +0100

39 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 22:19:52 +0100

26 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 22:00:42 +0200

46 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:56:50 -0400

29 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Heikki Levanto

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 21:46:09 +0200

23 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 20:29:59 +0100

34 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 21:36:37 +0200

70 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 21:01:50 +0200

64 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 19:31:37 +0100

33 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:31:37 -0400

55 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:27:52 -0400

25 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:18:39 -0400

31 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 18:54:53 +0100

43 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:58:28 -0400

28 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Heikki Levanto

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 19:35:55 +0200

30 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:42:27 -0400

96 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 19:38:36 +0200

82 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:11:16 -0400

44 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:10:35 -0400

24 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:58:56 -0400

78 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:35:48 -0400

54 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:11:24 +0100

39 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:11:41 -0400

42 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:06:40 +0100

29 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:43:09 -0400

67 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 23:29:42 +0200

44 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:36:14 -0400

39 lines

Re: "I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 20:53:07 +0100

55 lines

"I have done ... questionable things" (Was: Proximity)

Mike Taylor

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:28:32 +0100

80 lines

New Thread

'matches' was: assumptions

Re: 'matches' was: assumptions

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 07:30:08 -0400

40 lines

Re: 'matches' was: assumptions

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:23:49 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Mike Taylor

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 17:09:20 +0100

51 lines

New Thread

Again: Grammar Tweaks

Re: fwd: Again: Grammar Tweaks

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:56:50 +0100

71 lines

fwd: Again: Grammar Tweaks

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:41:19 -0500

96 lines

Re: Again: Grammar Tweaks

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:30:23 -0500

73 lines

Re: Again: Grammar Tweaks

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:15:23 +0000

38 lines

Again: Grammar Tweaks

Mike Taylor

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:11:13 GMT

135 lines

New Thread

another approach

Re: another approach

Alan Kent

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:21:36 +1000

29 lines

Re: another approach

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 00:42:41 +0100

40 lines

Re: another approach

Alan Kent

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:39:12 +1000

34 lines

Re: another approach

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 16:35:12 +0100

38 lines

Re: another approach

Mike Taylor

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:29:55 +0100

25 lines

Re: another approach

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 09:59:39 -0400

53 lines

Re: another approach

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 07:53:39 -0400

62 lines

Re: another approach

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 12:25:29 +0100

39 lines

Re: another approach

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:57:19 +0100

48 lines

Re: another approach

Mike Taylor

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:30:25 +0100

43 lines

another approach

Theo van Veen

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 17:05:28 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

Arrgh! (Was: serverChoice relation)

Arrgh! (Was: serverChoice relation)

Mike Taylor

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:12:47 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

assumptions

Re: assumptions

Mike Taylor

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:04:25 +0100

33 lines

Re: assumptions

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 15:07:44 -0400

21 lines

Re: assumptions

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:43:50 -0400

37 lines

Re: assumptions

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:20:03 -0400

25 lines

Re: assumptions

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 12:39:06 -0400

24 lines

Re: assumptions

Mike Taylor

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 15:49:24 +0100

38 lines

Re: assumptions

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:05:15 +0100

30 lines

Re: assumptions

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 09:05:05 -0400

23 lines

Re: assumptions

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 08:51:50 -0400

23 lines

Re: assumptions

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 12:51:32 +0100

56 lines

Re: assumptions

Mike Taylor

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:53:39 +0100

47 lines

Re: assumptions

Mike Taylor

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:49:36 +0100

68 lines

Re: assumptions

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 19:09:10 +0100

46 lines

Re: assumptions

Ray denenberg

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:13:38 -0400

84 lines

Re: assumptions

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 22:47:07 +0100

72 lines

assumptions

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:57:56 -0400

58 lines

New Thread

Attn Matthew: WSDL questions

Re: Attn Matthew: WSDL questions

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 11:00:48 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Bath Qualifiers

Re: Bath Qualifiers

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:52:25 -0400

24 lines

Re: Bath Qualifiers

Mike Taylor

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:32:30 +0100

83 lines

Re: Bath Qualifiers

Mike Taylor

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:26:23 +0100

33 lines

Re: Bath Qualifiers

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:40:19 -0400

42 lines

Re: Bath Qualifiers

Larry E. Dixson

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:51:09 -0400

39 lines

Re: Bath Qualifiers

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:12:40 -0400

45 lines

Re: Bath Qualifiers

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 19:48:43 +0100

32 lines

Re: Bath Qualifiers

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:48:49 -0400

35 lines

Re: Bath Qualifiers

Larry E. Dixson

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:41:55 -0400

47 lines

Re: Bath Qualifiers

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:15:16 -0400

39 lines

Re: Bath Qualifiers

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:40:26 +0100

26 lines

Re: Bath Qualifiers

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:41:33 -0400

26 lines

Bath Qualifiers

Mike Taylor

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:38:28 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: another approach

Betr.: Re: another approach

Theo van Veen

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 16:45:10 +0100

69 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: another approach

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:08:39 +0100

64 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: another approach

Mike Taylor

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:01:03 +0100

40 lines

Betr.: Re: another approach

Theo van Veen

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 01:13:42 +0100

75 lines

Betr.: Re: another approach

Theo van Veen

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 18:17:56 +0100

62 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation

Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:12:03 +0000

31 lines

Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation

Theo van Veen

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:40:30 +0100

43 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:44:15 +0100

37 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:48:46 +0000

51 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:40:41 +0100

92 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation

Sebastian Hammer

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:29:20 +0100

30 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:26:19 -0500

24 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:48:14 +0000

76 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:54:03 +0100

65 lines

Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation

Theo van Veen

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:12:26 +0100

51 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:44:29 +0100

51 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation

Mike Taylor

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:39:52 +0100

50 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:51:49 +0100

56 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation

Mike Taylor

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:19:52 +0100

41 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:07:24 +0100

29 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation

Adam Dickmeiss

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:15:54 +0200

42 lines

Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation

Theo van Veen

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:55:55 +0100

34 lines

Betr.: Re: serverChoice relation

Theo van Veen

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:02:06 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: SRW Query represented as strings and/or XCQL structures

Betr.: Re: SRW Query represented as strings and/or XCQL structures

Theo van Veen

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:29:08 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: task list -- retrieval records

Re: Betr.: Re: task list -- retrieval records

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:36:43 +0000

56 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: task list -- retrieval records

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:49:31 -0000

36 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: task list -- retrieval records

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:35:35 -0500

18 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: task list -- retrieval records

Sebastian Hammer

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:31:21 +0100

39 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: task list -- retrieval records

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:08:48 +0000

27 lines

Betr.: Re: task list -- retrieval records

Theo van Veen

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:21:09 +0100

56 lines

New Thread

Betr.: record schemas

Re: Betr.: record schemas

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:24:30 -0500

35 lines

Betr.: record schemas

Theo van Veen

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:33:43 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

Betr.: ServerChoice Relation for Implementors

Betr.: ServerChoice Relation for Implementors

Theo van Veen

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:04:44 +0100

113 lines

New Thread

Betr.: what record schemas are permissable?

Re: Betr.: what record schemas are permissable?

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:32:33 +0000

38 lines

Betr.: what record schemas are permissable?

Theo van Veen

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:26:56 +0100

66 lines

New Thread

bib-1 or AA?

Re: bib-1 or AA?

Janifer Gatenby

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:52:40 +0200

94 lines

Re: bib-1 or AA?

Alan Kent

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:33:20 +1000

21 lines

Re: bib-1 or AA?

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 18:47:45 +0100

69 lines

Re: bib-1 or AA?

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 13:51:08 -0400

50 lines

bib-1 or AA?

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:26:40 -0400

41 lines

New Thread

bnf style question

Re: bnf style question

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 13:56:10 -0400

97 lines

Re: bnf style question

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 18:19:46 +0200

57 lines

bnf style question

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:53:20 -0400

75 lines

New Thread

CQL (FWD for Mike)

CQL (FWD for Mike)

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 19 Oct 2002 18:11:17 +0100

51 lines

New Thread

cql bnf last call

Re: cql bnf last call

Mike Taylor

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:29:04 +0100

54 lines

Re: cql bnf last call

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 22:13:43 +0100

39 lines

Re: cql bnf last call

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 16:44:22 -0400

39 lines

Re: cql bnf last call

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 20:04:34 +0100

55 lines

cql bnf last call

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 14:17:24 -0400

22 lines

New Thread

CQL datatype (still waiting)

Re: CQL datatype (still waiting)

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 14 Oct 2002 16:09:41 +0100

30 lines

CQL datatype (still waiting)

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 14 Oct 2002 11:09:50 -0400

22 lines

New Thread

cql relation proposal

Re: cql relation proposal

Thomas Place

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 00:16:36 +0200

174 lines

Re: cql relation proposal

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:00:40 -0400

117 lines

Re: cql relation proposal

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 18:40:28 +0100

30 lines

Re: cql relation proposal

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 13:44:00 -0400

22 lines

Re: cql relation proposal

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 18:12:15 +0100

89 lines

Re: cql relation proposal

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 12:52:16 -0400

70 lines

Re: cql relation proposal

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 16:59:10 +0100

51 lines

Re: cql relation proposal

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:45:02 -0400

28 lines

Re: cql relation proposal

Mike Taylor

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 11:34:50 +0100

47 lines

Re: cql relation proposal

Alan Kent

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 18:42:34 +1000

71 lines

Re: cql relation proposal

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 08:36:25 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

CQL Sample Queries

CQL Sample Queries

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:11:11 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

CQL2 (fwd for Mike)

CQL2 (fwd for Mike)

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 19 Oct 2002 18:12:14 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

cql: anything else?

Re: cql: anything else?

Mike Taylor

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 17:04:45 +0100

33 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 10:03:11 -0400

99 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 22:54:43 +0100

59 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 22:33:54 +0200

87 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 15:37:26 -0400

20 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 17:41:23 +0100

48 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 17:33:22 +0100

42 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Mike Taylor

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:25:40 +0100

53 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Mike Taylor

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:17:04 +0100

82 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 17:10:22 +0200

107 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 15:02:07 +0100

77 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Rob Koopman

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:09:03 +0200

30 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:42:34 +0100

65 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Mike Taylor

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:45:55 +0100

48 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Rob Koopman

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 15:26:35 +0200

36 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Mike Taylor

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:58:46 +0100

96 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Mike Taylor

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:40:12 +0100

129 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Mike Taylor

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:22:31 +0100

49 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:18:16 +0200

275 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:42:19 +0100

63 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:35:32 +0100

33 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:31:17 +0100

61 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 08:18:43 +0200

85 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Alan Kent

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:13:01 +1000

49 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Alan Kent

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:10:04 +1000

75 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:43:56 +0200

56 lines

Re: cql: anything else?

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 22:52:32 +0100

66 lines

cql: anything else?

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:38:03 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

cql: identifer and term

Re: cql: identifer and term

Alan Kent

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:30:41 +1000

51 lines

Re: cql: identifer and term

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:00:15 -0400

34 lines

Re: cql: identifer and term

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:55:08 -0400

82 lines

Re: cql: identifer and term

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 16:44:58 +0200

64 lines

cql: identifer and term

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:57:53 -0400

43 lines

New Thread

CqlType

Re: CqlType

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:56:04 +0200

41 lines

Re: CqlType

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 15:30:11 +0200

51 lines

Re: CqlType

Alan Kent

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 05:24:47 +1000

32 lines

Re: CqlType

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:12:40 +0100

33 lines

Re: CqlType

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:45:04 -0400

62 lines

Re: CqlType

Alan Kent

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:46:54 +1000

38 lines

Re: CqlType

Adam Dickmeiss

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 21:16:09 +0200

136 lines

CqlType

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 14:36:36 -0400

122 lines

New Thread

cqlType?

Re: cqlType?

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 09:51:03 -0400

25 lines

cqlType?

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 09:45:47 -0400

12 lines

New Thread

degenerate description

Re: degenerate description

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:05:02 +0100

51 lines

Re: degenerate description

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:02:56 +0200

56 lines

Re: degenerate description

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:54:16 +0200

64 lines

Re: degenerate description

Mike Taylor

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:43:28 +0100

51 lines

Re: degenerate description

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:53:09 +0100

46 lines

Re: degenerate description

Mike Taylor

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:48:37 +0100

45 lines

Re: degenerate description

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:20:25 +0100

47 lines

Re: degenerate description

Mike Taylor

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:35:51 +0100

64 lines

Re: degenerate description

Mike Taylor

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:12:30 +0100

69 lines

Re: degenerate description

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:33:39 +0100

42 lines

Re: degenerate description

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:08:00 +0100

35 lines

Re: degenerate description

Adam Dickmeiss

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:20:36 +0200

141 lines

Re: degenerate description

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:20:58 -0400

25 lines

Re: degenerate description

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 20:22:26 +0100

120 lines

Re: degenerate description

Adam Dickmeiss

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 18:23:43 +0200

106 lines

Re: degenerate description

Mike Taylor

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:55:53 +0100

63 lines

Re: degenerate description

Mike Taylor

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:47:15 +0100

47 lines

Re: degenerate description

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:53:15 -0400

30 lines

Re: degenerate description

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 14 Oct 2002 10:18:33 +0200

115 lines

Re: degenerate description

Adam Dickmeiss

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 00:54:51 +0200

33 lines

Re: degenerate description

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 17:57:23 -0400

20 lines

Re: degenerate description

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 23:02:32 +0200

78 lines

Re: degenerate description

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:01:17 -0400

25 lines

Re: degenerate description

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:47:12 -0400

33 lines

degenerate description

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:42:30 -0400

19 lines

New Thread

Explain

Re: Explain

Mike Taylor

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:27:17 +0100

40 lines

Re: Explain

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:54:45 -0400

26 lines

Re: Explain

Mike Taylor

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:07:55 +0100

34 lines

Re: Explain

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:02:47 +0100

55 lines

Re: Explain

Mike Taylor

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:37:26 +0100

39 lines

Re: Explain

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:02:24 -0400

71 lines

Re: Explain

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:41:50 +0100

54 lines

Re: Explain

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:17:28 -0400

51 lines

Explain

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:43:09 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Explain?

Re: Explain?

Mike Taylor

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:44:54 +0100

34 lines

Re: Explain?

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:27:18 +0100

101 lines

Re: Explain?

Alan Kent

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:30:56 +1000

83 lines

Re: Explain?

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 19:21:13 +0100

62 lines

Explain?

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:05:59 -0400

16 lines

New Thread

getExplain

Re: getExplain

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:36:38 -0500

42 lines

Re: getExplain

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:17:06 +0000

89 lines

Re: getExplain

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:43:21 -0500

21 lines

Re: getExplain

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:28:25 +0000

53 lines

Re: getExplain

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:38:04 -0500

30 lines

Re: getExplain

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:37:37 +0000

32 lines

Re: getExplain

Matthew Dovey

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 10:05:14 -0000

65 lines

Re: getExplain

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 23:37:13 +0000

40 lines

Re: getExplain

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 23:03:14 -0000

41 lines

Re: getExplain

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:38:09 +0000

34 lines

Re: getExplain

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:52:10 -0000

39 lines

Re: getExplain

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:32:49 +0000

33 lines

Re: getExplain

Sebastian Hammer

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 23:36:54 +0100

31 lines

getExplain

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:19:33 -0000

42 lines

New Thread

identifer and term

Re: identifer and term

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:34:31 -0400

68 lines

Re: identifer and term

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:07:16 -0400

59 lines

New Thread

List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits

Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:38:34 +0000

33 lines

Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:44:01 -0000

50 lines

Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:27:43 +0000

121 lines

Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:19:51 -0500

20 lines

Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:13:54 -0500

25 lines

Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:52:11 -0000

24 lines

Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:52:10 -0000

57 lines

Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:06:23 +0000

30 lines

Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:19:45 -0000

59 lines

Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:20:42 +0100

40 lines

Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits

Sebastian Hammer

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:20:00 +0200

31 lines

Re: List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:57:10 +0100

80 lines

List of SRW Namespaces and their related Toolkits

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Poul_Henrik_J=F8rgensen?=

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:53:08 +0200

76 lines

New Thread

MARC encoding

Re: MARC encoding

Thomas Place

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 13:19:45 +0200

41 lines

Re: MARC encoding

Mike Taylor

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:42:43 +0100

27 lines

Re: MARC encoding

Alan Kent

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 17:02:09 +1000

43 lines

Re: MARC encoding

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 20:09:01 +0100

39 lines

Re: MARC encoding

Adam Dickmeiss

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 21:07:57 +0200

86 lines

Re: MARC encoding

Thomas Place

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 13:48:00 +0200

44 lines

MARC encoding

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:45:09 +0200

22 lines

New Thread

Method for moving forward proposal... XCQL based

Re: Method for moving forward proposal... XCQL based

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 18:03:19 +0100

48 lines

Re: Method for moving forward proposal... XCQL based

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 18:49:02 +0200

88 lines

Re: Method for moving forward proposal... XCQL based

Mike Taylor

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 17:31:26 +0100

82 lines

Re: Method for moving forward proposal... XCQL based

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 16:50:15 +0100

77 lines

Re: Method for moving forward proposal... XCQL based

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 17:15:42 +0200

45 lines

Re: Method for moving forward proposal... XCQL based

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 10:27:41 -0400

56 lines

Method for moving forward proposal... XCQL based

Alan Kent

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:14:06 +1000

88 lines

New Thread

Multiple Relation Qualifiers

Re: Multiple Relation Qualifiers

Mike Taylor

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:55:55 +0100

33 lines

Re: Multiple Relation Qualifiers

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:58:35 +0100

41 lines

Re: Multiple Relation Qualifiers

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:06:28 -0400

26 lines

Multiple Relation Qualifiers

Mike Taylor

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:24:19 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

Off topic (XML vs SGML)

Off topic (XML vs SGML)

Matthew Dovey

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:57:32 -0000

33 lines

New Thread

Open Source Repository

Re: Open Source Repository

Roelant Ossewaarde

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 19:32:04 +0200

34 lines

Re: Open Source Repository

Mike Taylor

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:31:12 +0100

30 lines

Re: Open Source Repository

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 23:09:12 +0100

28 lines

Re: Open Source Repository

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 18:11:34 -0400

19 lines

Re: Open Source Repository

Sebastian Hammer

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 23:49:17 +0200

37 lines

Open Source Repository

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 14:57:05 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

order of proximity qualifiers

Re: order of proximity qualifiers

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:05:03 -0500

45 lines

Re: order of proximity qualifiers

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:14:13 +0000

31 lines

order of proximity qualifiers

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:00:33 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

parentheses

Re: parentheses

Adam Dickmeiss

Sat, 19 Oct 2002 14:55:22 +0200

42 lines

Re: parentheses

Ray denenberg

Sat, 19 Oct 2002 07:56:41 -0400

21 lines

Re: parentheses

Heikki Levanto

Sat, 19 Oct 2002 12:51:18 +0200

34 lines

Re: parentheses

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 19 Oct 2002 00:13:54 +0100

45 lines

Re: parentheses

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 16:52:34 -0400

26 lines

Re: parentheses

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 20:13:11 +0200

40 lines

Re: parentheses

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 18:12:13 +0100

33 lines

Re: parentheses

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 18:33:01 +0200

61 lines

Re: parentheses

Ray denenberg

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:57:09 -0400

19 lines

Re: parentheses

Ray denenberg

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:54:50 -0400

41 lines

Re: parentheses

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 01:12:46 +0200

61 lines

Re: parentheses

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 23:56:00 +0100

49 lines

parentheses

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 18:09:21 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

phrase and string

Re: phrase and string

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:46:48 -0400

20 lines

phrase and string

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:27:29 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

Place for database resource?

Re: Place for database resource?

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 15:37:59 +0200

18 lines

Re: Place for database resource?

Mike Taylor

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:28:11 +0100

34 lines

Re: Place for database resource?

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 08:58:49 -0400

45 lines

Place for database resource?

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:08:01 +0200

31 lines

New Thread

prox

prox

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:25:29 -0400

22 lines

New Thread

Prox and Relations (part 2)

Re: Prox and Relations (part 2)

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:41:03 +0200

34 lines

Prox and Relations (part 2)

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:01:21 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

prox bnf

Re: prox bnf

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 23:25:21 +0100

36 lines

Re: prox bnf

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:06:30 -0400

31 lines

Re: prox bnf

Adam Dickmeiss

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 22:45:22 +0200

61 lines

Re: prox bnf

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 18:40:18 +0100

52 lines

Re: prox bnf

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:55:01 +0100

42 lines

prox bnf

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:49:12 -0400

14 lines

New Thread

prox bnf (fwd)

Re: prox bnf (fwd)

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:28:27 -0400

18 lines

Re: prox bnf (fwd)

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 19:19:53 +0200

46 lines

Re: prox bnf (fwd)

Mike Taylor

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:54:36 +0100

28 lines

Re: prox bnf (fwd)

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:29:41 +0200

46 lines

Re: prox bnf (fwd)

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:10:35 +0100

28 lines

Re: prox bnf (fwd)

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:09:05 +0100

37 lines

Re: prox bnf (fwd)

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:22:09 +0200

49 lines

Re: prox bnf (fwd)

Mike Taylor

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:14:31 +0100

31 lines

Re: prox bnf (fwd)

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:07:58 +0200

57 lines

Re: prox bnf (fwd)

Mike Taylor

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:26:21 +0100

35 lines

Re: prox bnf (fwd)

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:01:41 +0100

37 lines

Re: prox bnf (fwd)

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:59:07 -0400

22 lines

Re: prox bnf (fwd)

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 00:36:06 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

Proximity

Re: Proximity

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:43:58 -0400

110 lines

Re: Proximity

Mike Taylor

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:20:24 +0100

38 lines

Re: Proximity

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:48:56 +0100

45 lines

Proximity

Mike Taylor

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:11:15 +0100

102 lines

New Thread

Qualifiers at higher level

Re: Qualifiers at higher level

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 00:44:37 +0200

110 lines

Re: Qualifiers at higher level

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 15:29:51 -0400

33 lines

Re: Qualifiers at higher level

Mike Taylor

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 17:21:31 +0100

66 lines

Re: Qualifiers at higher level

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 11:40:49 -0400

39 lines

Re: Qualifiers at higher level

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 11:00:27 -0400

33 lines

Re: Qualifiers at higher level

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:49:44 -0400

62 lines

Qualifiers at higher level

Mike Taylor

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:41:04 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

Qualifiers at higher level and XCQL

Re: Qualifiers at higher level and XCQL

Mike Taylor

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:06:13 +0100

60 lines

Re: Qualifiers at higher level and XCQL

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:02:13 +0100

61 lines

New Thread

questionable things

Re: questionable things

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:42:30 +0200

49 lines

Re: questionable things

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:54:26 +0100

29 lines

Re: questionable things

Mike Taylor

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:59:57 +0100

29 lines

Re: questionable things

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:57:55 -0400

52 lines

Re: questionable things

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:58:13 -0400

34 lines

Re: questionable things

Mike Taylor

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:16:13 +0100

39 lines

questionable things

Rob Koopman

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:57:50 +0200

24 lines

New Thread

record schemas

Re: record schemas

Matthew Dovey

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:00:27 -0000

27 lines

Re: record schemas

Matthew Dovey

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:00:27 -0000

46 lines

Re: record schemas

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:36:28 +0000

39 lines

Re: record schemas

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:47:29 -0500

30 lines

Re: record schemas

Matthew Dovey

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:28:32 -0000

30 lines

record schemas

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:09:52 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Relation Modifiers and Explain

Re: Relation Modifiers and Explain

Mike Taylor

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:02:26 +0100

33 lines

Re: Relation Modifiers and Explain

Alan Kent

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:16:52 +1000

31 lines

Re: Relation Modifiers and Explain

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 00:33:35 +0100

47 lines

Re: Relation Modifiers and Explain

Alan Kent

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:11:25 +1000

31 lines

Re: Relation Modifiers and Explain

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 08:34:55 -0400

58 lines

Relation Modifiers and Explain

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:13:37 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

Relations

Re: Relations

Mike Taylor

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:51:56 +0100

38 lines

Re: Relations

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 22:22:12 +0100

71 lines

Re: Relations

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 21:59:30 +0200

240 lines

Re: Relations

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 21:53:30 +0200

67 lines

Re: Relations

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:52:19 -0400

31 lines

Re: Relations

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 19:52:06 +0100

167 lines

Re: Relations

Mike Taylor

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:47:26 +0100

23 lines

Re: Relations

Mike Taylor

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:46:36 +0100

45 lines

Re: Relations

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 18:11:23 +0200

60 lines

Re: Relations

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:54:02 +0100

32 lines

Re: Relations

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:52:30 +0100

29 lines

Re: Relations

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:53:44 -0400

41 lines

Re: Relations

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:05:22 +0100

45 lines

Re: Relations

Mike Taylor

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:51:14 +0100

49 lines

Re: Relations

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:30:44 -0400

36 lines

Relations

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:57:51 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

relations redrafted

Re: relations redrafted

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 12:47:02 +0100

47 lines

Re: relations redrafted

Mike Taylor

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:40:04 +0100

39 lines

Re: relations redrafted

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:45:04 -0400

24 lines

Re: relations redrafted

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:43:21 -0400

52 lines

Re: relations redrafted

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:54:28 +0100

40 lines

Re: relations redrafted

Mike Taylor

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:50:04 +0100

35 lines

Re: relations redrafted

Mike Taylor

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:42:53 +0100

43 lines

Re: relations redrafted

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 11:23:22 -0400

53 lines

Re: relations redrafted

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 11:21:27 -0400

60 lines

Re: relations redrafted

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:24:27 +0100

45 lines

Re: relations redrafted

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:15:54 +0100

39 lines

Re: relations redrafted

Mike Taylor

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:11:21 +0100

41 lines

Re: relations redrafted

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 09:43:51 -0400

41 lines

Re: relations redrafted

Mike Taylor

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 14:38:51 +0100

116 lines

Re: relations redrafted

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 13:48:07 +0100

30 lines

Re: relations redrafted

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 08:58:41 -0400

79 lines

Re: relations redrafted

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 08:45:32 -0400

72 lines

relations redrafted

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:55:48 -0400

59 lines

New Thread

reserved words

Re: reserved words

Mike Taylor

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 14:20:38 +0100

50 lines

Re: reserved words

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 14:28:14 -0400

26 lines

Re: reserved words

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 14:17:57 -0400

20 lines

Re: reserved words

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 18:47:07 +0100

48 lines

Re: reserved words

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 13:54:45 -0400

44 lines

Re: reserved words

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 13:14:41 -0400

31 lines

Re: reserved words

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:00:40 -0400

64 lines

Re: reserved words

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:40:04 +0100

55 lines

reserved words

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:44:54 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

revised cql

Re: revised cql

Mike Taylor

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:49:48 +0100

48 lines

Re: revised cql

Alan Kent

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:57:34 +1000

47 lines

Re: revised cql

Mike Taylor

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:01:58 +0100

47 lines

Re: revised cql

Alan Kent

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:23:28 +1000

25 lines

Re: revised cql

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 06:52:34 -0400

43 lines

Re: revised cql

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:18:22 +0100

60 lines

Re: revised cql

Mike Taylor

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 10:15:12 +0100

55 lines

Re: revised cql

Mike Taylor

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 10:09:31 +0100

36 lines

Re: revised cql

Mike Taylor

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 10:07:41 +0100

30 lines

Re: revised cql

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 10:06:30 +0200

59 lines

Re: revised cql

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 22:54:02 -0400

36 lines

Re: revised cql

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 22:52:06 -0400

24 lines

Re: revised cql

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 01:09:34 +0100

37 lines

Re: revised cql

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 02:03:11 +0200

25 lines

Re: revised cql

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:29:49 +0100

26 lines

Re: revised cql

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:26:01 +0100

50 lines

Re: revised cql

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 22:05:46 +0200

45 lines

Re: revised cql

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:05:47 -0400

37 lines

Re: revised cql

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:04:40 -0400

41 lines

Re: revised cql

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:02:32 -0400

38 lines

Re: revised cql

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 20:22:44 +0100

53 lines

Re: revised cql

Alan Kent

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 05:30:51 +1000

25 lines

Re: revised cql

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:30:35 -0400

22 lines

Re: revised cql

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:27:20 -0400

23 lines

Re: revised cql

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 21:03:00 +0200

46 lines

Re: revised cql

Mike Taylor

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:41:21 +0100

39 lines

Re: revised cql

Mike Taylor

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:38:53 +0100

37 lines

Re: revised cql

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:20:39 -0400

107 lines

Re: revised cql

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:01:17 +0100

59 lines

Re: revised cql

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:09:22 -0400

71 lines

Re: revised cql

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:02:53 -0400

60 lines

Re: revised cql

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:56:03 -0400

43 lines

Re: revised cql

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:22:12 +0100

38 lines

Re: revised cql

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:07:28 +0100

26 lines

Re: revised cql

Mike Taylor

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:46:52 +0100

29 lines

Re: revised cql

Janifer Gatenby

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:35:21 +0200

32 lines

Re: revised cql

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:36:12 -0400

32 lines

Re: revised cql

Mike Taylor

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:30:46 +0100

23 lines

Re: revised cql

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:28:31 -0400

32 lines

Re: revised cql

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:10:30 +0100

34 lines

Re: revised cql

Janifer Gatenby

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:05:25 +0200

66 lines

Re: revised cql

Mike Taylor

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:40:53 +0100

57 lines

Re: revised cql

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:12:42 +0100

66 lines

Re: revised cql

Mike Taylor

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:02:44 +0100

57 lines

Re: revised cql

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:31:20 +0100

104 lines

Re: revised cql

Mike Taylor

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:15:04 +0100

106 lines

Re: revised cql

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:30:33 +0100

90 lines

Re: revised cql

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:58:21 +0100

64 lines

Re: revised cql

Mike Taylor

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:59:53 +0100

82 lines

Re: revised cql

Ray denenberg

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 21:44:31 -0400

42 lines

Re: revised cql

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 00:26:13 +0100

58 lines

revised cql

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 17:27:57 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

serverChoice relation

Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 23:12:10 +0000

34 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 18:02:21 -0500

31 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Adam Dickmeiss

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:43:27 +0100

34 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:05:28 -0500

22 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Adam Dickmeiss

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:58:07 +0100

56 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:36:28 -0500

42 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:59:36 +0100

35 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:43:40 -0400

33 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:00:17 +0100

41 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:04:48 -0400

22 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:26:59 +0100

34 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:32:27 -0400

28 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:42:24 +0100

30 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Mike Taylor

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:37:37 +0100

25 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:04:07 +0100

37 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Mike Taylor

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:43:07 +0100

26 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 00:08:27 +0100

26 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:57:07 +0200

56 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:15:29 +0100

34 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:43:51 -0400

23 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:03:56 +0100

43 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:44:57 +0200

50 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Mike Taylor

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:39:10 +0100

23 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:10:26 +0100

60 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Mike Taylor

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:18:19 +0100

37 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:06:19 +0200

62 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:20:53 +0100

46 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:34:24 +0200

69 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Mike Taylor

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:11:22 +0100

59 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:54:23 +0100

48 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Mike Taylor

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:45:32 +0100

38 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:00:37 +0200

39 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:42:53 +0100

41 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:52:54 -0400

20 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:48:11 +0100

92 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:12:27 -0400

32 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:41:41 +0100

34 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:34:59 +0100

29 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Mike Taylor

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:40:50 +0100

35 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:16:27 +0100

48 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Mike Taylor

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:15:13 +0100

35 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:51:36 +0100

39 lines

Re: serverChoice relation

Mike Taylor

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:21:22 +0100

39 lines

serverChoice relation

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 22:46:45 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

serverChoice relation (exaggeration)

Re: serverChoice relation (exaggeration)

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 22:21:25 +0200

20 lines

New Thread

ServerChoice Relation for Implementors

Re: ServerChoice Relation for Implementors

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:18:28 +0100

60 lines

Re: ServerChoice Relation for Implementors

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:09:53 +0000

42 lines

ServerChoice Relation for Implementors

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:52:31 +0100

102 lines

New Thread

SOAP/CQL (fwd for Mike)

SOAP/CQL (fwd for Mike)

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 19 Oct 2002 18:12:53 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

SRW and Web Service Interoperability Initiative

Re: SRW and Web Service Interoperability Initiative

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:53:49 +0100

22 lines

Re: SRW and Web Service Interoperability Initiative

Mike Taylor

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:43:23 +0100

30 lines

SRW and Web Service Interoperability Initiative

=?windows-1252?Q?Poul_Henrik_J=F8rgensen?=

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:36:12 +0200

53 lines

New Thread

SRW Calendar

Re: SRW Calendar

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:44:12 -0400

19 lines

Re: SRW Calendar

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 14 Oct 2002 18:21:00 +0100

46 lines

SRW Calendar

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 14 Oct 2002 13:21:01 -0400

15 lines

New Thread

srw or zing?

Re: srw or zing?

Mike Taylor

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:42:10 +0100

31 lines

Re: srw or zing?

Alan Kent

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:54:30 +1000

21 lines

Re: srw or zing?

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:50:28 +0100

41 lines

Re: srw or zing?

William E. Moen

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:25:07 -0500

100 lines

Re: srw or zing?

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:13:20 -0400

34 lines

Re: srw or zing?

Janifer Gatenby

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:15:53 +0200

46 lines

Re: srw or zing?

Mike Taylor

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:10:29 +0100

43 lines

Re: srw or zing?

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:49:00 +0100

48 lines

srw or zing?

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:32:31 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

SRW Query represented as strings and/or XCQL structures

Re: SRW Query represented as strings and/or XCQL structures

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:17:33 +0100

42 lines

Re: SRW Query represented as strings and/or XCQL structures

Mike Taylor

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:12:14 +0100

25 lines

Re: SRW Query represented as strings and/or XCQL structures

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 08:05:28 -0400

157 lines

Re: SRW Query represented as strings and/or XCQL structures

=?windows-1252?Q?Poul_Henrik_J=F8rgensen?=

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:00:13 +0200

139 lines

Re: SRW Query represented as strings and/or XCQL structures

Mike Taylor

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:58:39 +0100

20 lines

Re: SRW Query represented as strings and/or XCQL structures

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 07:46:42 -0400

123 lines

SRW Query represented as strings and/or XCQL structures

=?windows-1252?Q?Poul_Henrik_J=F8rgensen?=

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:45:23 +0200

108 lines

New Thread

SRW service available for testing

Re: SRW service available for testing

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:43:49 +0200

46 lines

Re: SRW service available for testing

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 18:25:06 +0200

36 lines

Re: SRW service available for testing

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:43:27 +0100

42 lines

Re: SRW service available for testing

Mike Taylor

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 15:46:18 +0100

38 lines

SRW service available for testing

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:59:58 +0200

27 lines

New Thread

SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:52:27 +0000

34 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

Matthew Dovey

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 10:05:14 -0000

116 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:55:21 +0000

38 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:52:08 -0000

48 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:27:09 +0000

32 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 19:17:52 -0000

111 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:45:30 -0500

31 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:44:13 +0000

47 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:38:03 -0500

73 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:04:06 +0000

90 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:39:49 -0000

76 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

Sebastian Hammer

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:17:49 +0100

61 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:06:38 -0000

32 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

Sebastian Hammer

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:43:54 +0100

63 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:19:45 -0000

116 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:17:42 +0100

34 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Poul_Henrik_J=F8rgensen?=

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 20:15:05 +0200

170 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:03:29 -0400

22 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:46:39 +0100

37 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

Mike Taylor

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:36:39 +0100

37 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:16:52 +0100

49 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

=?windows-1252?Q?Poul_Henrik_J=F8rgensen?=

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:16:21 +0200

47 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:56:15 +0100

23 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Poul_Henrik_J=F8rgensen?=

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:36:37 +0200

180 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 06:55:09 -0400

86 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:32:26 +0100

128 lines

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:22:41 +0200

97 lines

SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications

=?windows-1252?Q?Poul_Henrik_J=F8rgensen?=

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 02:06:52 +0200

65 lines

New Thread

SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications (fwd)

Re: SRW WSDL and XML Namespace specifications (fwd)

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:39:17 +0000

41 lines

New Thread

SUN joins WS-I

SUN joins WS-I

=?windows-1252?Q?Poul_Henrik_J=F8rgensen?=

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:07:42 +0200

51 lines

New Thread

task list

Re: task list

Mike Taylor

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:23:54 +0100

29 lines

task list

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 17:13:59 -0400

43 lines

New Thread

task list -- retrieval records

Re: task list -- retrieval records

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:35:10 +0000

28 lines

Re: task list -- retrieval records

Sebastian Hammer

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:13:00 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

Towards a CQL Tutorial

Re: Towards a CQL Tutorial

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:16:17 -0400

18 lines

Towards a CQL Tutorial

Mike Taylor

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:36:38 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

URIs

Re: URIs

Matthew Dovey

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:19:57 +0100

49 lines

Re: URIs

Mike Taylor

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:13:38 +0100

44 lines

Re: URIs

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:03:50 -0400

49 lines

Re: URIs

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:56:42 -0400

32 lines

Re: URIs

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 20:01:29 +0100

34 lines

Re: URIs

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:24:55 -0400

24 lines

Re: URIs

Mike Taylor

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:58:43 +0100

33 lines

URIs

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:50:19 -0400

25 lines

New Thread

what record schemas are permissable?

Re: what record schemas are permissable?

Matthew Dovey

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:57:32 -0000

24 lines

Re: what record schemas are permissable?

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:59:37 +0000

70 lines

Re: what record schemas are permissable?

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:42:12 -0500

30 lines

Re: what record schemas are permissable?

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:06:37 +0000

71 lines

Re: what record schemas are permissable?

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:30:57 -0500

72 lines

Re: what record schemas are permissable?

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:22:20 +0000

44 lines

Re: what record schemas are permissable?

Matthew Dovey

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:40:18 -0000

49 lines

what record schemas are permissable?

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:27:46 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

what record schemas are permissible?

Re: what record schemas are permissible?

Matthew Dovey

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:24:09 -0000

51 lines

Re: what record schemas are permissible?

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:43:50 +0000

31 lines

Re: what record schemas are permissible?

Matthew Dovey

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:44:00 -0000

24 lines

Re: what record schemas are permissible?

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:17:54 +0000

41 lines

Re: what record schemas are permissible?

Matthew Dovey

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:14:45 -0000

42 lines

Re: what record schemas are permissible?

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:15:42 +0000

47 lines

Re: what record schemas are permissible?

=?windows-1252?Q?Poul_Henrik_J=F8rgensen?=

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:56:18 +0100

68 lines

New Thread

XCQL

XCQL

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:55:43 -0400

17 lines

New Thread

XCQL Schema/Example

Re: XCQL Schema/Example

Mike Taylor

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:42:18 +0100

39 lines

XCQL Schema/Example

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:40:12 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

XCQL: relation/boolean

Re: XCQL: relation/boolean

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 17:54:42 +0100

48 lines

Re: XCQL: relation/boolean

Mike Taylor

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 17:16:24 +0100

36 lines

XCQL: relation/boolean

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 22:32:33 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

your mail

Re: your mail

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 18:10:00 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

[Fwd: Explain updates]

Re: [Fwd: Explain updates]

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 22:50:52 +0000

20 lines

[Fwd: Explain updates]

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:59:08 -0500

301 lines

New Thread

^

Re: ^

Mike Taylor

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:57:24 +0100

18 lines

Re: ^

Mike Taylor

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:56:05 +0100

60 lines

Re: ^

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:28:46 -0400

73 lines

^

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:51:57 -0400

48 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

July 2017
October 2016
July 2016
August 2014
February 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
February 2013
January 2013
October 2012
August 2012
April 2012
January 2012
October 2011
May 2011
April 2011
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager