|
|
|
Size
|
"Who Are You People?"
|
susannah cleveland |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:32:39 -0400 |
34 lines |
..and in this week's eBay listings, we have...
|
Steven Smolian |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:55:28 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: .BWF implementation
|
Rob Poretti |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:29:46 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: .BWF implementation
|
Tom Fine |
Sat, 12 Aug 2006 18:14:28 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: .BWF implementation
|
seva |
Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:21:16 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: .BWF implementation
|
Bob Olhsson |
Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:11:51 -0400 |
21 lines |
Re: .BWF implementation
|
Steven Smolian |
Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:46:32 -0400 |
54 lines |
Re: .BWF implementation
|
Konrad Strauss |
Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:18:03 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: .BWF implementation
|
Bob Olhsson |
Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:12:21 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: .BWF implementation
|
seva |
Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:06:52 -0400 |
70 lines |
.BWF implementation
|
<> |
Sat, 12 Aug 2006 09:18:44 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: .BWF implementation
|
Graeme Jaye |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 23:38:54 +0200 |
31 lines |
Re: .BWF implementation
|
andy kolovos |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:06:50 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: .BWF implementation
|
Casey, Michael T |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:25:29 -0400 |
58 lines |
Re: .BWF implementation
|
andy kolovos |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:49:29 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: .BWF implementation
|
Bob Olhsson |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:28:01 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: .BWF implementation
|
Casey, Michael T |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:31:20 -0400 |
72 lines |
.BWF implementation
|
<> |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:19:04 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: 2 GB file limit
|
Brandon Burke |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:22:02 -0700 |
62 lines |
Re: 2 GB file limit
|
Konrad Strauss |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:26:22 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: 2 GB file limit
|
Brandon Burke |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:08:05 -0700 |
74 lines |
Re: 2 GB file limit
|
Bob Olhsson |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 23:22:18 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: 2 GB file limit
|
Richard L. Hess |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 17:09:04 -0400 |
45 lines |
2 GB file limit
|
Konrad Strauss |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:59:16 -0400 |
47 lines |
2007 ARSC Conference: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
|
Bill Klinger |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:01:46 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: 3M 996
|
John Bondurant |
Wed, 9 Aug 2006 15:13:54 -0400 |
38 lines |
3M 996
|
David Lennick |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 22:24:07 -0400 |
19 lines |
Re: 5" discs more hardy than some think
|
George Brock-Nannestad |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 22:38:17 +0200 |
51 lines |
Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think
|
<> |
Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:43:16 -0400 |
138 lines |
Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think
|
Rod Stephens |
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:59:41 -0700 |
87 lines |
Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think
|
David Breneman |
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 16:52:14 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think
|
Mike Richter |
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:43:09 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think
|
David Breneman |
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:34:14 -0700 |
33 lines |
Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 17:26:14 -0400 |
55 lines |
Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think
|
Richard L. Hess |
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 13:23:27 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think
|
Rod Stephens |
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 07:29:39 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think
|
Trey Bunn |
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 08:36:23 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: 78s on eBay
|
Lou Judson |
Sun, 13 Aug 2006 05:42:08 -0700 |
27 lines |
78s on eBay
|
Steven Smolian |
Sun, 13 Aug 2006 07:32:37 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: Advice on cassette decks?
|
Parker Dinkins |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:19:01 -0500 |
76 lines |
Re: Advice on cassette decks?
|
Parker Dinkins |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:14:44 -0500 |
67 lines |
Re: Advice on cassette decks?
|
Gary |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:31:26 -0700 |
58 lines |
Re: Advice on cassette decks?
|
Parker Dinkins |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 20:43:07 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: Advice on cassette decks?
|
Robert Hodge |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:09:58 -0400 |
51 lines |
Re: Advice on cassette decks?
|
George Brock-Nannestad |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:35:07 +0200 |
39 lines |
Re: Advice on cassette decks?
|
Steve Weiss |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:52:20 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Advice on cassette decks?
|
Parker Dinkins |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:02:11 -0500 |
65 lines |
Re: Advice on cassette decks?
|
Tommy =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F6berg?= |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:54:17 +0200 |
33 lines |
Advice on cassette decks?
|
Craig Breaden |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:40:45 -0400 |
35 lines |
Advice on how to get the list in digest form?
|
<> |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:01:24 EDT |
15 lines |
Re: Aol discs (was Podcasting)
|
Matt Sohn |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:08:20 -0400 |
21 lines |
Apologies for wrong auction links
|
Dr. Rainer E. Lotz c/o Birgit Lotz Verlag |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:56:16 +0200 |
35 lines |
Re: Archiving and Reformatting Digital Files
|
Tom Fine |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:16:34 -0400 |
88 lines |
Re: Archiving and Reformatting Digital Files
|
Richard L. Hess |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:12:11 -0400 |
74 lines |
Re: Archiving and Reformatting Digital Files
|
Mike Richter |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:42:15 -0700 |
49 lines |
Archiving and Reformatting Digital Files
|
McCormick, Kathleen |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:07:19 -0400 |
55 lines |
ARSC Awards Finalists 2006
|
Bill Klinger |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 22:24:47 -0400 |
169 lines |
ARSC Preservation Grants: The First Awards
|
Bill Klinger |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:56:07 -0400 |
55 lines |
Article on Glenn Gould Archive and Forgery in today's WSJ
|
Steve Ramm |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:02:32 EDT |
205 lines |
Audio for "free," but first a word from our sponsor...
|
Karl Miller |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:34:24 -0500 |
18 lines |
Re: Backward turntables?
|
Graeme Jaye |
Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:01:33 +0200 |
33 lines |
Re: Backward turntables?
|
steven c |
Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:14:03 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: Backward turntables?
|
Parker Dinkins |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:31:44 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: Backward turntables?
|
Mike Richter |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:18:44 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: Backward turntables?
|
Parker Dinkins |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:07:44 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: Backward turntables?
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:28:05 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: Backward turntables?
|
Rob Poretti |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:44:18 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: Backward turntables?
|
Charles Lawson |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:04:33 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: Backward turntables?
|
Charles Lawson |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:03:37 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: Backward turntables?
|
Steven Smolian |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:02:58 -0400 |
59 lines |
Re: Backward turntables?
|
David Lennick |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:26:22 -0400 |
50 lines |
Backward turntables?
|
Charles Lawson |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:08:37 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Scott Phillips |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 21:20:44 -0500 |
66 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Tom Fine |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 21:39:51 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Richard L. Hess |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 21:23:51 -0400 |
51 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Matt Sohn |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 21:19:58 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Edward Falk |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:07:35 -0700 |
34 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Scott Phillips |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 19:47:03 -0500 |
133 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
<> |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 20:17:16 EDT |
24 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Tom Fine |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 20:14:14 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Tom Fine |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 20:08:06 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Parker Dinkins |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:54:25 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Lisa NnNnNn |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:47:58 -0500 |
181 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Lisa NnNnNn |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:44:10 -0500 |
72 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Tom Fine |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 19:22:59 -0400 |
146 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
David Lewiston |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 12:51:19 -1000 |
58 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
David Lewiston |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:38:03 -1000 |
58 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Edward Falk |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:32:43 -0700 |
41 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Don Cox |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 22:16:58 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Steven Smolian |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:57:37 -0400 |
96 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Mark Durenberger |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:54:53 -0500 |
165 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Lisa NnNnNn |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:41:38 -0500 |
142 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Marie Azile O'Connell |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:39:46 -0700 |
123 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Tom Fine |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:26:21 -0400 |
144 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
David Lewiston |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:07:18 -1000 |
126 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Lisa NnNnNn |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:46:18 -0500 |
102 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
David Lewiston |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:35:18 -1000 |
80 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Lisa NnNnNn |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:57:35 -0500 |
112 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Tom Fine |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:26:17 -0400 |
82 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
David Lewiston |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 08:14:47 -1000 |
56 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Lisa NnNnNn |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:13:46 -0500 |
118 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Robert Hodge |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:39:31 -0400 |
101 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Lisa NnNnNn |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:07:17 -0500 |
75 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Eric Jacobs |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 08:52:42 -0700 |
70 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Steven Smolian |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:16:03 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
George Brock-Nannestad |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 17:00:15 +0200 |
43 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Lisa NnNnNn |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:03:43 -0500 |
65 lines |
Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Richard L. Hess |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:50:39 -0400 |
39 lines |
Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
|
Lisa NnNnNn |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:17:43 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: Bing v. Enrico--was: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Milan P. Milovanovic |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:59:13 +0200 |
40 lines |
Bing v. Enrico--was: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
steven c |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:29:34 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
steven c |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:40:25 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Matt Sohn |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:01:16 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
steven c |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:27:36 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Lou Judson |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:27:50 -0700 |
24 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Matt Sohn |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:53:56 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:17:25 -0400 |
86 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:01:59 -0700 |
67 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Don Cox |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:13:18 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Mike Richter |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:59:31 -0700 |
44 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Richard L. Hess |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 23:31:49 -0400 |
51 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Mike Richter |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:12:52 -0700 |
35 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Mike Richter |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:06:20 -0700 |
34 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Scott Phillips |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:51:24 -0500 |
59 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Jerome Hartke |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:42:00 -0400 |
77 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Mike Richter |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:24:39 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
steven c |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:05:05 -0400 |
58 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Tom Fine |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:41:28 -0400 |
59 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
<> |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:01:13 EDT |
39 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
George Brock-Nannestad |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:52:19 +0200 |
76 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Scott Phillips |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:16:47 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Mike Richter |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:04:43 -0700 |
48 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Scott Phillips |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:00:20 -0500 |
59 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Lou Judson |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 07:36:57 -0700 |
44 lines |
Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Steven Smolian |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:29:43 -0400 |
72 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Lou Judson |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:46:32 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Don Cox |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:18:18 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Don Cox |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:05:56 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Don Cox |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:22:41 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Lou Judson |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 07:26:11 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Bob Olhsson |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:58:35 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Jerome Hartke |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 07:31:29 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Don Cox |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:40:18 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Don Cox |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 08:38:22 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Don Cox |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 08:33:03 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
phillip holmes |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:55:52 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
steven c |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 02:48:11 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
phillip holmes |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:07:46 -0500 |
55 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
steven c |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:21:50 -0400 |
72 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
steven c |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:03:06 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
steven c |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:23:01 -0400 |
58 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Parker Dinkins |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 21:02:00 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
steven c |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:02:57 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Scott Phillips |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:49:18 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Richard L. Hess |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:08:28 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
George Brock-Nannestad |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 02:08:41 +0200 |
60 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
steven c |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:11:56 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
steven c |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:03:58 -0400 |
36 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
steven c |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:45:20 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
steven c |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:41:36 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
David Breneman |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 15:54:31 -0700 |
41 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
David Lennick |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:28:39 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Milan P. Milovanovic |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:04:52 +0200 |
34 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:13:19 -0700 |
47 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
David Lennick |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:17:04 -0400 |
128 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:01:08 -0700 |
58 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:39:30 -0700 |
94 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
MD at Upsala |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:46:55 -0500 |
68 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
MD at Upsala |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:45:12 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Lou Judson |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 08:54:11 -0700 |
39 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Scott Phillips |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:38:12 -0500 |
107 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Tom Fine |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:22:16 -0400 |
74 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
David Lennick |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:03:13 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Don Cox |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 19:46:56 +0000 |
42 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Don Cox |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:35:49 +0000 |
77 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
steven c |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:50:03 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
steven c |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:24:52 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
steven c |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:16:35 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Dave Bradley |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:40:21 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Bob Olhsson |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:05:06 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Michael Shoshani |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:51:15 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Michael Shoshani |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:45:17 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Lou Judson |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:33:30 -0700 |
26 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Lou Judson |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:31:34 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
steven c |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:30:23 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
<> |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:45:46 EDT |
25 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Tom Fine |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:22:52 -0400 |
51 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
steven c |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:01:48 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
steven c |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 16:46:00 -0400 |
84 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Mike Richter |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:30:16 -0700 |
44 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
George Brock-Nannestad |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:38:16 +0200 |
37 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Tom Fine |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 12:58:50 -0400 |
120 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Tom Fine |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 12:37:52 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Scott Phillips |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:31:43 -0500 |
102 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
phillip holmes |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:30:03 -0500 |
100 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
phillip holmes |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:25:49 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Scott Phillips |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:23:30 -0500 |
67 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
phillip holmes |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:23:24 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Scott Phillips |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:15:52 -0500 |
49 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Tom Fine |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:50:51 -0400 |
82 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Lou Judson |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 08:29:52 -0700 |
81 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Marcos Sueiro Bal |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 10:18:14 -0400 |
18 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
George Brock-Nannestad |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 15:33:22 +0200 |
53 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Bob Olhsson |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 09:15:33 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Don Cox |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:43:29 +0000 |
69 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Tom Fine |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 07:45:22 -0400 |
75 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Tom Fine |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 07:36:40 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Lou Judson |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:22:55 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Lou Judson |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:04:49 -0700 |
52 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
steven c |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 00:34:35 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
steven c |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 00:20:20 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
David Breneman |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:50:48 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Tom Fine |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:52:15 -0400 |
83 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
<> |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:42:35 EDT |
31 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Michael Shoshani |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:34:58 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Milan P. Milovanovic |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:33:27 +0200 |
63 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Lou Judson |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:32:17 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Milan P. Milovanovic |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:20:10 +0200 |
41 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Tom Fine |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:56:21 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Lou Judson |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:39:03 -0700 |
57 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:18:38 -0700 |
35 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Tom Fine |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:49:30 -0400 |
85 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Tom Fine |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:32:50 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Lou Judson |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:54:50 -0700 |
83 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Mike Richter |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 08:29:00 -0700 |
40 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Marcos Sueiro Bal |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:19:17 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Bob Olhsson |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:13:44 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Bob Olhsson |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:00:15 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Tom Fine |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:54:36 -0400 |
57 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Tom Fine |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:47:00 -0400 |
64 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
George Brock-Nannestad |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:47:37 +0200 |
63 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Steven Smolian |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:44:57 -0400 |
78 lines |
Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Charles Lawson |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:39:25 -0400 |
37 lines |
Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Marcos Sueiro Bal |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:05:23 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: Can anybody identhify this odd little piece?
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 17:27:44 -0400 |
31 lines |
Can anybody identhify this odd little piece?
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 11:45:54 -0700 |
18 lines |
Re: Cassette playback (was Can 78s sound better than LPs?)
|
Lou Judson |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 09:52:03 -0700 |
27 lines |
Re: Cassette playback (was Can 78s sound better than LPs?)
|
Richard L. Hess |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:52:42 -0400 |
101 lines |
Re: Cassette speeds, was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Lou Judson |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:40:25 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: Cassette speeds, was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Mike Richter |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:00:13 -0700 |
30 lines |
Re: Cassette speeds, was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Steven Smolian |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:22:14 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?
|
Karl Miller |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:52:18 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?
|
steven c |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:56:04 -0400 |
200 lines |
Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?
|
Karl Miller |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:25:53 -0500 |
144 lines |
Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?
|
steven c |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:12:29 -0400 |
225 lines |
Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?
|
Karl Miller |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:28:52 -0500 |
103 lines |
Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?
|
steven c |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:52:26 -0400 |
144 lines |
Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?
|
Karl Miller |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:06:53 -0500 |
66 lines |
Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?
|
steven c |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:58:26 -0400 |
77 lines |
Re: Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing
|
Karl Miller |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:25:47 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:07:11 -0700 |
22 lines |
Re: Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing
|
Karl Miller |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:55:29 -0500 |
96 lines |
Re: Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing
|
steven c |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:00:17 -0400 |
194 lines |
Re: Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing
|
Karl Miller |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:43:49 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing
|
George Brock-Nannestad |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:32:51 +0200 |
39 lines |
Re: Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing
|
eugene hayhoe |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:49:24 -0700 |
139 lines |
Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing
|
Karl Miller |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:21:12 -0500 |
130 lines |
Cataloguing again--was: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
steven c |
Wed, 9 Aug 2006 21:01:47 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: Cataloguing still :-)--was: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?
|
Mike Richter |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:59:22 -0700 |
49 lines |
Re: Cataloguing still :-)--was: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?
|
Karl Miller |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:48:56 -0500 |
92 lines |
Cataloguing still :-)--was: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?
|
steven c |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:18:16 -0400 |
90 lines |
centre speaker is sympathetically vibrating
|
phillip holmes |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:19:40 -0500 |
80 lines |
Cheap computer books -- final call
|
Tom Fine |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 12:04:28 -0400 |
26 lines |
Re: Chinese copies- slang
|
Aaron Z Snyder |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:30:32 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: Chinese copies- slang
|
Sam Brylawski |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:28:06 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: Chinese copies- slang
|
steven c |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:13:50 -0400 |
50 lines |
Chinese copies- slang
|
Steven Smolian |
Sun, 13 Aug 2006 22:59:09 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Chinese recordings?
|
Dick Spottswood |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:37:13 -0400 |
50 lines |
Chinese recordings?
|
Jonathan Wise |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:59:55 -0400 |
18 lines |
computer books cheap
|
Tom Fine |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:08:42 -0400 |
62 lines |
Re: Concertape SSS?
|
Marcos Sueiro Bal |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 07:27:46 -0400 |
69 lines |
Re: Concertape SSS?
|
David Lennick |
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:58:58 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: Concertape SSS?
|
David Breneman |
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 07:31:46 -0700 |
41 lines |
Re: Concertape SSS?
|
Dave Bradley |
Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:57:45 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: Concertape SSS?
|
<> |
Sat, 19 Aug 2006 11:09:58 EDT |
27 lines |
Re: Concertape SSS?
|
David Lennick |
Sat, 19 Aug 2006 09:45:31 -0400 |
29 lines |
Concertape SSS?
|
Marcos Sueiro Bal |
Sat, 19 Aug 2006 09:24:25 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: Converter
|
David Lewiston |
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 17:34:17 -1000 |
45 lines |
Converter
|
Steven Smolian |
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 06:43:16 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: Damping (was: Can 78s sound better than LPs?)
|
steven c |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:32:31 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: Damping (was: Can 78s sound better than LPs?)
|
Lou Judson |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:24:36 -0700 |
44 lines |
Damping (was: Can 78s sound better than LPs?)
|
Matt Sohn |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:54:11 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: DAT tapes
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:04:09 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: DAT tapes
|
David Lennick |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:02:01 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: DAT tapes
|
<> |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:55:12 EDT |
31 lines |
DAT tapes
|
David Lennick |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:27:39 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
steven c |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:35:54 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
Mike Richter |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:38:39 -0700 |
40 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
steven c |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:25:29 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
Don Cox |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:01:59 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
steven c |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:05:49 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
Richard L. Hess |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:08:58 -0400 |
72 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
Scott Phillips |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:25:40 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
Tom Fine |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:30:20 -0400 |
68 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
Tom Fine |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:27:00 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
Richard L. Hess |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:55:51 -0400 |
55 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
David Lennick |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:59:31 -0400 |
36 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
phillip holmes |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 15:44:26 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
steven c |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:20:22 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
steven c |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:14:36 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
Tom Fine |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:54:47 -0400 |
177 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:33:31 -0700 |
153 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
Tom Fine |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:09:09 -0400 |
145 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:01:39 -0700 |
94 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
Tom Fine |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:38:14 -0400 |
83 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
David Lennick |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:07:57 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
Tom Fine |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:15:10 -0400 |
74 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
Tom Fine |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:08:37 -0400 |
61 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
<> |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:49:28 EDT |
28 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
Steven Smolian |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:49:18 -0400 |
185 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
David Lennick |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:53:54 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
Mike Richter |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:31:42 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
Lou Judson |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:23:40 -0700 |
40 lines |
Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
|
Rob Bamberger |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:40:22 -0400 |
161 lines |
Re: Figure 8, was Not using headphones
|
Bob Olhsson |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:27:23 -0400 |
26 lines |
Re: Figure 8, was Not using headphones
|
Lou Judson |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:15:08 -0700 |
27 lines |
Re: Figure 8, was Not using headphones
|
Marcos Sueiro Bal |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:34:23 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: File Size Confusion
|
Alec McLane |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:06:47 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: File Size Confusion
|
Rob Poretti |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:30:50 -0400 |
120 lines |
Re: File Size Confusion
|
<> |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:01:06 EDT |
30 lines |
Re: File Size Confusion
|
Brandon Burke |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:45:30 -0700 |
68 lines |
Re: File Size Confusion
|
Mike Richter |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:09:00 -0700 |
57 lines |
Re: File Size Confusion
|
Rob Poretti |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:26:36 -0400 |
97 lines |
Re: File Size Confusion
|
Eugene Lew |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:17:15 -0400 |
68 lines |
File Size Confusion
|
Brandon Burke |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:57:28 -0700 |
48 lines |
Re: Folkways Records broadcasts
|
Lou Judson |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:12:15 -0700 |
44 lines |
Re: Folkways Records broadcasts
|
Alex Hartov |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:23:00 -0400 |
57 lines |
Re: Folkways Records broadcasts
|
Lou Judson |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:06:38 -0700 |
46 lines |
Folkways Records broadcasts
|
Alex Hartov |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 08:06:31 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: FOX HOLLOW folk LP's
|
John Ross |
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:40:47 -0700 |
31 lines |
FOX HOLLOW folk LP's
|
Thomas Stern |
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:26:42 -0400 |
19 lines |
Re: George Gaskin recording sought
|
Matthew Barton |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:52:35 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: George Gaskin recording sought
|
Susan Stinson |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:48:08 -0400 |
36 lines |
George Gaskin recording sought
|
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Matthew_Barton?= |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:24:15 -0400 |
17 lines |
Re: Glitchy dats
|
David Lennick |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:26:17 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: Glitchy dats
|
Robert Hodge |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:12:17 -0400 |
76 lines |
Re: Glitchy dats
|
Scott D. Smith |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:48:03 -0500 |
51 lines |
Re: Glitchy dats
|
David Lennick |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 23:38:38 -0400 |
81 lines |
Re: Glitchy dats
|
[log in to unmask] |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 22:16:51 -0500 |
68 lines |
Re: Glitchy dats
|
David Lennick |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 18:31:47 -0400 |
51 lines |
Re: Glitchy dats
|
Watsky, Lance |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:19:59 -0700 |
85 lines |
Re: Glitchy dats
|
Watsky, Lance |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:18:20 -0700 |
76 lines |
Re: Glitchy dats
|
[log in to unmask] |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:04:05 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: Glitchy dats
|
Richard L. Hess |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:12:00 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: Glitchy dats
|
David Lennick |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:22:33 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: Glitchy dats
|
Karl Miller |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:12:14 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: Glitchy dats
|
David Lewiston |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 07:09:46 -1000 |
45 lines |
Re: Glitchy dats
|
David Lennick |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:08:36 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: Glitchy dats
|
Marie Azile O'Connell |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 11:58:26 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: Glitchy dats
|
Jeff Carroll |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:51:10 -0400 |
24 lines |
Glitchy dats
|
David Lennick |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 11:41:51 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: help needed regarding sputnik documentary
|
Mike Richter |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:21:37 -0700 |
46 lines |
Re: help needed regarding sputnik documentary
|
John Ross |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:50:01 -0700 |
34 lines |
Re: help needed regarding sputnik documentary
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:23:44 -0700 |
34 lines |
Re: help needed regarding sputnik documentary
|
David Breneman |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:00:15 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: help needed regarding sputnik documentary
|
Lou Judson |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:20:57 -0700 |
49 lines |
help needed regarding sputnik documentary
|
<> |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:35:15 EDT |
23 lines |
Re: How many 78's--was: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study
|
steven c |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:28:16 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: How many 78's--was: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study
|
Don Cox |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:33:42 +0000 |
52 lines |
Re: How many 78's--was: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:26:00 -0400 |
68 lines |
How many 78's--was: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study
|
steven c |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 01:17:23 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: IASA Conference
|
<> |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:21:15 EDT |
27 lines |
Re: IASA Conference
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:10:51 -0700 |
43 lines |
IASA Conference
|
Kurt Nauck |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:38:16 -0500 |
32 lines |
IASA Conference and the Political Situation in Mexico
|
Sam Brylawski |
Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:46:48 -0400 |
67 lines |
Re: IASA Conference in Mexico (re: Kurt Nauck's concerns)
|
Jacqueline von Arb |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:49:33 +0200 |
21 lines |
Fwd: IASA Mexico Conference
|
Sam Brylawski |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:24:19 -0400 |
70 lines |
Re: Ives' Universe Symphony
|
Brandon Burke |
Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:09:41 -0700 |
80 lines |
Re: Ives' Universe Symphony
|
David Lewis |
Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:06:29 -0400 |
80 lines |
Ives' Universe Symphony
|
Brandon Burke |
Wed, 9 Aug 2006 10:53:51 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: J Folksay records label vs. Stinson records
|
David Lennick |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 22:46:01 -0400 |
131 lines |
Re: J Folksay records label vs. Stinson records
|
Thomas Stern |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:53:22 -0400 |
151 lines |
Re: J Folksay records label vs. Stinson records
|
Steven Smolian |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 07:20:56 -0400 |
142 lines |
Re: J Folksay records label vs. Stinson records
|
Thomas Stern |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:52:57 -0400 |
123 lines |
JOB POSTING: Audio Specialist - Gospel Music Restoration Project
|
Sha_Towers |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:22:53 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: Josh White Langston Hughes Folksay records label Folksong and folksingers Stinson records
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:00:58 -0700 |
57 lines |
Josh White Langston Hughes Folksay records label Folksong and folksingers Stinson records
|
Thomas Stern |
Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:32:45 -0400 |
89 lines |
Klaus Asher
|
Karl Miller |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 08:46:37 -0500 |
22 lines |
Kostelanetz
|
Matthew Snyder |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:38:50 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: Kostelanetz, was [ARSCLIST] Transfer responsibility
|
David Lennick |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:00:57 -0400 |
84 lines |
Re: Kostelanetz, was [ARSCLIST] Transfer responsibility
|
Steven Smolian |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:45:25 -0400 |
76 lines |
Re: Kostelanetz, was [ARSCLIST] Transfer responsibility
|
David Lennick |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:51:04 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: link to ebay listings
|
Lou Judson |
Sun, 13 Aug 2006 07:33:04 -0700 |
29 lines |
link to ebay listings
|
Steven Smolian |
Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:09:27 -0400 |
18 lines |
Re: Lomax The Songhunter
|
Steve Ramm |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:42:27 EDT |
29 lines |
Re: Lomax The Songhunter
|
Watsky, Lance |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:04:46 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: Looking for Odeon recording
|
David Lennick |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:30:30 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: Looking for Odeon recording
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:09:33 -0700 |
36 lines |
Looking for Odeon recording
|
Marcos Sueiro Bal |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:01:21 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: Fw: Lost Musical Treasure
|
Steve Ramm |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:04:03 EDT |
29 lines |
Re: Fw: Lost Musical Treasure
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:15:43 -0700 |
59 lines |
Re: Fw: Lost Musical Treasure
|
Tom Fine |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:11:09 -0400 |
62 lines |
Re: Fw: Lost Musical Treasure
|
Kurt Nauck |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:10:34 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: Fw: Lost Musical Treasure
|
Nelson-Strauss, Brenda |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:23:47 -0400 |
80 lines |
Re: Fw: Lost Musical Treasure
|
Robert Hodge |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:11:51 -0400 |
65 lines |
Fw: Lost Musical Treasure
|
Dick Spottswood |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:01:30 -0400 |
49 lines |
Lotz-Liste-23
|
Dr. Rainer E. Lotz c/o Birgit Lotz Verlag |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:56:16 +0200 |
50 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
<> |
Sat, 12 Aug 2006 09:13:57 EDT |
39 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:45:18 -0700 |
152 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Robert Hodge |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:14:29 -0400 |
143 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
<> |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:26:18 EDT |
76 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Andes, Donald |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:00:48 -0700 |
211 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Dr. Cheryl Thurber |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:50:44 -0700 |
102 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
eugene hayhoe |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:53:45 -0700 |
86 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:32:10 -0700 |
74 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Karl Miller |
Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:45:32 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Tom Fine |
Wed, 9 Aug 2006 06:31:49 -0400 |
61 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Cary Ginell |
Wed, 9 Aug 2006 01:39:47 EDT |
39 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Peter Hirsch |
Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:42:33 -0400 |
85 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
steven c |
Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:43:34 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
David Lennick |
Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:25:41 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Cary Ginell |
Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:13:11 EDT |
43 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 20:41:02 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
steven c |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 20:40:38 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
David Lennick |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 20:39:29 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
steven c |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 20:34:35 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Bob Olhsson |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:57:55 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Robert Hodge |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:56:31 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
David Lennick |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:22:31 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Robert Hodge |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:04:49 -0400 |
36 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Richard L. Hess |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:15:11 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
David Lennick |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 15:43:27 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Andes, Donald |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:19:40 -0700 |
270 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
James L Wolf |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:49:22 -0400 |
96 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Steven Smolian |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:35:19 -0400 |
167 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Andes, Donald |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 11:19:53 -0700 |
178 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Erik Dix |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:00:44 -0400 |
99 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Steven Smolian |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 13:50:37 -0400 |
97 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Steven Smolian |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 13:22:59 -0400 |
82 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Andes, Donald |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:11:51 -0700 |
93 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
James L Wolf |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:58:47 -0400 |
68 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Dr. Cheryl Thurber |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:55:38 -0700 |
44 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:42:00 -0700 |
117 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:32:17 -0700 |
78 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:29:27 -0700 |
55 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:27:18 -0700 |
34 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
James L Wolf |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:23:42 -0400 |
114 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Robert Hodge |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 08:57:52 -0400 |
117 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Erik Dix |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 08:17:28 -0400 |
102 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 06:11:15 -0400 |
83 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
steven c |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 00:45:23 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Peter Hirsch |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 00:09:44 -0400 |
69 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
steven c |
Mon, 7 Aug 2006 22:27:10 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Tom Fine |
Mon, 7 Aug 2006 21:10:56 -0400 |
68 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
-=sVo=- |
Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:53:40 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Tom Fine |
Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:13:14 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Bob Olhsson |
Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:12:47 -0400 |
24 lines |
LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Rod Smear |
Mon, 7 Aug 2006 16:29:21 -0700 |
21 lines |
Re: LP RECORD STORAGE - plywood/particle board
|
eugene hayhoe |
Sat, 12 Aug 2006 07:08:23 -0700 |
52 lines |
Re: Magnetic tape through the mail
|
Dave Bradley |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:04:12 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: Magnetic tape through the mail
|
steven c |
Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:03:25 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: Magnetic tape through the mail
|
<> |
Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:54:37 EDT |
17 lines |
Re: Magnetic tape through the mail
|
David Lennick |
Wed, 23 Aug 2006 18:07:06 -0400 |
91 lines |
Re: Magnetic tape through the mail
|
Scott Phillips |
Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:54:19 -0500 |
86 lines |
Re: Magnetic tape through the mail
|
Jerome Hartke |
Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:22:56 -0400 |
79 lines |
Re: Magnetic tape through the mail
|
Rob Poretti |
Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:43:14 -0400 |
80 lines |
Re: Magnetic tape through the mail
|
Jeff Willens |
Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:29:29 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: Magnetic tape through the mail
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:37:10 -0700 |
39 lines |
Magnetic tape through the mail
|
Robert Hodge |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:24:36 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: Mahler 4th: Konoye wanted
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:20:06 -0700 |
32 lines |
Mahler 4th: Konoye wanted
|
David Lennick |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:50:05 -0400 |
21 lines |
Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones)
|
Tom Fine |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:41:13 -0400 |
51 lines |
Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones)
|
steven c |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:24:06 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones)
|
Scott D. Smith |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:56:50 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones)
|
Marcos Sueiro Bal |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:49:41 -0400 |
59 lines |
Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones)
|
Tom Fine |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 06:44:05 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones)
|
Tom Fine |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 06:30:10 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones)
|
Tom Fine |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:07:25 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones)
|
Tom Fine |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:50:12 -0400 |
42 lines |
Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones)
|
Matt Sohn |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:04:39 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Mellencamp
|
Robert Hodge |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:17:07 -0400 |
26 lines |
Re: Mellencamp
|
Mahern, Paul Cantwell |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:00:35 -0400 |
19 lines |
Re: Mellencamp
|
steven c |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:28:12 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: Mellencamp
|
David Lennick |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:13:33 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: Mellencamp
|
Tom Fine |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:57:44 -0400 |
37 lines |
Mellencamp
|
Mahern, Paul Cantwell |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:16:39 -0400 |
24 lines |
Microcassettes
|
Marcia Segal |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:41:17 -0400 |
22 lines |
Microphones--was: Not using headphones
|
steven c |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:14:59 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: Mitsubishi X-86 and ESM (was Glitchy dats)
|
Richard L. Hess |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 17:19:12 -0400 |
50 lines |
Re: My Tape Covers
|
Rod Stephens |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 01:10:53 -0700 |
21 lines |
Re: NASA
|
Don Cox |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:41:36 +0000 |
84 lines |
Re: NASA
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:05:08 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: NASA
|
Don Cox |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:06:00 +0000 |
43 lines |
Re: NASA
|
Richard L. Hess |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 00:33:12 -0400 |
84 lines |
Re: NASA
|
steven c |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:08:59 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: NASA
|
David Breneman |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:34:11 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: NASA
|
David Breneman |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:30:25 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: NASA
|
Lou Judson |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:58:36 -0700 |
23 lines |
Re: NASA
|
John Ross |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:26:57 -0700 |
30 lines |
Re: NASA
|
Mike Richter |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:59:26 -0700 |
45 lines |
Re: NASA
|
Watsky, Lance |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:47:03 -0700 |
81 lines |
Re: NASA
|
David Lennick |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:43:22 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: NASA
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:34:34 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: NASA
|
David Breneman |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:07:42 -0700 |
46 lines |
Re: NASA
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:52:14 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: NASA
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:43:01 -0400 |
162 lines |
Re: NASA
|
Lou Judson |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:16:43 -0700 |
35 lines |
Re: NASA
|
David Breneman |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:45:15 -0700 |
52 lines |
Re: NASA
|
David Lewis |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:21:04 -0400 |
169 lines |
Re: NASA
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:07:48 -0400 |
113 lines |
Re: NASA
|
Robert Hodge |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:50:18 -0400 |
84 lines |
Re: NASA
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:31:13 -0400 |
63 lines |
Re: NASA
|
<> |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:54:01 EDT |
29 lines |
NASA
|
Mahern, Paul Cantwell |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:36:20 -0400 |
21 lines |
Re: NASA (and beyond, far beyond!)
|
Lou Judson |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:05:14 -0700 |
102 lines |
Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study
|
steven c |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:09:32 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study
|
Karl Miller |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:42:06 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:19:40 -0400 |
95 lines |
Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study
|
steven c |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 00:42:21 -0400 |
74 lines |
Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study
|
steven c |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 00:07:06 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study
|
David Lennick |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:42:21 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study
|
Lou Judson |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:28:16 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study
|
David Lennick |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:06:41 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study
|
steven c |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:02:10 -0400 |
31 lines |
Need help understanding how to get an Important Folk Music collection Accessible
|
Steve Ramm |
Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:39:47 EDT |
42 lines |
New History Page available
|
Richard L. Hess |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 02:08:19 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders
|
Karl Miller |
Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:44:37 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders
|
steven c |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:14:27 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:44:23 -0400 |
58 lines |
Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders
|
Richard L. Hess |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:21:42 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders
|
Lou Judson |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:52:03 -0700 |
45 lines |
Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders
|
Matt Sohn |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:43:53 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders
|
Eugene Lew |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:44:26 -0400 |
55 lines |
Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders
|
Lou Judson |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:36:34 -0700 |
33 lines |
Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders
|
Mike Richter |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:00:13 -0700 |
41 lines |
Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders
|
Steve Ramm |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:48:10 EDT |
32 lines |
Re: Non-RIAA preamp
|
Charles Lawson |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:04:50 -0400 |
79 lines |
Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
|
Parker Dinkins |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:20:40 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:12:03 -0700 |
35 lines |
Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
|
Doug Pomeroy |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:46:32 +0000 |
80 lines |
Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
|
Charles Lawson |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:24:22 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
|
Charles Lawson |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:02:28 -0400 |
36 lines |
Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
|
Parker Dinkins |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:15:33 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
|
Bob Olhsson |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:38:30 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
|
Lou Judson |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:46:59 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
|
Charles Lawson |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:00:28 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
|
Charles Lawson |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:48:29 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
|
Steven Smolian |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:34:33 -0400 |
62 lines |
Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
|
seva |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:18:55 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
|
Bob Olhsson |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:53:41 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
|
Tom Fine |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:04:28 -0400 |
82 lines |
Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
|
Tom Fine |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:01:45 -0400 |
78 lines |
Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
|
Steven Smolian |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 09:16:41 -0400 |
70 lines |
Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
|
Parker Dinkins |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:01:01 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
|
Matt Sohn |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:07:20 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
|
Lou Judson |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:36:13 -0700 |
34 lines |
Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
|
Parker Dinkins |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:06:58 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
|
Tom Fine |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:01:36 -0400 |
40 lines |
Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
|
Matt Sohn |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 17:16:38 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Marcos Sueiro Bal |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:59:17 -0400 |
117 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
steven c |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:26:31 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
steven c |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:39:05 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
steven c |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:12:30 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Tom Fine |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:07:13 -0400 |
77 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
steven c |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:41:10 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Angie Dickinson Mickle |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:20:27 -0600 |
74 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
steven c |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:25:46 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Tom Fine |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:09:37 -0400 |
83 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Tom Fine |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:09:11 -0400 |
93 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Tom Fine |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:55:47 -0400 |
101 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Lou Judson |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:32:05 -0700 |
40 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Lou Judson |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:25:47 -0700 |
24 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Angie Dickinson Mickle |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:45:01 -0600 |
75 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Don Cox |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:03:31 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Aaron Levinson |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:37:02 -0400 |
80 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Matthew Barton |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:45:27 -0400 |
99 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Marcos Sueiro Bal |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:37:06 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Steven Smolian |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 00:45:28 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Bob Olhsson |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:31:42 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Bob Olhsson |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:22:21 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:06:22 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Lou Judson |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:55:44 -0700 |
35 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Lou Judson |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:57:07 -0700 |
110 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Bob Olhsson |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:53:19 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Matt Sohn |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:45:12 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:14:22 -0400 |
72 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:48:42 -0400 |
75 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Marcos Sueiro Bal |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:51:33 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Lou Judson |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:15:09 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
George Brock-Nannestad |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:13:32 +0200 |
68 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Marcos Sueiro Bal |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:26:16 -0400 |
18 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Don Cox |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:13:10 +0000 |
49 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
steven c |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:15:41 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Tom Fine |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 07:55:10 -0400 |
103 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Michael Shoshani |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:55:40 -0500 |
55 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
steven c |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:16:57 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
steven c |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:00:41 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
steven c |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:45:27 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Bob Olhsson |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:16:22 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
George Brock-Nannestad |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:49:21 +0200 |
85 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
MD at Upsala |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 16:13:36 -0500 |
57 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
Bob Olhsson |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 15:32:56 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
<> |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 15:15:07 EDT |
57 lines |
Re: Not using headphones
|
George Brock-Nannestad |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:31:21 +0200 |
47 lines |
Not using headphones
|
Dave Bradley |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:47:39 -0400 |
34 lines |
Oistrakh at The Fair
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:24:15 -0700 |
19 lines |
Re: Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers
|
Richard L. Hess |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 20:00:19 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers
|
phillip holmes |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:01:38 -0500 |
91 lines |
Re: Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers
|
phillip holmes |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 17:57:34 -0500 |
96 lines |
Re: Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers
|
Rod Stephens |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:35:50 -0700 |
85 lines |
Re: Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers
|
Bruce Maddocks |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:38:18 -0700 |
58 lines |
Re: Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers
|
Marie Azile O'Connell |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:09:01 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers
|
Rod Stephens |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:38:39 -0700 |
27 lines |
Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers
|
<> |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:15:04 EDT |
17 lines |
Re: Overtone Records
|
Susan Stinson |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:50:45 -0400 |
77 lines |
Re: Overtone Records
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:38:15 -0700 |
57 lines |
Overtone Records
|
Robert Hodge |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:58:06 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: Peter Copeland
|
Jonathan Wise |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:39:51 -0400 |
141 lines |
Re: Peter Copeland
|
Tom Fine |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 18:20:54 -0400 |
77 lines |
Re: Peter Copeland
|
Rod Stephens |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 15:08:04 -0700 |
83 lines |
Re: Peter Copeland
|
Marie Azile O'Connell |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 18:35:26 -0500 |
89 lines |
Peter Copeland
|
Bewley, Nigel |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 16:00:45 +0100 |
72 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Don Cox |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:32:32 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:42:58 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Mike Richter |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:14:22 -0700 |
49 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
steven c |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:59:01 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Tom Fine |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:25:51 -0400 |
57 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
steven c |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:19:48 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
steven c |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:51:48 -0400 |
51 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Bob Olhsson |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 10:39:33 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
steven c |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:46:44 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Matt Sohn |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 21:55:00 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Lou Judson |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:49:16 -0700 |
50 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Tom Fine |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:53:46 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:28:32 -0700 |
25 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Lou Judson |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:43:23 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Tom Fine |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:13:29 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Tom Fine |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:03:25 -0400 |
140 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:20:27 -0700 |
41 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:15:43 -0700 |
87 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:06:30 -0700 |
51 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Lou Judson |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:37:55 -0700 |
33 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
steven c |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:37:25 -0400 |
57 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
steven c |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:30:28 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
steven c |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:28:14 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
steven c |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:43:22 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
steven c |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:13:50 -0400 |
111 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
steven c |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:25:47 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Tom Fine |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:41:52 -0400 |
62 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
David Breneman |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:32:14 -0700 |
39 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Mike Richter |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:26:30 -0700 |
50 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
David Breneman |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:02:26 -0700 |
45 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Dave Bradley |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:57:20 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Tom Fine |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:29:14 -0400 |
84 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
<> |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:00:28 EDT |
38 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Tom Fine |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 06:10:52 -0400 |
61 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Tom Fine |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 06:08:51 -0400 |
78 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
steven c |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:32:30 -0400 |
77 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Dave Bradley |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:03:14 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Lou Judson |
Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:16:10 -0700 |
44 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Mike Richter |
Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:06:05 -0700 |
51 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
steven c |
Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:20:14 -0400 |
84 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Tom Fine |
Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:15:50 -0400 |
100 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Lou Judson |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:43:29 -0700 |
44 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Mike Richter |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:23:16 -0700 |
76 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
steven c |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:00:55 -0400 |
115 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Charles Lawson |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 22:10:45 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 22:00:02 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Lou Judson |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:44:46 -0700 |
91 lines |
Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
steven c |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 21:29:17 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:38:49 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion
|
Russ Hamm |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:04:47 -0700 |
34 lines |
Re: Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 07:43:05 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion
|
Mike Richter |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:54:38 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion
|
Marie Azile O'Connell |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:42:30 -0700 |
44 lines |
Re: Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion
|
Charles Lawson |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:28:03 -0400 |
28 lines |
Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion
|
steven c |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:17:25 -0400 |
26 lines |
Presonus 1394
|
Steven Smolian |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:26:20 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: Professional courtesy: Looking for "The Lake Song"
|
DSL FODA01 |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:05:36 -0400 |
81 lines |
Professional courtesy: Looking for "The Lake Song"
|
andy Kolovos |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 17:39:03 -0400 |
63 lines |
Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.
|
Robert Hodge |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:31:50 -0400 |
51 lines |
Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.
|
steven c |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:12:02 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.
|
<> |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:37:40 EDT |
25 lines |
Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.
|
Lou Judson |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:33:51 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.
|
David Lennick |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:17:48 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.
|
Lou Judson |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:49:44 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.
|
John Ross |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:19:48 -0700 |
20 lines |
Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.
|
Karl Miller |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:11:44 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.
|
Pete Tinker |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:35:54 -0700 |
90 lines |
Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:27:39 -0400 |
62 lines |
Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.
|
Robert Hodge |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:18:53 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.
|
Lou Judson |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:49:18 -0700 |
40 lines |
Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.
|
Rod Stephens |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:36:56 -0700 |
124 lines |
Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.
|
Robert Hodge |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:43:04 -0400 |
74 lines |
Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.
|
John Spencer |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:44:10 -0500 |
55 lines |
Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.
|
George Brock-Nannestad |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:44:45 +0200 |
49 lines |
Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.
|
Steve Ramm |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:43:38 EDT |
30 lines |
Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] Glitchy dats
|
steven c |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 22:57:44 -0400 |
22 lines |
Recall: [ARSCLIST] Glitchy dats
|
Watsky, Lance |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:21:19 -0700 |
14 lines |
Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:12:09 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE
|
David Breneman |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:48:43 -0700 |
30 lines |
Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:39:07 -0700 |
61 lines |
Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE
|
David Breneman |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:05:00 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE
|
steven c |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:47:42 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE
|
<> |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:12:02 EDT |
30 lines |
Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Lou Judson |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:22:50 -0700 |
54 lines |
Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Andes, Donald |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:03:07 -0700 |
39 lines |
Re: Recall: ^ [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Lou Judson |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:00:00 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: Recall: ^ [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE
|
Robert Hodge |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:19:32 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: Recall: ^ [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE
|
steven c |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:40:23 -0400 |
26 lines |
Re: rejoining the flock
|
Jacqueline von Arb |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:54:41 +0200 |
55 lines |
Re: rejoining the flock
|
David Lennick |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:23:58 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: rejoining the flock
|
Mike Richter |
Wed, 9 Aug 2006 21:14:50 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: rejoining the flock
|
David Lennick |
Wed, 9 Aug 2006 23:43:40 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: rejoining the flock
|
steven c |
Wed, 9 Aug 2006 23:35:56 -0400 |
21 lines |
rejoining the flock
|
David Lennick |
Wed, 9 Aug 2006 23:15:15 -0400 |
15 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph
|
eugene hayhoe |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:45:12 -0700 |
26 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph
|
Marcos Sueiro Bal |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:21:29 -0400 |
15 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -- update
|
Marcos Sueiro Bal |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:31:27 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -- update
|
Richard L. Hess |
Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:31:10 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
Scott D. Smith |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:38:18 -0500 |
101 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
Lou Judson |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:23:18 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
Marcos Sueiro Bal |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 15:11:57 -0400 |
74 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 12:09:57 -0700 |
33 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
Lou Judson |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:15:26 -0700 |
33 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
Richard L. Hess |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:01:55 -0400 |
98 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
Angie Dickinson Mickle |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:36:02 -0600 |
79 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:34:38 -0700 |
63 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:32:34 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
Richard L. Hess |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:53:56 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
Lou Judson |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:02:53 -0700 |
45 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
David Lennick |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:51:29 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
Angie Dickinson Mickle |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:30:39 -0600 |
33 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
Robert Hodge |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:09:37 -0400 |
64 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 08:05:49 -0700 |
57 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
Angie Dickinson Mickle |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:04:26 -0600 |
43 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 07:58:43 -0700 |
47 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
Rod Stephens |
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 23:13:10 -0700 |
77 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
David Lennick |
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:36:38 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:17:20 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
steven c |
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:15:22 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
Lou Judson |
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 18:43:14 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
Aaron Z Snyder |
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 21:19:17 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
David Lennick |
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 20:39:13 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
|
Scott D. Smith |
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 18:45:44 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: Searching For Ethnomusic Footage
|
Tom Fine |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 19:17:18 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: Searching For Ethnomusic Footage
|
Dr. Cheryl Thurber |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:31:23 -0700 |
35 lines |
Re: Searching For Ethnomusic Footage
|
Watsky, Lance |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:08:07 -0700 |
21 lines |
Re: seeking a semi-obscure article
|
Tom Fine |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:50:13 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: seeking a semi-obscure article
|
Alec McLane |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:45:51 -0400 |
39 lines |
seeking a semi-obscure article
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:26:19 -0400 |
20 lines |
seeking another Murrow LP set
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:40:08 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: shelving
|
steven c |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 19:46:40 -0400 |
90 lines |
shelving
|
Steven Smolian |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 07:49:49 -0400 |
63 lines |
Re: Some advice on cassette decks?
|
Tom Fine |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:29:34 -0400 |
97 lines |
Re: Some advice on cassette decks?
|
Richard L. Hess |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:58:16 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: Some advice on cassette decks?
|
Tom Fine |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:55:26 -0400 |
92 lines |
Some advice on cassette decks?
|
Craig Breaden |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:56:49 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: soundscape DAW
|
seva |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:45:08 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: soundscape DAW
|
Matt Sohn |
Thu, 7 Sep 2006 23:19:36 -0400 |
46 lines |
soundscape DAW
|
seva |
Mon, 7 Aug 2006 22:26:50 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: Soundtrack Pro help...
|
andy kolovos |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:19:14 -0400 |
114 lines |
Re: Soundtrack Pro help...
|
Moser, Dennis |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:17:00 -0400 |
84 lines |
Re: Soundtrack Pro help...
|
Aaron Coe |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:05:09 -0400 |
92 lines |
Re: Soundtrack Pro help...
|
Lou Judson |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:22:43 -0700 |
84 lines |
Soundtrack Pro help...
|
andy kolovos |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:06:26 -0400 |
57 lines |
Re: SP-15 turntable question
|
Graham Newton |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:15:25 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: SP-15 turntable question
|
David Breneman |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:43:42 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: SP-15 turntable question
|
Cary Ginell |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:35:04 -0400 |
61 lines |
Re: SP-15 turntable question
|
Steven Smolian |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:00:02 -0400 |
50 lines |
Re: SP-15 turntable question
|
Robert Hodge |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:47:49 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: SP-15 turntable question
|
Charles Lawson |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:22:44 -0400 |
27 lines |
SP-15 turntable question
|
Doug Pomeroy |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:24:51 +0000 |
22 lines |
Speed correction, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Parker Dinkins |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:41:35 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: stereo or double mono
|
Michael Shoshani |
Sat, 19 Aug 2006 21:40:38 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: stereo or double mono
|
Tom Fine |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:19:18 -0400 |
59 lines |
Re: stereo or double mono
|
Mike Richter |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:42:46 -0700 |
35 lines |
Re: stereo or double mono
|
David Lennick |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:39:26 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: stereo or double mono
|
Mike Richter |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:52:26 -0700 |
41 lines |
Re: stereo or double mono
|
Mike Richter |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:30:27 -0700 |
48 lines |
Re: stereo or double mono
|
Aaron Z Snyder |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:12:29 -0400 |
57 lines |
Re: stereo or double mono
|
Angie Dickinson Mickle |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:47:54 -0600 |
55 lines |
Re: stereo or double mono
|
Mew, Peter |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:41:37 +0100 |
77 lines |
Re: stereo or double mono
|
[log in to unmask] |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:40:07 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: stereo or double mono
|
David Lennick |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:42:18 -0400 |
42 lines |
stereo or double mono
|
Dave Rice |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:28:10 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: Strage blue amberol
|
Susan Stinson |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:09:47 -0400 |
45 lines |
Strage blue amberol
|
Steven Smolian |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:21:59 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: tape eaten by 112mkII
|
Peter Mosher |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:44:35 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: tape eaten by 112mkII
|
Robert Hodge |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:57:01 -0400 |
69 lines |
Re: tape eaten by 112mkII
|
Richard L. Hess |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:19:52 -0400 |
68 lines |
tape eaten by 112mkII
|
Brandon Burke |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:53:08 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: tape op
|
Rod Stephens |
Sat, 19 Aug 2006 09:38:45 -0700 |
34 lines |
Re: tape op
|
Steven Smolian |
Sat, 19 Aug 2006 09:29:25 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: tape op
|
andy Kolovos |
Sat, 19 Aug 2006 08:23:38 -0400 |
45 lines |
tape op
|
phillip holmes |
Fri, 18 Aug 2006 22:47:19 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: Tel-Mar or Ter-Mar? (Was: Malcolm Chisolm )
|
Bob Olhsson |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:27:59 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: Tel-Mar or Ter-Mar? (Was: Malcolm Chisolm )
|
Matt Sohn |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:02:14 -0400 |
54 lines |
Re: Tel-Mar or Ter-Mar? (Was: Malcolm Chisolm )
|
Tom Fine |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:29:51 -0400 |
52 lines |
Tel-Mar or Ter-Mar? (Was: Malcolm Chisolm )
|
Matt Sohn |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:14:16 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: Telemetry Tapes
|
steven c |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 00:35:13 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: Telemetry Tapes
|
Mike Richter |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:31:47 -0700 |
30 lines |
Re: Telemetry Tapes
|
steven c |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:13:33 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: Telemetry Tapes
|
Lou Judson |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:46:49 -0700 |
30 lines |
Re: Telemetry Tapes
|
Tom Fine |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:45:45 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: Telemetry Tapes
|
Mike Richter |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:43:53 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: Telemetry Tapes
|
David Breneman |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:16:09 -0700 |
30 lines |
Re: Telemetry Tapes
|
Lou Judson |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:55:14 -0700 |
92 lines |
Re: Telemetry Tapes
|
David Breneman |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:38:21 -0700 |
25 lines |
Re: Telemetry Tapes
|
Eugene DeAnna |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:18:03 -0400 |
79 lines |
Re: Telemetry Tapes
|
David Lewis |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:41:23 -0400 |
72 lines |
Re: The person responds was Thin tape decay
|
steven c |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 21:15:26 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: The person responds was Thin tape decay
|
steven c |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 21:04:47 -0400 |
26 lines |
Re: The person responds was Thin tape decay
|
Mike Richter |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 21:30:17 -0700 |
35 lines |
Re: The person responds was Thin tape decay
|
steven c |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 23:10:55 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: The person responds was Thin tape decay
|
Nigel Champion (FOA ANT) |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:55:14 +1200 |
41 lines |
Re: The person responds was Thin tape decay
|
Mike Richter |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 14:40:28 -0700 |
29 lines |
The person responds was Thin tape decay
|
<> |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 16:36:55 -0400 |
139 lines |
Re: Thin tape decay
|
Don Cox |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 22:19:37 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: Thin tape decay
|
Lou Judson |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 08:53:06 -0700 |
46 lines |
Re: Thin tape decay
|
Don Cox |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:33:19 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: Thin tape decay
|
Lou Judson |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:44:14 -0700 |
50 lines |
Re: Thin tape decay
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 11:19:48 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: Thin tape decay
|
<> |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:40:47 EDT |
42 lines |
Re: Thin tape decay
|
Tom Fine |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 19:25:02 -0400 |
66 lines |
Re: Thin tape decay
|
Lou Judson |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 15:57:13 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: Thin tape decay
|
Richard L. Hess |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 17:15:46 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: Thin tape decay
|
<> |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 16:42:27 -0400 |
185 lines |
Re: Thin tape decay
|
<> |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 16:29:39 EDT |
27 lines |
Re: Thin tape decay
|
Lou Judson |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:00:32 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: Thin tape decay
|
Richard L. Hess |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 14:45:50 -0400 |
90 lines |
Re: Thin tape decay
|
Robert Hodge |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:38:40 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: Thin tape decay
|
David Lennick |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 12:12:33 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: Thin tape decay
|
Lou Judson |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 08:57:56 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: Thin tape decay
|
<> |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:04:09 -0400 |
73 lines |
Re: Thin tape decay
|
<> |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:00:33 EDT |
35 lines |
Re: Thin tape decay
|
Robert Hodge |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:52:56 -0400 |
61 lines |
Thin tape decay
|
Marcos Sueiro Bal |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:24:51 -0400 |
28 lines |
This week's auction
|
Steven Smolian |
Sat, 19 Aug 2006 08:12:19 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: To bake or not to bake?
|
Tom Fine |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:00:09 -0400 |
64 lines |
Re: To bake or not to bake?
|
David Lewiston |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:49:57 -1000 |
46 lines |
Re: To bake or not to bake?
|
Lou Judson |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:34:45 -0700 |
25 lines |
Re: To bake or not to bake?
|
Tom Fine |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:31:13 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: To bake or not to bake?
|
Lou Judson |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:25:57 -0700 |
39 lines |
Re: To bake or not to bake?
|
Bob Olhsson |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:20:53 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: To bake or not to bake?
|
Tom Fine |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:55:48 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: To bake or not to bake?
|
[log in to unmask] |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:35:55 -0500 |
99 lines |
Re: To bake or not to bake?
|
Robert Hodge |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:02:07 -0400 |
81 lines |
Re: To bake or not to bake?
|
Lou Judson |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:01:24 -0700 |
59 lines |
Re: To bake or not to bake?
|
David Lennick |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:47:12 -0400 |
41 lines |
To bake or not to bake?
|
Lou Judson |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:30:12 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: Transfer responsibility- was Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Lou Judson |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:16:57 -0700 |
23 lines |
Re: Transfer responsibility- was Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Lou Judson |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:28:53 -0700 |
107 lines |
Re: Transfer responsibility- was Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Ron Fial |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:54:38 -0700 |
62 lines |
Re: Transfer responsibility- was Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Lou Judson |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:36:07 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: Transfer responsibility- was Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Ron Fial |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:41:40 -0700 |
18 lines |
Re: Transfer responsibility- was Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Bob Olhsson |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:34:06 -0400 |
26 lines |
Re: Transfer responsibility- was Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Mike Richter |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:37:03 -0700 |
51 lines |
Re: Transfer responsibility- was Podcasting--explained a bit...
|
Steven Smolian |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:45:20 -0400 |
132 lines |
UK sound-recording copyright term change...
|
steven c |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:31:19 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: Use care with new-to-you tape machines
|
Robert Hodge |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:13:38 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: Use care with new-to-you tape machines
|
Marie Azile O'Connell |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:40:10 -0700 |
71 lines |
Re: Use care with new-to-you tape machines
|
Mike Richter |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:33:41 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: Use care with new-to-you tape machines
|
David Lennick |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:32:40 -0400 |
49 lines |
Use care with new-to-you tape machines
|
Richard L. Hess |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:16:41 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: Video format preferences
|
[log in to unmask] |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:57:15 -0500 |
70 lines |
Re: Video format preferences
|
[log in to unmask] |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:42:45 -0500 |
91 lines |
Re: Video format preferences
|
Tommy =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F6berg?= |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:26:18 +0200 |
44 lines |
Re: Video format preferences
|
David Breneman |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:37:37 -0700 |
29 lines |
Video format preferences
|
Tommy =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F6berg?= |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 20:44:17 +0200 |
45 lines |
WALKIE-RECORDALL {Re: [ARSCLIST] Beginner's question RE: digital recordings}
|
<> |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 20:12:10 EDT |
39 lines |
Wattle Records (Australia)
|
John Ross |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:59:51 -0700 |
15 lines |
Re: Which Stylus Size for 78's (if you could have only one) ?
|
Milan P. Milovanovic |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:31:29 +0200 |
79 lines |
Re: Which Stylus Size for 78's (if you could have only one) ?
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:31:49 -0700 |
46 lines |
Re: Which Stylus Size for 78's (if you could have only one) ?
|
Milan P. Milovanovic |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:13:52 +0200 |
52 lines |
Re: Which Stylus Size for 78's (if you could have only one) ?
|
Dr. Cheryl Thurber |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:07:39 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: Which Stylus Size for 78's (if you could have only one) ?
|
David Lennick |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:53:18 -0400 |
22 lines |
Which Stylus Size for 78's (if you could have only one) ?
|
DSL FODA01 |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:41:01 -0400 |
36 lines |
Re: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do??? (was Podcasting of 78's)
|
steven c |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:18:04 -0400 |
55 lines |
Re: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do??? (was Podcasting of 78's)
|
Sherwin Cerini |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 15:52:37 -0400 |
186 lines |
Re: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do??? (was Podcasting of 78's)
|
steven c |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:49:59 -0400 |
113 lines |
Re: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do??? (was Podcasting of 78's)
|
Tom Fine |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 20:52:38 -0400 |
194 lines |
Re: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do??? (was Podcasting of 78's)
|
Sherwin Cerini |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 19:20:05 -0400 |
157 lines |
Re: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do??? (was Podcasting of 78's)
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:31:59 -0700 |
167 lines |
Re: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do??? (was Podcasting of 78's)
|
Andes, Donald |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:44:43 -0700 |
266 lines |
Re: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do??? (was Podcasting of 78's)
|
Tom Fine |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:21:07 -0400 |
158 lines |
WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do??? (was Podcasting of 78's)
|
Andes, Donald |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:36:11 -0700 |
189 lines |
Re: X-Ray records
|
[log in to unmask] |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:08:02 -0500 |
152 lines |
Re: X-Ray records
|
George Brock-Nannestad |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:04:31 +0200 |
40 lines |
Re: X-Ray records
|
David Lewis |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:57:36 -0400 |
171 lines |
Re: X-Ray records
|
Roger and Allison Kulp |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:32:32 -0700 |
25 lines |
Re: X-Ray records
|
Steven Smolian |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:16:39 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: X-Ray records
|
[log in to unmask] |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:06:27 -0500 |
36 lines |
X-Ray records
|
Marcos Sueiro Bal |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:28:35 -0400 |
15 lines |
Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
Don Tait |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:48:44 EDT |
70 lines |
FW: [ARSCLIST] Chinese copies- slang
|
Aaron Z Snyder |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:19:19 -0400 |
67 lines |
Fwd: [eefc] California Gold website
|
Lou Judson |
Mon, 7 Aug 2006 16:34:17 -0700 |
72 lines |
FW: [MLA-L] Fw: JISC consultation: _Gramophone_
|
Farrington, Jim |
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:10:31 -0400 |
122 lines |
FW: [music] 75th Birthday Special for/with Chris Strachwitz on KPFA (fwd)
|
JJJJ |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 21:00:43 -0400 |
179 lines |
Re: ^ Can 78s sound better than LPs?
|
steven c |
Sat, 26 Aug 2006 00:37:45 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: ^ Magnetic tape through the mail
|
Lou Judson |
Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:25:05 -0700 |
26 lines |
Re: ^ Re: [ARSCLIST] Telemetry Tapes
|
steven c |
Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:21:29 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: ^ Re: [ARSCLIST] Telemetry Tapes
|
steven c |
Sat, 19 Aug 2006 21:46:49 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: ^ Re: [ARSCLIST] Telemetry Tapes
|
Lou Judson |
Sat, 19 Aug 2006 11:05:17 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: ^ Re: [ARSCLIST] Telemetry Tapes
|
Don Cox |
Sat, 19 Aug 2006 17:16:02 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: ^ Re: [ARSCLIST] Telemetry Tapes
|
Mike Richter |
Fri, 18 Aug 2006 20:14:19 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: ^ Re: [ARSCLIST] Telemetry Tapes
|
steven c |
Fri, 18 Aug 2006 22:01:15 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: ^ Re: [ARSCLIST] Telemetry Tapes
|
Don Cox |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:45:16 +0000 |
36 lines |
^ Re: [ARSCLIST] Telemetry Tapes
|
Lou Judson |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:58:56 -0700 |
62 lines |
Re: ^ SP-15 turntable question
|
Tom Fine |
Wed, 23 Aug 2006 05:59:22 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: ^ SP-15 turntable question
|
steven c |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:06:13 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: ^ Telemetry Tapes
|
Lou Judson |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:26:28 -0700 |
27 lines |
Re: ^ Telemetry Tapes
|
steven c |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:02:29 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: ^ Telemetry Tapes
|
steven c |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:38:31 -0400 |
25 lines |