|
|
|
|
Size
|
Re: merits of a type library
|
Andrew E Switala |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:24:41 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: merits of a type library
|
Andrew E Switala |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:17:05 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: merits of a type library
|
Andrew E Switala |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:12:08 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: merits of a type library
|
Andrew E Switala |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:11:23 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Andrew E Switala |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:34:22 -0500 |
79 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Andrew E Switala |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:51:39 -0500 |
67 lines |
Re: New MADS draft, January 13
|
Andrew E Switala |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:57:13 -0500 |
96 lines |
Re: New MADS draft, January 13
|
Andrew E Switala |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:13:52 -0500 |
57 lines |
Re: New MADS draft, January 13
|
Andrew E Switala |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:46:48 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: New MADS draft, January 13
|
Andrew E Switala |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:45:35 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
|
Andrew E Switala |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 21:01:34 -0500 |
45 lines |
Schema validation
|
Andrew E Switala |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:56:30 -0500 |
38 lines |
Type library and unqualified local elements
|
Andrew E Switala |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:36:54 -0500 |
67 lines |
Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace
|
Andrew E Switala |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:51:52 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)
|
Andrew E Switala |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:47:46 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)
|
Andrew E Switala |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:41:23 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
|
Barbara B Tillett |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:18:23 -0500 |
78 lines |
Couldnt finish! Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!
|
Barzilai Spinak |
Sun, 30 Jan 2005 00:46:03 -0200 |
79 lines |
I'm stupid Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!
|
Barzilai Spinak |
Sun, 30 Jan 2005 01:01:06 -0200 |
24 lines |
Re: Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!
|
Barzilai Spinak |
Sun, 30 Jan 2005 02:16:06 -0200 |
51 lines |
Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!
|
Barzilai Spinak |
Sun, 30 Jan 2005 01:12:41 -0200 |
26 lines |
Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!
|
Barzilai Spinak |
Sun, 30 Jan 2005 00:24:47 -0200 |
72 lines |
On what system does MODS run?
|
Bill Walker |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:35:10 -0600 |
59 lines |
Re: merits of a type library
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 07:18:50 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: merits of a type library
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:52:43 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: merits of a type library
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:44:38 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: merits of a type library
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:46:53 -0500 |
74 lines |
Re: merits of a type library
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:59:13 -0500 |
67 lines |
Re: merits of a type library
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:27:11 -0500 |
67 lines |
Re: merits of a type library
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:10:09 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: merits of a type library
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:41:22 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: MODS and Atom?
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:53:57 -0500 |
23 lines |
MODS and Atom?
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:32:43 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:09:40 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:16:28 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:12:18 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:07:30 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:39:43 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:52:46 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: New MADS draft, January 13
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:31:25 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: New MADS draft, January 13
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:43:24 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: On what system does MODS run?
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:07:58 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 23:42:24 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 22:39:09 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: purpose of a type library
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:11:49 -0500 |
58 lines |
Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:00:11 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 08:30:35 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:56:31 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:16:05 -0500 |
50 lines |
Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:30:00 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:33:49 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:26:46 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: why is mods allowed as root?
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:37:01 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: why is mods allowed as root?
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:16:20 -0500 |
32 lines |
why is mods allowed as root?
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:59:37 -0500 |
18 lines |
Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
|
Diane Hillmann |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:44:00 -0500 |
73 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Dick Thaxter |
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:11:24 -0500 |
111 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Dick Thaxter |
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:17:48 -0500 |
145 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Dick Thaxter |
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:10:20 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Dick Thaxter |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:54:31 -0500 |
73 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Karen Coyle |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:33:48 -0800 |
164 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Karen Coyle |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:18:49 -0800 |
62 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Karen Coyle |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 07:56:48 -0800 |
49 lines |
Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
|
Karen Coyle |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:44:55 -0800 |
85 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Mike Rylander |
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 16:20:06 +0000 |
119 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Mike Rylander |
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:15:57 +0000 |
163 lines |
MODS part
|
Mike Rylander |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 22:49:32 +0000 |
81 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Mike Rylander |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:41:49 +0000 |
118 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Mike Rylander |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:01:18 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Mike Rylander |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 19:54:07 +0000 |
82 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Mike Rylander |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:08:23 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Mike Rylander |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 17:35:52 +0000 |
60 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Mike Rylander |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:39:21 +0000 |
77 lines |
Re: why is mods allowed as root?
|
Nathan L Trail |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:24:19 -0500 |
121 lines |
Re: why is mods allowed as root?
|
Nathan L Trail |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:24:19 -0500 |
121 lines |
Getting MADS back on track
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:18:21 -0500 |
64 lines |
Re: MADS bug report
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:20:35 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: merits of a type library
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:20:51 -0500 |
18 lines |
Re: merits of a type library
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:06:25 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: merits of a type library
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:36:44 -0500 |
55 lines |
Re: merits of a type library
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:49:39 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: merits of a type library
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:40:03 -0500 |
48 lines |
New MADS draft, January 13
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:27:00 -0500 |
34 lines |
purpose of a type library
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:03:03 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:26:19 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:42:03 -0500 |
115 lines |
Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:55:01 -0500 |
39 lines |
Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:59:50 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: why is mods allowed as root?
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:08:37 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: why is mods allowed as root?
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:02:35 -0500 |
24 lines |
Language coding (WAS Re: [MODS] New MADS draft, January 13)
|
Rebecca S. Guenther |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:26:30 -0500 |
136 lines |
merits of a type library
|
Rebecca S. Guenther |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:11:15 -0500 |
76 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Rebecca S. Guenther |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:40:44 -0500 |
63 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Rebecca S. Guenther |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:02:01 -0500 |
78 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Rebecca S. Guenther |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:57:28 -0500 |
122 lines |
MODS part
|
Rebecca S. Guenther |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:26:01 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: New MADS draft, January 13
|
Rebecca S. Guenther |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:43:30 -0500 |
73 lines |
Re: On what system does MODS run?
|
Rebecca S. Guenther |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:48:06 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
|
Rebecca S. Guenther |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:48:17 -0500 |
98 lines |
Re: Using the <extension> element
|
Riley, Jenn |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:33:05 -0500 |
123 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Ruth Bogan |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:20:13 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: MODS part
|
Ruth Bogan |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:09:43 -0500 |
108 lines |
Re: Using the <extension> element
|
Ruth Bogan |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:00:24 -0500 |
148 lines |
Using the <extension> element
|
Ruth Bogan |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:49:28 -0500 |
80 lines |
