LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for MODS Archives


MODS Archives

MODS Archives


January 2005


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MODS Home

MODS Home

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Chronologically

Size

Re: MADS bug report

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:20:35 -0500

25 lines

Schema validation

Andrew E Switala

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:56:30 -0500

38 lines

Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:42:03 -0500

115 lines

Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion

Bruce D'Arcus

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:16:05 -0500

50 lines

Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:26:19 -0500

24 lines

Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion

Karen Coyle

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:44:55 -0800

85 lines

Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion

Bruce D'Arcus

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:56:31 -0500

44 lines

Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion

Andrew E Switala

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 21:01:34 -0500

45 lines

Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion

Bruce D'Arcus

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 08:30:35 -0500

56 lines

Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion

Barbara B Tillett

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:18:23 -0500

78 lines

Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion

Rebecca S. Guenther

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:48:17 -0500

98 lines

Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion

Bruce D'Arcus

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:00:11 -0500

33 lines

Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion

Diane Hillmann

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:44:00 -0500

73 lines

Using the <extension> element

Ruth Bogan

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:49:28 -0500

80 lines

Re: Using the <extension> element

Riley, Jenn

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:33:05 -0500

123 lines

Re: Using the <extension> element

Ruth Bogan

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:00:24 -0500

148 lines

New MADS draft, January 13

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:27:00 -0500

34 lines

Re: New MADS draft, January 13

Andrew E Switala

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:45:35 -0500

33 lines

Re: New MADS draft, January 13

Bruce D'Arcus

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:43:24 -0500

20 lines

Re: New MADS draft, January 13

Andrew E Switala

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:46:48 -0500

28 lines

Re: New MADS draft, January 13

Bruce D'Arcus

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:31:25 -0500

26 lines

Re: New MADS draft, January 13

Andrew E Switala

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:13:52 -0500

57 lines

Re: New MADS draft, January 13

Rebecca S. Guenther

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:43:30 -0500

73 lines

Re: New MADS draft, January 13

Andrew E Switala

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:57:13 -0500

96 lines

Language coding (WAS Re: [MODS] New MADS draft, January 13)

Rebecca S. Guenther

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:26:30 -0500

136 lines

MODS and Atom?

Bruce D'Arcus

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:32:43 -0500

28 lines

merits of a type library

Rebecca S. Guenther

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:11:15 -0500

76 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Bruce D'Arcus

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:41:22 -0500

52 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Andrew E Switala

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:11:23 -0500

36 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:40:03 -0500

48 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:49:39 -0500

26 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Bruce D'Arcus

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:10:09 -0500

27 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Andrew E Switala

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:12:08 -0500

61 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:36:44 -0500

55 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Bruce D'Arcus

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:27:11 -0500

67 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:06:25 -0500

35 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Bruce D'Arcus

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:59:13 -0500

67 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Andrew E Switala

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:17:05 -0500

62 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:20:51 -0500

18 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Bruce D'Arcus

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:46:53 -0500

74 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Bruce D'Arcus

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:44:38 -0500

36 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Andrew E Switala

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:24:41 -0500

32 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Bruce D'Arcus

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:52:43 -0500

42 lines

Re: merits of a type library

Bruce D'Arcus

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 07:18:50 -0500

21 lines

Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:59:50 -0500

24 lines

Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)

Bruce D'Arcus

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:26:46 -0500

42 lines

Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)

Bruce D'Arcus

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:33:49 -0500

34 lines

Type library and unqualified local elements

Andrew E Switala

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:36:54 -0500

67 lines

Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)

Andrew E Switala

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:41:23 -0500

24 lines

Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)

Andrew E Switala

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:47:46 -0500

42 lines

Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:55:01 -0500

39 lines

Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)

Bruce D'Arcus

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:30:00 -0500

30 lines

Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace

Andrew E Switala

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:51:52 -0500

29 lines

purpose of a type library

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:03:03 -0500

40 lines

Re: purpose of a type library

Bruce D'Arcus

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:11:49 -0500

58 lines

why is mods allowed as root?

Bruce D'Arcus

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:59:37 -0500

18 lines

Re: why is mods allowed as root?

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:02:35 -0500

24 lines

Getting MADS back on track

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:18:21 -0500

64 lines

Re: why is mods allowed as root?

Bruce D'Arcus

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:16:20 -0500

32 lines

MODS part

Rebecca S. Guenther

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:26:01 -0500

43 lines

Re: MODS part

Andrew E Switala

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:51:39 -0500

67 lines

Re: MODS part

Bruce D'Arcus

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:52:46 -0500

30 lines

Re: MODS and Atom?

Bruce D'Arcus

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:53:57 -0500

23 lines

Re: MODS part

Karen Coyle

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 07:56:48 -0800

49 lines

Re: why is mods allowed as root?

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:08:37 -0500

42 lines

Re: why is mods allowed as root?

Nathan L Trail

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:24:19 -0500

121 lines

Re: why is mods allowed as root?

Nathan L Trail

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:24:19 -0500

121 lines

Re: why is mods allowed as root?

Bruce D'Arcus

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:37:01 -0500

22 lines

Re: MODS part

Ruth Bogan

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:09:43 -0500

108 lines

Re: MODS part

Bruce D'Arcus

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:39:43 -0500

39 lines

On what system does MODS run?

Bill Walker

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:35:10 -0600

59 lines

Re: On what system does MODS run?

Bruce D'Arcus

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:07:58 -0500

23 lines

Re: MODS part

Mike Rylander

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:39:21 +0000

77 lines

Re: On what system does MODS run?

Rebecca S. Guenther

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:48:06 -0500

37 lines

Re: MODS part

Rebecca S. Guenther

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:57:28 -0500

122 lines

Re: MODS part

Bruce D'Arcus

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:07:30 -0500

31 lines

Re: MODS part

Karen Coyle

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:18:49 -0800

62 lines

Re: MODS part

Andrew E Switala

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:34:22 -0500

79 lines

Re: MODS part

Mike Rylander

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 17:35:52 +0000

60 lines

Re: MODS part

Mike Rylander

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:08:23 +0000

39 lines

Re: MODS part

Rebecca S. Guenther

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:02:01 -0500

78 lines

Re: MODS part

Bruce D'Arcus

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:12:18 -0500

44 lines

Re: MODS part

Bruce D'Arcus

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:16:28 -0500

25 lines

Re: MODS part

Mike Rylander

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 19:54:07 +0000

82 lines

Re: MODS part

Dick Thaxter

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:54:31 -0500

73 lines

Re: MODS part

Mike Rylander

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:01:18 +0000

39 lines

Re: MODS part

Ruth Bogan

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:20:13 -0500

42 lines

Re: MODS part

Rebecca S. Guenther

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:40:44 -0500

63 lines

Re: MODS part

Bruce D'Arcus

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:09:40 -0500

32 lines

Re: MODS part

Mike Rylander

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:41:49 +0000

118 lines

Re: MODS part

Karen Coyle

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:33:48 -0800

164 lines

MODS part

Mike Rylander

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 22:49:32 +0000

81 lines

Re: MODS part

Dick Thaxter

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:10:20 -0500

62 lines

Re: MODS part

Dick Thaxter

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:17:48 -0500

145 lines

Re: MODS part

Dick Thaxter

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:11:24 -0500

111 lines

Re: MODS part

Mike Rylander

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:15:57 +0000

163 lines

Re: MODS part

Mike Rylander

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 16:20:06 +0000

119 lines

Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!

Barzilai Spinak

Sun, 30 Jan 2005 00:24:47 -0200

72 lines

Couldnt finish! Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!

Barzilai Spinak

Sun, 30 Jan 2005 00:46:03 -0200

79 lines

I'm stupid Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!

Barzilai Spinak

Sun, 30 Jan 2005 01:01:06 -0200

24 lines

Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!

Barzilai Spinak

Sun, 30 Jan 2005 01:12:41 -0200

26 lines

Re: Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!

Bruce D'Arcus

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 22:39:09 -0500

23 lines

Re: Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!

Barzilai Spinak

Sun, 30 Jan 2005 02:16:06 -0200

51 lines

Re: Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!

Bruce D'Arcus

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 23:42:24 -0500

34 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Error during command authentication.

Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager