LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ZNG Archives


ZNG Archives

ZNG Archives


November 2003


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

another cql bnf draft (10 messages)
Another dumbass question... (2 messages)
Betr.: Another dumbass question... (8 messages)
Betr.: Explain to Search XSLT (5 messages)
Betr.: More diagnostics locations (1 message)
Betr.: recordData type (5 messages)
Betr.: Unknown Params in SRU (3 messages)
Case Sensitivity (3 messages)
Case Sensitivity (Was Re: Fw: Standards) (5 messages)
cql bnf (35 messages)
CQL for ranked queries? (1 message)
CQL sample query set for conformance testing (3 messages)
ebXML with Z39.50 -- help needed! (1 message)
Explain Request (1 message)
Explain to Search XSLT (3 messages)
More diagnostics locations (1 message)
More dumbass questions from Rob (2 messages)
New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar) (32 messages)
November 20 target for 1.1 (1 message)
OASIS E-Government TC Search Service document (1 message)
prox unit (4 messages)
recordData type (8 messages)
Report from SRW/Metasearch Meeting (1 message)
Scan Request Params (2 messages)
scanTermType (5 messages)
Setting the Default Context (Was: another cql bnf draft) (1 message)
Standards (14 messages)
Unknown Params in SRU (1 message)
version compatibility (11 messages)
yacc grammar for CQL (10 messages)
[Ex-plain] Explain Request (2 messages)
[Ex-plain] Re: Fw: Standards (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ZNG Home

ZNG Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

another cql bnf draft

Re: another cql bnf draft

Mike Taylor

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:51:45 GMT

39 lines

Re: another cql bnf draft

Mike Taylor

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:35:38 GMT

58 lines

Re: another cql bnf draft

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 09:59:20 +0000

35 lines

Re: another cql bnf draft

Alan Kent

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:08:34 +1100

46 lines

Re: another cql bnf draft

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 17:20:33 +0000

86 lines

Re: another cql bnf draft

Mike Taylor

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 17:09:46 GMT

114 lines

Re: another cql bnf draft

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 00:33:34 +0100

58 lines

Re: another cql bnf draft

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 17:07:53 -0500

51 lines

Re: another cql bnf draft

Mike Taylor

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:28:25 GMT

57 lines

another cql bnf draft

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 20:03:20 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Another dumbass question...

Re: Another dumbass question...

Mike Taylor

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:45:07 GMT

32 lines

Another dumbass question...

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:10:31 +0000

34 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Another dumbass question...

Re: Betr.: Another dumbass question...

Mike Taylor

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:17:37 GMT

30 lines

Re: Betr.: Another dumbass question...

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:10:57 +0000

111 lines

Re: Betr.: Another dumbass question...

Mike Taylor

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:04:26 GMT

31 lines

Re: Betr.: Another dumbass question...

Oldroyd, Bill

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 12:23:25 -0000

84 lines

Re: Betr.: Another dumbass question...

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 17:06:57 +0000

40 lines

Re: Betr.: Another dumbass question...

Mike Taylor

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:44:15 GMT

28 lines

Re: Betr.: Another dumbass question...

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:54:30 +0000

29 lines

Betr.: Another dumbass question...

Theo van Veen

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 11:37:11 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Explain to Search XSLT

Re: Betr.: Explain to Search XSLT

Theo van Veen

Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:44:57 +0100

62 lines

Re: Betr.: Explain to Search XSLT

Matthew J. Dovey

Mon, 17 Nov 2003 22:50:59 -0000

45 lines

Re: Betr.: Explain to Search XSLT

Theo van Veen

Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:32:55 +0100

30 lines

Re: Betr.: Explain to Search XSLT

Matthew J. Dovey

Fri, 14 Nov 2003 14:52:23 -0000

23 lines

Betr.: Explain to Search XSLT

Theo van Veen

Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:42:04 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

Betr.: More diagnostics locations

Betr.: More diagnostics locations

Theo van Veen

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 18:07:31 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Betr.: recordData type

Re: Betr.: recordData type

Mike Taylor

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:45:30 GMT

28 lines

Re: Betr.: recordData type

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 12:03:03 +0000

25 lines

Re: Betr.: recordData type

Theo van Veen

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 12:53:19 +0100

45 lines

Re: Betr.: recordData type

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 11:13:04 +0000

37 lines

Betr.: recordData type

Theo van Veen

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 11:32:26 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Unknown Params in SRU

Re: Betr.: Unknown Params in SRU

Theo van Veen

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 00:22:50 +0100

70 lines

Re: Betr.: Unknown Params in SRU

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:40:20 +0000

51 lines

Betr.: Unknown Params in SRU

Theo van Veen

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:58:03 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

Case Sensitivity

Re: Case Sensitivity

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 08:19:54 +0000

28 lines

Re: Case Sensitivity

Mike Taylor

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 21:25:05 GMT

31 lines

Re: Case Sensitivity

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:38:38 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

Case Sensitivity (Was Re: Fw: Standards)

Re: Case Sensitivity (Was Re: Fw: Standards)

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:14:40 -0500

26 lines

Re: Case Sensitivity (Was Re: Fw: Standards)

Mike Taylor

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:19:13 GMT

35 lines

Re: Case Sensitivity (Was Re: Fw: Standards)

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 09:00:57 +0000

28 lines

Re: Case Sensitivity (Was Re: Fw: Standards)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Mon, 24 Nov 2003 14:16:41 -0500

15 lines

Case Sensitivity (Was Re: Fw: Standards)

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 22 Nov 2003 08:58:18 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

cql bnf

Re: cql bnf

Mike Taylor

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:58:38 GMT

61 lines

Re: cql bnf

Oldroyd, Bill

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:59:18 -0000

100 lines

Re: cql bnf

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 18:58:21 +0100

116 lines

Re: cql bnf

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:10:02 +0000

33 lines

Re: cql bnf

Mike Taylor

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:09:50 GMT

38 lines

Re: cql bnf

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:28:28 +0000

46 lines

Re: cql bnf

Mike Taylor

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:41:24 GMT

34 lines

Re: cql bnf

Oldroyd, Bill

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 12:00:10 -0000

81 lines

Re: cql bnf

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 09:28:35 +0100

46 lines

Re: cql bnf

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 08:11:19 +0000

30 lines

Re: cql bnf

Mike Taylor

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 22:00:26 GMT

27 lines

Re: cql bnf

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 16:52:03 -0500

25 lines

Re: cql bnf

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 16:48:54 -0500

98 lines

Re: cql bnf

Mike Taylor

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 21:29:01 GMT

29 lines

Re: cql bnf

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:52:45 -0500

14 lines

Re: cql bnf

Oldroyd, Bill

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 17:32:27 -0000

68 lines

Re: cql bnf

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:10:26 -0500

20 lines

Re: cql bnf

Mike Taylor

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:41:54 GMT

56 lines

Re: cql bnf

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:00:24 +0000

52 lines

Re: cql bnf

Adam Dickmeiss

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 07:35:11 +0100

86 lines

Re: cql bnf

Alan Kent

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 14:09:30 +1100

62 lines

Re: cql bnf

Mike Taylor

Mon, 24 Nov 2003 23:30:35 GMT

29 lines

Re: cql bnf

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:00:40 +0000

39 lines

Re: cql bnf

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 24 Nov 2003 16:04:17 +0100

83 lines

Re: cql bnf

Mike Taylor

Mon, 24 Nov 2003 12:24:41 GMT

47 lines

Re: cql bnf

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:37:41 +0000

58 lines

Re: cql bnf

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:20:53 +0000

32 lines

Re: cql bnf

Mike Taylor

Mon, 24 Nov 2003 09:58:54 GMT

128 lines

Re: cql bnf

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 24 Nov 2003 09:00:45 +0100

212 lines

Re: cql bnf

Alan Kent

Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:32:26 +1100

131 lines

Re: cql bnf

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:26:22 -0500

17 lines

Re: cql bnf

Mike Taylor

Fri, 21 Nov 2003 22:04:14 GMT

28 lines

cql bnf

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:18:36 -0500

518 lines

Re: CQL BNF

Mike Taylor

Mon, 3 Nov 2003 22:22:43 GMT

57 lines

CQL BNF

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:39:44 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

CQL for ranked queries?

CQL for ranked queries?

Alan Kent

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:12:58 +1100

23 lines

New Thread

CQL sample query set for conformance testing

Re: CQL sample query set for conformance testing

Mike Taylor

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 09:55:17 GMT

42 lines

Re: CQL sample query set for conformance testing

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 08:14:35 +0000

28 lines

CQL sample query set for conformance testing

Alan Kent

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:37:16 +1100

41 lines

New Thread

ebXML with Z39.50 -- help needed!

ebXML with Z39.50 -- help needed!

Eliot Christian

Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:02:53 -0500

65 lines

New Thread

Explain Request

Explain Request

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:05:51 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

Explain to Search XSLT

Re: Explain to Search XSLT

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 14 Nov 2003 22:57:15 +0000

35 lines

Re: Explain to Search XSLT

Mike Taylor

Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:08:26 GMT

30 lines

Explain to Search XSLT

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:30:56 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

More diagnostics locations

More diagnostics locations

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:59:40 +0000

24 lines

New Thread

More dumbass questions from Rob

Re: More dumbass questions from Rob

Mike Taylor

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:43:02 GMT

29 lines

More dumbass questions from Rob

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 12:57:29 +0000

23 lines

New Thread

New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Alan Kent

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:07:35 +1100

72 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Alan Kent

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 13:23:01 +1100

59 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Alan Kent

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 13:12:30 +1100

51 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Alan Kent

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 13:03:17 +1100

49 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 29 Nov 2003 18:12:44 +0000

41 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 21:11:12 +0100

60 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Mike Taylor

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 20:00:43 GMT

47 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 17:22:46 +0000

36 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Mike Taylor

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 17:08:01 GMT

49 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 16:40:09 +0000

43 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Mike Taylor

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 16:23:49 GMT

37 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Mike Taylor

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 16:20:46 GMT

35 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:30:56 +0000

27 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:23:24 +0000

39 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Mike Taylor

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:23:55 GMT

27 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 14:59:26 +0000

41 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:56:25 +0100

38 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 14:38:59 +0000

23 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 14:10:45 +0000

63 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 14:57:38 +0100

32 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 14:56:37 +0100

101 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:25:21 +0000

31 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:14:06 +0000

72 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 12:49:29 +0100

167 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Mike Taylor

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 11:46:45 GMT

81 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Mike Taylor

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 11:40:58 GMT

72 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Mike Taylor

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 11:25:39 GMT

87 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 09:47:35 +0000

76 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Alan Kent

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 20:17:09 +1100

110 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 09:20:23 +0100

253 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Alan Kent

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:55:01 +1100

33 lines

New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Alan Kent

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 12:00:42 +1100

176 lines

New Thread

November 20 target for 1.1

November 20 target for 1.1

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:35:39 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

OASIS E-Government TC Search Service document

OASIS E-Government TC Search Service document

Eliot Christian

Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:03:57 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

prox unit

Re: prox unit

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:01:41 +0000

44 lines

Re: prox unit

Mike Taylor

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 09:50:53 GMT

43 lines

Re: prox unit

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 08:19:22 +0000

35 lines

prox unit

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 13:46:35 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

recordData type

Re: recordData type

Alan Kent

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 12:40:34 +1100

39 lines

Re: recordData type

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:11:52 +0000

36 lines

Re: recordData type

Mike Taylor

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:41:24 GMT

40 lines

Re: recordData type

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 09:33:40 +0000

44 lines

Re: recordData type

Alan Kent

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 09:53:07 +1100

39 lines

Re: recordData type

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:13:37 +0000

31 lines

Re: recordData type

Mike Taylor

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:43:41 GMT

27 lines

recordData type

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:48:53 +0000

23 lines

New Thread

Report from SRW/Metasearch Meeting

Report from SRW/Metasearch Meeting

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:28:46 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Scan Request Params

Re: Scan Request Params

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 6 Nov 2003 01:07:27 +0000

43 lines

Re: Scan Request Params

Janifer Gatenby

Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:22:30 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

scanTermType

Re: FW: scanTermType

Mike Taylor

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:01:55 GMT

29 lines

FW: scanTermType

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 00:28:45 -0500

85 lines

Re: scanTermType

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:28:16 -0500

57 lines

Re: scanTermType

Mike Taylor

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 13:43:39 GMT

24 lines

scanTermType

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:38:33 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

Setting the Default Context (Was: another cql bnf draft)

Setting the Default Context (Was: another cql bnf draft)

Mike Taylor

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:01:28 GMT

52 lines

New Thread

Standards

Re: Fw: Standards

Matthew J. Dovey

Sat, 22 Nov 2003 23:19:14 -0000

29 lines

Re: Fw: Standards

Mike Taylor

Sat, 22 Nov 2003 22:24:10 GMT

29 lines

Re: Fw: Standards

Matthew J. Dovey

Sat, 22 Nov 2003 17:01:53 -0000

77 lines

Re: Fw: Standards

Mike Taylor

Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:20:43 GMT

38 lines

Re: Fw: Standards

Eliot Christian

Fri, 21 Nov 2003 11:27:40 -0500

52 lines

Re: Fw: Standards

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:07:44 +0000

35 lines

Re: Fw: Standards

Matthew J. Dovey

Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:16:56 -0000

45 lines

Re: Fw: Standards

Eliot Christian

Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:22:07 -0500

30 lines

Re: Fw: Standards

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:21:42 +0000

35 lines

Re: Fw: Standards

Matthew J. Dovey

Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:20:28 -0000

33 lines

Re: Fw: Standards

Eliot Christian

Fri, 21 Nov 2003 00:51:23 -0500

147 lines

Re: Fw: Standards

Matthew J. Dovey

Thu, 20 Nov 2003 22:45:57 -0000

121 lines

Re: Fw: Standards

Mike Taylor

Thu, 20 Nov 2003 22:16:49 GMT

38 lines

Fw: Standards

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:59:25 -0500

82 lines

New Thread

Unknown Params in SRU

Unknown Params in SRU

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:32:35 +0000

21 lines

New Thread

version compatibility

Re: version compatibility

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:29:35 +0100

66 lines

Re: version compatibility

Matthew J. Dovey

Fri, 21 Nov 2003 11:03:47 -0000

45 lines

Re: version compatibility

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:36:17 +0000

33 lines

Re: version compatibility

Mike Taylor

Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:30:13 GMT

32 lines

Re: version compatibility

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 21 Nov 2003 11:27:01 +0100

43 lines

Re: version compatibility

Matthew J. Dovey

Thu, 20 Nov 2003 22:42:33 -0000

32 lines

Re: version compatibility

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:56:47 -0500

80 lines

Re: version compatibility

Matthew J. Dovey

Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:30:50 -0000

66 lines

Re: version compatibility

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:03:31 -0500

18 lines

Re: version compatibility

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:59:45 +0100

38 lines

version compatibility

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:19:25 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

yacc grammar for CQL

Re: yacc grammar for CQL

Mike Taylor

Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:36:33 GMT

34 lines

Re: yacc grammar for CQL

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 17:33:33 +0000

37 lines

Re: yacc grammar for CQL

Mike Taylor

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 17:26:26 GMT

45 lines

Re: yacc grammar for CQL

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:57:35 +0000

47 lines

Re: yacc grammar for CQL

Mike Taylor

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:47:47 GMT

27 lines

Re: yacc grammar for CQL

Mike Taylor

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:46:58 GMT

32 lines

Re: yacc grammar for CQL

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 14:35:19 +0000

33 lines

Re: yacc grammar for CQL

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 15:33:57 +0100

51 lines

Re: yacc grammar for CQL

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:45:08 +0000

37 lines

yacc grammar for CQL

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 26 Nov 2003 20:40:17 +0100

72 lines

New Thread

[Ex-plain] Explain Request

Re: [Ex-plain] Explain Request

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:10:45 +0000

28 lines

Re: [Ex-plain] Explain Request

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:03:47 -0500

55 lines

New Thread

[Ex-plain] Re: Fw: Standards

Re: [Ex-plain] Re: Fw: Standards

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:26:28 +0000

34 lines

Re: [Ex-plain] Re: Fw: Standards

Mike Taylor

Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:23:11 GMT

32 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

July 2017
October 2016
July 2016
August 2014
February 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
February 2013
January 2013
October 2012
August 2012
April 2012
January 2012
October 2011
May 2011
April 2011
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager