LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


January 2005


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

<No subject> (1 message)
A fundamental Flaw (1 message)
A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (1 message)
A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy) (26 messages)
Allen Brothers - Bluebird B-5001 and Victor 23755 (or is that 23756?) (2 messages)
Analog: A Race Against Time (1 message)
Analog: A Race Against Time - Billboard August 28, 2004 (5 messages)
ARSC Conference -- Register Now! (1 message)
ARSC Newsletter (1 message)
ARSC Newsletter deadlines (1 message)
Article in today's WSJ on Collecting 78s. (1 message)
audio mag tape 2"-1"-1/2"-1/4" available (2 messages)
Audio Recording "Freebie" Mailing List (1 message)
Audio Recording "Freebie" Mailing List now video and film, too (1 message)
Available: Betacam, U-Matic tapes, 1" Layback machine (1 message)
cataloging question (4 messages)
CFP ECDL 2005, Vienna, Austria, September 18-23 2005 (1 message)
Cisco Houston (1 message)
Clarification regarding "Seeking appraiser" (2 messages)
Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...) (20 messages)
Conference Recording (4 messages)
Consumer tape machines available (1 message)
Contact for Reserach re: Mills Publishing Company (Ellington, etc.) (1 message)
Copyright Questions (1 message)
DASH and 1-inch Video and the Quantegy closing (1 message)
DC Area ARSC event (1 message)
Dealer for Otari MX5050 reel-to-reel? (2 messages)
Don Richardson, early Columbia Records fiddler (1 message)
Don't Dumpster That Tape Machine! (7 messages)
ELP Turntable (was historical stylus rake angles) (6 messages)
EMTEC intentions (1 message)
Fonotecnica - Italian label, active 1930s? (1 message)
Format conundrum (46 messages)
Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy (22 messages)
From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer (14 messages)
From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the... (2 messages)
Harry the Hipster search (2 messages)
Hearing aids--was: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Q... (1 message)
historical stylus rake angles (SRA) (5 messages)
If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape... (16 messages)
John Lomax Library of Congress recordings (6 messages)
Listening Test - was: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy) (4 messages)
Lots of tape decks (4 messages)
Magnetic tape shortage... (4 messages)
MVI Audio Tape Fixer (12 messages)
new magnetic tape coming soon from Europe (1 message)
Newsletter deadline correction (1 message)
Nominations for the 2005 ARSC Awards (1 message)
Original Piano Roll recording (6 messages)
Practicalities (1 message)
Quantegy closed: TV piece (1 message)
Quantegy files Chapter 11 (3 messages)
Quantegy has closed ??? (9 messages)
Record cleaning machines (2 messages)
Recording Disc Preservation/Off-gassing? (6 messages)
Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Q... (1 message)
Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy) (34 messages)
Searching for Golden Age of Radio Collections (1 message)
Seeking appraiser (6 messages)
Slowing down playing speed in software (9 messages)
Small sound booth for transfers and restoration (3 messages)
SPARS working with Quantegy for custom tape runs (1 message)
squealing cassette tapes (4 messages)
Stellavox support by Sonosax (1 message)
Subject: RE: [ARSCLIST] historical stylus rake angles (SRA) (8 messages)
The state of cassette tape (11 messages)
The state of cassette tape: non-moving parts, etc. (2 messages)
U.S. copyright (1 message)
US Copyright office seeks public comment on "orphaned works" (1 message)
Vertical Tracking Angle (2 messages)
Vinyl Killer Record Playing VW Van (8 messages)
[Fwd: sound recording] (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Brian Callahan

Sat, 22 Jan 2005 00:29:40 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

A fundamental Flaw

Re: A fundamental Flaw

Dale Francis

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 06:56:42 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory

Dan Kj

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:54:24 -0500

63 lines

New Thread

A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Don Cox

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:35:08 +0000

41 lines

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Mike Richter

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:17:43 -0800

39 lines

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

David Lewiston

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:04:36 -1000

78 lines

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Steven C. Barr

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:43:48 -0500

20 lines

A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Frank Strauss

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:14:24 -0500

27 lines

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Mike Richter

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:45:19 -0800

48 lines

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Steven Smolian

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:51:42 -0500

56 lines

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Steven Smolian

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:50:32 -0500

51 lines

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Dale Francis

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:14:46 -0500

30 lines

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Karl Miller

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:34:29 -0600

24 lines

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Don Cox

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:55:24 +0000

59 lines

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Karl Miller

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:59:46 -0600

88 lines

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Steven C. Barr

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:29:56 -0500

34 lines

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Steven C. Barr

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:03:49 -0500

67 lines

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

matt Sohn

Sat, 19 Feb 2005 14:56:06 -0500

27 lines

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

David Lewiston

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:39:21 -1000

79 lines

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Dan Kj

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:02:59 -0500

32 lines

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Steven Smolian

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:43:58 -0500

103 lines

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Karl Miller

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 07:45:21 -0600

26 lines

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Karl Miller

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 07:26:02 -0600

43 lines

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Steven C. Barr

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:48:33 -0500

41 lines

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

steven austin

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 18:13:02 -0800

203 lines

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Steven C. Barr

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:57:40 -0500

133 lines

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Steven Smolian

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:41:08 -0500

162 lines

Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Richard L. Hess

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:58:57 -0500

119 lines

A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

James Lindner

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:31:52 -0500

122 lines

New Thread

Allen Brothers - Bluebird B-5001 and Victor 23755 (or is that 23756?)

Re: Allen Brothers - Bluebird B-5001 and Victor 23755 (or is that 23756?)

Dick Spottswood

Sun, 2 Jan 2005 11:05:44 -0500

61 lines

Allen Brothers - Bluebird B-5001 and Victor 23755 (or is that 23756?)

Tyrone Settlemier

Sun, 2 Jan 2005 08:45:48 -0600

42 lines

New Thread

Analog: A Race Against Time

Re: Analog: A Race Against Time

seva

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:31:13 -0500

616 lines

New Thread

Analog: A Race Against Time - Billboard August 28, 2004

Re: Fw: Analog: A Race Against Time - Billboard August 28, 2004

H. Duane Goldman

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:43:28 -0600

68 lines

Fw: Analog: A Race Against Time - Billboard August 28, 2004

Dick Spottswood

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:48:28 -0500

51 lines

Re: Fw: Analog: A Race Against Time - Billboard August 28, 2004

Karl Miller

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:30:05 -0600

21 lines

Re: Fw: Analog: A Race Against Time - Billboard August 28, 2004

steven austin

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:43:28 -0800

318 lines

Fw: Analog: A Race Against Time - Billboard August 28, 2004

Dick Spottswood

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:25:23 -0500

202 lines

New Thread

ARSC Conference -- Register Now!

ARSC Conference -- Register Now!

Bill Klinger

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:42:57 -0500

102 lines

New Thread

ARSC Newsletter

ARSC Newsletter

David Seubert

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:54:49 -0800

28 lines

New Thread

ARSC Newsletter deadlines

ARSC Newsletter deadlines

David Seubert

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:59:56 -0800

28 lines

New Thread

Article in today's WSJ on Collecting 78s.

Article in today's WSJ on Collecting 78s.

Steve Ramm

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:56:43 EST

206 lines

New Thread

audio mag tape 2"-1"-1/2"-1/4" available

FW: audio mag tape 2"-1"-1/2"-1/4" available

Watsky, Lance

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:00:50 -0500

73 lines

audio mag tape 2"-1"-1/2"-1/4" available

Joachim Polzer

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:40:58 +0100

55 lines

New Thread

Audio Recording "Freebie" Mailing List

Audio Recording "Freebie" Mailing List

Richard L. Hess

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:56:06 -0500

58 lines

New Thread

Audio Recording "Freebie" Mailing List now video and film, too

Re: Audio Recording "Freebie" Mailing List now video and film, too

Richard L. Hess

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:56:35 -0500

100 lines

New Thread

Available: Betacam, U-Matic tapes, 1" Layback machine

Available: Betacam, U-Matic tapes, 1" Layback machine

Richard L. Hess

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:52:24 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

cataloging question

Re: cataloging question

Claus Trelby

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:07:06 -0500

176 lines

Re: cataloging question

Brandon Burke

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:49:05 -0800

97 lines

Re: cataloging question

Mike Richter

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:22:44 -0800

64 lines

cataloging question

Brandon Burke

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:44:41 -0800

48 lines

New Thread

CFP ECDL 2005, Vienna, Austria, September 18-23 2005

CFP ECDL 2005, Vienna, Austria, September 18-23 2005

Carl Rauch

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 23:57:43 +0100

147 lines

New Thread

Cisco Houston

Cisco Houston

Lewanne Jones

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:03:56 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Clarification regarding "Seeking appraiser"

Re: Clarification regarding "Seeking appraiser"

David Lewiston

Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:01:32 -1000

157 lines

Re: Clarification regarding "Seeking appraiser"

Eric Podietz

Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:38:59 -0500

131 lines

New Thread

Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)

Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)

Steven Smolian

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:08:41 -0500

59 lines

Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)

Dale Francis

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:48:37 -0500

30 lines

Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)

George Brock-Nannestad

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:10:43 +0100

100 lines

Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)

Steven Smolian

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:04:20 -0500

88 lines

Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)

Richard L. Hess

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:07:25 -0500

51 lines

Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)

Steven C. Barr

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:54:51 -0500

23 lines

Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)

Dale Francis

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:20:19 -0500

79 lines

Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)

John Ross

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:23:27 -0800

39 lines

Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)

Richard L. Hess

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:07:13 -0500

45 lines

Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)

Karl Miller

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:52:58 -0600

53 lines

Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)

Karl Miller

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 07:47:27 -0600

43 lines

Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)

<>

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 23:16:40 EST

23 lines

Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)

steven austin

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:03:45 -0800

67 lines

Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)

Steven Smolian

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:57:17 -0500

50 lines

Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)

Steven Smolian

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:55:48 -0500

57 lines

Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)

Dale Francis

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:14:59 -0500

24 lines

Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)

Don Cox

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:38:11 +0000

40 lines

Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)

<>

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:06:21 EST

26 lines

Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)

George Brock-Nannestad

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 18:04:52 +0100

61 lines

Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)

Mike Richter

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 06:57:35 -0800

56 lines

New Thread

Conference Recording

Re: Conference Recording

Matt Bailey

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:32:22 -0500

61 lines

Re: Conference Recording

andy kolovos

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:25:25 -0500

75 lines

Re: Conference Recording

Richard L. Hess

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:53:32 -0500

59 lines

Conference Recording

Greg Yates

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:30:07 -0600

38 lines

New Thread

Consumer tape machines available

Consumer tape machines available

Richard L. Hess

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:55:32 -0500

56 lines

New Thread

Contact for Reserach re: Mills Publishing Company (Ellington, etc.)

Contact for Reserach re: Mills Publishing Company (Ellington, etc.)

Steve Ramm

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:39:28 EST

26 lines

New Thread

Copyright Questions

Copyright Questions

Tim Brooks

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 17:49:35 EST

26 lines

New Thread

DASH and 1-inch Video and the Quantegy closing

DASH and 1-inch Video and the Quantegy closing

Richard L. Hess

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:53:20 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

DC Area ARSC event

DC Area ARSC event

Bryan E Cornell

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:08:16 -0500

52 lines

New Thread

Dealer for Otari MX5050 reel-to-reel?

Re: Dealer for Otari MX5050 reel-to-reel?

Tim Murray

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:50:06 -0800

55 lines

Dealer for Otari MX5050 reel-to-reel?

Matt Bailey

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:58:18 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Don Richardson, early Columbia Records fiddler

Don Richardson, early Columbia Records fiddler

Dick Spottswood

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:11:41 -0500

68 lines

New Thread

Don't Dumpster That Tape Machine!

Re: Don't Dumpster That Tape Machine!

matt Sohn

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:02:13 -0500

25 lines

Re: Don't Dumpster That Tape Machine!

Steven C. Barr

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 19:29:55 -0500

34 lines

Re: Don't Dumpster That Tape Machine!

Richard L. Hess

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:41:28 -0500

27 lines

Re: Don't Dumpster That Tape Machine!

Richard L. Hess

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:56:09 -0500

31 lines

Re: Don't Dumpster That Tape Machine!

Jack L. Palmer

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:30:12 -0500

54 lines

Re: Don't Dumpster That Tape Machine!

Cary Ginell

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:05:03 EST

32 lines

Don't Dumpster That Tape Machine!

Richard L. Hess

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:21:27 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

ELP Turntable (was historical stylus rake angles)

Re: ELP Turntable (was historical stylus rake angles)

Eric Jacobs

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 03:56:17 -0800

151 lines

Re: ELP Turntable (was historical stylus rake angles)

Don Cox

Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:26:32 +0000

38 lines

Re: ELP Turntable (was historical stylus rake angles)

Steven Smolian

Sat, 8 Jan 2005 06:51:50 -0500

142 lines

Re: ELP Turntable (was historical stylus rake angles)

George Brock-Nannestad

Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:08:46 +0100

54 lines

Re: ELP Turntable (was historical stylus rake angles)

steven austin

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:57:43 -0800

229 lines

ELP Turntable (was historical stylus rake angles)

Jeffrey Kane

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:41:11 -0600

198 lines

New Thread

EMTEC intentions

EMTEC intentions

Anonymous SET ARSCLIST DIGEST

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:23:11 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Fonotecnica - Italian label, active 1930s?

Fw: Fonotecnica - Italian label, active 1930s?

Dick Spottswood

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 20:54:14 -0500

67 lines

New Thread

Format conundrum

Re: Format conundrum

matt Sohn

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:42:14 -0500

26 lines

Re: Format conundrum

steven austin

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 18:12:15 -0800

48 lines

Re: Format conundrum

<>

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 21:07:26 EST

28 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Steven Smolian

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 18:28:58 -0500

73 lines

Re: Format conundrum

steven austin

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 14:02:14 -0800

67 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Steven C. Barr

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 16:38:13 -0500

46 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Karl Miller

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:12:27 -0600

33 lines

Re: Format conundrum

steven austin

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:39:49 -0800

40 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Tom

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:36:08 -0800

27 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Karl Miller

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:01:35 -0600

19 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Karl Miller

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 07:34:49 -0600

31 lines

Re: Format conundrum

steven austin

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 07:43:16 -0800

34 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Don Cox

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:47:29 +0000

32 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Rod Stephens

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 00:51:12 -0800

226 lines

Re: Format conundrum

steven austin

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:52:39 -0800

152 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Dave Bradley

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:49:20 -0500

23 lines

Re: Format conundrum

John Ross

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:36:40 -0800

38 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Steven C. Barr

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:25:57 -0500

47 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Steven C. Barr

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:16:09 -0500

38 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Rick Taylor

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:08:58 -0600

73 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Steven C. Barr

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:06:51 -0500

44 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Steven C. Barr

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:48:39 -0500

73 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Rod Stephens

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:17:58 -0800

134 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Rod Stephens

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:10:54 -0800

127 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Jerome Hartke

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:45:08 -0500

61 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Dan Kj

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:06:05 -0500

16 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Ron Fial

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:56:39 -0800

81 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Jeffrey Kane

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:39:36 -0600

204 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Richard L. Hess

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:33:45 -0500

39 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Don Cox

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:07:47 +0000

26 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Richard L. Hess

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:59:13 -0500

45 lines

Re: Format conundrum

steven austin

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:55:00 -0800

181 lines

Re: Format conundrum

John Spencer

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:51:38 -0600

74 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Steven C. Barr

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:49:06 -0500

53 lines

Re: Format conundrum

andy kolovos

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:50:40 -0500

73 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Steven C. Barr

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:29:40 -0500

29 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Watsky, Lance

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:17:57 -0500

163 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Karl Miller

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:10:01 -0600

35 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Richard L. Hess

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:02:18 -0500

124 lines

Re: Format conundrum

steven austin

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 12:57:59 -0800

144 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Watsky, Lance

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:45:48 -0500

128 lines

Re: Format conundrum

steven austin

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 12:12:35 -0800

98 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Richard L. Hess

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:43:12 -0500

59 lines

Re: Format conundrum

David Lewiston

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:35:05 -1000

87 lines

Re: Format conundrum

Rod Stephens

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:24:57 -0800

42 lines

Format conundrum

Anonymous SET ARSCLIST DIGEST

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 12:14:08 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy

Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy

Steven C. Barr

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 20:43:16 -0500

29 lines

Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy

Steven C. Barr

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 19:55:10 -0500

43 lines

Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy

Don Cox

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:32:39 +0000

40 lines

Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy

steven austin

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:37:33 -0800

104 lines

Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy

Richard Warren

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:24:42 -0500

85 lines

Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy

steven austin

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:01:04 -0800

81 lines

Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy

Steven Smolian

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:09:14 -0500

61 lines

Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy

<>

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:34:55 EST

30 lines

Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy

Matthew Barton

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:25:28 -0500

56 lines

Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy

Karl Miller

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 08:07:26 -0600

25 lines

Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy

Don Cox

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:33:53 +0000

34 lines

Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy

Steven Smolian

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 23:31:42 -0500

221 lines

Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy

steven austin

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:02:14 -0800

185 lines

Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy

Steven Smolian

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:45:53 -0500

126 lines

Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy

Dave Bradley

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:02:58 -0500

77 lines

Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy

seva

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:57:06 -0500

44 lines

Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy

Jeffrey Kane

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:42:24 -0600

29 lines

Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy

Steven C. Barr

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:35:03 -0500

74 lines

Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy

Richard L. Hess

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 00:40:08 -0500

137 lines

Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy

steven austin

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:27:57 -0800

99 lines

Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy

H. Duane Goldman

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:02:22 -0600

72 lines

Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy

Richard L. Hess

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:54:32 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer

Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer

Brandon Burke

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:18:55 -0800

55 lines

Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer

Steven C. Barr

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:13:14 -0500

21 lines

Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer

Karl Miller

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:01:32 -0600

112 lines

Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer

Steven Smolian

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:51:14 -0500

71 lines

Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer

steven austin

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:48:54 -0800

45 lines

Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer

Steven C. Barr

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:35:11 -0500

97 lines

Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer

steven austin

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:26:03 -0800

46 lines

Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer

Don Cox

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:59:06 +0000

33 lines

Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer

Brandon Burke

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:22:48 -0800

48 lines

Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer

steven austin

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:33:05 -0800

98 lines

Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer

Matthew Barton

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:25:57 -0500

87 lines

Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer

Siue Moffat

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:05:00 -0500

71 lines

Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer

Jeffrey Kane

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:30:55 -0600

83 lines

From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer

andy kolovos

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:07:45 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the...

Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the...

Steven C. Barr

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:28:54 -0500

26 lines

Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the...

<>

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:46:33 EST

35 lines

New Thread

Harry the Hipster search

Re: Harry the Hipster search

Steven C. Barr

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 22:43:50 -0500

27 lines

Re: Harry the Hipster search

Matthew Barton

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:01:30 -0500

52 lines

New Thread

Hearing aids--was: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Q...

Hearing aids--was: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Q...

Steven C. Barr

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:10:06 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

historical stylus rake angles (SRA)

Re: historical stylus rake angles (SRA)

Don Cox

Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:18:22 +0000

49 lines

Re: historical stylus rake angles (SRA)

Jon Noring

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:35:51 -0700

70 lines

Re: historical stylus rake angles (SRA)

Pete Tinker

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:36:42 -0800

215 lines

Re: historical stylus rake angles (SRA)

George Brock-Nannestad

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:59:38 +0100

28 lines

historical stylus rake angles (SRA)

Eric Jacobs

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:50:08 -0800

52 lines

New Thread

If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...

Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...

H. Duane Goldman

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:12:52 -0600

204 lines

Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...

Richard L. Hess

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:10:16 -0500

177 lines

Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...

H. Duane Goldman

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:51:37 -0600

144 lines

Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...

Steven C. Barr

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:08:33 -0500

30 lines

Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...

Marie O'Connell

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:35:40 -0600

105 lines

Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...

Richard L. Hess

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:02:50 -0500

114 lines

Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...

Richard L. Hess

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:54:34 -0500

130 lines

Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...

H. Duane Goldman

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:39:53 -0600

99 lines

Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...

Marie O'Connell

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:45:49 -0600

95 lines

Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...

Richard L. Hess

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:35:26 -0500

80 lines

Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...

Marie O'Connell

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:53:27 -0600

63 lines

Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...

Richard L. Hess

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 00:58:53 -0500

46 lines

Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...

Steven C. Barr

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 00:15:39 -0500

31 lines

Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...

Steven C. Barr

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 00:07:52 -0500

40 lines

Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...

Richard L. Hess

Sat, 8 Jan 2005 23:14:39 -0500

115 lines

If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...

Dick Spottswood

Sat, 8 Jan 2005 22:59:32 -0500

90 lines

New Thread

John Lomax Library of Congress recordings

Re: John Lomax Library of Congress recordings

Matthew Barton

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:40:16 -0500

113 lines

Re: John Lomax Library of Congress recordings

steven austin

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:47:27 -0800

90 lines

Re: John Lomax Library of Congress recordings

Matthew Barton

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:56:50 -0500

72 lines

Re: John Lomax Library of Congress recordings

steven austin

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:49:29 -0800

78 lines

Re: John Lomax Library of Congress recordings

Richard L. Hess

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:37:31 -0500

60 lines

John Lomax Library of Congress recordings

steven austin

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:24:49 -0800

42 lines

New Thread

Listening Test - was: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Re: Listening Test - was: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Eric Jacobs

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 23:35:38 -0800

177 lines

Re: Listening Test - was: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Steven C. Barr

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:47:43 -0500

139 lines

Re: Listening Test - was: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Dave Bradley

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:29:07 -0500

109 lines

Re: Listening Test - was: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Eric Jacobs

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:54:47 -0800

198 lines

New Thread

Lots of tape decks

Re: Lots of tape decks

steven austin

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 22:16:21 -0800

37 lines

Re: Lots of tape decks

<>

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 23:36:10 EST

25 lines

Re: Lots of tape decks

Richard L. Hess

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:32:39 -0500

43 lines

Lots of tape decks

matt Sohn

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:22:04 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

Magnetic tape shortage...

Re: Magnetic tape shortage...

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:59:46 -0500

134 lines

Re: Magnetic tape shortage...

Rod Stephens

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 20:06:01 -0800

101 lines

Re: Magnetic tape shortage...

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:44:27 -0500

66 lines

Re: Magnetic tape shortage...

davidgarland

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:01:42 -0600

21 lines

New Thread

MVI Audio Tape Fixer

Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer

Watsky, Lance

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:15:34 -0500

24 lines

Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:29:43 -0500

78 lines

Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer

David Hamilton

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:06:11 -0500

106 lines

Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer

Watsky, Lance

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:48:52 -0500

91 lines

Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer

<>

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 06:44:01 +0000

101 lines

Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer

Steven C. Barr

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:25:01 -0500

31 lines

Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer

Richard L. Hess

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:29:19 -0500

71 lines

Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer

David Hamilton

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:40:17 -0500

60 lines

Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer

Richard L. Hess

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:42:19 -0500

41 lines

Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer

Watsky, Lance

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:24:25 -0500

78 lines

Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer

Steven Smolian

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:10:45 -0500

52 lines

Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer

Watsky, Lance

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:25:23 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

new magnetic tape coming soon from Europe

new magnetic tape coming soon from Europe

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:39:37 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

Newsletter deadline correction

Newsletter deadline correction

David Seubert

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:03:44 -0800

19 lines

New Thread

Nominations for the 2005 ARSC Awards

Nominations for the 2005 ARSC Awards

Bill Klinger

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:37:43 -0500

89 lines

New Thread

Original Piano Roll recording

Re: Original Piano Roll recording

Karl Miller

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:46:22 -0600

29 lines

Original Piano Roll Recording

Doug Pomeroy

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:06:47 +0000

24 lines

Re: Original Piano Roll recording

Steven Smolian

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:19:58 -0500

64 lines

Re: Original Piano Roll recording

Don Cox

Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:12:30 +0000

35 lines

Re: Original Piano Roll recording

Stefan Skirtz

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:01:42 -0500

64 lines

Original Piano Roll recording

Doug Pomeroy

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:46:53 +0000

33 lines

New Thread

Practicalities

Practicalities

David Lewiston

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:12:46 -1000

22 lines

New Thread

Quantegy closed: TV piece

Quantegy closed: TV piece

Richard L. Hess

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 02:26:17 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

Quantegy files Chapter 11

Re: Quantegy files Chapter 11

Eric Jacobs

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:18:57 -0800

177 lines

Re: Quantegy files Chapter 11

Richard L. Hess

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:45:16 -0500

19 lines

Quantegy files Chapter 11

Richard L. Hess

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:21:13 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Quantegy has closed ???

Re: Quantegy has closed ???

James Lindner

Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:19:52 -0500

73 lines

Re: Quantegy has closed ???

Richard L. Hess

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 19:30:13 -0500

33 lines

Re: Quantegy has closed ???

Aaron Luis Levinson

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 18:33:47 -0500

74 lines

Re: Quantegy has closed ???

steven austin

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:51:49 -0800

39 lines

Re: Quantegy has closed ???

steven austin

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:48:44 -0800

51 lines

Re: Quantegy has closed ???

Dale Francis

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:53:44 -0500

24 lines

Re: Quantegy has closed ???

Don Cox

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:34:36 +0000

33 lines

Re: Quantegy has closed ???

Richard L. Hess

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:20:39 -0500

63 lines

Quantegy has closed ???

Dale Francis

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:38:03 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Record cleaning machines

Re: Record cleaning machines

Eric Jacobs

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 02:49:24 -0800

54 lines

Record cleaning machines

Jos Van Dyck

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:30:17 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

Recording Disc Preservation/Off-gassing?

Re: Recording Disc Preservation/Off-gassing?

Robert Hodge

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:12:12 -0500

129 lines

Re: Recording Disc Preservation/Off-gassing?

steven austin

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:17:14 -0800

94 lines

Re: Recording Disc Preservation/Off-gassing?

steven austin

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:07:35 -0800

94 lines

Re: Recording Disc Preservation/Off-gassing?

James Lindner

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:26:14 -0500

57 lines

Re: Recording Disc Preservation/Off-gassing?

Steven C. Barr

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:00:39 -0500

68 lines

Recording Disc Preservation/Off-gassing?

steven austin

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:13:51 -0800

69 lines

New Thread

Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Q...

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Q...

<>

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:56:28 EST

25 lines

New Thread

Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

matt Sohn

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:56:50 -0500

27 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Don Cox

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:43:54 +0000

47 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Steven C. Barr

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:03:22 -0500

41 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Mike Richter

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:51:36 -0800

61 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Steven C. Barr

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 18:16:22 -0500

33 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Karl Miller

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:46:37 -0600

34 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Steven Smolian

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:16:24 -0500

97 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Rod Stephens

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:49:26 -0800

64 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Steven C. Barr

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:39:01 -0500

71 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Mike Richter

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:57:42 -0800

38 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Rod Stephens

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:58:42 -0800

99 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Steven C. Barr

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:23:47 -0500

58 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Rod Stephens

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:33:55 -0800

124 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Jerome Hartke

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:56:05 -0500

65 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Dave Bradley

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:35:43 -0500

73 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

George Brock-Nannestad

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:22:36 +0100

112 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

H. Duane Goldman

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:20:36 -0600

62 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Mike Richter

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:15:57 -0800

39 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Eric Jacobs

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:10:18 -0800

67 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Dave Bradley

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:03:45 -0500

31 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Mike Richter

Sun, 16 Jan 2005 20:36:40 -0800

42 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Steven C. Barr

Sun, 16 Jan 2005 23:12:24 -0500

71 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Steven C. Barr

Sun, 16 Jan 2005 22:53:17 -0500

30 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Goran Finnberg

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 03:09:20 +0100

60 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Alex Hartov

Sun, 16 Jan 2005 15:14:05 -0500

50 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Mike Richter

Sun, 16 Jan 2005 11:12:06 -0800

62 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Goran Finnberg

Sun, 16 Jan 2005 19:56:49 +0100

34 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Goran Finnberg

Sun, 16 Jan 2005 19:56:42 +0100

33 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Mike Richter

Sun, 16 Jan 2005 09:23:25 -0800

28 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Aaron Luis Levinson

Sun, 16 Jan 2005 10:33:34 -0500

67 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Don Cox

Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:44:24 +0000

40 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Richard L. Hess

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 22:18:36 -0500

60 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Steven C. Barr

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 19:03:00 -0500

44 lines

Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

Richard L. Hess

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:37:32 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

Searching for Golden Age of Radio Collections

Searching for Golden Age of Radio Collections

Susan Siegel

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:06:33 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

Seeking appraiser

Re: Seeking appraiser

Steven C. Barr

Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:15:33 -0500

31 lines

Re: Seeking appraiser

steven austin

Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:47:35 -0800

31 lines

Re: Seeking appraiser

Steven C. Barr

Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:37:14 -0500

108 lines

Re: Seeking appraiser

steven austin

Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:37:04 -0800

102 lines

Re: Seeking appraiser

David Lewiston

Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:26:46 -1000

44 lines

Seeking appraiser

Eric Podietz

Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:47:51 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Slowing down playing speed in software

Re: Slowing down playing speed in software

seva

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:06:09 -0500

60 lines

Re: Slowing down playing speed in software

Richard L. Hess

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:07:39 -0500

60 lines

Re: Slowing down playing speed in software

Alex Hartov

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:10:48 -0500

50 lines

Re: Slowing down playing speed in software

Daniel Leech-Wilkinson

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:44:28 +0000

26 lines

Re: Slowing down playing speed in software

Rod Stephens

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:35:01 -0800

56 lines

Re: Slowing down playing speed in software

Mike Richter

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:31:11 -0800

34 lines

Re: Slowing down playing speed in software

Steven Smolian

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:47:07 -0500

64 lines

Re: Slowing down playing speed in software

matt Sohn

Sat, 19 Feb 2005 22:44:04 -0500

29 lines

Slowing down playing speed in software

Joel Bresler

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:39:01 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

Small sound booth for transfers and restoration

Re: Small sound booth for transfers and restoration

Eric Jacobs

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:54:48 -0800

76 lines

Re: Small sound booth for transfers and restoration

Steven C. Barr

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 22:39:19 -0500

72 lines

Small sound booth for transfers and restoration

RA Friedman

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:31:00 -0800

26 lines

New Thread

SPARS working with Quantegy for custom tape runs

SPARS working with Quantegy for custom tape runs

Richard L. Hess

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:46:49 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

squealing cassette tapes

Re: squealing cassette tapes

Richard L. Hess

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:47:23 -0500

45 lines

Re: squealing cassette tapes

Jeff Carroll

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:18:51 -0500

24 lines

Re: squealing cassette tapes

Richard L. Hess

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:18:33 -0500

61 lines

Re: squealing cassette tapes

Jos Van Dyck

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:01:50 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Stellavox support by Sonosax

Re: Stellavox support by Sonosax

Jos Van Dyck

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:01:40 +0100

55 lines

New Thread

Subject: RE: [ARSCLIST] historical stylus rake angles (SRA)

Re: Subject: RE: [ARSCLIST] historical stylus rake angles (SRA)

Vincent J. Novara

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:44:20 -0500

18 lines

Re: Subject: RE: [ARSCLIST] historical stylus rake angles (SRA)

Steven Smolian

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:21:52 -0500

147 lines

Re: Subject: RE: [ARSCLIST] historical stylus rake angles (SRA)

steven austin

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:17:49 -0800

167 lines

Re: Subject: RE: [ARSCLIST] historical stylus rake angles (SRA)

Jeffrey Kane

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:52:11 -0600

141 lines

Re: Subject: RE: [ARSCLIST] historical stylus rake angles (SRA)

steven austin

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:34:43 -0800

118 lines

Subject: RE: [ARSCLIST] historical stylus rake angles (SRA)

James L Wolf

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:21:19 -0500

101 lines

Re: Subject: RE: [ARSCLIST] historical stylus rake angles (SRA)

Richard Warren

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:06:50 -0500

92 lines

Subject: RE: [ARSCLIST] historical stylus rake angles (SRA)

steven austin

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:42:27 -0800

86 lines

New Thread

The state of cassette tape

Re: The state of cassette tape

Jerome Hartke

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 18:22:50 -0500

88 lines

Re: The state of cassette tape

Steven Smolian

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:26:34 -0500

62 lines

Re: The state of cassette tape

Don Cox

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:37:54 +0000

27 lines

Re: The state of cassette tape

Steven C. Barr

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:54:22 -0500

39 lines

Re: The state of cassette tape

Steven C. Barr

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:33:50 -0500

45 lines

Re: The state of cassette tape

steven austin

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:41:17 -0800

158 lines

Re: The state of cassette tape

Steven Smolian

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:38:59 -0500

136 lines

Re: The state of cassette tape

steven austin

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:28:25 -0800

110 lines

Re: The state of cassette tape

John Ross

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:20:21 -0800

74 lines

Re: The state of cassette tape

Matthew Barton

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:10:46 -0500

68 lines

The state of cassette tape

andy kolovos

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:14:46 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

The state of cassette tape: non-moving parts, etc.

Re: The state of cassette tape: non-moving parts, etc.

seva

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 22:17:00 -0500

45 lines

Re: The state of cassette tape: non-moving parts, etc.

seva

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 22:16:23 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

U.S. copyright

U.S. copyright

Steven Smolian

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:50:14 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

US Copyright office seeks public comment on "orphaned works"

US Copyright office seeks public comment on "orphaned works"

JJJJ

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:26:05 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Vertical Tracking Angle

Re: Vertical Tracking Angle

H. Duane Goldman

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:13:08 -0600

124 lines

Vertical Tracking Angle

Doug Pomeroy

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:04:36 +0000

103 lines

New Thread

Vinyl Killer Record Playing VW Van

Re: Vinyl Killer Record Playing VW Van

Steve Ramm

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:45:36 EST

35 lines

Re: Vinyl Killer Record Playing VW Van

Karl Miller

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:09:14 -0600

28 lines

Re: Vinyl Killer Record Playing VW Van

Steven C. Barr

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 22:00:37 -0500

33 lines

Re: Vinyl Killer Record Playing VW Van

Steven Smolian

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:29:42 -0500

59 lines

Re: Vinyl Killer Record Playing VW Van

<>

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 09:06:25 EST

29 lines

Vinyl Killer Record Playing VW Van

Dick Spottswood

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 19:25:06 -0500

54 lines

Re: Vinyl Killer Record Playing VW Van

steven austin

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:27:02 -0800

60 lines

Vinyl Killer Record Playing VW Van

Tom Caw

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:00:01 -0600

36 lines

New Thread

[Fwd: sound recording]

FWD: [Fwd: sound recording]

bnemerov

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:23:42 -0600

53 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager