RE: requirements and expectations

=?UTF-8?B?SmFuaWZlciBHYXRlbmJ5?=

Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:29:19 +0100

47 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:23:32 +0100

67 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 13:46:28 +0100

130 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:59:59 +0100

37 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:29:33 +0100

81 lines

Re: No such database diagnostic

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:32:30 +0100

75 lines

Re: No such database diagnostic

Adam Dickmeiss

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 07:41:31 +0100

29 lines

Re: Revised WSDL

Adam Dickmeiss

Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:26:50 +0100

26 lines

Re: version element placement.

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:48:57 +0100

47 lines

WSDL/Schemas for 1.1

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:18:54 +0100

18 lines

Re: XCQL - its purpose and prefixes

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:02:23 +0100

192 lines

Attribute lists for queries - what are people doing?

Alan Kent

Tue, 9 Dec 2003 20:53:41 +1100

84 lines

Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas

Alan Kent

Mon, 22 Dec 2003 12:10:48 +1100

28 lines

XCQL - its purpose and prefixes

Alan Kent

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 18:10:19 +1100

53 lines

Re: base-url includes "?"

Eliot Christian

Mon, 22 Dec 2003 05:18:28 -0500

50 lines

Re: SRU examples

Eliot Christian

Wed, 24 Dec 2003 07:54:34 -0500

44 lines

Re: 1.1 Release Date

Janifer Gatenby

Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:22:39 +0100

756 lines

Re: Bath Profile for SRW/CQL

Janifer Gatenby

Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:29:58 +0100

51 lines

Re: CQL-like Masking Attribute in BIB-1

Janifer Gatenby

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:31:19 +0100

50 lines

Re: New Diagnostics proposal

Janifer Gatenby

Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:32:37 +0100

50 lines

Re: Scan

Janifer Gatenby

Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:33:10 +0100

41 lines

Re: Unknown Params in SRU

Janifer Gatenby

Wed, 3 Dec 2003 15:53:51 +0100

100 lines

Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1

Janifer Gatenby

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 17:40:34 +0100

91 lines

Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1

Janifer Gatenby

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:21:17 +0100

712 lines

Re: Trying to Ketchup.

Larry E. Dixson

Tue, 2 Dec 2003 08:53:43 -0500

69 lines

Re: 1.1 Release Date

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:21:52 -0500

58 lines

Re: Bath Profile for SRW/CQL

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 12 Dec 2003 09:57:34 -0500

42 lines

Re: Documentation and Code Release

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:01:08 -0500

61 lines

Re: Extensions and Context Sets

LeVan,Ralph

Sun, 14 Dec 2003 21:47:24 -0500

54 lines

Re: No such database diagnostic

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:57:23 -0500

25 lines

Re: No such database diagnostic

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:40:14 -0500

34 lines

Re: No such database diagnostic

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:48:42 -0500

69 lines

Re: No such database diagnostic

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:30:41 -0500

39 lines

Re: requirements and expectations

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:50:56 -0500

57 lines

Re: Scan

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 2 Dec 2003 07:26:30 -0500

45 lines

SRW/U Explain

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:08:56 -0500

14 lines

Re: WSDL

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:53:43 -0500

57 lines

Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:20:53 -0500

60 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: SRU examples

Matthew J. Dovey

Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:33:10 -0000

258 lines

Draft WSDL

Matthew J. Dovey

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:54:26 -0000

561 lines

Revised WSDL

Matthew J. Dovey

Sat, 20 Dec 2003 00:26:38 -0000

566 lines

Re: WSDL

Matthew J. Dovey

Sat, 20 Dec 2003 00:13:53 -0000

22 lines

Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1

Matthew J. Dovey

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 15:21:47 -0000

65 lines

Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1

Matthew J. Dovey

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:42:54 -0000

117 lines

Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1

Matthew J. Dovey

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 10:19:07 -0000

34 lines

Re: Attribute lists for queries - what are people doing?

Mike Taylor

Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:20:53 GMT

79 lines

Re: Bath Profile for SRW/CQL

Mike Taylor

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:32:26 GMT

134 lines

Re: Fw: Bath Profile for SRW/CQL

Mike Taylor

Sat, 13 Dec 2003 00:53:01 GMT

34 lines

Bath Profile for SRW/CQL

Mike Taylor

Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:45:16 GMT

23 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: recordSchema

Mike Taylor

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:14:39 GMT

45 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: SRU examples

Mike Taylor

Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:10:41 GMT

35 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: SRU examples

Mike Taylor

Tue, 23 Dec 2003 15:52:53 GMT

54 lines

Re: Betr.: recordSchema

Mike Taylor

Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:58:05 GMT

29 lines

Re: Betr.: recordSchema

Mike Taylor

Fri, 12 Dec 2003 09:28:23 GMT

69 lines

Re: context set vs index set

Mike Taylor

Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:13:47 GMT

42 lines

Re: CQL-like Masking Attribute in BIB-1

Mike Taylor

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:44:46 GMT

36 lines

Re: Diagnostic 60

Mike Taylor

Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:52:57 GMT

30 lines

Erratum: CQL Index Sets link

Mike Taylor

Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:02:28 GMT

27 lines

Re: Extensions and Context Sets

Mike Taylor

Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:37:07 GMT

39 lines

Re: Extensions and Context Sets

Mike Taylor

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:56:03 GMT

85 lines

Re: Extensions and Context Sets

Mike Taylor

Sun, 14 Dec 2003 23:59:26 GMT

43 lines

Re: New Diagnostics proposal

Mike Taylor

Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:51:45 GMT

27 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Mike Taylor

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:22:11 GMT

26 lines

Re: No such database diagnostic

Mike Taylor

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:19:46 GMT

35 lines

Re: No such database diagnostic

Mike Taylor

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:59:33 GMT

36 lines

Re: Profiles

Mike Taylor

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:10:31 GMT

33 lines

Re: recordSchema

Mike Taylor

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 20:40:45 GMT

40 lines

Re: recordSchema

Mike Taylor

Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:50:17 GMT

30 lines

Re: requirements and expectations

Mike Taylor

Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:52:28 GMT

41 lines

Re: Scan

Mike Taylor

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:49:00 GMT

34 lines

Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas

Mike Taylor

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:21:20 GMT

30 lines

Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas

Mike Taylor

Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:02:29 GMT

75 lines

Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas

Mike Taylor

Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:09:35 GMT

59 lines

Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas

Mike Taylor

Sat, 13 Dec 2003 02:04:58 GMT

78 lines

Re: 1.1 Release Date

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 12 Dec 2003 09:48:55 -0500

123 lines

Re: Bath Profile for SRW/CQL

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:46:28 -0500

104 lines

Re: context set vs index set

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:06:18 -0500

67 lines

Re: Extensions and Context Sets

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:46:27 -0500

12 lines

more question on dcx and record schema

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:38:08 -0500

53 lines

Re: recordSchema

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:07:27 -0500

30 lines

Re: recordSchema

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:15:55 -0500

43 lines

requirements and expectations

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:19:44 -0500

36 lines

result set semantics

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Mon, 29 Dec 2003 16:10:29 -0500

31 lines

Re: SRU examples

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 24 Dec 2003 09:24:26 -0500

17 lines

Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 17 Dec 2003 15:35:14 -0500

33 lines

Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:57:12 -0500

28 lines

versioning for context sets and record schemas

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 12 Dec 2003 14:38:37 -0500

137 lines

Re: requirements and expectations

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:28:42 -0500

21 lines

Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 09:43:52 -0500

34 lines

Re: 1.1 Release Date

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:44:10 +0000

32 lines

1.1 Release Date

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:44:42 +0000

37 lines

Re: Attribute lists for queries - what are people doing?

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:27:40 +0000

89 lines

Re: Betr.: more question on dcx and record schema

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 13 Dec 2003 13:21:05 +0000

29 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: Unknown Params in SRU

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 3 Dec 2003 12:51:38 +0000

54 lines

Re: Betr.: recordSchema

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:56:10 +0000

42 lines

Re: Betr.: recordSchema

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:21:31 +0000

43 lines

Re: Betr.: recordSchema

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 11 Dec 2003 20:46:24 +0000

64 lines

Re: Betr.: Unknown Params in SRU

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:18:58 +0000

71 lines

Re: context set vs index set

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:10:33 +0000

31 lines

Re: CQL for ranked queries?

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:34:00 +0000

39 lines

Diagnostic 60

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:53:02 +0000

31 lines

Documentation and Code Release

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 15:53:24 +0000

43 lines

Re: Extensions and Context Sets

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:08:44 +0000

39 lines

Re: Extensions and Context Sets

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:10:55 +0000

65 lines

Extensions and Context Sets

Robert Sanderson

Sun, 14 Dec 2003 22:26:09 +0000

34 lines

Re: negotiation example

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:24:47 +0000

37 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:38:48 +0000

28 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 14:37:04 +0000

92 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 13:15:43 +0000

139 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:20:34 +0000

82 lines

Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:31:28 +0000

25 lines

Re: No such database diagnostic

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:06:01 +0000

32 lines

Re: No such database diagnostic

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:42:25 +0000

36 lines

Re: Other changes since 1.0.

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 11:56:52 +0000

32 lines

Re: Profiles

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:17:36 +0000

45 lines

Re: recordSchema

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:45:50 +0000

49 lines

Re: recordSchema

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 13 Dec 2003 13:25:32 +0000

38 lines

Re: requirements and expectations

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:56:25 +0000

59 lines

Scan

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 12:06:47 +0000

30 lines

Re: Scan (and docs)

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 2 Dec 2003 13:59:49 +0000

41 lines

Re: SRW/U Explain

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:24:07 +0000

33 lines

Re: Unknown Params in SRU

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 3 Dec 2003 14:51:24 +0000

40 lines

Re: version element placement.

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:26:40 +0000

29 lines

Re: version parameter

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:26:02 +0000

30 lines

Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:30:51 +0000

37 lines

Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 13:47:18 +0000

66 lines

Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 17 Dec 2003 13:16:47 +0000

72 lines

Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:30:36 +0000

70 lines

Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 13 Dec 2003 13:35:02 +0000

42 lines

WSDL

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 15:39:17 +0000

41 lines

Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:41:54 +0000

29 lines

Re: XCQL - its purpose and prefixes

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:02:28 +0000

63 lines

Re: XCQL and default >"foo" thingy

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:38:51 +0000

52 lines

ZeeRex versions

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:52:28 +0000

24 lines

Betr.: 1.1 Release Date

Theo van Veen

Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:09:27 +0100

48 lines

Betr.: New Diagnostics proposal

Theo van Veen

Thu, 11 Dec 2003 16:00:42 +0100

48 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: recordSchema

Theo van Veen

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 23:30:29 +0100

58 lines

Betr.: Re: Scan

Theo van Veen

Wed, 3 Dec 2003 09:32:49 +0100

52 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: SRU examples

Theo van Veen

Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:16:51 +0100

20 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: SRU examples

Theo van Veen

Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:29:21 +0100

158 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: SRU examples

Theo van Veen

Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:11:41 +0100

159 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: Unknown Params in SRU

Theo van Veen

Wed, 3 Dec 2003 14:48:16 +0100

73 lines

Betr.: Re: Unknown Params in SRU

Theo van Veen

Wed, 3 Dec 2003 13:27:07 +0100

64 lines

Re: Betr.: recordSchema

Theo van Veen

Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:24:04 +0100

54 lines

Re: Betr.: recordSchema

Theo van Veen

Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:51:45 +0100

49 lines

Re: Betr.: recordSchema

Theo van Veen

Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:47:55 +0100

41 lines

Re: Betr.: recordSchema

Theo van Veen

Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:34:38 +0100

104 lines

Re: Betr.: Unknown Params in SRU

Theo van Veen

Tue, 2 Dec 2003 13:00:36 +0100

88 lines

Re: Profiles

Theo van Veen

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:01:59 +0100

53 lines

Re: SRU examples

Theo van Veen

Wed, 24 Dec 2003 18:02:16 +0100

27 lines

Re: Unknown Params in SRU

Theo van Veen

Wed, 3 Dec 2003 16:19:32 +0100

122 lines

Re: Unknown Params in SRU

Theo van Veen

Wed, 3 Dec 2003 09:58:55 +0100

108 lines