LISTSERV 16.0 - MARC Archives

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

MARC Archives

April 2004

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		MARC Home

Subject	From	Date	Size
Re: Building catalogues	Dragon, Patricia M	Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:50:03 -0500	69 lines
Re: Building catalogues	A. Ralph Papakhian	Thu, 1 Apr 2004 12:28:03 -0500	88 lines
Re: Building catalogues	Barbara B Tillett	Thu, 1 Apr 2004 12:31:22 -0500	97 lines
Re: Building catalogues	Horn, Marguerite	Thu, 1 Apr 2004 15:25:48 -0500	99 lines
Re: Building catalogues	Karen Coyle	Thu, 1 Apr 2004 15:43:06 -0800	40 lines
Re: Building catalogues	Hal Cain	Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:08:59 +1000	42 lines
Re: Building catalogues	Patricia Scott	Fri, 2 Apr 2004 11:47:31 +0930	92 lines
Re: Building catalogues	PIEPENBURG SCOTT	Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:05:24 -0500	112 lines
Re: Building catalogues	MSHERMAN	Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:23:28 -0500	32 lines
Re: Keywording authority records (was Building catalogues)	Miller, David	Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:29:34 -0500	78 lines
Re: Building catalogues	Lowell Ashley	Fri, 2 Apr 2004 12:34:18 -0500	116 lines
Re: Building catalogues	Rob Atkinson	Fri, 2 Apr 2004 13:53:26 -0600	122 lines
Re: Building catalogues	<>	Mon, 5 Apr 2004 09:21:09 +1000	34 lines
Additions to the MARC Code Lists for Relators, Sources and Description Conventions	account for net dev and marc	Tue, 6 Apr 2004 17:36:53 -0400	40 lines
Re: Building catalogues	William Schupbach	Wed, 7 Apr 2004 13:47:35 -0400	49 lines
Direct access updating databases	Anne Munkebyaune	Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:42:20 +0200	21 lines
Re: Direct access updating databases	Rebecca S. Guenther	Wed, 14 Apr 2004 15:14:27 -0400	31 lines
NISO Metadata Workshop: Early Registration Ends April 15th	Rebecca S. Guenther	Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:12:15 -0400	50 lines
Unicode	docinfo	Tue, 20 Apr 2004 19:50:47 +0530	26 lines
Re: Unicode	Stephen Toney	Tue, 20 Apr 2004 13:55:24 -0400	45 lines
Re: Unicode	Nguyen Ngoc Binh	Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:29:33 +0700	34 lines
Translation note in 546 or 500?	Deborah Fritz	Thu, 22 Apr 2004 12:20:59 -0400	40 lines
Re: Translation note in 546 or 500?	Jerri Swinehart	Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:41 -0400	34 lines
Re: Translation note in 546 or 500?	Jimmie Lundgren	Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:49:24 -0400	72 lines
Re: Translation note in 546 or 500?	Randall K Barry	Thu, 22 Apr 2004 14:24:13 -0400	79 lines
Re: Translation note in 546 or 500?	J. McRee Elrod	Thu, 22 Apr 2004 12:27:06 -0700	28 lines
Re: Translation note in 546 or 500?	Deborah Fritz	Thu, 22 Apr 2004 17:08:38 -0400	25 lines
Re: Translation note in 546 or 500?	J. McRee Elrod	Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:47:49 -0700	27 lines
506 and 540	William Schupbach	Fri, 23 Apr 2004 04:43:04 -0400	43 lines
Re: Translation note in 546 or 500?	Bill Lehm	Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:58:51 +0100	62 lines
Re: Translation note in 546 or 500?	PHILIP DAVIES	Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:50:02 +0100	114 lines
Re: Translation note in 546 or 500?	Linda Smith	Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:13:01 -0400	65 lines
Re: Translation note in 546 or 500?	Gordon Pew	Fri, 23 Apr 2004 10:05:30 -0400	36 lines
Re: Translation note in 546 or 500?	Dick Miller	Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:25:14 -0700	68 lines
Re: Translation note in 546 or 500?	Deborah Fritz	Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:16:49 -0400	92 lines
Re: Translation note in 546 or 500?	Linda Smith	Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:27:40 -0400	107 lines
Re: Translation note in 546 or 500?	Deborah Fritz	Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:42:50 -0400	121 lines
Re: Translation note in 546 or 500?	Linda Smith	Fri, 23 Apr 2004 13:50:44 -0400	137 lines
Re: Translation note in 546 or 500?	Daniel CannCasciato	Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:16:17 -0700	33 lines
546	J. McRee Elrod	Fri, 23 Apr 2004 23:08:49 -0700	17 lines
Re: Translation note in 546 or 500?	Hal Cain	Sat, 24 Apr 2004 23:33:43 +1000	44 lines
506/540	J. McRee Elrod	Sat, 24 Apr 2004 07:07:46 -0700	26 lines
Re: Translation note in 546 or 500?	Cauthen, Paul (cauthep)	Sat, 24 Apr 2004 16:44:37 -0400	225 lines
FRBR Preconference	Kate Harcourt	Mon, 26 Apr 2004 10:38:59 -0400	37 lines
546	Linda Smith	Mon, 26 Apr 2004 15:25:47 -0400	42 lines
Revisiting the LC view of Translation note (in 546 or 500?)	Patricia Scott	Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:04:48 +0930	126 lines
Re: Translation note in 500 or 546	Gordon Pew	Tue, 27 Apr 2004 09:07:12 -0400	43 lines
Re: Revisiting the LC view of Translation note (in 546 or 500?)	Norma Jessop	Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:44:08 +0100	53 lines
Re: Revisiting the LC view of Translation note (in 546 or 500?)	Mike Tribby	Tue, 27 Apr 2004 10:20:46 -0500	29 lines
Additions to the MARC Code Lists for Relators, Sources and Desription Conventions	DeAnna D. Evans	Tue, 27 Apr 2004 16:11:00 -0400	36 lines
Re: Revisiting the LC view of Translation note (in 546 or 500?)	Hal Cain	Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:40:12 +1000	56 lines
Additions to the MARC Code Lists for Relators, Sources and Description Conventions	account for net dev and marc	Wed, 28 Apr 2004 11:20:56 -0400	37 lines
Re: Revisiting the LC view of Translation note (in 546 or 500?)	Verna Urbanski	Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:33:57 -0400	42 lines
Re: Revisiting the LC view of Translation note (in 546 or 500?)	William W. Jones	Wed, 28 Apr 2004 14:52:17 -0400	50 lines
Re: Revisiting the LC view of Translation note (in 546 or 500?)	Mike Tribby	Thu, 29 Apr 2004 07:31:28 -0500	81 lines
Re: Revisiting the LC view of Translation note (in 546 or 500?)	Linda Smith	Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:54:34 -0400	57 lines
Re: Revisiting the LC view of Translation note (in 546 or 500?)	Ian Fairclough	Thu, 29 Apr 2004 15:51:36 -0400	45 lines