LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for MARC Archives


MARC Archives

MARC Archives


October 2005


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

020 element for binding (1 message)
040$c and JSC/MARBI (1 message)
040$c, etc. (1 message)
246 punctuation (1 message)
About simplifying MARC (10 messages)
Additions to MARC Code Lists (3 messages)
Better MARC coding in 24X fields (4 messages)
Mac's question: Which MARC fields do you use? (2 messages)
Marc for serials periodicals publications (2 messages)
periods (2 messages)
Reducing number of MARC fields? (31 messages)
Technical Notice - Additions to the MARC Code Lists for Relators, Sources, Description Conventions (1 message)
Updated cover sheets for MARC Proposals (1 message)
Which MARC fields so *you* use? (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MARC Home

MARC Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

020 element for binding

020 element for binding

Randall K Barry

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 18:30:47 -0400

76 lines

New Thread

040$c and JSC/MARBI

040$c and JSC/MARBI

J. McRee Elrod

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 08:05:50 -0700

61 lines

New Thread

040$c, etc.

040$c, etc.

J. McRee Elrod

Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:03:00 -0700

39 lines

New Thread

246 punctuation

Re: 246 punctuation

J. McRee Elrod

Thu, 27 Oct 2005 08:56:30 -0700

31 lines

New Thread

About simplifying MARC

About simplifying MARC

Peter Stuber

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:09:41 +0200

132 lines

Re: About simplifying marc

Hal Cain

Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:20:47 +1000

36 lines

Re: About simplifying marc

Sherman Clarke

Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:23:41 -0400

79 lines

Re: About simplifying marc

John Hostage

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:56:01 -0400

46 lines

Re: About simplifying MARC

Davey ,Mr Paul

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:39:32 +0100

37 lines

Re: About simplifying marc

Bernhard Eversberg

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:13:49 +0200

59 lines

Re: About simplifying marc

Schupbach ,Mr William

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:45:36 +0100

53 lines

Re: About simplifying marc

Young, Brenda

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 17:11:30 +0100

71 lines

Re: About simplifying marc

Bernhard Eversberg

Sat, 8 Oct 2005 10:14:20 +0200

24 lines

About simplifying marc

Jaakko I Tuohiniemi

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:26:40 +0300

47 lines

New Thread

Additions to MARC Code Lists

Re: Additions to MARC Code Lists

Hal Cain

Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:14:07 +1000

45 lines

Re: Additions to MARC Code Lists

Leonard Bill

Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:28:56 -0400

71 lines

Re: Additions to MARC Code Lists

Winship

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 20:31:27 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Better MARC coding in 24X fields

Re: Better MARC coding in 24X fields

Anne Munkebyaune

Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:43:15 +0200

48 lines

Re: Better MARC coding in 24X fields

Young, Brenda

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:07:15 +0100

63 lines

Re: Better MARC coding in 24X fields

Ian Fairclough

Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:43:55 -0400

33 lines

Better MARC coding in 24X fields

Randall K Barry

Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:28:26 -0400

191 lines

New Thread

Mac's question: Which MARC fields do you use?

Re: Mac's question: Which MARC fields do you use?

A. Ralph Papakhian

Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:17:59 -0500

28 lines

Mac's question: Which MARC fields do you use?

Adam Schiff

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:47:25 -0700

37 lines

New Thread

Marc for serials periodicals publications

Re: Marc for serials periodicals publications

Tim Faile

Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:47:56 -0400

555 lines

Marc for serials periodicals publications

Roxana Huaman Huriarte

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:03:07 -0500

53 lines

New Thread

periods

Re: periods

Barbara Washecka

Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:34:41 -0500

44 lines

periods

Adam Schiff

Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:47:17 -0700

53 lines

New Thread

Reducing number of MARC fields?

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

Winship

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:14:15 -0500

37 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

Shawne Miksa

Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:26:32 -0500

84 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

Ian Fairclough

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 18:28:20 -0400

50 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

Hal Cain

Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:45:36 +1000

83 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

J. McRee Elrod

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 22:11:53 -0700

46 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

Stephen Hearn

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 15:48:00 -0500

71 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

J. McRee Elrod

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 11:05:23 -0700

51 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

J. McRee Elrod

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 11:31:12 -0700

25 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

Bigwood, David

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:26:12 -0500

47 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

Karen Coyle

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 07:40:19 -0700

71 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

Hal Cain

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:20:21 +1000

58 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

Hal Cain

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:09:11 +1000

48 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

Bernhard Eversberg

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:01:19 +0200

36 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

A. Ralph Papakhian

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 20:46:49 -0500

26 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

Ian Dunn

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 10:01:23 +1000

43 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

J. McRee Elrod

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 11:27:36 -0700

33 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

Margo Menconi

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:15:52 -0400

92 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

Margo Menconi

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 13:01:31 -0400

69 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

J. McRee Elrod

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 08:15:35 -0700

45 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

Karen Coyle

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 13:25:26 -0700

54 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

Mary Mastraccio

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 10:45:05 -0500

43 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

Hal Cain

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 20:45:57 +1000

61 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

Winship

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 01:53:24 -0500

53 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

Bernhard Eversberg

Wed, 5 Oct 2005 17:28:25 +0200

34 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

Shawne Miksa

Wed, 5 Oct 2005 14:22:21 -0500

108 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

Kevin M. Randall

Wed, 5 Oct 2005 13:35:12 -0500

47 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

James Agenbroad

Tue, 4 Oct 2005 12:33:28 EDT

90 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

Ian Fairclough

Tue, 4 Oct 2005 11:31:37 -0400

34 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

Bernhard Eversberg

Tue, 4 Oct 2005 13:08:51 +0200

30 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

Hal Cain

Mon, 3 Oct 2005 11:24:27 +1000

57 lines

Re: Reducing number of MARC fields?

J. McRee Elrod

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 22:20:19 -0700

30 lines

New Thread

Technical Notice - Additions to the MARC Code Lists for Relators, Sources, Description Conventions

Technical Notice - Additions to the MARC Code Lists for Relators, Sources, Description Conventions

account for net dev and marc

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:37:40 -0400

66 lines

New Thread

Updated cover sheets for MARC Proposals

Updated cover sheets for MARC Proposals

Jacqueline Radebaugh

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 08:29:27 -0400

47 lines

New Thread

Which MARC fields so *you* use?

Which MARC fields so *you* use?

J. McRee Elrod

Sat, 8 Oct 2005 08:56:28 -0700

57 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager