LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for MODS Archives


MODS Archives

MODS Archives


January 2005


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

Couldnt finish! Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!! (1 message)
Getting MADS back on track (1 message)
I'm stupid Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!! (1 message)
Language coding (WAS Re: [MODS] New MADS draft, January 13) (1 message)
MADS bug report (1 message)
merits of a type library (18 messages)
MODS and Atom? (2 messages)
MODS part (30 messages)
New MADS draft, January 13 (8 messages)
On what system does MODS run? (3 messages)
Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!! (4 messages)
purpose of a type library (2 messages)
RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion (11 messages)
Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!! (1 message)
Schema validation (1 message)
Type library and unqualified local elements (1 message)
Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (1 message)
Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library) (7 messages)
Using the <extension> element (3 messages)
why is mods allowed as root? (7 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MODS Home

MODS Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

Couldnt finish! Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!

Couldnt finish! Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!

Barzilai Spinak

Sun, 30 Jan 2005 00:46:03 -0200

79 lines

New Thread

Getting MADS back on track

Getting MADS back on track

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:18:21 -0500

64 lines

New Thread

I'm stupid Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!

I'm stupid Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!

Barzilai Spinak

Sun, 30 Jan 2005 01:01:06 -0200

24 lines

New Thread

Language coding (WAS Re: [MODS] New MADS draft, January 13)

Language coding (WAS Re: [MODS] New MADS draft, January 13)

Rebecca S. Guenther

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:26:30 -0500

136 lines

New Thread

MADS bug report

Re: MADS bug report

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:20:35 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

merits of a type library

Re: merits of a type library

Bruce D'Arcus

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 07:18:50 -0500

21 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Bruce D'Arcus

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:52:43 -0500

42 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Andrew E Switala

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:24:41 -0500

32 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Bruce D'Arcus

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:44:38 -0500

36 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Bruce D'Arcus

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:46:53 -0500

74 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:20:51 -0500

18 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Andrew E Switala

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:17:05 -0500

62 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Bruce D'Arcus

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:59:13 -0500

67 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:06:25 -0500

35 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Bruce D'Arcus

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:27:11 -0500

67 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:36:44 -0500

55 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Andrew E Switala

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:12:08 -0500

61 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Bruce D'Arcus

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:10:09 -0500

27 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:49:39 -0500

26 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:40:03 -0500

48 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Andrew E Switala

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:11:23 -0500

36 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Bruce D'Arcus

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:41:22 -0500

52 lines

merits of a type library

Rebecca S. Guenther

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:11:15 -0500

76 lines

New Thread

MODS and Atom?

Re: MODS and Atom?

Bruce D'Arcus

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:53:57 -0500

23 lines

MODS and Atom?

Bruce D'Arcus

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:32:43 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

MODS part

Re: MODS part

Mike Rylander

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 16:20:06 +0000

119 lines

Re: MODS part

Mike Rylander

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:15:57 +0000

163 lines

Re: MODS part

Dick Thaxter

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:11:24 -0500

111 lines

Re: MODS part

Dick Thaxter

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:17:48 -0500

145 lines

Re: MODS part

Dick Thaxter

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:10:20 -0500

62 lines

MODS part

Mike Rylander

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 22:49:32 +0000

81 lines

Re: MODS part

Karen Coyle

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:33:48 -0800

164 lines

Re: MODS part

Mike Rylander

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:41:49 +0000

118 lines

Re: MODS part

Bruce D'Arcus

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:09:40 -0500

32 lines

Re: MODS part

Rebecca S. Guenther

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:40:44 -0500

63 lines

Re: MODS part

Ruth Bogan

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:20:13 -0500

42 lines

Re: MODS part

Mike Rylander

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:01:18 +0000

39 lines

Re: MODS part

Dick Thaxter

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:54:31 -0500

73 lines

Re: MODS part

Mike Rylander

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 19:54:07 +0000

82 lines

Re: MODS part

Bruce D'Arcus

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:16:28 -0500

25 lines

Re: MODS part

Bruce D'Arcus

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:12:18 -0500

44 lines

Re: MODS part

Rebecca S. Guenther

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:02:01 -0500

78 lines

Re: MODS part

Mike Rylander

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:08:23 +0000

39 lines

Re: MODS part

Mike Rylander

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 17:35:52 +0000

60 lines

Re: MODS part

Andrew E Switala

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:34:22 -0500

79 lines

Re: MODS part

Karen Coyle

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:18:49 -0800

62 lines

Re: MODS part

Bruce D'Arcus

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:07:30 -0500

31 lines

Re: MODS part

Rebecca S. Guenther

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:57:28 -0500

122 lines

Re: MODS part

Mike Rylander

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:39:21 +0000

77 lines

Re: MODS part

Bruce D'Arcus

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:39:43 -0500

39 lines

Re: MODS part

Ruth Bogan

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:09:43 -0500

108 lines

Re: MODS part

Karen Coyle

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 07:56:48 -0800

49 lines

Re: MODS part

Bruce D'Arcus

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:52:46 -0500

30 lines

Re: MODS part

Andrew E Switala

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:51:39 -0500

67 lines

MODS part

Rebecca S. Guenther

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:26:01 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

New MADS draft, January 13

Re: New MADS draft, January 13

Andrew E Switala

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:57:13 -0500

96 lines

Re: New MADS draft, January 13

Rebecca S. Guenther

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:43:30 -0500

73 lines

Re: New MADS draft, January 13

Andrew E Switala

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:13:52 -0500

57 lines

Re: New MADS draft, January 13

Bruce D'Arcus

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:31:25 -0500

26 lines

Re: New MADS draft, January 13

Andrew E Switala

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:46:48 -0500

28 lines

Re: New MADS draft, January 13

Bruce D'Arcus

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:43:24 -0500

20 lines

Re: New MADS draft, January 13

Andrew E Switala

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:45:35 -0500

33 lines

New MADS draft, January 13

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:27:00 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

On what system does MODS run?

Re: On what system does MODS run?

Rebecca S. Guenther

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:48:06 -0500

37 lines

Re: On what system does MODS run?

Bruce D'Arcus

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:07:58 -0500

23 lines

On what system does MODS run?

Bill Walker

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:35:10 -0600

59 lines

New Thread

Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!

Re: Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!

Bruce D'Arcus

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 23:42:24 -0500

34 lines

Re: Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!

Barzilai Spinak

Sun, 30 Jan 2005 02:16:06 -0200

51 lines

Re: Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!

Bruce D'Arcus

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 22:39:09 -0500

23 lines

Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!

Barzilai Spinak

Sun, 30 Jan 2005 01:12:41 -0200

26 lines

New Thread

purpose of a type library

Re: purpose of a type library

Bruce D'Arcus

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:11:49 -0500

58 lines

purpose of a type library

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:03:03 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion

Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion

Diane Hillmann

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:44:00 -0500

73 lines

Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion

Bruce D'Arcus

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:00:11 -0500

33 lines

Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion

Rebecca S. Guenther

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:48:17 -0500

98 lines

Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion

Barbara B Tillett

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:18:23 -0500

78 lines

Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion

Bruce D'Arcus

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 08:30:35 -0500

56 lines

Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion

Andrew E Switala

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 21:01:34 -0500

45 lines

Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion

Bruce D'Arcus

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:56:31 -0500

44 lines

Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion

Karen Coyle

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:44:55 -0800

85 lines

Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:26:19 -0500

24 lines

Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion

Bruce D'Arcus

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:16:05 -0500

50 lines

Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:42:03 -0500

115 lines

New Thread

Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!

Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!

Barzilai Spinak

Sun, 30 Jan 2005 00:24:47 -0200

72 lines

New Thread

Schema validation

Schema validation

Andrew E Switala

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:56:30 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Type library and unqualified local elements

Type library and unqualified local elements

Andrew E Switala

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:36:54 -0500

67 lines

New Thread

Unifying MODS and MADS namespace

Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace

Andrew E Switala

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:51:52 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)

Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)

Bruce D'Arcus

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:30:00 -0500

30 lines

Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:55:01 -0500

39 lines

Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)

Andrew E Switala

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:47:46 -0500

42 lines

Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)

Andrew E Switala

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:41:23 -0500

24 lines

Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)

Bruce D'Arcus

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:33:49 -0500

34 lines

Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)

Bruce D'Arcus

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:26:46 -0500

42 lines

Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:59:50 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Using the <extension> element

Re: Using the <extension> element

Ruth Bogan

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:00:24 -0500

148 lines

Re: Using the <extension> element

Riley, Jenn

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:33:05 -0500

123 lines

Using the <extension> element

Ruth Bogan

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:49:28 -0500

80 lines

New Thread

why is mods allowed as root?

Re: why is mods allowed as root?

Bruce D'Arcus

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:37:01 -0500

22 lines

Re: why is mods allowed as root?

Nathan L Trail

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:24:19 -0500

121 lines

Re: why is mods allowed as root?

Nathan L Trail

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:24:19 -0500

121 lines

Re: why is mods allowed as root?

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:08:37 -0500

42 lines

Re: why is mods allowed as root?

Bruce D'Arcus

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:16:20 -0500

32 lines

Re: why is mods allowed as root?

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:02:35 -0500

24 lines

why is mods allowed as root?

Bruce D'Arcus

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:59:37 -0500

18 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager