|
|
|
Size
|
<No subject>
|
Brian Callahan |
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 00:29:40 -0500 |
17 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw
|
Dale Francis |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 06:56:42 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory
|
Dan Kj |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:54:24 -0500 |
63 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Don Cox |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:35:08 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Mike Richter |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:17:43 -0800 |
39 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
David Lewiston |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:04:36 -1000 |
78 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Steven C. Barr |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:43:48 -0500 |
20 lines |
A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Frank Strauss |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:14:24 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Mike Richter |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:45:19 -0800 |
48 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Steven Smolian |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:51:42 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Steven Smolian |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:50:32 -0500 |
51 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Dale Francis |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:14:46 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Karl Miller |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:34:29 -0600 |
24 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Don Cox |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:55:24 +0000 |
59 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Karl Miller |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:59:46 -0600 |
88 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Steven C. Barr |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:29:56 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Steven C. Barr |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:03:49 -0500 |
67 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
matt Sohn |
Sat, 19 Feb 2005 14:56:06 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
David Lewiston |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:39:21 -1000 |
79 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Dan Kj |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:02:59 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Steven Smolian |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:43:58 -0500 |
103 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Karl Miller |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 07:45:21 -0600 |
26 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Karl Miller |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 07:26:02 -0600 |
43 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Steven C. Barr |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:48:33 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
steven austin |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 18:13:02 -0800 |
203 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Steven C. Barr |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:57:40 -0500 |
133 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Steven Smolian |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:41:08 -0500 |
162 lines |
Re: A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Richard L. Hess |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:58:57 -0500 |
119 lines |
A fundamental Flaw: Was Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
James Lindner |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:31:52 -0500 |
122 lines |
Re: Allen Brothers - Bluebird B-5001 and Victor 23755 (or is that 23756?)
|
Dick Spottswood |
Sun, 2 Jan 2005 11:05:44 -0500 |
61 lines |
Allen Brothers - Bluebird B-5001 and Victor 23755 (or is that 23756?)
|
Tyrone Settlemier |
Sun, 2 Jan 2005 08:45:48 -0600 |
42 lines |
Re: Analog: A Race Against Time
|
seva |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:31:13 -0500 |
616 lines |
Re: Fw: Analog: A Race Against Time - Billboard August 28, 2004
|
H. Duane Goldman |
Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:43:28 -0600 |
68 lines |
Fw: Analog: A Race Against Time - Billboard August 28, 2004
|
Dick Spottswood |
Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:48:28 -0500 |
51 lines |
Re: Fw: Analog: A Race Against Time - Billboard August 28, 2004
|
Karl Miller |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:30:05 -0600 |
21 lines |
Re: Fw: Analog: A Race Against Time - Billboard August 28, 2004
|
steven austin |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:43:28 -0800 |
318 lines |
Fw: Analog: A Race Against Time - Billboard August 28, 2004
|
Dick Spottswood |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:25:23 -0500 |
202 lines |
ARSC Conference -- Register Now!
|
Bill Klinger |
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:42:57 -0500 |
102 lines |
ARSC Newsletter
|
David Seubert |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:54:49 -0800 |
28 lines |
ARSC Newsletter deadlines
|
David Seubert |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:59:56 -0800 |
28 lines |
Article in today's WSJ on Collecting 78s.
|
Steve Ramm |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:56:43 EST |
206 lines |
FW: audio mag tape 2"-1"-1/2"-1/4" available
|
Watsky, Lance |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:00:50 -0500 |
73 lines |
audio mag tape 2"-1"-1/2"-1/4" available
|
Joachim Polzer |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:40:58 +0100 |
55 lines |
Audio Recording "Freebie" Mailing List
|
Richard L. Hess |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:56:06 -0500 |
58 lines |
Re: Audio Recording "Freebie" Mailing List now video and film, too
|
Richard L. Hess |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:56:35 -0500 |
100 lines |
Available: Betacam, U-Matic tapes, 1" Layback machine
|
Richard L. Hess |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:52:24 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: cataloging question
|
Claus Trelby |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:07:06 -0500 |
176 lines |
Re: cataloging question
|
Brandon Burke |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:49:05 -0800 |
97 lines |
Re: cataloging question
|
Mike Richter |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:22:44 -0800 |
64 lines |
cataloging question
|
Brandon Burke |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:44:41 -0800 |
48 lines |
CFP ECDL 2005, Vienna, Austria, September 18-23 2005
|
Carl Rauch |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 23:57:43 +0100 |
147 lines |
Cisco Houston
|
Lewanne Jones |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:03:56 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: Clarification regarding "Seeking appraiser"
|
David Lewiston |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:01:32 -1000 |
157 lines |
Re: Clarification regarding "Seeking appraiser"
|
Eric Podietz |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:38:59 -0500 |
131 lines |
Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)
|
Steven Smolian |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:08:41 -0500 |
59 lines |
Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)
|
Dale Francis |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:48:37 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)
|
George Brock-Nannestad |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:10:43 +0100 |
100 lines |
Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)
|
Steven Smolian |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:04:20 -0500 |
88 lines |
Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)
|
Richard L. Hess |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:07:25 -0500 |
51 lines |
Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)
|
Steven C. Barr |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:54:51 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)
|
Dale Francis |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:20:19 -0500 |
79 lines |
Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)
|
John Ross |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:23:27 -0800 |
39 lines |
Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)
|
Richard L. Hess |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:07:13 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)
|
Karl Miller |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:52:58 -0600 |
53 lines |
Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)
|
Karl Miller |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 07:47:27 -0600 |
43 lines |
Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)
|
<> |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 23:16:40 EST |
23 lines |
Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)
|
steven austin |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:03:45 -0800 |
67 lines |
Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)
|
Steven Smolian |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:57:17 -0500 |
50 lines |
Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)
|
Steven Smolian |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:55:48 -0500 |
57 lines |
Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)
|
Dale Francis |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:14:59 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)
|
Don Cox |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:38:11 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)
|
<> |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:06:21 EST |
26 lines |
Re: Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)
|
George Brock-Nannestad |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 18:04:52 +0100 |
61 lines |
Compression (was Re: [ARSCLIST] A fundamental Flaw ...)
|
Mike Richter |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 06:57:35 -0800 |
56 lines |
Re: Conference Recording
|
Matt Bailey |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:32:22 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: Conference Recording
|
andy kolovos |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:25:25 -0500 |
75 lines |
Re: Conference Recording
|
Richard L. Hess |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:53:32 -0500 |
59 lines |
Conference Recording
|
Greg Yates |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:30:07 -0600 |
38 lines |
Consumer tape machines available
|
Richard L. Hess |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:55:32 -0500 |
56 lines |
Contact for Reserach re: Mills Publishing Company (Ellington, etc.)
|
Steve Ramm |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:39:28 EST |
26 lines |
Copyright Questions
|
Tim Brooks |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 17:49:35 EST |
26 lines |
DASH and 1-inch Video and the Quantegy closing
|
Richard L. Hess |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:53:20 -0500 |
27 lines |
DC Area ARSC event
|
Bryan E Cornell |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:08:16 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: Dealer for Otari MX5050 reel-to-reel?
|
Tim Murray |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:50:06 -0800 |
55 lines |
Dealer for Otari MX5050 reel-to-reel?
|
Matt Bailey |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:58:18 -0500 |
28 lines |
Don Richardson, early Columbia Records fiddler
|
Dick Spottswood |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:11:41 -0500 |
68 lines |
Re: Don't Dumpster That Tape Machine!
|
matt Sohn |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:02:13 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: Don't Dumpster That Tape Machine!
|
Steven C. Barr |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 19:29:55 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: Don't Dumpster That Tape Machine!
|
Richard L. Hess |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:41:28 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: Don't Dumpster That Tape Machine!
|
Richard L. Hess |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:56:09 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: Don't Dumpster That Tape Machine!
|
Jack L. Palmer |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:30:12 -0500 |
54 lines |
Re: Don't Dumpster That Tape Machine!
|
Cary Ginell |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:05:03 EST |
32 lines |
Don't Dumpster That Tape Machine!
|
Richard L. Hess |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:21:27 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: ELP Turntable (was historical stylus rake angles)
|
Eric Jacobs |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 03:56:17 -0800 |
151 lines |
Re: ELP Turntable (was historical stylus rake angles)
|
Don Cox |
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:26:32 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: ELP Turntable (was historical stylus rake angles)
|
Steven Smolian |
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 06:51:50 -0500 |
142 lines |
Re: ELP Turntable (was historical stylus rake angles)
|
George Brock-Nannestad |
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:08:46 +0100 |
54 lines |
Re: ELP Turntable (was historical stylus rake angles)
|
steven austin |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:57:43 -0800 |
229 lines |
ELP Turntable (was historical stylus rake angles)
|
Jeffrey Kane |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:41:11 -0600 |
198 lines |
EMTEC intentions
|
Anonymous SET ARSCLIST DIGEST |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:23:11 -0500 |
26 lines |
Fw: Fonotecnica - Italian label, active 1930s?
|
Dick Spottswood |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 20:54:14 -0500 |
67 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
matt Sohn |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:42:14 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
steven austin |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 18:12:15 -0800 |
48 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
<> |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 21:07:26 EST |
28 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Steven Smolian |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 18:28:58 -0500 |
73 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
steven austin |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 14:02:14 -0800 |
67 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Steven C. Barr |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 16:38:13 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Karl Miller |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:12:27 -0600 |
33 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
steven austin |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:39:49 -0800 |
40 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Tom |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:36:08 -0800 |
27 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Karl Miller |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:01:35 -0600 |
19 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Karl Miller |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 07:34:49 -0600 |
31 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
steven austin |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 07:43:16 -0800 |
34 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Don Cox |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:47:29 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Rod Stephens |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 00:51:12 -0800 |
226 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
steven austin |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:52:39 -0800 |
152 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Dave Bradley |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:49:20 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
John Ross |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:36:40 -0800 |
38 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Steven C. Barr |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:25:57 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Steven C. Barr |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:16:09 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Rick Taylor |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:08:58 -0600 |
73 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Steven C. Barr |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:06:51 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Steven C. Barr |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:48:39 -0500 |
73 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Rod Stephens |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:17:58 -0800 |
134 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Rod Stephens |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:10:54 -0800 |
127 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Jerome Hartke |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:45:08 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Dan Kj |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:06:05 -0500 |
16 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Ron Fial |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:56:39 -0800 |
81 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Jeffrey Kane |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:39:36 -0600 |
204 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Richard L. Hess |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:33:45 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Don Cox |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:07:47 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Richard L. Hess |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:59:13 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
steven austin |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:55:00 -0800 |
181 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
John Spencer |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:51:38 -0600 |
74 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Steven C. Barr |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:49:06 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
andy kolovos |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:50:40 -0500 |
73 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Steven C. Barr |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:29:40 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Watsky, Lance |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:17:57 -0500 |
163 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Karl Miller |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:10:01 -0600 |
35 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Richard L. Hess |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:02:18 -0500 |
124 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
steven austin |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 12:57:59 -0800 |
144 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Watsky, Lance |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:45:48 -0500 |
128 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
steven austin |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 12:12:35 -0800 |
98 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Richard L. Hess |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:43:12 -0500 |
59 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
David Lewiston |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:35:05 -1000 |
87 lines |
Re: Format conundrum
|
Rod Stephens |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:24:57 -0800 |
42 lines |
Format conundrum
|
Anonymous SET ARSCLIST DIGEST |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 12:14:08 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy
|
Steven C. Barr |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 20:43:16 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy
|
Steven C. Barr |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 19:55:10 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy
|
Don Cox |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:32:39 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy
|
steven austin |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:37:33 -0800 |
104 lines |
Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy
|
Richard Warren |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:24:42 -0500 |
85 lines |
Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy
|
steven austin |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:01:04 -0800 |
81 lines |
Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy
|
Steven Smolian |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:09:14 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy
|
<> |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:34:55 EST |
30 lines |
Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy
|
Matthew Barton |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:25:28 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy
|
Karl Miller |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 08:07:26 -0600 |
25 lines |
Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy
|
Don Cox |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:33:53 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy
|
Steven Smolian |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 23:31:42 -0500 |
221 lines |
Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy
|
steven austin |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:02:14 -0800 |
185 lines |
Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy
|
Steven Smolian |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:45:53 -0500 |
126 lines |
Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy
|
Dave Bradley |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:02:58 -0500 |
77 lines |
Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy
|
seva |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:57:06 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy
|
Jeffrey Kane |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:42:24 -0600 |
29 lines |
Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy
|
Steven C. Barr |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:35:03 -0500 |
74 lines |
Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy
|
Richard L. Hess |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 00:40:08 -0500 |
137 lines |
Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy
|
steven austin |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:27:57 -0800 |
99 lines |
Re: Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy
|
H. Duane Goldman |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:02:22 -0600 |
72 lines |
Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy
|
Richard L. Hess |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:54:32 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer
|
Brandon Burke |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:18:55 -0800 |
55 lines |
Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer
|
Steven C. Barr |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:13:14 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer
|
Karl Miller |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:01:32 -0600 |
112 lines |
Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer
|
Steven Smolian |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:51:14 -0500 |
71 lines |
Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer
|
steven austin |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:48:54 -0800 |
45 lines |
Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer
|
Steven C. Barr |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:35:11 -0500 |
97 lines |
Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer
|
steven austin |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:26:03 -0800 |
46 lines |
Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer
|
Don Cox |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:59:06 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer
|
Brandon Burke |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:22:48 -0800 |
48 lines |
Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer
|
steven austin |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:33:05 -0800 |
98 lines |
Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer
|
Matthew Barton |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:25:57 -0500 |
87 lines |
Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer
|
Siue Moffat |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:05:00 -0500 |
71 lines |
Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer
|
Jeffrey Kane |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:30:55 -0600 |
83 lines |
From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the Studer
|
andy kolovos |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:07:45 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the...
|
Steven C. Barr |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:28:54 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: From ProTools to Vinyl? was [ARSCLIST] Fred Layn's post on the...
|
<> |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:46:33 EST |
35 lines |
Re: Harry the Hipster search
|
Steven C. Barr |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 22:43:50 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: Harry the Hipster search
|
Matthew Barton |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:01:30 -0500 |
52 lines |
Hearing aids--was: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Q...
|
Steven C. Barr |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:10:06 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: historical stylus rake angles (SRA)
|
Don Cox |
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:18:22 +0000 |
49 lines |
Re: historical stylus rake angles (SRA)
|
Jon Noring |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:35:51 -0700 |
70 lines |
Re: historical stylus rake angles (SRA)
|
Pete Tinker |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:36:42 -0800 |
215 lines |
Re: historical stylus rake angles (SRA)
|
George Brock-Nannestad |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:59:38 +0100 |
28 lines |
historical stylus rake angles (SRA)
|
Eric Jacobs |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:50:08 -0800 |
52 lines |
Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...
|
H. Duane Goldman |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:12:52 -0600 |
204 lines |
Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...
|
Richard L. Hess |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:10:16 -0500 |
177 lines |
Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...
|
H. Duane Goldman |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:51:37 -0600 |
144 lines |
Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...
|
Steven C. Barr |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:08:33 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...
|
Marie O'Connell |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:35:40 -0600 |
105 lines |
Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...
|
Richard L. Hess |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:02:50 -0500 |
114 lines |
Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...
|
Richard L. Hess |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:54:34 -0500 |
130 lines |
Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...
|
H. Duane Goldman |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:39:53 -0600 |
99 lines |
Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...
|
Marie O'Connell |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:45:49 -0600 |
95 lines |
Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...
|
Richard L. Hess |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:35:26 -0500 |
80 lines |
Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...
|
Marie O'Connell |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:53:27 -0600 |
63 lines |
Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...
|
Richard L. Hess |
Sun, 9 Jan 2005 00:58:53 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...
|
Steven C. Barr |
Sun, 9 Jan 2005 00:15:39 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...
|
Steven C. Barr |
Sun, 9 Jan 2005 00:07:52 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...
|
Richard L. Hess |
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 23:14:39 -0500 |
115 lines |
If I knew you were coming I'd've baked a tape...
|
Dick Spottswood |
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 22:59:32 -0500 |
90 lines |
Re: John Lomax Library of Congress recordings
|
Matthew Barton |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:40:16 -0500 |
113 lines |
Re: John Lomax Library of Congress recordings
|
steven austin |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:47:27 -0800 |
90 lines |
Re: John Lomax Library of Congress recordings
|
Matthew Barton |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:56:50 -0500 |
72 lines |
Re: John Lomax Library of Congress recordings
|
steven austin |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:49:29 -0800 |
78 lines |
Re: John Lomax Library of Congress recordings
|
Richard L. Hess |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:37:31 -0500 |
60 lines |
John Lomax Library of Congress recordings
|
steven austin |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:24:49 -0800 |
42 lines |
Re: Listening Test - was: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Eric Jacobs |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 23:35:38 -0800 |
177 lines |
Re: Listening Test - was: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Steven C. Barr |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:47:43 -0500 |
139 lines |
Re: Listening Test - was: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Dave Bradley |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:29:07 -0500 |
109 lines |
Re: Listening Test - was: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Eric Jacobs |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:54:47 -0800 |
198 lines |
Re: Lots of tape decks
|
steven austin |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 22:16:21 -0800 |
37 lines |
Re: Lots of tape decks
|
<> |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 23:36:10 EST |
25 lines |
Re: Lots of tape decks
|
Richard L. Hess |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:32:39 -0500 |
43 lines |
Lots of tape decks
|
matt Sohn |
Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:22:04 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: Magnetic tape shortage...
|
[log in to unmask] |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:59:46 -0500 |
134 lines |
Re: Magnetic tape shortage...
|
Rod Stephens |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 20:06:01 -0800 |
101 lines |
Re: Magnetic tape shortage...
|
[log in to unmask] |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:44:27 -0500 |
66 lines |
Re: Magnetic tape shortage...
|
davidgarland |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:01:42 -0600 |
21 lines |
Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer
|
Watsky, Lance |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:15:34 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer
|
[log in to unmask] |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:29:43 -0500 |
78 lines |
Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer
|
David Hamilton |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:06:11 -0500 |
106 lines |
Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer
|
Watsky, Lance |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:48:52 -0500 |
91 lines |
Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer
|
<> |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 06:44:01 +0000 |
101 lines |
Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer
|
Steven C. Barr |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:25:01 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer
|
Richard L. Hess |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:29:19 -0500 |
71 lines |
Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer
|
David Hamilton |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:40:17 -0500 |
60 lines |
Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer
|
Richard L. Hess |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:42:19 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer
|
Watsky, Lance |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:24:25 -0500 |
78 lines |
Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer
|
Steven Smolian |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:10:45 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: MVI Audio Tape Fixer
|
Watsky, Lance |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:25:23 -0500 |
27 lines |
new magnetic tape coming soon from Europe
|
[log in to unmask] |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:39:37 +0100 |
34 lines |
Newsletter deadline correction
|
David Seubert |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:03:44 -0800 |
19 lines |
Nominations for the 2005 ARSC Awards
|
Bill Klinger |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:37:43 -0500 |
89 lines |
Re: Original Piano Roll recording
|
Karl Miller |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:46:22 -0600 |
29 lines |
Original Piano Roll Recording
|
Doug Pomeroy |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:06:47 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: Original Piano Roll recording
|
Steven Smolian |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:19:58 -0500 |
64 lines |
Re: Original Piano Roll recording
|
Don Cox |
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:12:30 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: Original Piano Roll recording
|
Stefan Skirtz |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:01:42 -0500 |
64 lines |
Original Piano Roll recording
|
Doug Pomeroy |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:46:53 +0000 |
33 lines |
Practicalities
|
David Lewiston |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:12:46 -1000 |
22 lines |
Quantegy closed: TV piece
|
Richard L. Hess |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 02:26:17 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: Quantegy files Chapter 11
|
Eric Jacobs |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:18:57 -0800 |
177 lines |
Re: Quantegy files Chapter 11
|
Richard L. Hess |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:45:16 -0500 |
19 lines |
Quantegy files Chapter 11
|
Richard L. Hess |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:21:13 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: Quantegy has closed ???
|
James Lindner |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:19:52 -0500 |
73 lines |
Re: Quantegy has closed ???
|
Richard L. Hess |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 19:30:13 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: Quantegy has closed ???
|
Aaron Luis Levinson |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 18:33:47 -0500 |
74 lines |
Re: Quantegy has closed ???
|
steven austin |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:51:49 -0800 |
39 lines |
Re: Quantegy has closed ???
|
steven austin |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:48:44 -0800 |
51 lines |
Re: Quantegy has closed ???
|
Dale Francis |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:53:44 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: Quantegy has closed ???
|
Don Cox |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:34:36 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: Quantegy has closed ???
|
Richard L. Hess |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:20:39 -0500 |
63 lines |
Quantegy has closed ???
|
Dale Francis |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:38:03 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: Record cleaning machines
|
Eric Jacobs |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 02:49:24 -0800 |
54 lines |
Record cleaning machines
|
Jos Van Dyck |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:30:17 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: Recording Disc Preservation/Off-gassing?
|
Robert Hodge |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:12:12 -0500 |
129 lines |
Re: Recording Disc Preservation/Off-gassing?
|
steven austin |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:17:14 -0800 |
94 lines |
Re: Recording Disc Preservation/Off-gassing?
|
steven austin |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:07:35 -0800 |
94 lines |
Re: Recording Disc Preservation/Off-gassing?
|
James Lindner |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:26:14 -0500 |
57 lines |
Re: Recording Disc Preservation/Off-gassing?
|
Steven C. Barr |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:00:39 -0500 |
68 lines |
Recording Disc Preservation/Off-gassing?
|
steven austin |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:13:51 -0800 |
69 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Q...
|
<> |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:56:28 EST |
25 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
matt Sohn |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:56:50 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Don Cox |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:43:54 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Steven C. Barr |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:03:22 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Mike Richter |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:51:36 -0800 |
61 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Steven C. Barr |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 18:16:22 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Karl Miller |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:46:37 -0600 |
34 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Steven Smolian |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:16:24 -0500 |
97 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Rod Stephens |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:49:26 -0800 |
64 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Steven C. Barr |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:39:01 -0500 |
71 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Mike Richter |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:57:42 -0800 |
38 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Rod Stephens |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:58:42 -0800 |
99 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Steven C. Barr |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:23:47 -0500 |
58 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Rod Stephens |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:33:55 -0800 |
124 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Jerome Hartke |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:56:05 -0500 |
65 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Dave Bradley |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:35:43 -0500 |
73 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
George Brock-Nannestad |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:22:36 +0100 |
112 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
H. Duane Goldman |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:20:36 -0600 |
62 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Mike Richter |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:15:57 -0800 |
39 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Eric Jacobs |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:10:18 -0800 |
67 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Dave Bradley |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:03:45 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Mike Richter |
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 20:36:40 -0800 |
42 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Steven C. Barr |
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 23:12:24 -0500 |
71 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Steven C. Barr |
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 22:53:17 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Goran Finnberg |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 03:09:20 +0100 |
60 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Alex Hartov |
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 15:14:05 -0500 |
50 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Mike Richter |
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 11:12:06 -0800 |
62 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Goran Finnberg |
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 19:56:49 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Goran Finnberg |
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 19:56:42 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Mike Richter |
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 09:23:25 -0800 |
28 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Aaron Luis Levinson |
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 10:33:34 -0500 |
67 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Don Cox |
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:44:24 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Richard L. Hess |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 22:18:36 -0500 |
60 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Steven C. Barr |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 19:03:00 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
|
Richard L. Hess |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:37:32 -0500 |
36 lines |
Searching for Golden Age of Radio Collections
|
Susan Siegel |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:06:33 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: Seeking appraiser
|
Steven C. Barr |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:15:33 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: Seeking appraiser
|
steven austin |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:47:35 -0800 |
31 lines |
Re: Seeking appraiser
|
Steven C. Barr |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:37:14 -0500 |
108 lines |
Re: Seeking appraiser
|
steven austin |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:37:04 -0800 |
102 lines |
Re: Seeking appraiser
|
David Lewiston |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:26:46 -1000 |
44 lines |
Seeking appraiser
|
Eric Podietz |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:47:51 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: Slowing down playing speed in software
|
seva |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:06:09 -0500 |
60 lines |
Re: Slowing down playing speed in software
|
Richard L. Hess |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:07:39 -0500 |
60 lines |
Re: Slowing down playing speed in software
|
Alex Hartov |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:10:48 -0500 |
50 lines |
Re: Slowing down playing speed in software
|
Daniel Leech-Wilkinson |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:44:28 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: Slowing down playing speed in software
|
Rod Stephens |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:35:01 -0800 |
56 lines |
Re: Slowing down playing speed in software
|
Mike Richter |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:31:11 -0800 |
34 lines |
Re: Slowing down playing speed in software
|
Steven Smolian |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:47:07 -0500 |
64 lines |
Re: Slowing down playing speed in software
|
matt Sohn |
Sat, 19 Feb 2005 22:44:04 -0500 |
29 lines |
Slowing down playing speed in software
|
Joel Bresler |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:39:01 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: Small sound booth for transfers and restoration
|
Eric Jacobs |
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:54:48 -0800 |
76 lines |
Re: Small sound booth for transfers and restoration
|
Steven C. Barr |
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 22:39:19 -0500 |
72 lines |
Small sound booth for transfers and restoration
|
RA Friedman |
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:31:00 -0800 |
26 lines |
SPARS working with Quantegy for custom tape runs
|
Richard L. Hess |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:46:49 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: squealing cassette tapes
|
Richard L. Hess |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:47:23 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: squealing cassette tapes
|
Jeff Carroll |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:18:51 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: squealing cassette tapes
|
Richard L. Hess |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:18:33 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: squealing cassette tapes
|
Jos Van Dyck |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:01:50 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: Stellavox support by Sonosax
|
Jos Van Dyck |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:01:40 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: Subject: RE: [ARSCLIST] historical stylus rake angles (SRA)
|
Vincent J. Novara |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:44:20 -0500 |
18 lines |
Re: Subject: RE: [ARSCLIST] historical stylus rake angles (SRA)
|
Steven Smolian |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:21:52 -0500 |
147 lines |
Re: Subject: RE: [ARSCLIST] historical stylus rake angles (SRA)
|
steven austin |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:17:49 -0800 |
167 lines |
Re: Subject: RE: [ARSCLIST] historical stylus rake angles (SRA)
|
Jeffrey Kane |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:52:11 -0600 |
141 lines |
Re: Subject: RE: [ARSCLIST] historical stylus rake angles (SRA)
|
steven austin |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:34:43 -0800 |
118 lines |
Subject: RE: [ARSCLIST] historical stylus rake angles (SRA)
|
James L Wolf |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:21:19 -0500 |
101 lines |
Re: Subject: RE: [ARSCLIST] historical stylus rake angles (SRA)
|
Richard Warren |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:06:50 -0500 |
92 lines |
Subject: RE: [ARSCLIST] historical stylus rake angles (SRA)
|
steven austin |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:42:27 -0800 |
86 lines |
Re: The state of cassette tape
|
Jerome Hartke |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 18:22:50 -0500 |
88 lines |
Re: The state of cassette tape
|
Steven Smolian |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:26:34 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: The state of cassette tape
|
Don Cox |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:37:54 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: The state of cassette tape
|
Steven C. Barr |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:54:22 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: The state of cassette tape
|
Steven C. Barr |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:33:50 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: The state of cassette tape
|
steven austin |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:41:17 -0800 |
158 lines |
Re: The state of cassette tape
|
Steven Smolian |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:38:59 -0500 |
136 lines |
Re: The state of cassette tape
|
steven austin |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:28:25 -0800 |
110 lines |
Re: The state of cassette tape
|
John Ross |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:20:21 -0800 |
74 lines |
Re: The state of cassette tape
|
Matthew Barton |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:10:46 -0500 |
68 lines |
The state of cassette tape
|
andy kolovos |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:14:46 -0500 |
49 lines |
Re: The state of cassette tape: non-moving parts, etc.
|
seva |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 22:17:00 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: The state of cassette tape: non-moving parts, etc.
|
seva |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 22:16:23 -0500 |
45 lines |
U.S. copyright
|
Steven Smolian |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:50:14 -0500 |
43 lines |
US Copyright office seeks public comment on "orphaned works"
|
JJJJ |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:26:05 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: Vertical Tracking Angle
|
H. Duane Goldman |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:13:08 -0600 |
124 lines |
Vertical Tracking Angle
|
Doug Pomeroy |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:04:36 +0000 |
103 lines |
Re: Vinyl Killer Record Playing VW Van
|
Steve Ramm |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:45:36 EST |
35 lines |
Re: Vinyl Killer Record Playing VW Van
|
Karl Miller |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:09:14 -0600 |
28 lines |
Re: Vinyl Killer Record Playing VW Van
|
Steven C. Barr |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 22:00:37 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: Vinyl Killer Record Playing VW Van
|
Steven Smolian |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:29:42 -0500 |
59 lines |
Re: Vinyl Killer Record Playing VW Van
|
<> |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 09:06:25 EST |
29 lines |
Vinyl Killer Record Playing VW Van
|
Dick Spottswood |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 19:25:06 -0500 |
54 lines |
Re: Vinyl Killer Record Playing VW Van
|
steven austin |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:27:02 -0800 |
60 lines |
Vinyl Killer Record Playing VW Van
|
Tom Caw |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:00:01 -0600 |
36 lines |
FWD: [Fwd: sound recording]
|
bnemerov |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:23:42 -0600 |
53 lines |