LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ZNG Archives


ZNG Archives

ZNG Archives


January 2004


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

1-1 (2 messages)
A flaw in the examples (1 message)
acknowledgements (2 messages)
authentication token extension (7 messages)
Base Message Type (1 message)
base profile explain support (Re: requirements and expectations) (1 message)
Betr.: character unit (1 message)
Betr.: DC (etc) schema namespace (1 message)
Betr.: extension or extension-space (1 message)
Betr.: First and Last Terms in Index (5 messages)
Betr.: new home pate (1 message)
Betr.: please review 1.1 specs (80 messages)
Betr.: profiles and extensions (Re: register extra data) (1 message)
Betr.: Re: Database URL in EchoedRequests (4 messages)
Betr.: Re: dc collection (2 messages)
Betr.: Re: dc schema (16 messages)
Betr.: Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs) (1 message)
Betr.: Re: diagnostic 9 (1 message)
Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri (10 messages)
Betr.: Re: extension namespace (Re: register extra data) (2 messages)
Betr.: Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation (2 messages)
Betr.: Re: namespaces for dc schema (9 messages)
Betr.: Re: negotiation example (3 messages)
Betr.: Re: negotiation ___example___ (6 messages)
Betr.: Re: register extra data (10 messages)
Betr.: Re: Scan operation (3 messages)
Betr.: Re: SRU rigour (1 message)
Betr.: Re: unknown "base-parameters" (2 messages)
Betr.: Revised Scan text (1 message)
Betr.: SRU diagnostics (1 message)
Changes (12 messages)
character unit (6 messages)
context set ids (4 messages)
Contribution on ZING Extension (13 messages)
Database URL in EchoedRequests (5 messages)
Database/resource/whatever unavailable. (1 message)
DC (etc) schema namespace (2 messages)
dc collection (9 messages)
dc schema (28 messages)
dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs) (21 messages)
diagnostic (RE: dc schema) (1 message)
Diagnostic 8. (1 message)
Diagnostic 8. And 9 (22 messages)
diagnostic 9 (9 messages)
diagnostic code type (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri) (3 messages)
Diagnostic Codes (3 messages)
diagnostic namespace vs. uri (21 messages)
diagnostic object (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri) (5 messages)
diagnostic.html (1 message)
Diagnostics URI (6 messages)
Done? (Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema))) (6 messages)
EchoedRequest (3 messages)
explain schema uri (2 messages)
extension namespace (Re: register extra data) (8 messages)
extension or extension-space (3 messages)
Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema)) (6 messages)
extra-data-example.html typo (1 message)
FAQ (2 messages)
faq (Re: xpath results (Re: namespaces for dc schema)) (2 messages)
First and Last Terms in Index (2 messages)
Help with SRW response (18 messages)
idle time (Re: please review 1.1 specs) (1 message)
Info URIs (13 messages)
infoURI register (1 message)
linking (was: Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs) (1 message)
Metasearch (1 message)
MIKE SPEAKS on XPath and Validation :-) (3 messages)
Minor correction in XCQL example (5 messages)
Missing EchoedScanRequest elements? (3 messages)
namespace identifiers (8 messages)
namespaces for dc schema (17 messages)
Namespacing diagnostics (Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9) (2 messages)
negotiation example (10 messages)
New FAQ Entry. (1 message)
new home pate (8 messages)
New proposed standard - SSRW (3 messages)
NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation (10 messages)
No such operation "searchRetrieveRequest" (1 message)
Numeric types (2 messages)
please review 1.1 specs (32 messages)
please review 1.1 specs [diagnostics] (2 messages)
profile ids (Re: please review 1.1 specs) (6 messages)
profiles and extensions (Re: register extra data) (2 messages)
Quote of the Day (4 messages)
Quote of the Day (Was: new home pate) (1 message)
register extra data (17 messages)
Release date (3 messages)
release date (Re: Betr.: Re: negotiation ___example___) (2 messages)
Required elements for scan termType. (4 messages)
requirements and expectations (5 messages)
result set semantics (was: Re: WSDL) (7 messages)
review of 1.1 (3 messages)
Revised Scan text (8 messages)
Scan operation (27 messages)
Schema (2 messages)
schema info ids (1 message)
SRU diagnostics (3 messages)
SRU examples (7 messages)
SRU rigour (6 messages)
SRU XML response (3 messages)
SRW Implementors page (3 messages)
SRW Service - WSDL question (5 messages)
SRW/SRU/Z39.50 server for testing. (1 message)
surely (Re: diagnostic object (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri)) (1 message)
ToDo List + corrections (2 messages)
unknown "base-parameters" (10 messages)
URIs and URLs (2 messages)
version page (1 message)
version parameter (1 message)
WSDL Draft 3 (1 message)
XPath and Validation (29 messages)
xpath results (Re: namespaces for dc schema) (4 messages)
ZeeRex versions (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ZNG Home

ZNG Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

1-1

Re: 1-1

Mike Taylor

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:43:51 GMT

26 lines

1-1

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:54:57 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

A flaw in the examples

A flaw in the examples

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:59:50 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

acknowledgements

Re: acknowledgements

Mike Taylor

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:11:55 GMT

25 lines

acknowledgements

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 2 Jan 2004 15:58:07 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

authentication token extension

Re: authentication token extension

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:19:59 +0000

28 lines

Re: authentication token extension

Janifer Gatenby

Sun, 18 Jan 2004 10:56:13 +0100

56 lines

Re: authentication token extension

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:44:07 +0000

31 lines

Re: authentication token extension

Mike Taylor

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:07:42 GMT

47 lines

Re: authentication token extension

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:51:47 -0500

39 lines

Re: authentication token extension

Mike Taylor

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:24:26 GMT

29 lines

authentication token extension

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:52:04 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Base Message Type

Base Message Type

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:08:43 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

base profile explain support (Re: requirements and expectations)

base profile explain support (Re: requirements and expectations)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 19:00:34 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Betr.: character unit

Betr.: character unit

Theo van Veen

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 13:20:41 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

Betr.: DC (etc) schema namespace

Betr.: DC (etc) schema namespace

Theo van Veen

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:57:26 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

Betr.: extension or extension-space

Betr.: extension or extension-space

Theo van Veen

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:28:20 +0100

87 lines

New Thread

Betr.: First and Last Terms in Index

Re: Betr.: First and Last Terms in Index

Theo van Veen

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:00:10 +0100

40 lines

Re: Betr.: First and Last Terms in Index

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:25:26 -0500

24 lines

Re: Betr.: First and Last Terms in Index

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:06:12 +0000

35 lines

Betr.: First and Last Terms in Index

Theo van Veen

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:05:10 +0100

83 lines

Betr.: First and Last Terms in Index

Theo van Veen

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:53:21 +0100

63 lines

New Thread

Betr.: new home pate

Betr.: new home pate

Theo van Veen

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 12:16:08 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Theo van Veen

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:46:48 +0100

42 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Mike Taylor

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:22:59 GMT

38 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Theo van Veen

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:42:20 +0100

33 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Theo van Veen

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:03:49 +0100

57 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:01:40 +0100

84 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Mike Taylor

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:45:20 GMT

45 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Theo van Veen

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:29:10 +0100

41 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Theo van Veen

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:24:32 +0100

33 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 22:46:04 +0100

58 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:52:50 +0000

34 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Janifer Gatenby

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 19:00:35 +0100

97 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Mike Taylor

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:34:49 GMT

35 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:15:23 +0000

37 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Matthew J. Dovey

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:23:43 -0000

85 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:00:28 +0000

24 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Matthew J. Dovey

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:10:28 -0000

20 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:08:28 +0100

62 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:02:05 +0100

52 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:41:48 +0000

42 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Mike Taylor

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:50:07 GMT

28 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:32:51 -0500

22 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Mike Taylor

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:24:08 GMT

35 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Theo van Veen

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:10:08 +0100

26 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:28:24 +0000

44 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Mike Taylor

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:35:18 GMT

38 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Theo van Veen

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:24:00 +0100

31 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:17:48 +0100

64 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Mike Taylor

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:49:20 GMT

40 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:19:06 +0000

59 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Mike Taylor

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:01:15 GMT

45 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Mike Taylor

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:00:02 GMT

44 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:47:43 +0100

77 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:20:07 -0500

20 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:59:27 +0000

43 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:53:22 +0000

44 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:58:22 -0500

60 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:49:56 +0100

73 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:24:59 +0000

44 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Theo van Veen

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:19:49 +0100

82 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:26:04 +0000

42 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Janifer Gatenby

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:38:13 +0100

55 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:28:31 +0000

39 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:21:54 -0500

43 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:20:12 -0500

49 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 12:48:49 +0000

30 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 07:30:41 -0500

50 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Matthew J. Dovey

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 12:16:09 -0000

15 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:47:54 +0000

32 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:44:03 +0000

28 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Theo van Veen

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 12:50:07 +0100

110 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Matthew J. Dovey

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:08:23 -0000

84 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Mike Taylor

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:39:31 GMT

52 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Theo van Veen

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 01:11:22 +0100

32 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Mike Taylor

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 23:45:14 GMT

36 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 18:40:41 -0500

27 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Theo van Veen

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 00:08:44 +0100

62 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Matthew J. Dovey

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:02:10 -0000

70 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:57:00 -0500

39 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:52:22 -0500

52 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Mike Taylor

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:54:32 GMT

50 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:26:27 +0000

27 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Theo van Veen

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:30:16 +0100

89 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:08:20 +0000

29 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Janifer Gatenby

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:08:56 +0100

87 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Theo van Veen

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:57:56 +0100

41 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:03:04 +0000

33 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Matthew J. Dovey

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:05:57 -0000

42 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Theo van Veen

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:59:28 +0100

25 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Theo van Veen

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:11:00 +0100

39 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Mike Taylor

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:31:50 GMT

32 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Matthew J. Dovey

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:12:30 -0000

30 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:46:58 +0000

36 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:24:34 +0000

39 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Matthew J. Dovey

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:28:55 -0000

43 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Theo van Veen

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:17:54 +0100

44 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:39:39 -0500

21 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:17:47 +0000

61 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:25:38 -0500

40 lines

Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:10:58 -0500

21 lines

Betr.: please review 1.1 specs

Theo van Veen

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:57:09 +0100

57 lines

New Thread

Betr.: profiles and extensions (Re: register extra data)

Betr.: profiles and extensions (Re: register extra data)

Theo van Veen

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 10:10:46 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: Database URL in EchoedRequests

Re: Betr.: Re: Database URL in EchoedRequests

Mike Taylor

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:42:03 GMT

36 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: Database URL in EchoedRequests

Theo van Veen

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:06:45 +0100

100 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: Database URL in EchoedRequests

Oldroyd, Bill

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 09:49:49 -0000

79 lines

Betr.: Re: Database URL in EchoedRequests

Theo van Veen

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 09:53:18 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: dc collection

Betr.: Re: dc collection

Theo van Veen

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:54:58 +0100

33 lines

Betr.: Re: dc collection

Theo van Veen

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:16:37 +0100

101 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: dc schema

Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema

Theo van Veen

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:56:57 +0100

34 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema

Mike Taylor

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:11:36 GMT

38 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema

Theo van Veen

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:47:21 +0100

121 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema

Oldroyd, Bill

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:24:02 -0000

99 lines

Betr.: Re: dc schema

Theo van Veen

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:43:10 +0100

61 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema

Theo van Veen

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:00:39 +0100

36 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:19:11 +0000

25 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema

Theo van Veen

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:34:41 +0100

63 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:10:02 +0000

48 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema

Theo van Veen

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:20:27 +0100

52 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema

Theo van Veen

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:08:58 +0100

66 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:48:46 +0000

36 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:53:22 -0500

53 lines

Betr.: Re: dc schema

Theo van Veen

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:49:01 +0100

41 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema

Oldroyd, Bill

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:20:29 -0000

115 lines

Betr.: Re: dc schema

Theo van Veen

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:40:09 +0100

72 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Betr.: Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Theo van Veen

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:16:54 +0100

124 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: diagnostic 9

Betr.: Re: diagnostic 9

Theo van Veen

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:00:10 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:28:03 -0500

28 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Mike Taylor

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:47:36 GMT

48 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Theo van Veen

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:14:04 +0100

50 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Matthew J. Dovey

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:07:47 -0000

75 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:41:34 +0000

47 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:54:52 -0500

26 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Mike Taylor

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:36:21 GMT

35 lines

Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Theo van Veen

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:14:26 +0100

82 lines

Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Theo van Veen

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:53:51 +0100

42 lines

Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Theo van Veen

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:31:58 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: extension namespace (Re: register extra data)

Re: Betr.: Re: extension namespace (Re: register extra data)

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:33:51 +0000

40 lines

Betr.: Re: extension namespace (Re: register extra data)

Theo van Veen

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:34:58 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation

Re: Betr.: Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:20:59 -0500

41 lines

Betr.: Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation

Theo van Veen

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 18:12:10 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: namespaces for dc schema

Re: Betr.: Re: namespaces for dc schema

Theo van Veen

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:30:36 +0100

41 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: namespaces for dc schema

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:18:22 +0100

57 lines

Betr.: Re: namespaces for dc schema

Theo van Veen

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 10:45:35 +0100

32 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: namespaces for dc schema

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:47:04 +0000

109 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: namespaces for dc schema

Oldroyd, Bill

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:48:00 -0000

84 lines

Betr.: Re: namespaces for dc schema

Theo van Veen

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:26:49 +0100

45 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: namespaces for dc schema

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 07:36:15 -0500

55 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: namespaces for dc schema

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:08:31 +0000

35 lines

Betr.: Re: namespaces for dc schema

Theo van Veen

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 09:48:26 +0100

101 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: negotiation example

Re: Betr.: Re: negotiation example

Theo van Veen

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:56:34 +0100

37 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: negotiation example

Mike Taylor

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:43:32 GMT

37 lines

Betr.: Re: negotiation example

Theo van Veen

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:38:31 +0100

57 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: negotiation ___example___

Re: Betr.: Re: negotiation ___example___

Mike Taylor

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:36:12 GMT

28 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: negotiation ___example___

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:57:45 -0500

15 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: negotiation ___example___

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:22:27 +0000

30 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: negotiation ___example___

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:23:53 -0500

42 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: negotiation ___example___

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:05:00 -0500

24 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: negotiation ___example___

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:17:05 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: register extra data

Re: Betr.: Re: register extra data

Mike Taylor

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:21:10 GMT

29 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: register extra data

Mike Taylor

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:20:10 GMT

29 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: register extra data

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:14:58 +0000

29 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: register extra data

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:27:11 +0100

41 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: register extra data

Mike Taylor

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:16:40 GMT

26 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: register extra data

Theo van Veen

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 01:10:32 +0100

36 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: register extra data

Theo van Veen

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 01:01:09 +0100

48 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: register extra data

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:11:49 +0000

42 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: register extra data

Matthew J. Dovey

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:19:30 -0000

36 lines

Betr.: Re: register extra data

Theo van Veen

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:12:57 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: Scan operation

Re: Betr.: Re: Scan operation

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:46:37 +0000

38 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: Scan operation

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:35:54 +0100

22 lines

Betr.: Re: Scan operation

Theo van Veen

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:30:43 +0100

85 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: SRU rigour

Betr.: Re: SRU rigour

Theo van Veen

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:55:10 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: unknown "base-parameters"

Re: Betr.: Re: unknown "base-parameters"

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:57:23 +0000

38 lines

Betr.: Re: unknown "base-parameters"

Theo van Veen

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:55:04 +0100

57 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Revised Scan text

Betr.: Revised Scan text

Theo van Veen

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 18:23:58 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

Betr.: SRU diagnostics

Betr.: SRU diagnostics

Theo van Veen

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:27:10 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

Changes

Re: Changes

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 14:27:58 -0500

97 lines

Re: Changes

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:41:45 +0000

38 lines

Re: Changes

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:33:14 +0000

120 lines

Re: Changes

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:24:31 -0500

69 lines

Re: Changes

Matthew J. Dovey

Sat, 17 Jan 2004 23:30:33 -0000

21 lines

Re: Changes

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:54:45 +0000

25 lines

Re: Changes

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:44:15 +0000

20 lines

Re: Changes

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:26:52 +0000

112 lines

Re: Changes

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:19:41 -0500

99 lines

Re: Changes

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:50:52 +0000

41 lines

Re: Changes

Mike Taylor

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:51:47 GMT

36 lines

Changes

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:19:55 +0000

72 lines

New Thread

character unit

Re: character unit

Mike Taylor

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:44:42 GMT

29 lines

Re: character unit

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 22:27:17 +0000

33 lines

Re: character unit

Edward C. Zimmermann

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 23:29:51 +0100

33 lines

Re: character unit

Mike Taylor

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:31:06 GMT

36 lines

Re: character unit

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:52:52 -0500

29 lines

character unit

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:41:42 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

context set ids

Re: context set ids

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:02:42 -0500

80 lines

Re: context set ids

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:41:34 +0000

25 lines

Re: context set ids

Mike Taylor

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:39:53 GMT

39 lines

context set ids

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:28:40 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

Contribution on ZING Extension

Re: Contribution on ZING Extension

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:50:01 -0500

65 lines

Re: Fw: Contribution on ZING Extension

Matthew J. Dovey

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:56:56 -0000

63 lines

Re: Fw: Contribution on ZING Extension

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:36:25 +0000

28 lines

Re: Fw: Contribution on ZING Extension

Mike Taylor

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:47:47 GMT

36 lines

Re: Fw: Contribution on ZING Extension

Oldroyd, Bill

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:36:44 -0000

61 lines

Re: Fw: Contribution on ZING Extension

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:13:00 -0500

27 lines

Re: Fw: Contribution on ZING Extension

Mike Taylor

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:53:45 GMT

48 lines

Re: Fw: Contribution on ZING Extension

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 26 Jan 2004 23:33:01 +0000

42 lines

Re: Fw: Contribution on ZING Extension

Matthew J. Dovey

Mon, 26 Jan 2004 23:41:33 -0000

34 lines

Re: Fw: Contribution on ZING Extension

Mike Taylor

Mon, 26 Jan 2004 23:22:03 GMT

45 lines

Re: Fw: Contribution on ZING Extension

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:15:14 +0000

49 lines

Re: Contribution on ZING Extension

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:12:05 -0500

75 lines

Fw: Contribution on ZING Extension

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 09:48:49 -0500

525 lines

New Thread

Database URL in EchoedRequests

Re: Database URL in EchoedRequests

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:19:38 +0000

32 lines

Re: Database URL in EchoedRequests

Matthew J. Dovey

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 09:47:14 -0000

47 lines

Re: Database URL in EchoedRequests

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 23:11:21 -0500

23 lines

Re: Database URL in EchoedRequests

Matthew J. Dovey

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 21:49:21 -0000

61 lines

Database URL in EchoedRequests

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:02:17 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

Database/resource/whatever unavailable.

Database/resource/whatever unavailable.

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 00:29:00 +0100

20 lines

New Thread

DC (etc) schema namespace

Re: DC (etc) schema namespace

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:14:50 -0500

209 lines

DC (etc) schema namespace

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:31:01 +0000

31 lines

New Thread

dc collection

Re: dc collection

Mike Taylor

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:58:07 GMT

41 lines

Re: dc collection

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:47:45 -0500

23 lines

Re: dc collection

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:14:49 +0000

63 lines

Re: dc collection

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:47:56 -0500

46 lines

Re: dc collection

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 12:28:24 +0100

41 lines

Re: dc collection

Mike Taylor

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:40:34 GMT

25 lines

Re: dc collection

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 23:55:39 +0000

66 lines

Re: dc collection

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 18:51:45 -0500

42 lines

dc collection

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 18:02:26 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

dc schema

Re: dc schema

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:29:58 +0000

40 lines

Re: dc schema

Theo van Veen

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 02:40:27 +0100

37 lines

Re: dc schema

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:34:45 +0000

28 lines

Re: dc schema

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:02:12 -0500

35 lines

Re: dc schema

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:41:36 -0500

22 lines

Re: dc schema

Sebastian Hammer

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:32:40 +0100

80 lines

Re: dc schema

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:36:03 +0000

28 lines

Re: dc schema

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:30:28 -0500

22 lines

Re: dc schema

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:23:47 -0500

25 lines

Re: dc schema

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 19:00:13 +0000

27 lines

Re: dc schema

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:20:15 +0000

41 lines

Re: dc schema

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:28:03 -0500

22 lines

Re: dc schema

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:12:18 +0000

34 lines

Re: dc schema

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:18:34 -0500

43 lines

Re: dc schema

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:05:59 -0500

24 lines

Re: dc schema

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:00:05 -0500

43 lines

Re: dc schema

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:49:14 -0500

17 lines

Re: dc schema

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:54:53 -0500

24 lines

Re: dc schema

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:21:16 -0500

50 lines

Re: dc schema

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:47:00 +0000

32 lines

Re: dc schema

Oldroyd, Bill

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:00:17 -0000

56 lines

Re: dc schema

Theo van Veen

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 02:17:21 +0100

41 lines

Re: dc schema

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:02:38 -0500

28 lines

Re: dc schema

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:40:55 +0000

28 lines

Re: dc schema

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:42:13 -0500

56 lines

Re: dc schema

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:40:05 -0500

33 lines

Re: dc schema

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:15:28 -0500

36 lines

dc schema

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:59:44 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Mike Taylor

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:28:08 GMT

25 lines

Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:48:15 -0500

104 lines

Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Mike Taylor

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:47:47 GMT

47 lines

Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:00:40 +0000

48 lines

Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:57:18 +0000

58 lines

Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Mike Taylor

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:12:22 GMT

37 lines

Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Eliot Christian

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:35:14 -0500

44 lines

Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Eliot Christian

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:49:50 -0500

94 lines

Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Sebastian Hammer

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:21:58 +0100

56 lines

Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:50:24 +0000

93 lines

Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Mike Taylor

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:36:58 GMT

31 lines

Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Eliot Christian

Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:27:41 -0500

111 lines

Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Mike Taylor

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 22:56:06 GMT

31 lines

Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:58:06 -0500

20 lines

Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Mike Taylor

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:47:10 GMT

47 lines

Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:11:35 -0500

22 lines

Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:43:22 +0000

32 lines

Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:45:18 -0500

63 lines

Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Eliot Christian

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:15:55 -0500

44 lines

Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 00:29:53 +0000

34 lines

dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 19:10:46 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

diagnostic (RE: dc schema)

diagnostic (RE: dc schema)

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:04:53 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Diagnostic 8.

Diagnostic 8.

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 23:42:41 +0100

14 lines

New Thread

Diagnostic 8. And 9

Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 18:17:00 -0500

20 lines

Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9

Mike Taylor

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:02:49 GMT

39 lines

Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9

Matthew J. Dovey

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 22:48:18 -0000

52 lines

Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:38:52 -0500

22 lines

Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9

Theo van Veen

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:19:11 +0100

32 lines

Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:28:29 -0500

21 lines

Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 20:58:13 +0100

38 lines

Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:48:29 -0500

21 lines

Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 20:24:40 +0100

40 lines

Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9

Matthew J. Dovey

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 19:15:15 -0000

69 lines

Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9

Matthew J. Dovey

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 19:13:42 -0000

40 lines

Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:11:33 -0500

46 lines

Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:16:33 -0500

75 lines

Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:22:43 +0000

34 lines

Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:19:34 +0000

46 lines

Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9

Matthew J. Dovey

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:18:20 -0000

41 lines

Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9

Matthew J. Dovey

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:15:24 -0000

37 lines

Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:54:59 -0500

15 lines

Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9

Mike Taylor

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:51:01 GMT

48 lines

Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:31:17 -0500

25 lines

Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:48:03 +0100

46 lines

Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:42:40 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

diagnostic 9

Re: diagnostic 9

Mike Taylor

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:03:26 GMT

55 lines

Re: diagnostic 9

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:47:45 +0000

22 lines

Re: diagnostic 9

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:25:07 +0000

29 lines

Re: diagnostic 9

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:13:30 +0000

34 lines

Re: diagnostic 9

Theo van Veen

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:14:19 +0100

41 lines

Re: diagnostic 9

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:07:43 -0500

27 lines

Re: diagnostic 9

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:35:45 +0000

31 lines

Re: diagnostic 9

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:53:30 -0500

30 lines

diagnostic 9

Theo van Veen

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:51:46 +0100

15 lines

New Thread

diagnostic code type (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri)

Re: diagnostic code type (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri)

Matthew J. Dovey

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:49:29 -0000

53 lines

Re: diagnostic code type (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri)

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:44:37 -0500

30 lines

diagnostic code type (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri)

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:06:54 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

Diagnostic Codes

Re: Diagnostic Codes

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 18:39:29 -0500

46 lines

Re: Diagnostic Codes

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 20:59:24 +0000

34 lines

Diagnostic Codes

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:40:31 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:08:06 +0000

38 lines

Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:03:31 -0500

21 lines

Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:25:24 +0000

66 lines

Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Mike Taylor

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:17:16 GMT

77 lines

Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Mike Taylor

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:23:28 GMT

31 lines

Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Adam Dickmeiss

Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:56:25 +0100

49 lines

Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Theo van Veen

Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:56:26 +0100

75 lines

Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Ray Denenberg

Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:47:22 -0500

21 lines

Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

LeVan,Ralph

Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:31:48 -0500

38 lines

Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Theo van Veen

Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:50:34 +0100

38 lines

Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Ray Denenberg

Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:41:17 -0500

31 lines

Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Matthew J. Dovey

Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:12:05 -0000

65 lines

Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

LeVan,Ralph

Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:27:56 -0500

30 lines

Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

LeVan,Ralph

Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:21:50 -0500

20 lines

Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Matthew J. Dovey

Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:40:38 -0000

43 lines

Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Theo van Veen

Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:24:20 +0100

26 lines

Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Theo van Veen

Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:12:29 +0100

28 lines

Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Matthew J. Dovey

Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:22:47 -0000

180 lines

Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 21:27:48 -0500

72 lines

Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 21:22:13 -0500

53 lines

diagnostic namespace vs. uri

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 18:46:44 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

diagnostic object (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri)

Re: diagnostic object (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri)

Mike Taylor

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:20:38 GMT

85 lines

Re: diagnostic object (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri)

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:31:49 +0000

49 lines

Re: diagnostic object (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri)

Mike Taylor

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:18:55 GMT

62 lines

Re: diagnostic object (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri)

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:29:44 +0000

29 lines

diagnostic object (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:10:02 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

diagnostic.html

diagnostic.html

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:04:51 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

Diagnostics URI

Re: Diagnostics URI

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 07:59:14 -0500

19 lines

Re: Diagnostics URI

Mike Taylor

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:51:19 GMT

35 lines

Re: Diagnostics URI

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 22:37:47 +0000

27 lines

Re: Diagnostics URI

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:11:55 -0500

82 lines

Re: Diagnostics URI

Mike Taylor

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:59:28 GMT

49 lines

Diagnostics URI

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:40:59 +0000

58 lines

New Thread

Done? (Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema)))

Re: Done? (Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema)))

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:14:10 +0000

26 lines

Re: Done? (Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema)))

Theo van Veen

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:19:53 +0100

24 lines

Re: Done? (Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema)))

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:32:46 -0500

43 lines

Re: Done? (Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema)))

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:26:02 -0500

26 lines

Re: Done? (Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema)))

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:40:29 +0000

41 lines

Done? (Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema)))

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 12:58:22 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

EchoedRequest

Re: EchoedRequest

Theo van Veen

Sat, 17 Jan 2004 00:44:42 +0100

31 lines

Re: EchoedRequest

Matthew J. Dovey

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 19:23:57 -0000

35 lines

EchoedRequest

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 18:18:57 +0000

21 lines

New Thread

explain schema uri

Re: explain schema uri

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 23:04:23 +0000

27 lines

explain schema uri

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 17:10:14 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

extension namespace (Re: register extra data)

Re: extension namespace (Re: register extra data)

Mike Taylor

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:25:27 GMT

37 lines

Re: extension namespace (Re: register extra data)

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:19:19 +0000

35 lines

Re: extension namespace (Re: register extra data)

Mike Taylor

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:17:04 GMT

31 lines

Re: extension namespace (Re: register extra data)

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:02:42 +0000

44 lines

Re: extension namespace (Re: register extra data)

Mike Taylor

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:11:45 GMT

75 lines

Re: extension namespace (Re: register extra data)

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:35:07 -0500

99 lines

Re: extension namespace (Re: register extra data)

Theo van Veen

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:15:31 +0100

86 lines

extension namespace (Re: register extra data)

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:37:27 -0500

79 lines

New Thread

extension or extension-space

Re: extension or extension-space

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:46:37 +0000

46 lines

Re: extension or extension-space

Mike Taylor

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:59:53 GMT

112 lines

extension or extension-space

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:13:10 -0500

71 lines

New Thread

Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema))

Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema))

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:34:24 +0000

32 lines

Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema))

Mike Taylor

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:50:40 GMT

31 lines

Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema))

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:37:28 -0500

20 lines

Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema))

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 12:27:06 +0000

25 lines

Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema))

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:21:05 -0500

21 lines

Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema))

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:23:41 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

extra-data-example.html typo

extra-data-example.html typo

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:43:36 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

FAQ

Re: FAQ

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:21:59 +0000

24 lines

FAQ

Mike Taylor

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:05:26 GMT

51 lines

New Thread

faq (Re: xpath results (Re: namespaces for dc schema))

Re: faq (Re: xpath results (Re: namespaces for dc schema))

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:43:53 +0000

68 lines

faq (Re: xpath results (Re: namespaces for dc schema))

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:43:55 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

First and Last Terms in Index

Re: First and Last Terms in Index

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:33:14 +0000

41 lines

First and Last Terms in Index

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:28:07 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

Help with SRW response

Re: Help with SRW response

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:45:52 -0500

23 lines

Re: Help with SRW response

Matthew J. Dovey

Sat, 17 Jan 2004 22:39:17 -0000

48 lines

Re: Help with SRW response

Matthew J. Dovey

Sat, 17 Jan 2004 22:37:49 -0000

52 lines

Re: Help with SRW response

Theo van Veen

Sat, 17 Jan 2004 00:58:02 +0100

36 lines

Re: Help with SRW response

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:30:05 +0000

28 lines

Re: Help with SRW response

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:28:08 +0000

30 lines

Re: Help with SRW response

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:00:46 -0500

19 lines

Re: Help with SRW response

Matthew J. Dovey

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 19:45:51 -0000

41 lines

Re: Help with SRW response

Matthew J. Dovey

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 19:25:59 -0000

53 lines

Re: Help with SRW response

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:34:11 +0000

34 lines

Re: Help with SRW response

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:09:32 -0500

26 lines

Re: Help with SRW response

Mike Taylor

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:01:53 GMT

29 lines

Re: Help with SRW response

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:58:19 -0500

29 lines

Re: Help with SRW response

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:14:37 +0000

63 lines

Re: Help with SRW response

Matthew J. Dovey

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:10:41 -0000

74 lines

Re: Help with SRW response

Mike Taylor

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:05:53 GMT

50 lines

Re: Help with SRW response

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:21:42 +0000

39 lines

Help with SRW response

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:49:22 -0500

83 lines

New Thread

idle time (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

idle time (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:59:23 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Info URIs

Info URIs

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:28:53 +0000

12 lines

Re: info URIs

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:35:46 +0000

42 lines

Re: info URIs

Mike Taylor

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:50:55 GMT

48 lines

Re: info URIs

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:04:56 +0000

25 lines

Re: info URIs

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:59:14 -0500

51 lines

Re: info URIs

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:40:17 -0500

32 lines

Re: info URIs

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 12:18:33 -0500

49 lines

Re: info URIs

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:36:54 -0500

32 lines

Re: info URIs

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:28:14 +0000

52 lines

Re: info URIs

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:03:46 -0500

32 lines

Re: info URIs

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 14:31:34 +0000

58 lines

Re: info URIs

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 09:23:58 -0500

41 lines

Re: info URIs

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 12:02:16 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

infoURI register

Fw: infoURI register

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:51:43 -0500

81 lines

New Thread

linking (was: Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs)

linking (was: Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs)

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:11:03 -0500

95 lines

New Thread

Metasearch

Metasearch

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:55:04 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

MIKE SPEAKS on XPath and Validation :-)

Re: MIKE SPEAKS on XPath and Validation :-)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:50:06 -0500

15 lines

Re: MIKE SPEAKS on XPath and Validation :-)

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:36:04 +0000

71 lines

MIKE SPEAKS on XPath and Validation :-)

Mike Taylor

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:09:06 GMT

96 lines

New Thread

Minor correction in XCQL example

Re: Minor correction in XCQL example

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:47:13 -0500

20 lines

Re: Minor correction in XCQL example

Oldroyd, Bill

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:16:05 -0000

60 lines

Re: Minor correction in XCQL example

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 10:13:09 -0500

24 lines

Re: Minor correction in XCQL example

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:57:27 +0000

33 lines

Minor correction in XCQL example

Oldroyd, Bill

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 13:00:03 -0000

49 lines

New Thread

Missing EchoedScanRequest elements?

Re: Missing EchoedScanRequest elements?

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 11:11:31 -0500

43 lines

Re: Missing EchoedScanRequest elements?

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:31:15 +0000

29 lines

Missing EchoedScanRequest elements?

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:32:26 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

namespace identifiers

Re: namespace identifiers

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:35:54 +0000

35 lines

Re: namespace identifiers

Mike Taylor

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:32:53 GMT

30 lines

Re: namespace identifiers

Theo van Veen

Sat, 10 Jan 2004 01:42:27 +0100

22 lines

Re: namespace identifiers

Matthew J. Dovey

Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:16:10 -0000

82 lines

Re: namespace identifiers

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 19:02:15 -0500

40 lines

Re: namespace identifiers

Mike Taylor

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:49:33 GMT

36 lines

Re: namespace identifiers

Adam Dickmeiss

Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:47:58 +0100

31 lines

namespace identifiers

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:35:52 -0500

76 lines

New Thread

namespaces for dc schema

Re: namespaces for dc schema

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 10:02:00 +0100

46 lines

Re: namespaces for dc schema

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 22:31:41 +0000

28 lines

Re: namespaces for dc schema

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 18:59:04 +0100

40 lines

Re: namespaces for dc schema

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 18:57:45 +0100

70 lines

Re: namespaces for dc schema

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:02:52 +0000

41 lines

Re: namespaces for dc schema

Mike Taylor

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:00:57 GMT

38 lines

Re: namespaces for dc schema

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:57:43 -0500

24 lines

Re: namespaces for dc schema

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:10:44 +0000

43 lines

Re: namespaces for dc schema

Mike Taylor

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:57:29 GMT

37 lines

Re: namespaces for dc schema

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:28:57 +0000

33 lines

Re: namespaces for dc schema

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:19:48 -0500

33 lines

Re: namespaces for dc schema

Mike Taylor

Mon, 26 Jan 2004 23:04:31 GMT

32 lines

Re: namespaces for dc schema

Ray Denenberg

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 20:03:17 -0500

70 lines

Re: namespaces for dc schema

Theo van Veen

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 01:41:44 +0100

39 lines

Re: namespaces for dc schema

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:33:37 +0000

28 lines

Re: namespaces for dc schema

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:30:50 -0500

23 lines

namespaces for dc schema

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:26:01 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Namespacing diagnostics (Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9)

Re: Namespacing diagnostics (Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9)

Mike Taylor

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:50:52 GMT

28 lines

Namespacing diagnostics (Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 18:13:05 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

negotiation example

Re: negotiation example

Mike Taylor

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:29:35 GMT

41 lines

Re: negotiation example

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:29:20 -0500

32 lines

Re: negotiation example

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:33:13 -0500

20 lines

Re: negotiation example

Mike Taylor

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:27:17 GMT

26 lines

Re: negotiation example

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 00:27:39 +0000

39 lines

Re: negotiation example

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 18:30:38 -0500

35 lines

Re: negotiation example

Mike Taylor

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:09:58 GMT

31 lines

Re: negotiation example

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:26:36 +0000

27 lines

Re: negotiation example

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:42:35 -0500

31 lines

Re: negotiation example

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 3 Jan 2004 19:38:52 +0000

41 lines

New Thread

New FAQ Entry.

New FAQ Entry.

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:47:10 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

new home pate

Re: new home pate

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:56:00 +0000

40 lines

Re: new home pate

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:56:16 +0100

31 lines

Re: new home pate

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:24:31 +0000

35 lines

Re: new home pate

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:19:34 -0500

43 lines

RE: new home pate

=?UTF-8?B?SmFuaWZlciBHYXRlbmJ5?=

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 10:43:48 +0100

26 lines

Re: new home pate

Matthew J. Dovey

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 08:14:44 -0000

40 lines

Re: new home pate

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 00:33:54 +0000

27 lines

new home pate

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:07:15 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

New proposed standard - SSRW

Re: New proposed standard - SSRW

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:08:40 -0500

19 lines

Re: New proposed standard - SSRW

Sebastian Hammer

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:24:58 +0100

45 lines

New proposed standard - SSRW

Matthew J. Dovey

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:36:45 -0000

31 lines

New Thread

NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation

Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 17:03:28 +0000

36 lines

Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation

Matthew J. Dovey

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 17:02:26 -0000

53 lines

Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation

Matthew J. Dovey

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 17:00:30 -0000

37 lines

Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:29:09 -0500

20 lines

Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation

Matthew J. Dovey

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:24:43 -0000

52 lines

Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:36:20 +0000

42 lines

Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:30:53 -0500

28 lines

Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:29:03 -0500

19 lines

Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:02:23 +0000

36 lines

Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 09:52:33 -0500

84 lines

New Thread

No such operation "searchRetrieveRequest"

No such operation "searchRetrieveRequest"

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:44:43 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Numeric types

Re: Numeric types

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:05:55 +0000

48 lines

Numeric types

Matthew J. Dovey

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:56:57 -0000

18 lines

New Thread

please review 1.1 specs

Re: please review 1.1 specs

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:53:41 -0500

71 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Mike Taylor

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:28:52 GMT

39 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Mike Taylor

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:19:46 GMT

28 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Janifer Gatenby

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:04:55 +0100

32 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 12:34:39 +0000

306 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Janifer Gatenby

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 13:28:32 +0100

69 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Janifer Gatenby

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 13:12:54 +0100

194 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Janifer Gatenby

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 13:06:40 +0100

129 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:37:48 +0000

329 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Eliot Christian

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 18:12:31 -0500

21 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:00:24 -0500

85 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 18:45:39 +0000

44 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:37:20 -0500

83 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 12:39:17 -0500

20 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Mike Taylor

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:37:43 GMT

52 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:39:11 -0500

63 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:12:35 +0000

48 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:13:42 -0500

28 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:30:18 +0000

33 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

LeVan,Ralph

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:51:14 -0500

125 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Mike Taylor

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:25:55 GMT

30 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Matthew J. Dovey

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:30:35 -0000

32 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Matthew J. Dovey

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 22:44:25 -0000

17 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Adam Dickmeiss

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 19:46:23 +0100

85 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:39:17 +0000

51 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Matthew J. Dovey

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:02:12 -0000

18 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Matthew J. Dovey

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:00:30 -0000

24 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 16:33:56 +0000

32 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Matthew J. Dovey

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:39:54 -0000

103 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 12:36:19 +0000

62 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs

Adam Dickmeiss

Sat, 3 Jan 2004 00:37:02 +0100

52 lines

please review 1.1 specs

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 2 Jan 2004 16:52:23 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

please review 1.1 specs [diagnostics]

Re: please review 1.1 specs [diagnostics]

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:21:54 -0500

15 lines

Re: please review 1.1 specs [diagnostics]

Adam Dickmeiss

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:12:32 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

profile ids (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Re: profile ids (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:11:18 +0000

52 lines

Re: profile ids (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:54:18 -0500

29 lines

Re: profile ids (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:22:59 +0000

31 lines

Re: profile ids (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Mike Taylor

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:25:43 GMT

33 lines

Re: profile ids (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 00:23:06 +0000

31 lines

profile ids (Re: please review 1.1 specs)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 18:41:41 -0500

56 lines

New Thread

profiles and extensions (Re: register extra data)

Re: profiles and extensions (Re: register extra data)

Mike Taylor

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:40:59 GMT

45 lines

profiles and extensions (Re: register extra data)

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 19:04:20 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Quote of the Day

Re: Quote of the Day

Mike Taylor

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:00:58 GMT

55 lines

Re: Quote of the Day

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:19:39 +0000

53 lines

Re: Quote of the Day

Mike Taylor

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:34:32 GMT

41 lines

Re: Quote of the Day

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:34:44 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

Quote of the Day (Was: new home pate)

Quote of the Day (Was: new home pate)

Mike Taylor

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:23:06 GMT

34 lines

New Thread

register extra data

Re: register extra data

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:30:07 +0000

27 lines

Re: register extra data

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:25:19 -0500

37 lines

Re: register extra data

Mike Taylor

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:27:45 GMT

48 lines

Re: register extra data

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:35:07 +0000

58 lines

Re: register extra data

Mike Taylor

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:30:48 GMT

43 lines

Re: register extra data

Mike Taylor

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:28:58 GMT

76 lines

Re: register extra data

Theo van Veen

Sat, 10 Jan 2004 01:39:04 +0100

38 lines

Re: register extra data

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 18:58:39 -0500

32 lines

Re: register extra data

Theo van Veen

Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:54:07 +0100

59 lines

Re: register extra data

Mike Taylor

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:17:41 GMT

59 lines

Re: register extra data

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:54:15 -0500

32 lines

Re: register extra data

Theo van Veen

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 00:34:48 +0100

23 lines

Re: register extra data

Mike Taylor

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:08:51 GMT

40 lines

Re: register extra data

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:49:48 +0000

27 lines

Re: register extra data

Matthew J. Dovey

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:02:14 -0000

28 lines

Re: register extra data

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:44:37 +0000

34 lines

register extra data

Theo van Veen

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:48:27 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

Release date

Re: Release date

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:19:02 +0000

17 lines

Re: Release date

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:11:29 -0500

30 lines

Release date

Matthew J. Dovey

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:19:51 -0000

13 lines

New Thread

release date (Re: Betr.: Re: negotiation ___example___)

Re: release date (Re: Betr.: Re: negotiation ___example___)

Mike Taylor

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:20:42 GMT

27 lines

release date (Re: Betr.: Re: negotiation ___example___)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:54:20 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

Required elements for scan termType.

Re: Required elements for scan termType.

Matthew J. Dovey

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:38:04 -0000

38 lines

Re: Required elements for scan termType.

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:21:28 +0000

27 lines

Re: Required elements for scan termType.

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:20:25 +0000

27 lines

Required elements for scan termType.

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:17:50 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

requirements and expectations

Re: requirements and expectations

Sebastian Hammer

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:58:44 +0100

32 lines

Re: requirements and expectations

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:32:49 +0000

40 lines

Re: requirements and expectations

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:30:14 +0000

29 lines

Re: requirements and expectations

Matthew J. Dovey

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:13:48 -0000

47 lines

Re: requirements and expectations

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:21:30 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

result set semantics (was: Re: WSDL)

Re: result set semantics (was: Re: WSDL)

Ray Denenberg

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:56:01 -0500

49 lines

Re: result set semantics (was: Re: WSDL)

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 20:09:06 +0000

38 lines

Re: result set semantics (was: Re: WSDL)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:03:34 -0500

22 lines

Re: result set semantics (was: Re: WSDL)

Mike Taylor

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:06:30 GMT

29 lines

Re: result set semantics (was: Re: WSDL)

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:29:07 +0000

30 lines

Re: result set semantics (was: Re: WSDL)

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:20:30 +0000

84 lines

result set semantics (was: Re: WSDL)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:11:50 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

review of 1.1

Re: review of 1.1

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:56:53 -0500

78 lines

Re: review of 1.1

Matthew J. Dovey

Mon, 26 Jan 2004 21:17:29 -0000

68 lines

review of 1.1

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:36:13 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Revised Scan text

Re: Revised Scan text

Mike Taylor

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:28:35 GMT

25 lines

Re: Revised Scan text

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:04:35 +0000

681 lines

Re: Revised Scan text

LeVan,Ralph

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:17:20 -0500

31 lines

Re: Revised Scan text

Mike Taylor

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:28:00 GMT

94 lines

Re: Revised Scan text

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:47:26 -0500

38 lines

Re: Revised Scan text

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 18:26:23 +0000

26 lines

Re: Revised Scan text

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:19:49 -0500

39 lines

Revised Scan text

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:52:42 +0000

159 lines

New Thread

Scan operation

Re: Scan operation

Mike Taylor

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:46:19 GMT

31 lines

Re: Scan operation

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:17:59 +0000

80 lines

Re: Scan operation

Mike Taylor

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:03:46 GMT

51 lines

Re: Scan operation

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:19:56 +0000

41 lines

Re: Scan operation

Mike Taylor

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:08:39 GMT

59 lines

Re: Scan operation

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:18:59 +0000

62 lines

Re: Scan operation

Mike Taylor

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:26:01 GMT

34 lines

Re: Scan operation

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:11:14 -0500

33 lines

Re: Scan operation

Oldroyd, Bill

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:59:02 -0000

82 lines

Re: Scan operation

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:49:43 -0500

21 lines

Re: Scan operation

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:44:00 -0500

19 lines

Re: Scan operation

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:19:48 +0000

39 lines

Re: Scan operation

Mike Taylor

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:07:11 GMT

35 lines

Re: Scan operation

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:39:24 +0000

46 lines

Re: Scan operation

Mike Taylor

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:05:20 GMT

32 lines

Re: Scan operation

Janifer Gatenby

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:39:25 +0100

47 lines

Re: Scan operation

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:24:40 +0000

35 lines

Re: Scan operation

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:08:34 -0500

21 lines

Re: Scan operation

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:40:42 +0000

47 lines

Re: Scan operation

Mike Taylor

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:49:01 GMT

38 lines

Re: Scan operation

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:29:16 -0500

39 lines

Re: Scan operation

Janifer Gatenby

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:54:42 +0100

56 lines

Re: Scan operation

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:37:20 +0000

35 lines

Re: Scan operation

Mike Taylor

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:38:42 GMT

42 lines

scan operation

Theo van Veen

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:16:52 +0100

31 lines

Re: Scan operation

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:05:18 +0000

66 lines

Scan operation

Oldroyd, Bill

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:57:38 -0000

79 lines

New Thread

Schema

Re: Schema

Matthew J. Dovey

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:24:08 -0000

54 lines

Schema

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:30:06 +0000

33 lines

New Thread

schema info ids

schema info ids

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:18:32 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

SRU diagnostics

Re: SRU diagnostics

Mike Taylor

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:44:44 GMT

25 lines

Re: SRU diagnostics

LeVan,Ralph

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:20:18 -0500

22 lines

SRU diagnostics

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:43:24 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

SRU examples

Re: SRU examples

Mike Taylor

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:34:08 GMT

28 lines

Re: SRU examples

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:53:15 -0500

14 lines

Re: SRU examples

Matthew J. Dovey

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:20:02 -0000

105 lines

Re: SRU examples

Janifer Gatenby

Sun, 4 Jan 2004 16:17:58 +0100

52 lines

Re: SRU examples

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 3 Jan 2004 19:43:56 +0000

38 lines

Re: SRU examples

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 3 Jan 2004 19:40:23 +0000

25 lines

Re: SRU examples

LeVan,Ralph

Thu, 1 Jan 2004 22:39:28 -0500

84 lines

New Thread

SRU rigour

Re: SRU rigour

Mike Taylor

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:42:52 GMT

52 lines

Re: SRU rigour

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:59:36 +0000

31 lines

Re: SRU rigour

LeVan,Ralph

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:41:05 -0500

21 lines

Re: SRU rigour

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:02:55 +0000

53 lines

Re: SRU rigour

Eliot Christian

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 06:50:54 -0500

31 lines

SRU rigour

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:56:55 +0000

41 lines

New Thread

SRU XML response

Re: SRU XML response

Matthew J. Dovey

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 14:32:55 -0000

87 lines

Re: SRU XML response

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:43:24 +0000

37 lines

SRU XML response

Oldroyd, Bill

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:37:21 -0000

47 lines

New Thread

SRW Implementors page

Re: SRW Implementors page

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:14:33 -0500

59 lines

Re: SRW Implementors page

Robert Sanderson

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 12:12:16 +0000

43 lines

SRW Implementors page

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 2 Jan 2004 12:03:08 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

SRW Service - WSDL question

Re: SRW Service - WSDL question

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:13:09 +0000

28 lines

Re: SRW Service - WSDL question

Matthew J. Dovey

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:25:38 -0000

67 lines

Re: SRW Service - WSDL question

Matthew J. Dovey

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:59:25 -0000

56 lines

Re: SRW Service - WSDL question

Matthew J. Dovey

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:56:31 -0000

42 lines

Re: SRW Service - WSDL question

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:27:20 +0000

47 lines

New Thread

SRW/SRU/Z39.50 server for testing.

SRW/SRU/Z39.50 server for testing.

Adam Dickmeiss

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:27:46 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

surely (Re: diagnostic object (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri))

surely (Re: diagnostic object (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri))

Ray Denenberg

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:56:54 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

ToDo List + corrections

Re: ToDo List + corrections

Matthew J. Dovey

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 22:44:29 -0000

84 lines

ToDo List + corrections

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:33:06 +0000

780 lines

New Thread

unknown "base-parameters"

Re: unknown "base-parameters"

Mike Taylor

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:39:14 GMT

34 lines

Re: unknown "base-parameters"

Mike Taylor

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:37:36 GMT

39 lines

Re: unknown "base-parameters"

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:01:28 +0000

35 lines

Re: unknown "base-parameters"

Matthew J. Dovey

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:11:53 -0000

36 lines

Re: unknown "base-parameters"

Oldroyd, Bill

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:49:15 -0000

81 lines

Re: unknown "base-parameters"

Eliot Christian

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 05:37:05 -0500

38 lines

Re: unknown "base-parameters"

Mike Taylor

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:16:46 GMT

39 lines

Re: unknown "base-parameters"

Mike Taylor

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:37:53 GMT

30 lines

Re: unknown "base-parameters"

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 3 Jan 2004 19:44:45 +0000

25 lines

Re: unknown "base-parameters"

Oldroyd, Bill

Fri, 2 Jan 2004 11:06:15 -0000

96 lines

New Thread

URIs and URLs

Re: URIs and URLs

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 13:44:06 -0500

17 lines

URIs and URLs

Matthew J. Dovey

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 17:24:25 -0000

31 lines

New Thread

version page

version page

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:25:58 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

version parameter

Re: version parameter

Mike Taylor

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:17:48 GMT

27 lines

New Thread

WSDL Draft 3

WSDL Draft 3

Matthew J. Dovey

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:22:01 -0000

567 lines

New Thread

XPath and Validation

Re: XPath and Validation

Robert Sanderson

Sat, 31 Jan 2004 14:06:41 +0000

121 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Adam Dickmeiss

Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:21:54 +0100

78 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 19:42:21 -0500

25 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 22:43:55 +0000

87 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 20:51:01 +0100

112 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:36:17 +0000

53 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:24:16 +0100

133 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:55:42 +0000

27 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Ray Denenberg

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 06:56:49 -0500

105 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:30:21 +0000

88 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:47:31 +0100

53 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Robert Sanderson

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:53:27 +0000

32 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Matthew J. Dovey

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:45:50 -0000

28 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Adam Dickmeiss

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:32:29 +0100

105 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:47:03 -0500

40 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 20:22:09 +0000

68 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 20:04:30 +0000

44 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:10:42 +0100

35 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:07:53 +0100

147 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:06:24 -0500

114 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:01:02 +0000

85 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:17:39 +0100

144 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:46:11 +0000

72 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:22:13 +0100

97 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:55:43 +0000

54 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 13:44:55 +0100

112 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:00:13 +0000

62 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Adam Dickmeiss

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:48:39 +0100

88 lines

Re: XPath and Validation

Robert Sanderson

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:16:23 +0000

36 lines

New Thread

xpath results (Re: namespaces for dc schema)

Re: xpath results (Re: namespaces for dc schema)

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:18:35 +0000

37 lines

Re: xpath results (Re: namespaces for dc schema)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:12:26 -0500

15 lines

Re: xpath results (Re: namespaces for dc schema)

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:28:38 +0000

43 lines

xpath results (Re: namespaces for dc schema)

Ray Denenberg

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:05:25 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

ZeeRex versions

Re: ZeeRex versions

Robert Sanderson

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:31:33 +0000

41 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

July 2017
October 2016
July 2016
August 2014
February 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
February 2013
January 2013
October 2012
August 2012
April 2012
January 2012
October 2011
May 2011
April 2011
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager