|
|
|
Size
|
Re: 1-1
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:43:51 GMT |
26 lines |
1-1
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:54:57 -0500 |
17 lines |
A flaw in the examples
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:59:50 -0500 |
14 lines |
Re: acknowledgements
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:11:55 GMT |
25 lines |
acknowledgements
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Fri, 2 Jan 2004 15:58:07 -0500 |
14 lines |
Re: authentication token extension
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:19:59 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: authentication token extension
|
Janifer Gatenby |
Sun, 18 Jan 2004 10:56:13 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: authentication token extension
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:44:07 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: authentication token extension
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:07:42 GMT |
47 lines |
Re: authentication token extension
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:51:47 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: authentication token extension
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:24:26 GMT |
29 lines |
authentication token extension
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:52:04 -0500 |
21 lines |
Base Message Type
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:08:43 -0500 |
15 lines |
base profile explain support (Re: requirements and expectations)
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 19:00:34 -0500 |
22 lines |
Betr.: character unit
|
Theo van Veen |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 13:20:41 +0100 |
21 lines |
Betr.: DC (etc) schema namespace
|
Theo van Veen |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:57:26 +0100 |
42 lines |
Betr.: extension or extension-space
|
Theo van Veen |
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:28:20 +0100 |
87 lines |
Re: Betr.: First and Last Terms in Index
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:00:10 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: Betr.: First and Last Terms in Index
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:25:26 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: Betr.: First and Last Terms in Index
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:06:12 +0000 |
35 lines |
Betr.: First and Last Terms in Index
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:05:10 +0100 |
83 lines |
Betr.: First and Last Terms in Index
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:53:21 +0100 |
63 lines |
Betr.: new home pate
|
Theo van Veen |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 12:16:08 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Theo van Veen |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:46:48 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:22:59 GMT |
38 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Theo van Veen |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:42:20 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Theo van Veen |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:03:49 +0100 |
57 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:01:40 +0100 |
84 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:45:20 GMT |
45 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Theo van Veen |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:29:10 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Theo van Veen |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:24:32 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 22:46:04 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:52:50 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Janifer Gatenby |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 19:00:35 +0100 |
97 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:34:49 GMT |
35 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:15:23 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:23:43 -0000 |
85 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:00:28 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:10:28 -0000 |
20 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:08:28 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:02:05 +0100 |
52 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:41:48 +0000 |
42 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:50:07 GMT |
28 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:32:51 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:24:08 GMT |
35 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Theo van Veen |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:10:08 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:28:24 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:35:18 GMT |
38 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Theo van Veen |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:24:00 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:17:48 +0100 |
64 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:49:20 GMT |
40 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:19:06 +0000 |
59 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:01:15 GMT |
45 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:00:02 GMT |
44 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:47:43 +0100 |
77 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:20:07 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:59:27 +0000 |
43 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:53:22 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:58:22 -0500 |
60 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:49:56 +0100 |
73 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:24:59 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:19:49 +0100 |
82 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:26:04 +0000 |
42 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Janifer Gatenby |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:38:13 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:28:31 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:21:54 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:20:12 -0500 |
49 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 12:48:49 +0000 |
30 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 07:30:41 -0500 |
50 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 12:16:09 -0000 |
15 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:47:54 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:44:03 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 12:50:07 +0100 |
110 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:08:23 -0000 |
84 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:39:31 GMT |
52 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 01:11:22 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 23:45:14 GMT |
36 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 18:40:41 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 00:08:44 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:02:10 -0000 |
70 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:57:00 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:52:22 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:54:32 GMT |
50 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:26:27 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Theo van Veen |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:30:16 +0100 |
89 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:08:20 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Janifer Gatenby |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:08:56 +0100 |
87 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Theo van Veen |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:57:56 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:03:04 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:05:57 -0000 |
42 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Theo van Veen |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:59:28 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Theo van Veen |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:11:00 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:31:50 GMT |
32 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:12:30 -0000 |
30 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:46:58 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:24:34 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:28:55 -0000 |
43 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Theo van Veen |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:17:54 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:39:39 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:17:47 +0000 |
61 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:25:38 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:10:58 -0500 |
21 lines |
Betr.: please review 1.1 specs
|
Theo van Veen |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:57:09 +0100 |
57 lines |
Betr.: profiles and extensions (Re: register extra data)
|
Theo van Veen |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 10:10:46 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: Database URL in EchoedRequests
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:42:03 GMT |
36 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: Database URL in EchoedRequests
|
Theo van Veen |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:06:45 +0100 |
100 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: Database URL in EchoedRequests
|
Oldroyd, Bill |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 09:49:49 -0000 |
79 lines |
Betr.: Re: Database URL in EchoedRequests
|
Theo van Veen |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 09:53:18 +0100 |
40 lines |
Betr.: Re: dc collection
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:54:58 +0100 |
33 lines |
Betr.: Re: dc collection
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:16:37 +0100 |
101 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema
|
Theo van Veen |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:56:57 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:11:36 GMT |
38 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema
|
Theo van Veen |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:47:21 +0100 |
121 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema
|
Oldroyd, Bill |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:24:02 -0000 |
99 lines |
Betr.: Re: dc schema
|
Theo van Veen |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:43:10 +0100 |
61 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:00:39 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:19:11 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:34:41 +0100 |
63 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:10:02 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:20:27 +0100 |
52 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:08:58 +0100 |
66 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:48:46 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:53:22 -0500 |
53 lines |
Betr.: Re: dc schema
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:49:01 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: dc schema
|
Oldroyd, Bill |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:20:29 -0000 |
115 lines |
Betr.: Re: dc schema
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:40:09 +0100 |
72 lines |
Betr.: Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Theo van Veen |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:16:54 +0100 |
124 lines |
Betr.: Re: diagnostic 9
|
Theo van Veen |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:00:10 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:28:03 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:47:36 GMT |
48 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
Theo van Veen |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:14:04 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:07:47 -0000 |
75 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:41:34 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:54:52 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:36:21 GMT |
35 lines |
Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
Theo van Veen |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:14:26 +0100 |
82 lines |
Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
Theo van Veen |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:53:51 +0100 |
42 lines |
Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
Theo van Veen |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:31:58 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: extension namespace (Re: register extra data)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:33:51 +0000 |
40 lines |
Betr.: Re: extension namespace (Re: register extra data)
|
Theo van Veen |
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:34:58 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:20:59 -0500 |
41 lines |
Betr.: Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation
|
Theo van Veen |
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 18:12:10 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Theo van Veen |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:30:36 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:18:22 +0100 |
57 lines |
Betr.: Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Theo van Veen |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 10:45:35 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:47:04 +0000 |
109 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Oldroyd, Bill |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:48:00 -0000 |
84 lines |
Betr.: Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Theo van Veen |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:26:49 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 07:36:15 -0500 |
55 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:08:31 +0000 |
35 lines |
Betr.: Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Theo van Veen |
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 09:48:26 +0100 |
101 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: negotiation example
|
Theo van Veen |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:56:34 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: negotiation example
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:43:32 GMT |
37 lines |
Betr.: Re: negotiation example
|
Theo van Veen |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:38:31 +0100 |
57 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: negotiation ___example___
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:36:12 GMT |
28 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: negotiation ___example___
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:57:45 -0500 |
15 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: negotiation ___example___
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:22:27 +0000 |
30 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: negotiation ___example___
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:23:53 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: negotiation ___example___
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:05:00 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: negotiation ___example___
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:17:05 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: register extra data
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:21:10 GMT |
29 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: register extra data
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:20:10 GMT |
29 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: register extra data
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:14:58 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: register extra data
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:27:11 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: register extra data
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:16:40 GMT |
26 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: register extra data
|
Theo van Veen |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 01:10:32 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: register extra data
|
Theo van Veen |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 01:01:09 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: register extra data
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:11:49 +0000 |
42 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: register extra data
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:19:30 -0000 |
36 lines |
Betr.: Re: register extra data
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:12:57 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: Scan operation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:46:37 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: Scan operation
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:35:54 +0100 |
22 lines |
Betr.: Re: Scan operation
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:30:43 +0100 |
85 lines |
Betr.: Re: SRU rigour
|
Theo van Veen |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:55:10 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: unknown "base-parameters"
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:57:23 +0000 |
38 lines |
Betr.: Re: unknown "base-parameters"
|
Theo van Veen |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:55:04 +0100 |
57 lines |
Betr.: Revised Scan text
|
Theo van Veen |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 18:23:58 +0100 |
27 lines |
Betr.: SRU diagnostics
|
Theo van Veen |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:27:10 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: Changes
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 14:27:58 -0500 |
97 lines |
Re: Changes
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:41:45 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: Changes
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:33:14 +0000 |
120 lines |
Re: Changes
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:24:31 -0500 |
69 lines |
Re: Changes
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Sat, 17 Jan 2004 23:30:33 -0000 |
21 lines |
Re: Changes
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:54:45 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: Changes
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:44:15 +0000 |
20 lines |
Re: Changes
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:26:52 +0000 |
112 lines |
Re: Changes
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:19:41 -0500 |
99 lines |
Re: Changes
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:50:52 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: Changes
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:51:47 GMT |
36 lines |
Changes
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:19:55 +0000 |
72 lines |
Re: character unit
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:44:42 GMT |
29 lines |
Re: character unit
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 22:27:17 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: character unit
|
Edward C. Zimmermann |
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 23:29:51 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: character unit
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:31:06 GMT |
36 lines |
Re: character unit
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:52:52 -0500 |
29 lines |
character unit
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:41:42 -0500 |
15 lines |
Re: context set ids
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:02:42 -0500 |
80 lines |
Re: context set ids
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:41:34 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: context set ids
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:39:53 GMT |
39 lines |
context set ids
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:28:40 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: Contribution on ZING Extension
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:50:01 -0500 |
65 lines |
Re: Fw: Contribution on ZING Extension
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:56:56 -0000 |
63 lines |
Re: Fw: Contribution on ZING Extension
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:36:25 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: Fw: Contribution on ZING Extension
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:47:47 GMT |
36 lines |
Re: Fw: Contribution on ZING Extension
|
Oldroyd, Bill |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:36:44 -0000 |
61 lines |
Re: Fw: Contribution on ZING Extension
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:13:00 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: Fw: Contribution on ZING Extension
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:53:45 GMT |
48 lines |
Re: Fw: Contribution on ZING Extension
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 23:33:01 +0000 |
42 lines |
Re: Fw: Contribution on ZING Extension
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 23:41:33 -0000 |
34 lines |
Re: Fw: Contribution on ZING Extension
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 23:22:03 GMT |
45 lines |
Re: Fw: Contribution on ZING Extension
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:15:14 +0000 |
49 lines |
Re: Contribution on ZING Extension
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:12:05 -0500 |
75 lines |
Fw: Contribution on ZING Extension
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 09:48:49 -0500 |
525 lines |
Re: Database URL in EchoedRequests
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:19:38 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: Database URL in EchoedRequests
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 09:47:14 -0000 |
47 lines |
Re: Database URL in EchoedRequests
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 23:11:21 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: Database URL in EchoedRequests
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 21:49:21 -0000 |
61 lines |
Database URL in EchoedRequests
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:02:17 -0500 |
33 lines |
Database/resource/whatever unavailable.
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 00:29:00 +0100 |
20 lines |
Re: DC (etc) schema namespace
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:14:50 -0500 |
209 lines |
DC (etc) schema namespace
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:31:01 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: dc collection
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:58:07 GMT |
41 lines |
Re: dc collection
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:47:45 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: dc collection
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:14:49 +0000 |
63 lines |
Re: dc collection
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:47:56 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: dc collection
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 12:28:24 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: dc collection
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:40:34 GMT |
25 lines |
Re: dc collection
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 23:55:39 +0000 |
66 lines |
Re: dc collection
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 18:51:45 -0500 |
42 lines |
dc collection
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 18:02:26 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:29:58 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
Theo van Veen |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 02:40:27 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:34:45 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:02:12 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:41:36 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
Sebastian Hammer |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:32:40 +0100 |
80 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:36:03 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:30:28 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:23:47 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 19:00:13 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:20:15 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:28:03 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:12:18 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:18:34 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:05:59 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:00:05 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:49:14 -0500 |
17 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:54:53 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:21:16 -0500 |
50 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:47:00 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
Oldroyd, Bill |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:00:17 -0000 |
56 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 02:17:21 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:02:38 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:40:55 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:42:13 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:40:05 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: dc schema
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:15:28 -0500 |
36 lines |
dc schema
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:59:44 -0500 |
15 lines |
Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:28:08 GMT |
25 lines |
Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:48:15 -0500 |
104 lines |
Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:47:47 GMT |
47 lines |
Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:00:40 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:57:18 +0000 |
58 lines |
Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:12:22 GMT |
37 lines |
Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Eliot Christian |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:35:14 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Eliot Christian |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:49:50 -0500 |
94 lines |
Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Sebastian Hammer |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:21:58 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:50:24 +0000 |
93 lines |
Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:36:58 GMT |
31 lines |
Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Eliot Christian |
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:27:41 -0500 |
111 lines |
Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 22:56:06 GMT |
31 lines |
Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:58:06 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:47:10 GMT |
47 lines |
Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:11:35 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:43:22 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:45:18 -0500 |
63 lines |
Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Eliot Christian |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:15:55 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 00:29:53 +0000 |
34 lines |
dc support (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 19:10:46 -0500 |
23 lines |
diagnostic (RE: dc schema)
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:04:53 -0500 |
38 lines |
Diagnostic 8.
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 23:42:41 +0100 |
14 lines |
Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 18:17:00 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:02:49 GMT |
39 lines |
Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 22:48:18 -0000 |
52 lines |
Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:38:52 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9
|
Theo van Veen |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:19:11 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:28:29 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 20:58:13 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:48:29 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 20:24:40 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 19:15:15 -0000 |
69 lines |
Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 19:13:42 -0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:11:33 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:16:33 -0500 |
75 lines |
Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:22:43 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:19:34 +0000 |
46 lines |
Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:18:20 -0000 |
41 lines |
Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:15:24 -0000 |
37 lines |
Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:54:59 -0500 |
15 lines |
Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:51:01 GMT |
48 lines |
Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:31:17 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:48:03 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:42:40 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: diagnostic 9
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:03:26 GMT |
55 lines |
Re: diagnostic 9
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:47:45 +0000 |
22 lines |
Re: diagnostic 9
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:25:07 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: diagnostic 9
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:13:30 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: diagnostic 9
|
Theo van Veen |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:14:19 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: diagnostic 9
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:07:43 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: diagnostic 9
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:35:45 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: diagnostic 9
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:53:30 -0500 |
30 lines |
diagnostic 9
|
Theo van Veen |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:51:46 +0100 |
15 lines |
Re: diagnostic code type (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri)
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:49:29 -0000 |
53 lines |
Re: diagnostic code type (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri)
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:44:37 -0500 |
30 lines |
diagnostic code type (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri)
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:06:54 -0500 |
17 lines |
Re: Diagnostic Codes
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 19 Jan 2004 18:39:29 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: Diagnostic Codes
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 19 Jan 2004 20:59:24 +0000 |
34 lines |
Diagnostic Codes
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:40:31 -0500 |
14 lines |
Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:08:06 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:03:31 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:25:24 +0000 |
66 lines |
Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:17:16 GMT |
77 lines |
Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:23:28 GMT |
31 lines |
Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:56:25 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
Theo van Veen |
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:56:26 +0100 |
75 lines |
Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
Ray Denenberg |
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:47:22 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:31:48 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
Theo van Veen |
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:50:34 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
Ray Denenberg |
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:41:17 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:12:05 -0000 |
65 lines |
Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:27:56 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:21:50 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:40:38 -0000 |
43 lines |
Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
Theo van Veen |
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:24:20 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
Theo van Veen |
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:12:29 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:22:47 -0000 |
180 lines |
Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 21:27:48 -0500 |
72 lines |
Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 21:22:13 -0500 |
53 lines |
diagnostic namespace vs. uri
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 18:46:44 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: diagnostic object (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri)
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:20:38 GMT |
85 lines |
Re: diagnostic object (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:31:49 +0000 |
49 lines |
Re: diagnostic object (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri)
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:18:55 GMT |
62 lines |
Re: diagnostic object (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:29:44 +0000 |
29 lines |
diagnostic object (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri)
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:10:02 -0500 |
25 lines |
diagnostic.html
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:04:51 -0500 |
15 lines |
Re: Diagnostics URI
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 07:59:14 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: Diagnostics URI
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:51:19 GMT |
35 lines |
Re: Diagnostics URI
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 22:37:47 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: Diagnostics URI
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:11:55 -0500 |
82 lines |
Re: Diagnostics URI
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:59:28 GMT |
49 lines |
Diagnostics URI
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:40:59 +0000 |
58 lines |
Re: Done? (Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema)))
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:14:10 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: Done? (Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema)))
|
Theo van Veen |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:19:53 +0100 |
24 lines |
Re: Done? (Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema)))
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:32:46 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: Done? (Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema)))
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:26:02 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: Done? (Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema)))
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:40:29 +0000 |
41 lines |
Done? (Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema)))
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 12:58:22 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: EchoedRequest
|
Theo van Veen |
Sat, 17 Jan 2004 00:44:42 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: EchoedRequest
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 19:23:57 -0000 |
35 lines |
EchoedRequest
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 18:18:57 +0000 |
21 lines |
Re: explain schema uri
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 23:04:23 +0000 |
27 lines |
explain schema uri
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 17:10:14 -0500 |
15 lines |
Re: extension namespace (Re: register extra data)
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:25:27 GMT |
37 lines |
Re: extension namespace (Re: register extra data)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:19:19 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: extension namespace (Re: register extra data)
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:17:04 GMT |
31 lines |
Re: extension namespace (Re: register extra data)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:02:42 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: extension namespace (Re: register extra data)
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:11:45 GMT |
75 lines |
Re: extension namespace (Re: register extra data)
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:35:07 -0500 |
99 lines |
Re: extension namespace (Re: register extra data)
|
Theo van Veen |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:15:31 +0100 |
86 lines |
extension namespace (Re: register extra data)
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:37:27 -0500 |
79 lines |
Re: extension or extension-space
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:46:37 +0000 |
46 lines |
Re: extension or extension-space
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:59:53 GMT |
112 lines |
extension or extension-space
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:13:10 -0500 |
71 lines |
Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema))
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:34:24 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema))
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:50:40 GMT |
31 lines |
Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema))
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:37:28 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema))
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 12:27:06 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema))
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:21:05 -0500 |
21 lines |
Extensions (Re: diagnostic (RE: dc schema))
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:23:41 +0000 |
30 lines |
extra-data-example.html typo
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:43:36 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: FAQ
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:21:59 +0000 |
24 lines |
FAQ
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:05:26 GMT |
51 lines |
Re: faq (Re: xpath results (Re: namespaces for dc schema))
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:43:53 +0000 |
68 lines |
faq (Re: xpath results (Re: namespaces for dc schema))
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:43:55 -0500 |
49 lines |
Re: First and Last Terms in Index
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:33:14 +0000 |
41 lines |
First and Last Terms in Index
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:28:07 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: Help with SRW response
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:45:52 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: Help with SRW response
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Sat, 17 Jan 2004 22:39:17 -0000 |
48 lines |
Re: Help with SRW response
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Sat, 17 Jan 2004 22:37:49 -0000 |
52 lines |
Re: Help with SRW response
|
Theo van Veen |
Sat, 17 Jan 2004 00:58:02 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: Help with SRW response
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:30:05 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: Help with SRW response
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:28:08 +0000 |
30 lines |
Re: Help with SRW response
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:00:46 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: Help with SRW response
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 19:45:51 -0000 |
41 lines |
Re: Help with SRW response
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 19:25:59 -0000 |
53 lines |
Re: Help with SRW response
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:34:11 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: Help with SRW response
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:09:32 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: Help with SRW response
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:01:53 GMT |
29 lines |
Re: Help with SRW response
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:58:19 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: Help with SRW response
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:14:37 +0000 |
63 lines |
Re: Help with SRW response
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:10:41 -0000 |
74 lines |
Re: Help with SRW response
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:05:53 GMT |
50 lines |
Re: Help with SRW response
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:21:42 +0000 |
39 lines |
Help with SRW response
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:49:22 -0500 |
83 lines |
idle time (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:59:23 -0500 |
28 lines |
Info URIs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:28:53 +0000 |
12 lines |
Re: info URIs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:35:46 +0000 |
42 lines |
Re: info URIs
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:50:55 GMT |
48 lines |
Re: info URIs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:04:56 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: info URIs
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:59:14 -0500 |
51 lines |
Re: info URIs
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:40:17 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: info URIs
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 12:18:33 -0500 |
49 lines |
Re: info URIs
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:36:54 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: info URIs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:28:14 +0000 |
52 lines |
Re: info URIs
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:03:46 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: info URIs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 14:31:34 +0000 |
58 lines |
Re: info URIs
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 09:23:58 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: info URIs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 12:02:16 +0000 |
39 lines |
Fw: infoURI register
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:51:43 -0500 |
81 lines |
linking (was: Re: Betr.: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:11:03 -0500 |
95 lines |
Metasearch
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:55:04 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: MIKE SPEAKS on XPath and Validation :-)
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:50:06 -0500 |
15 lines |
Re: MIKE SPEAKS on XPath and Validation :-)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:36:04 +0000 |
71 lines |
MIKE SPEAKS on XPath and Validation :-)
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:09:06 GMT |
96 lines |
Re: Minor correction in XCQL example
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:47:13 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: Minor correction in XCQL example
|
Oldroyd, Bill |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:16:05 -0000 |
60 lines |
Re: Minor correction in XCQL example
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 10:13:09 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: Minor correction in XCQL example
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:57:27 +0000 |
33 lines |
Minor correction in XCQL example
|
Oldroyd, Bill |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 13:00:03 -0000 |
49 lines |
Re: Missing EchoedScanRequest elements?
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 11:11:31 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: Missing EchoedScanRequest elements?
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:31:15 +0000 |
29 lines |
Missing EchoedScanRequest elements?
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:32:26 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: namespace identifiers
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:35:54 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: namespace identifiers
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:32:53 GMT |
30 lines |
Re: namespace identifiers
|
Theo van Veen |
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 01:42:27 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: namespace identifiers
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:16:10 -0000 |
82 lines |
Re: namespace identifiers
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 19:02:15 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: namespace identifiers
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:49:33 GMT |
36 lines |
Re: namespace identifiers
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:47:58 +0100 |
31 lines |
namespace identifiers
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:35:52 -0500 |
76 lines |
Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 10:02:00 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 22:31:41 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 18:59:04 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 18:57:45 +0100 |
70 lines |
Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:02:52 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:00:57 GMT |
38 lines |
Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:57:43 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:10:44 +0000 |
43 lines |
Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:57:29 GMT |
37 lines |
Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:28:57 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:19:48 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 23:04:31 GMT |
32 lines |
Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Ray Denenberg |
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 20:03:17 -0500 |
70 lines |
Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Theo van Veen |
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 01:41:44 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:33:37 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: namespaces for dc schema
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:30:50 -0500 |
23 lines |
namespaces for dc schema
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:26:01 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: Namespacing diagnostics (Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9)
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:50:52 GMT |
28 lines |
Namespacing diagnostics (Re: Diagnostic 8. And 9)
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 18:13:05 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: negotiation example
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:29:35 GMT |
41 lines |
Re: negotiation example
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:29:20 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: negotiation example
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:33:13 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: negotiation example
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:27:17 GMT |
26 lines |
Re: negotiation example
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 00:27:39 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: negotiation example
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 18:30:38 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: negotiation example
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:09:58 GMT |
31 lines |
Re: negotiation example
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:26:36 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: negotiation example
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:42:35 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: negotiation example
|
Robert Sanderson |
Sat, 3 Jan 2004 19:38:52 +0000 |
41 lines |
New FAQ Entry.
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:47:10 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: new home pate
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:56:00 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: new home pate
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:56:16 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: new home pate
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:24:31 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: new home pate
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:19:34 -0500 |
43 lines |
RE: new home pate
|
=?UTF-8?B?SmFuaWZlciBHYXRlbmJ5?= |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 10:43:48 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: new home pate
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 08:14:44 -0000 |
40 lines |
Re: new home pate
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 00:33:54 +0000 |
27 lines |
new home pate
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:07:15 -0500 |
15 lines |
Re: New proposed standard - SSRW
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:08:40 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: New proposed standard - SSRW
|
Sebastian Hammer |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:24:58 +0100 |
45 lines |
New proposed standard - SSRW
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:36:45 -0000 |
31 lines |
Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 17:03:28 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 17:02:26 -0000 |
53 lines |
Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 17:00:30 -0000 |
37 lines |
Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:29:09 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:24:43 -0000 |
52 lines |
Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:36:20 +0000 |
42 lines |
Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:30:53 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:29:03 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:02:23 +0000 |
36 lines |
Fw: NISO Metasearch Inititative: Call for Participation
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 09:52:33 -0500 |
84 lines |
No such operation "searchRetrieveRequest"
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:44:43 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: Numeric types
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:05:55 +0000 |
48 lines |
Numeric types
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:56:57 -0000 |
18 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:53:41 -0500 |
71 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:28:52 GMT |
39 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:19:46 GMT |
28 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Janifer Gatenby |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:04:55 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 12:34:39 +0000 |
306 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Janifer Gatenby |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 13:28:32 +0100 |
69 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Janifer Gatenby |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 13:12:54 +0100 |
194 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Janifer Gatenby |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 13:06:40 +0100 |
129 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:37:48 +0000 |
329 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Eliot Christian |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 18:12:31 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:00:24 -0500 |
85 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 18:45:39 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:37:20 -0500 |
83 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 12:39:17 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:37:43 GMT |
52 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:39:11 -0500 |
63 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:12:35 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:13:42 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:30:18 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:51:14 -0500 |
125 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:25:55 GMT |
30 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:30:35 -0000 |
32 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 22:44:25 -0000 |
17 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 19:46:23 +0100 |
85 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:39:17 +0000 |
51 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:02:12 -0000 |
18 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:00:30 -0000 |
24 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 16:33:56 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:39:54 -0000 |
103 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 12:36:19 +0000 |
62 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Sat, 3 Jan 2004 00:37:02 +0100 |
52 lines |
please review 1.1 specs
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Fri, 2 Jan 2004 16:52:23 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs [diagnostics]
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:21:54 -0500 |
15 lines |
Re: please review 1.1 specs [diagnostics]
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:12:32 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: profile ids (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:11:18 +0000 |
52 lines |
Re: profile ids (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:54:18 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: profile ids (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:22:59 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: profile ids (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:25:43 GMT |
33 lines |
Re: profile ids (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 00:23:06 +0000 |
31 lines |
profile ids (Re: please review 1.1 specs)
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 18:41:41 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: profiles and extensions (Re: register extra data)
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:40:59 GMT |
45 lines |
profiles and extensions (Re: register extra data)
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 19:04:20 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: Quote of the Day
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:00:58 GMT |
55 lines |
Re: Quote of the Day
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:19:39 +0000 |
53 lines |
Re: Quote of the Day
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:34:32 GMT |
41 lines |
Re: Quote of the Day
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:34:44 -0500 |
15 lines |
Quote of the Day (Was: new home pate)
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:23:06 GMT |
34 lines |
Re: register extra data
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:30:07 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: register extra data
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:25:19 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: register extra data
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:27:45 GMT |
48 lines |
Re: register extra data
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:35:07 +0000 |
58 lines |
Re: register extra data
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:30:48 GMT |
43 lines |
Re: register extra data
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:28:58 GMT |
76 lines |
Re: register extra data
|
Theo van Veen |
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 01:39:04 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: register extra data
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 18:58:39 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: register extra data
|
Theo van Veen |
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:54:07 +0100 |
59 lines |
Re: register extra data
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:17:41 GMT |
59 lines |
Re: register extra data
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:54:15 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: register extra data
|
Theo van Veen |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 00:34:48 +0100 |
23 lines |
Re: register extra data
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:08:51 GMT |
40 lines |
Re: register extra data
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:49:48 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: register extra data
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:02:14 -0000 |
28 lines |
Re: register extra data
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:44:37 +0000 |
34 lines |
register extra data
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:48:27 +0100 |
23 lines |
Re: Release date
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:19:02 +0000 |
17 lines |
Re: Release date
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:11:29 -0500 |
30 lines |
Release date
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:19:51 -0000 |
13 lines |
Re: release date (Re: Betr.: Re: negotiation ___example___)
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:20:42 GMT |
27 lines |
release date (Re: Betr.: Re: negotiation ___example___)
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:54:20 -0500 |
15 lines |
Re: Required elements for scan termType.
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:38:04 -0000 |
38 lines |
Re: Required elements for scan termType.
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:21:28 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: Required elements for scan termType.
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:20:25 +0000 |
27 lines |
Required elements for scan termType.
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:17:50 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: requirements and expectations
|
Sebastian Hammer |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:58:44 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: requirements and expectations
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:32:49 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: requirements and expectations
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:30:14 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: requirements and expectations
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:13:48 -0000 |
47 lines |
Re: requirements and expectations
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:21:30 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: result set semantics (was: Re: WSDL)
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:56:01 -0500 |
49 lines |
Re: result set semantics (was: Re: WSDL)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 20:09:06 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: result set semantics (was: Re: WSDL)
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:03:34 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: result set semantics (was: Re: WSDL)
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:06:30 GMT |
29 lines |
Re: result set semantics (was: Re: WSDL)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:29:07 +0000 |
30 lines |
Re: result set semantics (was: Re: WSDL)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:20:30 +0000 |
84 lines |
result set semantics (was: Re: WSDL)
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:11:50 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: review of 1.1
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:56:53 -0500 |
78 lines |
Re: review of 1.1
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 21:17:29 -0000 |
68 lines |
review of 1.1
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:36:13 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: Revised Scan text
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:28:35 GMT |
25 lines |
Re: Revised Scan text
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:04:35 +0000 |
681 lines |
Re: Revised Scan text
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:17:20 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: Revised Scan text
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:28:00 GMT |
94 lines |
Re: Revised Scan text
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:47:26 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: Revised Scan text
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 18:26:23 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: Revised Scan text
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:19:49 -0500 |
39 lines |
Revised Scan text
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:52:42 +0000 |
159 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:46:19 GMT |
31 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:17:59 +0000 |
80 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:03:46 GMT |
51 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:19:56 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:08:39 GMT |
59 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:18:59 +0000 |
62 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:26:01 GMT |
34 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:11:14 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
Oldroyd, Bill |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:59:02 -0000 |
82 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:49:43 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:44:00 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:19:48 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:07:11 GMT |
35 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:39:24 +0000 |
46 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:05:20 GMT |
32 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
Janifer Gatenby |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:39:25 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:24:40 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:08:34 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:40:42 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:49:01 GMT |
38 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:29:16 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
Janifer Gatenby |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:54:42 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:37:20 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:38:42 GMT |
42 lines |
scan operation
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:16:52 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: Scan operation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:05:18 +0000 |
66 lines |
Scan operation
|
Oldroyd, Bill |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:57:38 -0000 |
79 lines |
Re: Schema
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:24:08 -0000 |
54 lines |
Schema
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:30:06 +0000 |
33 lines |
schema info ids
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:18:32 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: SRU diagnostics
|
Mike Taylor |
Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:44:44 GMT |
25 lines |
Re: SRU diagnostics
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:20:18 -0500 |
22 lines |
SRU diagnostics
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:43:24 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: SRU examples
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:34:08 GMT |
28 lines |
Re: SRU examples
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:53:15 -0500 |
14 lines |
Re: SRU examples
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:20:02 -0000 |
105 lines |
Re: SRU examples
|
Janifer Gatenby |
Sun, 4 Jan 2004 16:17:58 +0100 |
52 lines |
Re: SRU examples
|
Robert Sanderson |
Sat, 3 Jan 2004 19:43:56 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: SRU examples
|
Robert Sanderson |
Sat, 3 Jan 2004 19:40:23 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: SRU examples
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Thu, 1 Jan 2004 22:39:28 -0500 |
84 lines |
Re: SRU rigour
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:42:52 GMT |
52 lines |
Re: SRU rigour
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:59:36 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: SRU rigour
|
LeVan,Ralph |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:41:05 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: SRU rigour
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:02:55 +0000 |
53 lines |
Re: SRU rigour
|
Eliot Christian |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 06:50:54 -0500 |
31 lines |
SRU rigour
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:56:55 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: SRU XML response
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 14:32:55 -0000 |
87 lines |
Re: SRU XML response
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:43:24 +0000 |
37 lines |
SRU XML response
|
Oldroyd, Bill |
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:37:21 -0000 |
47 lines |
Re: SRW Implementors page
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:14:33 -0500 |
59 lines |
Re: SRW Implementors page
|
Robert Sanderson |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 12:12:16 +0000 |
43 lines |
SRW Implementors page
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Fri, 2 Jan 2004 12:03:08 -0500 |
18 lines |
Re: SRW Service - WSDL question
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:13:09 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: SRW Service - WSDL question
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:25:38 -0000 |
67 lines |
Re: SRW Service - WSDL question
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:59:25 -0000 |
56 lines |
Re: SRW Service - WSDL question
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:56:31 -0000 |
42 lines |
Re: SRW Service - WSDL question
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:27:20 +0000 |
47 lines |
SRW/SRU/Z39.50 server for testing.
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:27:46 +0100 |
27 lines |
surely (Re: diagnostic object (Re: Betr.: Re: diagnostic namespace vs. uri))
|
Ray Denenberg |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:56:54 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: ToDo List + corrections
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 22:44:29 -0000 |
84 lines |
ToDo List + corrections
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:33:06 +0000 |
780 lines |
Re: unknown "base-parameters"
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:39:14 GMT |
34 lines |
Re: unknown "base-parameters"
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:37:36 GMT |
39 lines |
Re: unknown "base-parameters"
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:01:28 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: unknown "base-parameters"
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:11:53 -0000 |
36 lines |
Re: unknown "base-parameters"
|
Oldroyd, Bill |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:49:15 -0000 |
81 lines |
Re: unknown "base-parameters"
|
Eliot Christian |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 05:37:05 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: unknown "base-parameters"
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:16:46 GMT |
39 lines |
Re: unknown "base-parameters"
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:37:53 GMT |
30 lines |
Re: unknown "base-parameters"
|
Robert Sanderson |
Sat, 3 Jan 2004 19:44:45 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: unknown "base-parameters"
|
Oldroyd, Bill |
Fri, 2 Jan 2004 11:06:15 -0000 |
96 lines |
Re: URIs and URLs
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 13:44:06 -0500 |
17 lines |
URIs and URLs
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 17:24:25 -0000 |
31 lines |
version page
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:25:58 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: version parameter
|
Mike Taylor |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:17:48 GMT |
27 lines |
WSDL Draft 3
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:22:01 -0000 |
567 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 14:06:41 +0000 |
121 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:21:54 +0100 |
78 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 19:42:21 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 22:43:55 +0000 |
87 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 20:51:01 +0100 |
112 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:36:17 +0000 |
53 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:24:16 +0100 |
133 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:55:42 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Ray Denenberg |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 06:56:49 -0500 |
105 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:30:21 +0000 |
88 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:47:31 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:53:27 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:45:50 -0000 |
28 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:32:29 +0100 |
105 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:47:03 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 20:22:09 +0000 |
68 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 20:04:30 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:10:42 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:07:53 +0100 |
147 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:06:24 -0500 |
114 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:01:02 +0000 |
85 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:17:39 +0100 |
144 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:46:11 +0000 |
72 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:22:13 +0100 |
97 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:55:43 +0000 |
54 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 13:44:55 +0100 |
112 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:00:13 +0000 |
62 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Adam Dickmeiss |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:48:39 +0100 |
88 lines |
Re: XPath and Validation
|
Robert Sanderson |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:16:23 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: xpath results (Re: namespaces for dc schema)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:18:35 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: xpath results (Re: namespaces for dc schema)
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:12:26 -0500 |
15 lines |
Re: xpath results (Re: namespaces for dc schema)
|
Robert Sanderson |
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:28:38 +0000 |
43 lines |
xpath results (Re: namespaces for dc schema)
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:05:25 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: ZeeRex versions
|
Robert Sanderson |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:31:33 +0000 |
41 lines |