LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ZNG Archives


ZNG Archives

ZNG Archives


November 2002


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

-1 records requested (5 messages)
Axis and WSDL (3 messages)
Axis Status Report (1 message)
Bath index set (2 messages)
Bath Mapping (3 messages)
Betr.: DC Schema (8 messages)
Betr.: lists (2 messages)
Betr.: Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (5 messages)
Betr.: Re: DC index set. (3 messages)
Betr.: Re: echoedRequest (4 messages)
Betr.: Re: namespace and schema id URIs (1 message)
Betr.: Re: Namespaces (fwd) (3 messages)
Betr.: Re: nine or six months? (1 message)
Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking (11 messages)
Betr.: Re: SRU (1 message)
Betr.: real-life example of an index set (1 message)
Betr.: record schemas (3 messages)
Betr.: The Zthes Qualifier-Set (1 message)
Betr.: Version 1.0 of SRW and CQL (1 message)
Boolean/Relation as Term (3 messages)
Broken Links (1 message)
Comments on diagnostics (1 message)
Congratulations (1 message)
CQL (1 message)
CQL as part of/not part of SRW (1 message)
CQL in Z39.50 Classic (3 messages)
CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (59 messages)
CQL Wildcards in BIB-1 (1 message)
cql-java 0.1 released! (11 messages)
cql-java release 0.2 (1 message)
cql-java v0.3 is released (2 messages)
CQL: Boolean/Relation as Term (1 message)
CQL: Empty Terms (23 messages)
CQLParser Python Library (1 message)
Current WSDL etc. (4 messages)
DC index set. (3 messages)
DC Record Schema (3 messages)
DC Schema (2 messages)
dc schema identifier (3 messages)
diagnostic list (1 message)
Diagnostic well known name (1 message)
diagnosticCodeType (6 messages)
Diagnostics (8 messages)
Diagnostics and Explain (5 messages)
diagnostics, cql, xcql, schemas/wsdl, examples (2 messages)
draft announcement (2 messages)
dropping the name sru (10 messages)
echoedRequest (8 messages)
Empty Terms (4 messages)
Explain: = Relation (1 message)
Extra Element in srw-binding.wsdl (2 messages)
First EZNGIG meeting :) (8 messages)
history (3 messages)
implementor page (2 messages)
Index Data Service updated for testing (6 messages)
Index Set: CCG (6 messages)
Indexsets and intereferences (10 messages)
Keep those cliches coming! (9 messages)
Leaky Abstractions (1 message)
List problems (1 message)
lists (11 messages)
loose ends (1): Schemas (1 message)
Mapping Bath Profile Searches to CQL (7 messages)
Mapping Bath Profile Searches to CQL (fwd) (1 message)
Mapping CQL Qualifiers to Type-1 Attributes (7 messages)
More namespace nitpicking (1 message)
More on the Utility Qualifier-Set (1 message)
moved everything to zing (10 messages)
namespace and schema id URIs (7 messages)
Namespaces (8 messages)
Namespaces (fwd) (5 messages)
New Diagnostic for Prefixes (1 message)
New ZiNG page -- ZOOM reference (3 messages)
nine or six months? (4 messages)
Nov11 meeting in Manchester (1 message)
One small success story (2 messages)
operation name (1 message)
Operation name (again) (15 messages)
Operation name (again) -- part deux (2 messages)
Operation name/Delaying release (1 message)
order of proximity qualifiers (9 messages)
please review (1 message)
postponement (1 message)
postponing question (3 messages)
Proposal: recordPacking (16 messages)
Propose delay of release (19 messages)
real-life example of an index set (5 messages)
record schemas (20 messages)
record.recordNumber (1 message)
Relation Modifier: phonetic (2 messages)
Relation Modifier: phonetic (fwd) (1 message)
RELEASE: cql-java v0.4 (1 message)
response/records/record/recordSchema (3 messages)
revised "to do" list (11 messages)
running out of time (10 messages)
Schemas (1 of 2) (1 message)
Schemas (2 of 2) (1 message)
Schemas (really updated this time!) (2 messages)
Schemas (updated) (2 messages)
schemas and versions (2 messages)
SOAP samples (9 messages)
SOAP Types (17 messages)
speak up (2 messages)
spec review (2 messages)
SRU (24 messages)
SRU: echoedRequest (1 message)
SRW and SRU samples (updates) (1 message)
Str vs XML, SortSpec (1 message)
supported record schemas (1 message)
synchronizing (2 messages)
tasks (1 message)
Testing Listserv (1 message)
thanks Rob! (2 messages)
The Zthes Qualifier-Set (1 message)
to do (31 messages)
to do; add SRU syntax (3 messages)
To XCQL or not to XCQL? (9 messages)
Updates (17 messages)
uri udentifiers (3 messages)
URIs for Schemas (3 messages)
url-syntax (2 messages)
version 1.0 (near) final (4 messages)
Version 1.0 of SRW and CQL (2 messages)
versioning (1 message)
We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set (13 messages)
Web pages (6 messages)
well-known record schema names (2 messages)
what record schemas are permissable? (1 message)
White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment (12 messages)
www.loc.gov/cql (10 messages)
XCQL - location of <prefixes> (10 messages)
XCQL <prefixes> Specification (5 messages)
XCQL as fragment (23 messages)
XCQL Conformance (1 message)
XCQL Diagnostic (5 messages)
xcql.xsd (4 messages)
XCQL: Qualifiers for Prox (2 messages)
xStartRecord (Was: URIs for Schemas) (3 messages)
[[log in to unmask]: Re: to do (fwd)] (4 messages)
[Fwd: Stuff] (7 messages)
[[log in to unmask]: W3C Query Language] (2 messages)
[ot] Relax NG (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ZNG Home

ZNG Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

-1 records requested

Re: -1 records requested

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 8 Nov 2002 12:10:52 -0000

58 lines

Re: -1 records requested

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 7 Nov 2002 13:33:40 -0500

36 lines

Re: -1 records requested

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:26:02 +0000

32 lines

Re: -1 records requested

Matthew Dovey

Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:25:55 -0000

51 lines

-1 records requested

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:00:25 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

Axis and WSDL

Re: Axis and WSDL

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 16:01:34 -0500

17 lines

Re: Axis and WSDL

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:47:08 -0000

84 lines

Axis and WSDL

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:28:46 -0500

58 lines

New Thread

Axis Status Report

Axis Status Report

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 15:48:35 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

Bath index set

Re: Bath index set

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:26:04 -0500

23 lines

Bath index set

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:43:58 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

Bath Mapping

Re: Bath Mapping

Mike Taylor

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:29:05 GMT

86 lines

Re: Bath Mapping

Larry E. Dixson

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:23:36 -0500

156 lines

Re: Bath Mapping

Mike Taylor

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 13:14:50 GMT

125 lines

New Thread

Betr.: DC Schema

Re: Betr.: DC Schema

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 17:05:35 +0000

58 lines

Re: Betr.: DC Schema

Theo van Veen

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 17:58:01 +0100

55 lines

Re: Betr.: DC Schema

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 16:10:22 +0000

35 lines

Re: Betr.: DC Schema

Sebastian Hammer

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 17:10:06 +0100

64 lines

Re: Betr.: DC Schema

Theo van Veen

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 17:01:38 +0100

54 lines

Re: Betr.: DC Schema

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 15:39:27 +0000

36 lines

Re: Betr.: DC Schema

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 15:34:16 +0000

42 lines

Betr.: DC Schema

Theo van Veen

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 16:32:47 +0100

70 lines

New Thread

Betr.: lists

Re: Betr.: lists

Ray denenberg

Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:03:33 -0500

33 lines

Betr.: lists

Theo van Veen

Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:02:05 +0100

20 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Re: Betr.: Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Mike Taylor

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:27:56 GMT

31 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:20:47 +0000

30 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Theo van Veen

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:04:00 +0100

81 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Sebastian Hammer

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:39:11 +0100

65 lines

Betr.: Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Theo van Veen

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:04:07 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: DC index set.

Re: Betr.: Re: DC index set.

Theo van Veen

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:46:20 +0100

59 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: DC index set.

Mike Taylor

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:28:48 GMT

51 lines

Betr.: Re: DC index set.

Theo van Veen

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:14:34 +0100

24 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: echoedRequest

Betr.: Re: echoedRequest

Theo van Veen

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:19:41 +0100

68 lines

Betr.: Re: echoedRequest

Theo van Veen

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:11:28 +0100

50 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: echoedRequest

Matthew Dovey

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:44:53 -0000

29 lines

Betr.: Re: echoedRequest

Theo van Veen

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:01:57 +0100

61 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: namespace and schema id URIs

Betr.: Re: namespace and schema id URIs

Theo van Veen

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:08:29 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: Namespaces (fwd)

Re: Betr.: Re: Namespaces (fwd)

Theo van Veen

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:01:15 +0100

25 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: Namespaces (fwd)

Ray denenberg

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 06:44:56 -0500

19 lines

Betr.: Re: Namespaces (fwd)

Theo van Veen

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:59:26 +0100

125 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: nine or six months?

Betr.: Re: nine or six months?

Theo van Veen

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 16:47:29 +0100

64 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Theo van Veen

Thu, 28 Nov 2002 10:47:48 +0100

74 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:49:51 +0000

33 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:31:41 +0000

25 lines

Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Theo van Veen

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 15:18:45 +0100

76 lines

Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Theo van Veen

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 15:03:56 +0100

34 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Sebastian Hammer

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 13:40:14 +0100

41 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Theo van Veen

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 13:34:13 +0100

46 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:58:18 +0000

41 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Theo van Veen

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 13:09:36 +0100

146 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Matthew Dovey

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:52:11 -0000

141 lines

Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Theo van Veen

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:25:22 +0100

115 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: SRU

Betr.: Re: SRU

Theo van Veen

Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:27:03 +0100

123 lines

New Thread

Betr.: real-life example of an index set

Betr.: real-life example of an index set

Theo van Veen

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:58:21 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

Betr.: record schemas

Re: Betr.: record schemas

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 11:30:07 +0000

41 lines

Re: Betr.: record schemas

Theo van Veen

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 11:32:52 +0100

46 lines

Re: Betr.: record schemas

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 2 Nov 2002 13:08:52 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

Betr.: The Zthes Qualifier-Set

Betr.: The Zthes Qualifier-Set

Theo van Veen

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:48:38 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Version 1.0 of SRW and CQL

Betr.: Version 1.0 of SRW and CQL

Theo van Veen

Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:12:16 +0100

94 lines

New Thread

Boolean/Relation as Term

Re: Boolean/Relation as Term

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 8 Nov 2002 11:16:29 -0500

44 lines

Re: Boolean/Relation as Term

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 16:09:41 +0000

32 lines

Re: Boolean/Relation as Term

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 09:53:34 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Broken Links

Broken Links

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:48:56 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

Comments on diagnostics

Comments on diagnostics

Janifer Gatenby

Fri, 8 Nov 2002 18:06:01 +0100

6428 lines

New Thread

Congratulations

Congratulations

Mike Taylor

Tue, 26 Nov 2002 11:32:33 GMT

51 lines

New Thread

CQL

CQL

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 2 Nov 2002 18:16:00 +0000

34 lines

New Thread

CQL as part of/not part of SRW

CQL as part of/not part of SRW

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 23:38:47 +0000

54 lines

New Thread

CQL in Z39.50 Classic

Re: CQL in Z39.50 Classic

Mike Taylor

Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:45:52 GMT

46 lines

Re: CQL in Z39.50 Classic

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:14:00 -0500

67 lines

CQL in Z39.50 Classic

Mike Taylor

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:45:25 GMT

50 lines

New Thread

CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Sebastian Hammer

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 19:27:22 +0100

57 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 17:54:57 +0000

36 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:53:05 -0500

37 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 16:33:07 +0000

37 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 16:25:43 +0000

49 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Sebastian Hammer

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 17:28:06 +0100

54 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:13:39 -0500

60 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:52:34 +0000

55 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Sebastian Hammer

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 17:09:05 +0100

57 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:59:30 -0500

44 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:45:03 -0500

83 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Sebastian Hammer

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 16:43:52 +0100

26 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:37:00 -0500

31 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:55:31 +0000

50 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:06:02 -0500

44 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Sebastian Hammer

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:59:31 +0100

45 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:52:49 -0500

28 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:52:08 +0100

43 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:47:09 -0500

29 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:27:50 +0000

34 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:43:23 -0500

33 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:38:00 -0500

41 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:17:51 +0000

57 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:26:38 -0500

17 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Sebastian Hammer

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:27:08 +0100

33 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Sebastian Hammer

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:19:22 +0100

55 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:07:39 -0500

30 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:04:22 -0500

44 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:01:07 +0100

276 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Sebastian Hammer

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:56:10 +0100

60 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Janifer Gatenby

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:35:47 +0100

256 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 08:28:57 -0500

244 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Sebastian Hammer

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:24:23 +0100

65 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Ray denenberg

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 07:00:28 -0500

25 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Sebastian Hammer

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 08:50:36 +0100

47 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Ray denenberg

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 21:59:16 -0500

32 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 22:32:28 +0000

53 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 17:02:52 -0500

118 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 20:36:27 +0000

79 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 14:58:34 -0500

43 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Mike Taylor

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 17:07:01 GMT

37 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:34:50 +0000

61 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Janifer Gatenby

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 16:22:59 +0100

57 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Mike Taylor

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 13:55:40 GMT

45 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 13:36:15 +0000

58 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Ray denenberg

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 08:21:37 -0500

134 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:40:30 +0000

55 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Sebastian Hammer

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 13:54:52 +0100

111 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Ray denenberg

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 06:35:03 -0500

83 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:24:12 +0100

71 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:42:21 +0100

93 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Sebastian Hammer

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:09:32 +0100

31 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:32:21 +0000

38 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 01:32:04 +0100

207 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 12 Nov 2002 23:50:15 +0000

46 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 12 Nov 2002 23:41:33 +0000

55 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:25:25 -0500

182 lines

Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Matthew Dovey

Tue, 12 Nov 2002 22:30:16 -0000

41 lines

CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:46:52 +0000

170 lines

New Thread

CQL Wildcards in BIB-1

CQL Wildcards in BIB-1

Mike Taylor

Fri, 29 Nov 2002 16:33:46 GMT

26 lines

New Thread

cql-java 0.1 released!

Re: cql-java 0.1 released!

Mike Taylor

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 10:13:02 GMT

50 lines

Re: cql-java 0.1 released!

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:54:33 -0500

25 lines

Re: cql-java 0.1 released!

Mike Taylor

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 16:57:28 GMT

38 lines

Re: cql-java 0.1 released!

Mike Taylor

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 16:15:11 GMT

36 lines

Re: cql-java 0.1 released!

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 11:18:16 -0500

43 lines

Re: cql-java 0.1 released!

Mike Taylor

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 16:12:23 GMT

28 lines

Re: cql-java 0.1 released!

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:58:16 -0500

95 lines

Re: cql-java 0.1 released!

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:51:31 -0500

19 lines

Re: cql-java 0.1 released!

Mike Taylor

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 15:44:00 GMT

36 lines

Re: cql-java 0.1 released!

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:04:32 -0500

96 lines

cql-java 0.1 released!

Mike Taylor

Sun, 3 Nov 2002 20:03:18 GMT

80 lines

New Thread

cql-java release 0.2

cql-java release 0.2

Mike Taylor

Wed, 6 Nov 2002 22:35:04 GMT

151 lines

New Thread

cql-java v0.3 is released

Re: cql-java v0.3 is released

Mike Taylor

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:59:04 GMT

24 lines

cql-java v0.3 is released

Mike Taylor

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:58:03 GMT

48 lines

New Thread

CQL: Boolean/Relation as Term

CQL: Boolean/Relation as Term

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:47:24 +0000

54 lines

New Thread

CQL: Empty Terms

Re: CQL: Empty Terms

Ben Soares

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 10:48:25 +0000

140 lines

Re: CQL: Empty Terms

Mike Taylor

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 10:41:34 GMT

58 lines

Re: CQL: Empty Terms

Adam Dickmeiss

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 09:32:32 +0100

97 lines

Re: CQL: Empty Terms

Sebastian Hammer

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 22:59:05 +0100

35 lines

Re: CQL: Empty Terms

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 16:21:43 -0500

18 lines

Re: CQL: Empty Terms

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 21:01:10 +0000

37 lines

Re: CQL: Empty Terms

Sebastian Hammer

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 22:05:49 +0100

39 lines

Re: CQL: Empty Terms

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 21:52:41 +0100

43 lines

Re: CQL: Empty Terms

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 19:09:48 +0000

90 lines

Re: CQL: Empty Terms

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 14:04:04 -0500

77 lines

Re: CQL: Empty Terms

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 19:56:19 +0100

57 lines

Re: CQL: Empty Terms

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 18:36:48 +0000

44 lines

Re: CQL: Empty Terms

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 13:49:31 -0500

24 lines

Re: CQL: Empty Terms

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 19:42:13 +0100

39 lines

Re: CQL: Empty Terms

Mark Needleman - DRA

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:41:15 -0600

92 lines

Re: CQL: Empty Terms

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 19:37:05 +0100

80 lines

Re: CQL: Empty Terms

Mark Needleman - DRA

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:33:19 -0600

71 lines

Re: CQL: Empty Terms

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 13:32:43 -0500

27 lines

Re: CQL: Empty Terms

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 19:28:09 +0100

56 lines

Re: CQL: Empty Terms

Mark Needleman - DRA

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:18:21 -0600

41 lines

Re: CQL: Empty Terms

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 17:59:38 +0000

30 lines

Re: CQL: Empty Terms

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 18:50:43 +0100

41 lines

CQL: Empty Terms

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 17:15:17 +0000

35 lines

New Thread

CQLParser Python Library

CQLParser Python Library

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 16 Nov 2002 00:40:05 +0000

56 lines

New Thread

Current WSDL etc.

Re: Current WSDL etc.

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:59:31 +0000

27 lines

Re: Current WSDL etc.

Matthew Dovey

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:56:33 -0000

90 lines

Re: Current WSDL etc.

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 08:25:31 -0500

41 lines

Current WSDL etc.

Matthew Dovey

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:11:17 -0000

27 lines

New Thread

DC index set.

Re: DC index set.

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:07:21 +0000

41 lines

Re: DC index set.

Mike Taylor

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:55:57 GMT

44 lines

DC index set.

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 26 Nov 2002 19:13:17 +0000

35 lines

New Thread

DC Record Schema

Re: DC Record Schema

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:42:49 +0000

28 lines

Re: DC Record Schema

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:42:53 -0500

26 lines

DC Record Schema

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:39:27 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

DC Schema

Re: DC Schema

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 13:36:25 -0500

31 lines

DC Schema

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:42:40 +0000

52 lines

New Thread

dc schema identifier

Re: dc schema identifier

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:16:51 -0500

16 lines

Re: dc schema identifier

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:52:01 +0000

27 lines

dc schema identifier

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:55:02 -0500

16 lines

New Thread

diagnostic list

diagnostic list

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 09:53:27 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

Diagnostic well known name

Diagnostic well known name

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 21:20:22 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

diagnosticCodeType

Re: diagnosticCodeType

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 29 Nov 2002 13:02:26 +0000

28 lines

Re: diagnosticCodeType

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 29 Nov 2002 13:13:45 -0000

130 lines

Re: diagnosticCodeType

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 29 Nov 2002 14:07:39 +0100

52 lines

Re: diagnosticCodeType

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 29 Nov 2002 12:53:44 -0000

43 lines

Re: diagnosticCodeType

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 28 Nov 2002 23:08:04 +0000

26 lines

diagnosticCodeType

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 28 Nov 2002 23:10:59 +0100

15 lines

New Thread

Diagnostics

Re: Diagnostics

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:31:54 +0000

112 lines

Re: Diagnostics

Janifer Gatenby

Tue, 12 Nov 2002 19:04:52 +0100

216 lines

Re: Diagnostics

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 7 Nov 2002 16:02:49 +0000

26 lines

Re: Diagnostics

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 7 Nov 2002 11:25:10 +0000

49 lines

Re: Diagnostics

Janifer Gatenby

Thu, 7 Nov 2002 10:22:29 +0100

85 lines

Re: Diagnostics

Janifer Gatenby

Thu, 7 Nov 2002 09:58:04 +0100

46 lines

Re: Diagnostics

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 6 Nov 2002 21:41:36 +0000

29 lines

Diagnostics

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 6 Nov 2002 19:48:06 +0000

44 lines

New Thread

Diagnostics and Explain

Re: Diagnostics and Explain

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:55:49 +0000

32 lines

Re: Diagnostics and Explain

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:58:06 -0000

24 lines

Re: Diagnostics and Explain

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:18:15 +0000

48 lines

Re: Diagnostics and Explain

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 29 Nov 2002 14:27:03 -0000

32 lines

Diagnostics and Explain

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 29 Nov 2002 13:42:06 +0000

26 lines

New Thread

diagnostics, cql, xcql, schemas/wsdl, examples

Re: diagnostics, cql, xcql, schemas/wsdl, examples

Matthew Dovey

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:18:51 -0000

48 lines

diagnostics, cql, xcql, schemas/wsdl, examples

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:29:27 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

draft announcement

Re: draft announcement

Mike Taylor

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 11:28:21 GMT

147 lines

draft announcement

Ray Denenberg

Sat, 16 Nov 2002 16:28:15 -0500

90 lines

New Thread

dropping the name sru

Re: dropping the name sru

Matthew Dovey

Thu, 7 Nov 2002 09:41:51 -0000

29 lines

Re: dropping the name sru

Janifer Gatenby

Thu, 7 Nov 2002 09:56:08 +0100

37 lines

Re: dropping the name sru

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 6 Nov 2002 19:53:36 -0500

26 lines

Re: dropping the name sru

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 6 Nov 2002 14:35:37 -0500

17 lines

Re: dropping the name sru

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 6 Nov 2002 19:05:50 +0000

32 lines

Re: dropping the name sru

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 6 Nov 2002 13:51:04 -0500

18 lines

Re: dropping the name sru

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 6 Nov 2002 11:12:58 -0500

27 lines

Re: dropping the name sru

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 6 Nov 2002 15:36:03 +0000

44 lines

Re: dropping the name sru

Matthew Dovey

Wed, 6 Nov 2002 15:15:04 -0000

37 lines

dropping the name sru

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 6 Nov 2002 09:40:05 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

echoedRequest

Re: echoedRequest

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:25:15 +0000

35 lines

Re: echoedRequest

Matthew Dovey

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:54:21 -0000

34 lines

Re: echoedRequest

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:08:15 +0000

23 lines

Re: echoedRequest

Matthew Dovey

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:11:17 -0000

61 lines

Re: echoedRequest

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:39:30 +0000

25 lines

Re: echoedRequest

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:38:14 +0000

40 lines

Re: echoedRequest

Matthew Dovey

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:19:26 -0000

47 lines

echoedRequest

Theo van Veen

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:02:43 +0100

24 lines

New Thread

Empty Terms

Re: Empty Terms

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 21:59:18 +0100

29 lines

Re: Empty Terms

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 14:12:12 -0500

20 lines

Re: Empty Terms

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 18:23:12 +0000

47 lines

Re: Empty Terms

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 13:13:24 -0500

61 lines

New Thread

Explain: = Relation

Explain: = Relation

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 16:45:26 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

Extra Element in srw-binding.wsdl

Re: Extra Element in srw-binding.wsdl

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:03:59 -0000

41 lines

Extra Element in srw-binding.wsdl

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:43:35 +0100

24 lines

New Thread

First EZNGIG meeting :)

Re: First EZNGIG meeting :)

Mike Taylor

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:52:27 GMT

44 lines

Re: First EZNGIG meeting :)

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 12 Nov 2002 22:43:50 +0000

46 lines

Re: First EZNGIG meeting :)

Larry E. Dixson

Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:20:11 -0500

90 lines

Re: First EZNGIG meeting :)

Matthew Dovey

Wed, 6 Nov 2002 09:51:47 -0000

29 lines

Re: First EZNGIG meeting :)

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 23:58:08 +0000

38 lines

Re: First EZNGIG meeting :)

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 18:55:45 -0500

84 lines

Re: First EZNGIG meeting :)

Ray denenberg

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 18:04:53 -0500

14 lines

First EZNGIG meeting :)

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 22:14:57 +0000

73 lines

New Thread

history

Re: history

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:38:17 -0500

19 lines

Re: history

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 11:52:35 +0000

26 lines

history

Theo van Veen

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 10:29:42 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

implementor page

Re: implementor page

Mike Taylor

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:59:24 GMT

24 lines

implementor page

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:31:24 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Index Data Service updated for testing

Re: Index Data Service updated for testing

Matthew Dovey

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 20:42:06 -0000

58 lines

Re: Index Data Service updated for testing

Adam Dickmeiss

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:37:59 +0100

50 lines

Re: Index Data Service updated for testing

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:40:32 -0500

51 lines

Re: Index Data Service updated for testing

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:12:59 -0500

37 lines

Re: Index Data Service updated for testing

Adam Dickmeiss

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:21:18 +0100

20 lines

Index Data Service updated for testing

Adam Dickmeiss

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:11:21 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

Index Set: CCG

Re: Index Set: CCG

Mike Taylor

Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:53:07 GMT

52 lines

Re: Index Set: CCG

Mike Taylor

Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:38:55 GMT

25 lines

Re: Index Set: CCG

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 15:02:39 -0500

18 lines

Re: Index Set: CCG

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 17:04:04 +0000

34 lines

Re: Index Set: CCG

Mike Taylor

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:10:05 GMT

51 lines

Index Set: CCG

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 15:17:21 +0000

49 lines

New Thread

Indexsets and intereferences

Re: Indexsets and intereferences

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:16:43 -0500

21 lines

Re: Indexsets and intereferences

Mike Taylor

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:48:22 GMT

83 lines

Re: Indexsets and intereferences

Mike Taylor

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:36:22 GMT

59 lines

Re: Indexsets and intereferences

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:06:16 +0000

33 lines

Re: Indexsets and intereferences

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:03:27 +0000

39 lines

Re: Indexsets and intereferences

Sebastian Hammer

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:16:16 +0100

27 lines

Re: Indexsets and intereferences

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 08:08:04 -0500

29 lines

Re: Indexsets and intereferences

Mike Taylor

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:03:01 GMT

40 lines

Re: Indexsets and intereferences

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:42:58 -0500

51 lines

Re: Indexsets and intereferences

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:23:22 +0000

35 lines

New Thread

Keep those cliches coming!

Re: Keep those cliches coming!

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:11:36 -0500

20 lines

Re: Keep those cliches coming!

Mike Taylor

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 11:16:46 GMT

25 lines

Re: Keep those cliches coming!

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:32:41 +0000

27 lines

Re: Keep those cliches coming!

Janifer Gatenby

Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:18:16 +0100

77 lines

Re: Keep those cliches coming!

Ray Denenberg

Sat, 9 Nov 2002 16:20:57 -0500

20 lines

Re: Keep those cliches coming!

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 8 Nov 2002 19:07:12 +0000

58 lines

Re: Keep those cliches coming!

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 8 Nov 2002 13:23:39 -0500

28 lines

Re: Keep those cliches coming!

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 8 Nov 2002 16:44:48 +0000

28 lines

Keep those cliches coming!

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 8 Nov 2002 11:25:13 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Leaky Abstractions

Leaky Abstractions

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 18:21:11 +0100

18 lines

New Thread

List problems

List problems

Larry E. Dixson

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 13:48:43 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

lists

Re: lists

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:48:51 +0100

25 lines

Re: lists

Ray denenberg

Tue, 26 Nov 2002 19:12:22 -0500

34 lines

Re: lists

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 26 Nov 2002 17:39:50 +0000

33 lines

Re: lists

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 26 Nov 2002 11:21:55 -0500

41 lines

Re: lists

Ben Soares

Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:59:39 +0000

27 lines

Re: lists

miep

Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:16:57 +0100

21 lines

Re: lists

Ray denenberg

Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:11:43 -0500

15 lines

Re: lists

miep

Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:36:10 +0100

25 lines

Re: lists

Ray denenberg

Tue, 26 Nov 2002 07:34:30 -0500

21 lines

Re: lists

Adam Dickmeiss

Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:28:43 +0100

21 lines

lists

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:10:57 -0500

13 lines

New Thread

loose ends (1): Schemas

loose ends (1): Schemas

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:48:28 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

Mapping Bath Profile Searches to CQL

Re: Mapping Bath Profile Searches to CQL

Mike Taylor

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 11:42:22 GMT

72 lines

Re: Mapping Bath Profile Searches to CQL

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 12 Nov 2002 22:29:53 +0000

65 lines

Re: Mapping Bath Profile Searches to CQL

Larry E. Dixson

Tue, 12 Nov 2002 14:23:04 -0500

145 lines

Re: Mapping Bath Profile Searches to CQL

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:50:44 +0000

34 lines

Re: Mapping Bath Profile Searches to CQL

Janifer Gatenby

Tue, 12 Nov 2002 19:18:21 +0100

35 lines

Re: Mapping Bath Profile Searches to CQL

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 8 Nov 2002 21:49:12 +0000

53 lines

Mapping Bath Profile Searches to CQL

Larry E. Dixson

Fri, 8 Nov 2002 16:01:08 -0500

79 lines

New Thread

Mapping Bath Profile Searches to CQL (fwd)

Re: Mapping Bath Profile Searches to CQL (fwd)

Larry E. Dixson

Tue, 12 Nov 2002 13:17:21 -0500

94 lines

New Thread

Mapping CQL Qualifiers to Type-1 Attributes

Re: Mapping CQL Qualifiers to Type-1 Attributes

Mike Taylor

Wed, 6 Nov 2002 10:23:36 GMT

35 lines

Re: Mapping CQL Qualifiers to Type-1 Attributes

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 15:04:15 -0500

30 lines

Re: Mapping CQL Qualifiers to Type-1 Attributes

Mike Taylor

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 17:03:45 GMT

49 lines

Re: Mapping CQL Qualifiers to Type-1 Attributes

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 16:00:56 +0000

43 lines

Re: Mapping CQL Qualifiers to Type-1 Attributes

Mike Taylor

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 15:59:35 GMT

31 lines

Re: Mapping CQL Qualifiers to Type-1 Attributes

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:44:49 -0500

20 lines

Mapping CQL Qualifiers to Type-1 Attributes

Mike Taylor

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 15:03:40 GMT

19 lines

New Thread

More namespace nitpicking

More namespace nitpicking

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:43:33 +0000

33 lines

New Thread

More on the Utility Qualifier-Set

More on the Utility Qualifier-Set

Mike Taylor

Thu, 28 Nov 2002 12:37:58 GMT

108 lines

New Thread

moved everything to zing

Re: moved everything to zing

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 23:12:09 +0000

233 lines

Re: moved everything to zing

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:04:39 -0500

224 lines

Re: moved everything to zing

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:44:21 +0000

51 lines

Re: moved everything to zing

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:25:43 +0000

25 lines

Re: moved everything to zing

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:34:18 -0500

24 lines

Re: moved everything to zing

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:30:41 -0500

46 lines

Re: moved everything to zing

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:26:44 -0000

56 lines

Re: moved everything to zing

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:38:13 +0000

144 lines

Re: moved everything to zing

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:54:29 -0000

14 lines

moved everything to zing

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:56:17 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

namespace and schema id URIs

Re: namespace and schema id URIs

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:55:36 -0000

60 lines

Re: namespace and schema id URIs

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:08:46 +0000

43 lines

Re: namespace and schema id URIs

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 16:43:47 -0000

43 lines

Re: namespace and schema id URIs

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:41:29 +0000

38 lines

Re: namespace and schema id URIs

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:26:56 -0500

20 lines

Re: namespace and schema id URIs

Mike Taylor

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:13:56 GMT

33 lines

namespace and schema id URIs

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:09:33 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

Namespaces

Re: Namespaces

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:51:33 -0500

65 lines

Re: Namespaces

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 21:40:59 -0000

53 lines

Re: Namespaces

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:22:44 -0500

33 lines

Re: Namespaces

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:30:54 -0000

34 lines

Re: Namespaces

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:01:38 +0000

38 lines

Re: Namespaces

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:11:37 -0500

23 lines

Re: Namespaces

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:52:46 -0000

99 lines

Namespaces

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:46:26 -0000

79 lines

New Thread

Namespaces (fwd)

Re: Namespaces (fwd)

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:35:25 +0000

36 lines

Re: Namespaces (fwd)

Mike Taylor

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 12:03:27 GMT

77 lines

Re: Namespaces (fwd)

Ray denenberg

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 06:41:28 -0500

55 lines

Re: Namespaces (fwd)

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:09:31 -0000

34 lines

Re: Namespaces (fwd)

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 00:34:27 +0000

100 lines

New Thread

New Diagnostic for Prefixes

New Diagnostic for Prefixes

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:33:45 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

New ZiNG page -- ZOOM reference

Re: New ZiNG page -- ZOOM reference

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 22:51:56 +0000

54 lines

Re: New ZiNG page -- ZOOM reference

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 17:48:14 -0500

42 lines

New ZiNG page -- ZOOM reference

Sebastian Hammer

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 17:41:43 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

nine or six months?

Re: nine or six months?

Sebastian Hammer

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:00:29 +0100

42 lines

Re: nine or six months?

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:28:50 +0000

34 lines

Re: nine or six months?

Sebastian Hammer

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:20:21 +0100

52 lines

nine or six months?

Ray denenberg

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 07:59:27 -0500

73 lines

New Thread

Nov11 meeting in Manchester

Nov11 meeting in Manchester

Mike Taylor

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:41:59 GMT

21 lines

New Thread

One small success story

Re: One small success story

Mike Taylor

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:38:37 GMT

51 lines

One small success story

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 08:32:15 -0500

50 lines

New Thread

operation name

Re: operation name

Robert Sanderson

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 00:36:47 +0000

24 lines

New Thread

Operation name (again)

Re: Operation name (again)

Mike Taylor

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 11:38:36 GMT

24 lines

Re: Operation name (again)

Matthew Dovey

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 11:50:06 -0000

16 lines

Re: Operation name (again)

Matthew Dovey

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 11:48:21 -0000

24 lines

Re: Operation name (again)

Sebastian Hammer

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 12:24:38 +0100

24 lines

Re: Operation name (again)

Sebastian Hammer

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 12:23:29 +0100

120 lines

Re: Operation name (again)

Matthew Dovey

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 11:15:52 -0000

23 lines

Re: Operation name (again)

Matthew Dovey

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 11:00:29 -0000

88 lines

Re: Operation name (again)

Sebastian Hammer

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 10:33:39 +0100

41 lines

Re: Operation name (again)

Adam Dickmeiss

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 08:34:51 +0100

78 lines

Re: Operation name (again)

Matthew Dovey

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 00:53:40 -0000

46 lines

Re: Operation name (again)

Adam Dickmeiss

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 01:13:43 +0100

60 lines

Re: Operation name (again)

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 16 Nov 2002 23:26:08 +0000

29 lines

Re: Operation name (again)

Adam Dickmeiss

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 00:33:53 +0100

46 lines

Re: Operation name (again)

Adam Dickmeiss

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 00:26:08 +0100

46 lines

Operation name (again)

Adam Dickmeiss

Sat, 16 Nov 2002 23:46:27 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

Operation name (again) -- part deux

Re: Operation name (again) -- part deux

Matthew Dovey

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 11:00:25 -0000

30 lines

Re: Operation name (again) -- part deux

Sebastian Hammer

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 10:51:25 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

Operation name/Delaying release

Re: Operation name/Delaying release

Robert Sanderson

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 13:45:17 +0000

31 lines

New Thread

order of proximity qualifiers

Re: order of proximity qualifiers

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:20:26 +0000

31 lines

Re: order of proximity qualifiers

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:22:29 -0000

37 lines

Re: order of proximity qualifiers

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 11:36:27 +0000

47 lines

Re: order of proximity qualifiers

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 11:36:10 -0000

28 lines

Re: order of proximity qualifiers

Ray denenberg

Sun, 3 Nov 2002 13:13:37 -0500

43 lines

Re: order of proximity qualifiers

Mike Taylor

Sun, 3 Nov 2002 17:43:47 GMT

32 lines

Re: order of proximity qualifiers

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 2 Nov 2002 14:26:55 +0000

37 lines

Re: order of proximity qualifiers

Ray denenberg

Sat, 2 Nov 2002 09:21:02 -0500

38 lines

Re: order of proximity qualifiers

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 2 Nov 2002 13:45:19 +0000

33 lines

New Thread

please review

please review

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:18:50 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

postponement

postponement

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:40:29 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

postponing question

Re: postponing question

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 09:45:23 -0500

86 lines

Re: postponing question

Sebastian Hammer

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:54:42 +0100

54 lines

postponing question

Ray denenberg

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 07:24:24 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

Proposal: recordPacking

Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Mike Taylor

Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:43:17 GMT

52 lines

Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Matthew Dovey

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 23:16:13 -0000

37 lines

Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:46:29 +0000

33 lines

Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Mike Taylor

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:16:29 GMT

59 lines

Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 15:04:14 +0000

55 lines

Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Mike Taylor

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:56:42 GMT

46 lines

Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:05:13 +0000

78 lines

Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Mike Taylor

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 13:52:52 GMT

68 lines

Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:56:31 +0000

46 lines

Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Mike Taylor

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:56:30 GMT

47 lines

Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:18:37 +0000

77 lines

Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Mike Taylor

Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:06:46 GMT

104 lines

Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 26 Nov 2002 22:54:23 +0000

26 lines

Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Matthew Dovey

Tue, 26 Nov 2002 20:25:07 -0000

99 lines

Re: Proposal: recordPacking

Matthew Dovey

Tue, 26 Nov 2002 20:22:32 -0000

99 lines

Proposal: recordPacking

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 26 Nov 2002 19:33:55 +0000

77 lines

New Thread

Propose delay of release

Re: Propose delay of release

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:33:27 +0000

33 lines

Re: Propose delay of release

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:31:44 +0100

157 lines

Re: Propose delay of release

Mike Taylor

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:17:27 GMT

28 lines

Re: Propose delay of release

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:08:42 +0000

143 lines

Re: Propose delay of release

Matthew Dovey

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 22:18:15 -0000

126 lines

Re: Propose delay of release

Sebastian Hammer

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 21:36:45 +0100

26 lines

Re: Propose delay of release

Adam Dickmeiss

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 21:27:33 +0100

50 lines

Re: Propose delay of release

Adam Dickmeiss

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 20:12:51 +0100

99 lines

Re: Propose delay of release

Ray denenberg

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 12:55:20 -0500

69 lines

Re: Propose delay of release

Robert Sanderson

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 16:48:43 +0000

36 lines

Re: Propose delay of release

Matthew Dovey

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 16:48:45 -0000

181 lines

Re: Propose delay of release

Matthew Dovey

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 16:38:52 -0000

33 lines

Re: Propose delay of release

Robert Sanderson

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 15:31:15 +0000

31 lines

Re: Propose delay of release

Ray denenberg

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 10:09:12 -0500

33 lines

Re: Propose delay of release

Robert Sanderson

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 14:08:33 +0000

40 lines

Re: Propose delay of release

Matthew Dovey

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 14:08:02 -0000

21 lines

Re: Propose delay of release

Matthew Dovey

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 14:04:56 -0000

54 lines

Re: Propose delay of release

LeVan,Ralph

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 08:46:20 -0500

56 lines

Propose delay of release

Sebastian Hammer

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 14:08:46 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

real-life example of an index set

Re: real-life example of an index set

Ray denenberg

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:10:06 -0500

24 lines

Re: real-life example of an index set

Janifer Gatenby

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:10:50 +0100

24 lines

Re: real-life example of an index set

Mike Taylor

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:06:51 GMT

78 lines

Re: real-life example of an index set

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 23:22:24 +0000

26 lines

real-life example of an index set

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 18:24:17 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

record schemas

Re: record schemas

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 09:48:13 -0500

21 lines

Re: record schemas

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 13:45:58 -0000

25 lines

Re: record schemas

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:28:14 +0000

44 lines

Re: record schemas

Mike Taylor

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:02:17 GMT

24 lines

Re: record schemas

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 11:36:10 -0000

33 lines

Re: record schemas

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 2 Nov 2002 13:59:28 +0000

38 lines

Re: record schemas

Ray denenberg

Sat, 2 Nov 2002 08:53:55 -0500

27 lines

Re: record schemas

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 2 Nov 2002 13:23:43 +0000

35 lines

Re: record schemas

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 2 Nov 2002 13:18:28 +0000

41 lines

Re: record schemas

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 2 Nov 2002 13:11:56 +0000

33 lines

Re: record schemas

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 2 Nov 2002 13:11:00 +0000

36 lines

Re: record schemas

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 1 Nov 2002 13:51:40 -0500

30 lines

Re: record schemas

Mike Taylor

Fri, 1 Nov 2002 17:00:45 GMT

31 lines

Re: record schemas

Mike Taylor

Fri, 1 Nov 2002 16:57:42 GMT

34 lines

Re: record schemas

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 1 Nov 2002 11:39:50 -0500

42 lines

Re: record schemas

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 1 Nov 2002 11:41:48 -0500

17 lines

Re: record schemas

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 1 Nov 2002 11:33:22 -0500

35 lines

Re: record schemas

Mike Taylor

Fri, 1 Nov 2002 16:17:09 GMT

52 lines

Re: record schemas

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 1 Nov 2002 10:22:23 -0500

44 lines

Re: record schemas

Mike Taylor

Fri, 1 Nov 2002 14:29:20 GMT

32 lines

New Thread

record.recordNumber

record.recordNumber

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:12:25 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

Relation Modifier: phonetic

Re: Relation Modifier: phonetic

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:55:17 -0500

37 lines

Relation Modifier: phonetic

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 8 Nov 2002 19:56:54 +0000

33 lines

New Thread

Relation Modifier: phonetic (fwd)

Re: Relation Modifier: phonetic (fwd)

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:19:05 +0000

57 lines

New Thread

RELEASE: cql-java v0.4

RELEASE: cql-java v0.4

Mike Taylor

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 10:42:52 GMT

64 lines

New Thread

response/records/record/recordSchema

Re: response/records/record/recordSchema

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 21:10:50 +0000

28 lines

Re: response/records/record/recordSchema

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 13:33:36 -0500

20 lines

response/records/record/recordSchema

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:18:37 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

revised "to do" list

Re: revised "to do" list

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 21:35:42 -0000

135 lines

Re: revised "to do" list

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 20:31:21 -0000

27 lines

Re: revised "to do" list

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 21:24:11 +0100

114 lines

Re: revised "to do" list

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:18:10 +0000

36 lines

Re: revised "to do" list

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:13:47 +0000

253 lines

Re: revised "to do" list

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:37:58 -0500

28 lines

Re: revised "to do" list

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:18:10 +0000

34 lines

Re: revised "to do" list

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:29:12 -0000

71 lines

Re: revised "to do" list

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:06:45 +0000

40 lines

Re: revised "to do" list

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:01:14 -0000

25 lines

revised "to do" list

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:59:42 -0500

68 lines

New Thread

running out of time

Re: running out of time

Ray Denenberg

Sat, 16 Nov 2002 16:36:46 -0500

17 lines

Re: running out of time

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 16 Nov 2002 21:15:18 +0000

25 lines

Re: running out of time

Matthew Dovey

Sat, 16 Nov 2002 21:19:53 -0000

41 lines

Re: running out of time

Ray Denenberg

Sat, 16 Nov 2002 14:36:08 -0500

38 lines

Re: running out of time

Ray Denenberg

Sat, 16 Nov 2002 13:43:08 -0500

54 lines

Re: running out of time

Ray Denenberg

Sat, 16 Nov 2002 13:41:10 -0500

68 lines

Re: running out of time

Matthew Dovey

Sat, 16 Nov 2002 16:46:43 -0000

762 lines

Re: running out of time

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 16 Nov 2002 15:42:22 +0000

41 lines

Re: running out of time

Matthew Dovey

Sat, 16 Nov 2002 11:11:47 -0000

69 lines

running out of time

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:12:17 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

Schemas (1 of 2)

Schemas (1 of 2)

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:03:40 -0000

351 lines

New Thread

Schemas (2 of 2)

Schemas (2 of 2)

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:03:21 -0000

141 lines

New Thread

Schemas (really updated this time!)

Re: Schemas (really updated this time!)

Sebastian Hammer

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 23:54:56 +0100

86 lines

Re: Schemas (really updated this time!)

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:48:30 -0000

504 lines

New Thread

Schemas (updated)

Re: Schemas (updated)

Sebastian Hammer

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 23:54:20 +0100

62 lines

Schemas (updated)

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:45:43 -0000

428 lines

New Thread

schemas and versions

Re: schemas and versions

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:46:18 -0000

52 lines

schemas and versions

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:09:23 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

SOAP samples

Re: SOAP samples

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:54:07 -0500

19 lines

Re: SOAP samples

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:24:30 -0500

18 lines

Re: SOAP samples

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:36:40 +0000

37 lines

Re: SOAP samples

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:41:57 -0500

17 lines

Re: SOAP samples

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:28:14 -0000

32 lines

Re: SOAP samples

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:10:53 -0500

49 lines

Re: SOAP samples

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:13:01 +0000

43 lines

Re: SOAP samples

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:07:19 -0000

26 lines

SOAP samples

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:43:24 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

SOAP Types

Re: SOAP Types

Robert Sanderson

Sun, 1 Dec 2002 00:17:48 +0000

34 lines

Re: SOAP Types

Robert Sanderson

Sun, 1 Dec 2002 00:05:52 +0000

56 lines

Re: SOAP Types

Matthew Dovey

Sun, 1 Dec 2002 00:19:34 -0000

29 lines

Re: SOAP Types

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:48:33 +0000

33 lines

Re: SOAP Types

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:45:38 +0000

50 lines

Re: SOAP Types

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:36:47 +0000

40 lines

Re: SOAP Types

Adam Dickmeiss

Sun, 1 Dec 2002 00:53:56 +0100

39 lines

Re: SOAP Types

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:33:22 +0000

27 lines

Re: SOAP Types

Adam Dickmeiss

Sun, 1 Dec 2002 00:46:17 +0100

30 lines

Re: SOAP Types

Matthew Dovey

Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:40:26 -0000

21 lines

Re: SOAP Types

Matthew Dovey

Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:40:25 -0000

25 lines

Re: SOAP Types

Matthew Dovey

Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:30:28 -0000

36 lines

Re: SOAP Types

Matthew Dovey

Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:30:26 -0000

22 lines

Re: SOAP Types

Matthew Dovey

Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:30:25 -0000

29 lines

Re: SOAP Types

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 29 Nov 2002 18:41:40 +0000

27 lines

Re: SOAP Types

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 29 Nov 2002 18:37:39 +0000

50 lines

SOAP Types

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 29 Nov 2002 18:08:30 +0000

43 lines

New Thread

speak up

Re: speak up

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:08:05 -0500

25 lines

speak up

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:59:48 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

spec review

Re: spec review

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 20:38:16 +0000

35 lines

spec review

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:30:43 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

SRU

Re: SRU

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:27:18 -0500

100 lines

Re: SRU

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:36:34 -0500

18 lines

Re: SRU

Mike Taylor

Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:41:59 GMT

42 lines

Re: SRU

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:21:15 +0000

33 lines

Re: SRU

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:30:15 -0000

78 lines

Re: SRU

Ray denenberg

Mon, 25 Nov 2002 08:22:36 -0500

44 lines

Re: SRU

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 25 Nov 2002 12:59:46 +0000

35 lines

Re: SRU

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:46:39 -0000

22 lines

Re: SRU

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:39:37 +0100

29 lines

Re: SRU

Sebastian Hammer

Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:39:40 +0100

39 lines

Re: SRU

Sebastian Hammer

Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:36:22 +0100

32 lines

Re: SRU

Mike Taylor

Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:17:32 GMT

55 lines

Re: SRU

Mike Taylor

Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:10:52 GMT

25 lines

Re: SRU

Matthew Dovey

Sun, 24 Nov 2002 23:37:37 -0000

29 lines

Re: SRU

Sebastian Hammer

Sun, 24 Nov 2002 23:17:32 +0100

39 lines

Re: SRU

Matthew Dovey

Sun, 24 Nov 2002 22:05:40 -0000

37 lines

Re: SRU

Sebastian Hammer

Sun, 24 Nov 2002 22:33:49 +0100

58 lines

Re: SRU

Theo van Veen

Sun, 24 Nov 2002 19:47:45 +0100

41 lines

Re: SRU

Robert Sanderson

Sun, 24 Nov 2002 16:51:03 +0000

34 lines

SRU

Theo van Veen

Sun, 24 Nov 2002 17:49:45 +0100

17 lines

Re: SRU

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:52:03 -0500

74 lines

Re: SRU

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:43:49 -0000

282 lines

Re: SRU

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:16:35 +0000

51 lines

SRU

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:39:37 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

SRU: echoedRequest

SRU: echoedRequest

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 16:23:19 +0000

54 lines

New Thread

SRW and SRU samples (updates)

SRW and SRU samples (updates)

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:05:51 -0000

384 lines

New Thread

Str vs XML, SortSpec

Str vs XML, SortSpec

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 2 Nov 2002 14:50:52 +0000

69 lines

New Thread

supported record schemas

supported record schemas

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:22:44 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

synchronizing

Re: synchronizing

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:43:50 -0000

45 lines

synchronizing

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:21:18 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

tasks

tasks

Ray denenberg

Sat, 2 Nov 2002 10:45:23 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Testing Listserv

Testing Listserv

Larry E. Dixson

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 12:09:13 -0500

11 lines

New Thread

thanks Rob!

Re: thanks Rob!

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 9 Nov 2002 22:52:32 +0000

30 lines

thanks Rob!

Ray Denenberg

Sat, 9 Nov 2002 17:37:03 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

The Zthes Qualifier-Set

The Zthes Qualifier-Set

Mike Taylor

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:58:39 GMT

71 lines

New Thread

to do

Re: to do

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:56:05 +0000

49 lines

Re: to do

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:46:27 +0000

34 lines

Re: to do

Mike Taylor

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 11:03:08 GMT

51 lines

Re: to do

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:56:26 -0000

34 lines

Re: to do

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:45:32 -0000

56 lines

Re: to do

Mike Taylor

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:27:34 GMT

76 lines

Re: to do

Mike Taylor

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:12:55 GMT

37 lines

Re: to do

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:02:17 -0000

34 lines

Re: to do

Matthew Dovey

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 23:56:43 -0000

29 lines

Re: to do

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:39:52 -0500

45 lines

Re: to do

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 16:44:17 +0000

203 lines

Re: to do

Mike Taylor

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 16:40:41 GMT

31 lines

Re: to do

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:18:04 -0500

19 lines

Re: to do

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 17:34:30 +0000

40 lines

Re: to do

Sebastian Hammer

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:32:01 +0100

38 lines

Re: to do

Matthew Dovey

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 23:54:25 -0000

47 lines

Re: to do

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:21:50 +0100

79 lines

Re: to do

Sebastian Hammer

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:17:51 +0100

90 lines

Re: to do

Matthew Dovey

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:53:43 -0000

34 lines

Re: to do

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:21:48 +0000

65 lines

Re: to do

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 20:39:27 +0000

66 lines

Re: to do

Matthew Dovey

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 19:44:13 -0000

47 lines

Re: to do

Adam Dickmeiss

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 20:26:02 +0100

76 lines

Re: to do

Mike Taylor

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 17:29:39 GMT

56 lines

Re: to do

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 17:04:54 +0000

54 lines

Re: to do

Matthew Dovey

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:48:13 -0000

32 lines

Re: to do

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:41:04 +0000

71 lines

Re: to do

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:17:21 +0000

42 lines

Re: to do

Matthew Dovey

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:11:17 -0000

23 lines

Re: to do

Mike Taylor

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:44:00 GMT

122 lines

to do

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:13:21 -0500

551 lines

New Thread

to do; add SRU syntax

Re: to do; add SRU syntax

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 15:41:28 -0500

87 lines

Re: to do; add SRU syntax

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 20:07:12 +0000

49 lines

Re: to do; add SRU syntax

Janifer Gatenby

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 19:51:51 +0100

501 lines

New Thread

To XCQL or not to XCQL?

Re: To XCQL or not to XCQL?

Matthew Dovey

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 15:28:34 -0000

21 lines

Re: To XCQL or not to XCQL?

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 14:06:55 +0000

34 lines

Re: To XCQL or not to XCQL?

Sebastian Hammer

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 15:25:14 +0100

27 lines

Re: To XCQL or not to XCQL?

Ray denenberg

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 08:16:20 -0500

38 lines

Re: To XCQL or not to XCQL?

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:35:06 +0000

61 lines

Re: To XCQL or not to XCQL?

Mike Taylor

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:18:16 GMT

74 lines

Re: To XCQL or not to XCQL?

Sebastian Hammer

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:21:42 +0100

67 lines

Re: To XCQL or not to XCQL?

Mike Taylor

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 09:41:56 GMT

100 lines

To XCQL or not to XCQL?

Sebastian Hammer

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 10:24:03 +0100

55 lines

New Thread

Updates

Re: Updates

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:16:59 +0000

27 lines

Re: Updates

Matthew Dovey

Sun, 24 Nov 2002 18:17:47 -0000

20 lines

Re: Updates

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:14:09 -0500

31 lines

Re: Updates

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:27:01 +0000

35 lines

Re: Updates

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:54:28 -0000

377 lines

Re: Updates

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:46:16 -0000

494 lines

Re: Updates

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:32:16 -0500

18 lines

Re: Updates

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:30:36 -0500

30 lines

Re: Updates

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:11:36 +0100

32 lines

Updates

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 21:59:45 -0000

233 lines

Re: Updates

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:10:57 +0000

26 lines

Re: Updates

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 01:50:07 +0100

17 lines

Re: Updates

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 00:44:55 -0000

138 lines

Re: Updates

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 01:07:40 +0100

26 lines

Re: Updates

Matthew Dovey

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 23:58:45 -0000

129 lines

Re: Updates

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 00:34:10 +0100

53 lines

Updates

Matthew Dovey

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 23:13:30 -0000

583 lines

New Thread

uri udentifiers

Re: uri udentifiers

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 15:03:42 +0000

38 lines

Re: uri udentifiers

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:13:27 -0500

47 lines

uri udentifiers

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 09:59:07 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

URIs for Schemas

Re: URIs for Schemas

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:55:41 +0000

36 lines

Re: URIs for Schemas

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:42:49 -0000

57 lines

URIs for Schemas

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:08:31 +0000

26 lines

New Thread

url-syntax

Re: url-syntax

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:00:38 +0000

28 lines

url-syntax

Theo van Veen

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:38:05 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

version 1.0 (near) final

Re: version 1.0 (near) final

LeVan,Ralph

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 08:48:51 -0500

19 lines

Re: version 1.0 (near) final

Adam Dickmeiss

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 00:43:38 +0100

38 lines

Re: version 1.0 (near) final

Matthew Dovey

Sat, 16 Nov 2002 21:38:33 -0000

29 lines

version 1.0 (near) final

Ray Denenberg

Sat, 16 Nov 2002 15:46:12 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

Version 1.0 of SRW and CQL

Re: Version 1.0 of SRW and CQL

Adam Dickmeiss

Tue, 26 Nov 2002 12:24:03 +0100

98 lines

Version 1.0 of SRW and CQL

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 25 Nov 2002 14:01:06 -0500

87 lines

New Thread

versioning

versioning

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:08:15 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set

Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 29 Nov 2002 12:05:16 +0000

50 lines

Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set

Mike Taylor

Fri, 29 Nov 2002 12:05:14 GMT

48 lines

Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:28:24 +0000

60 lines

Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set

Mike Taylor

Fri, 29 Nov 2002 09:48:55 GMT

88 lines

Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 28 Nov 2002 17:03:32 +0000

78 lines

Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set

Mike Taylor

Thu, 28 Nov 2002 16:34:02 GMT

112 lines

Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 28 Nov 2002 15:09:01 +0000

121 lines

Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set

Mike Taylor

Thu, 28 Nov 2002 14:48:54 GMT

167 lines

Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 28 Nov 2002 12:48:28 +0000

28 lines

Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 28 Nov 2002 12:22:40 +0000

81 lines

Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set

Mike Taylor

Thu, 28 Nov 2002 12:20:02 GMT

81 lines

Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set

Ray denenberg

Thu, 28 Nov 2002 06:43:40 -0500

17 lines

We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set

Mike Taylor

Thu, 28 Nov 2002 10:08:26 GMT

68 lines

New Thread

Web pages

Re: Web pages

Matthew Dovey

Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:35:30 -0000

45 lines

Re: Web pages

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:01:53 +0000

62 lines

Re: Web pages

Matthew Dovey

Wed, 6 Nov 2002 11:50:04 -0000

19 lines

Re: Web pages

Mike Taylor

Wed, 6 Nov 2002 10:36:06 GMT

63 lines

Re: Web pages

moretti

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 19:40:56 -0000

55 lines

Web pages

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 16:37:28 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

well-known record schema names

Re: well-known record schema names

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:10:54 -0500

30 lines

well-known record schema names

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 09:54:33 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

what record schemas are permissable?

Re: what record schemas are permissable?

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 2 Nov 2002 13:06:37 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment

Re: White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:12:38 +0000

48 lines

Re: White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment

Mike Taylor

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 09:25:34 GMT

43 lines

Re: White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment

Mike Taylor

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 09:21:55 GMT

22 lines

Re: White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 07:24:08 +0100

57 lines

Re: White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 00:42:35 +0000

37 lines

Re: White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment

Matthew Dovey

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 23:28:04 -0000

148 lines

Re: White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 23:33:36 +0100

77 lines

Re: White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 21:41:41 +0000

83 lines

Re: White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 21:12:51 +0000

28 lines

Re: White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment

Sebastian Hammer

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 22:23:43 +0100

119 lines

Re: White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 21:42:25 +0100

81 lines

White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 19:48:39 +0000

60 lines

New Thread

www.loc.gov/cql

Re: www.loc.gov/cql

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:35:30 -0000

83 lines

Re: www.loc.gov/cql

Mike Taylor

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:10:48 GMT

28 lines

Re: www.loc.gov/cql

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 09:34:38 +0100

75 lines

Re: www.loc.gov/cql

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 00:28:14 -0000

57 lines

Re: www.loc.gov/cql

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:19:28 -0500

82 lines

Re: www.loc.gov/cql

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 17:14:07 +0100

58 lines

Re: www.loc.gov/cql

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 15:25:39 +0000

43 lines

Re: www.loc.gov/cql

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 10:20:50 -0500

49 lines

Re: www.loc.gov/cql

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 14:46:08 +0000

33 lines

www.loc.gov/cql

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 09:42:46 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

XCQL - location of <prefixes>

Re: XCQL - location of <prefixes>

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 17:18:17 +0000

35 lines

Re: XCQL - location of <prefixes>

Mike Taylor

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 17:15:47 GMT

85 lines

Re: XCQL - location of <prefixes>

Matthew Dovey

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 17:03:31 -0000

17 lines

Re: XCQL - location of <prefixes>

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:34:43 +0000

36 lines

Re: XCQL - location of <prefixes>

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:31:31 +0000

30 lines

Re: XCQL - location of <prefixes>

Matthew Dovey

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:31:17 -0000

20 lines

Re: XCQL - location of <prefixes>

Matthew Dovey

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:31:17 -0000

79 lines

Re: XCQL - location of <prefixes>

Matthew Dovey

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:01:11 -0000

21 lines

Re: XCQL - location of <prefixes>

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:11:54 +0000

49 lines

XCQL - location of <prefixes>

Mike Taylor

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:01:18 GMT

105 lines

New Thread

XCQL <prefixes> Specification

Re: XCQL <prefixes> Specification

Matthew Dovey

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:55:40 -0000

29 lines

Re: XCQL <prefixes> Specification

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 14:42:33 +0000

37 lines

Re: XCQL <prefixes> Specification

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 15:20:32 +0100

113 lines

Re: XCQL <prefixes> Specification

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:59:29 +0000

153 lines

XCQL <prefixes> Specification

Mike Taylor

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:40:31 GMT

24 lines

New Thread

XCQL as fragment

Re: XCQL as fragment

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 20:25:23 +0100

137 lines

Re: XCQL as fragment

Mike Taylor

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 15:40:05 GMT

93 lines

Re: XCQL as fragment

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:39:51 -0500

102 lines

Re: XCQL as fragment

Larry E. Dixson

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:11:25 -0500

11 lines

Re: XCQL as fragment

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 07:36:52 -0500

44 lines

Re: XCQL as fragment

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 15:24:20 +0000

50 lines

Re: XCQL as fragment

Matthew Dovey

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 15:26:31 -0000

38 lines

Re: XCQL as fragment

Matthew Dovey

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 15:26:32 -0000

28 lines

Re: XCQL as fragment

Matthew Dovey

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 15:26:32 -0000

81 lines

Re: XCQL as fragment

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 15:15:17 +0000

80 lines

Re: XCQL as fragment

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:15:24 -0500

45 lines

Re: XCQL as fragment

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:59:38 +0000

47 lines

Re: XCQL as fragment

Mike Taylor

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:55:50 GMT

42 lines

Re: XCQL as fragment

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 15:51:05 +0100

105 lines

Re: XCQL as fragment

Matthew Dovey

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:48:38 -0000

35 lines

Re: XCQL as fragment

Mike Taylor

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:45:06 GMT

24 lines

Re: XCQL as fragment

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:35:01 +0000

91 lines

Re: XCQL as fragment

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 15:40:36 +0100

80 lines

Re: XCQL as fragment

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 12:25:31 +0100

41 lines

XCQL as fragment

Matthew Dovey

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:45:13 -0000

46 lines

Re: XCQL as fragment

Mike Taylor

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:25:43 GMT

77 lines

Re: XCQL as fragment

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:36:06 +0100

39 lines

XCQL as fragment

Matthew Dovey

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 22:05:21 -0000

15 lines

New Thread

XCQL Conformance

XCQL Conformance

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:03:15 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

XCQL Diagnostic

Re: XCQL Diagnostic

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:15:53 -0500

19 lines

Re: XCQL Diagnostic

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:14:27 -0500

21 lines

Re: XCQL Diagnostic

Sebastian Hammer

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:36:49 +0100

29 lines

Re: XCQL Diagnostic

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 21:17:08 +0000

30 lines

XCQL Diagnostic

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:06:46 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

xcql.xsd

Re: xcql.xsd

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:10:29 +0000

38 lines

Re: xcql.xsd

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 11:53:19 -0500

23 lines

Re: xcql.xsd

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 15:35:56 +0000

30 lines

xcql.xsd

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:01:55 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

XCQL: Qualifiers for Prox

Re: XCQL: Qualifiers for Prox

Mike Taylor

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 10:14:02 GMT

23 lines

XCQL: Qualifiers for Prox

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 23:11:16 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

xStartRecord (Was: URIs for Schemas)

Re: xStartRecord (Was: URIs for Schemas)

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:30:37 +0000

41 lines

Re: xStartRecord (Was: URIs for Schemas)

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:36:25 -0500

22 lines

xStartRecord (Was: URIs for Schemas)

Mike Taylor

Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:29:20 GMT

102 lines

New Thread

[[log in to unmask]: Re: to do (fwd)]

Re: [[log in to unmask]: Re: to do (fwd)]

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 17:57:50 +0000

31 lines

Re: [[log in to unmask]: Re: to do (fwd)]

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 17:52:25 +0000

49 lines

Re: [[log in to unmask]: Re: to do (fwd)]

Matthew Dovey

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 17:41:23 -0000

29 lines

[[log in to unmask]: Re: to do (fwd)]

Mike Taylor

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 17:17:13 GMT

68 lines

New Thread

[Fwd: Stuff]

Re: [Fwd: Stuff]

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:58:54 +0100

108 lines

Re: [Fwd: Stuff]

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 18:54:44 +0000

87 lines

Re: [Fwd: Stuff]

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 19:42:47 +0100

62 lines

Re: [Fwd: Stuff]

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 16:46:07 +0000

39 lines

Re: [Fwd: Stuff]

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 16:13:45 -0000

29 lines

Re: [Fwd: Stuff]

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:03:44 +0000

44 lines

[Fwd: Stuff]

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 09:53:33 -0500

252 lines

New Thread

[[log in to unmask]: W3C Query Language]

Re: [[log in to unmask]: W3C Query Language]

Ray denenberg

Thu, 7 Nov 2002 07:27:39 -0500

20 lines

[[log in to unmask]: W3C Query Language]

Mike Taylor

Thu, 7 Nov 2002 11:59:24 GMT

32 lines

New Thread

[ot] Relax NG

Re: [ot] Relax NG

Matthew Dovey

Mon, 25 Nov 2002 20:57:38 -0000

29 lines

[ot] Relax NG

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:07:14 +0000

26 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

July 2017
October 2016
July 2016
August 2014
February 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
February 2013
January 2013
October 2012
August 2012
April 2012
January 2012
October 2011
May 2011
April 2011
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager