LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


August 2006


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Who Are You People?" (1 message)
..and in this week's eBay listings, we have... (1 message)
.BWF implementation (16 messages)
2 GB file limit (6 messages)
2007 ARSC Conference: Milwaukee, Wisconsin (1 message)
3M 996 (2 messages)
5" discs more hardy than some think (1 message)
5" discs more hearty than some think (9 messages)
78s on eBay (2 messages)
Advice on cassette decks? (10 messages)
Advice on how to get the list in digest form? (1 message)
Aol discs (was Podcasting) (1 message)
Apologies for wrong auction links (1 message)
Archiving and Reformatting Digital Files (4 messages)
ARSC Awards Finalists 2006 (1 message)
ARSC Preservation Grants: The First Awards (1 message)
Article on Glenn Gould Archive and Forgery in today's WSJ (1 message)
Audio for "free," but first a word from our sponsor... (1 message)
Backward turntables? (12 messages)
Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (37 messages)
Bing v. Enrico--was: Podcasting--explained a bit... (2 messages)
Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (24 messages)
Can 78s sound better than LPs? (99 messages)
Can anybody identhify this odd little piece? (2 messages)
Cassette playback (was Can 78s sound better than LPs?) (2 messages)
Cassette speeds, was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (3 messages)
Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility? (8 messages)
Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing (8 messages)
Cataloguing again--was: LP RECORD STORAGE (1 message)
Cataloguing still :-)--was: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility? (3 messages)
centre speaker is sympathetically vibrating (1 message)
Cheap computer books -- final call (1 message)
Chinese copies- slang (4 messages)
Chinese recordings? (2 messages)
computer books cheap (1 message)
Concertape SSS? (7 messages)
Converter (2 messages)
Damping (was: Can 78s sound better than LPs?) (3 messages)
DAT tapes (4 messages)
Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (28 messages)
Figure 8, was Not using headphones (3 messages)
File Size Confusion (8 messages)
Folkways Records broadcasts (4 messages)
FOX HOLLOW folk LP's (2 messages)
George Gaskin recording sought (3 messages)
Glitchy dats (17 messages)
help needed regarding sputnik documentary (6 messages)
How many 78's--was: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (4 messages)
IASA Conference (3 messages)
IASA Conference and the Political Situation in Mexico (1 message)
IASA Conference in Mexico (re: Kurt Nauck's concerns) (1 message)
IASA Mexico Conference (1 message)
Ives' Universe Symphony (3 messages)
J Folksay records label vs. Stinson records (4 messages)
JOB POSTING: Audio Specialist - Gospel Music Restoration Project (1 message)
Josh White Langston Hughes Folksay records label Folksong and folksingers Stinson records (2 messages)
Klaus Asher (1 message)
Kostelanetz (1 message)
Kostelanetz, was [ARSCLIST] Transfer responsibility (3 messages)
link to ebay listings (2 messages)
Lomax The Songhunter (2 messages)
Looking for Odeon recording (3 messages)
Lost Musical Treasure (7 messages)
Lotz-Liste-23 (1 message)
LP RECORD STORAGE (51 messages)
LP RECORD STORAGE - plywood/particle board (1 message)
Magnetic tape through the mail (10 messages)
Mahler 4th: Konoye wanted (2 messages)
Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones) (9 messages)
Mellencamp (6 messages)
Microcassettes (1 message)
Microphones--was: Not using headphones (1 message)
Mitsubishi X-86 and ESM (was Glitchy dats) (1 message)
My Tape Covers (1 message)
NASA (24 messages)
NASA (and beyond, far beyond!) (1 message)
National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (9 messages)
Need help understanding how to get an Important Folk Music collection Accessible (1 message)
New History Page available (1 message)
Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders (10 messages)
Non-RIAA preamp (1 message)
Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???) (22 messages)
Not using headphones (46 messages)
Oistrakh at The Fair (1 message)
Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers (8 messages)
Overtone Records (3 messages)
Peter Copeland (5 messages)
Podcasting--explained a bit... (48 messages)
Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion (7 messages)
Presonus 1394 (1 message)
Professional courtesy: Looking for "The Lake Song" (2 messages)
RCA Metal Parts in Camden. (17 messages)
Recall: [ARSCLIST] Glitchy dats (2 messages)
Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE (8 messages)
Recall: ^ [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE (3 messages)
rejoining the flock (6 messages)
Scotch 200 box photograph (2 messages)
Scotch 200 box photograph -- update (2 messages)
Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (25 messages)
Searching For Ethnomusic Footage (3 messages)
seeking a semi-obscure article (3 messages)
seeking another Murrow LP set (1 message)
shelving (2 messages)
Some advice on cassette decks? (4 messages)
soundscape DAW (3 messages)
Soundtrack Pro help... (5 messages)
SP-15 turntable question (7 messages)
Speed correction, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Can 78s sound better than LPs? (1 message)
stereo or double mono (12 messages)
Strage blue amberol (2 messages)
tape eaten by 112mkII (4 messages)
tape op (4 messages)
Tel-Mar or Ter-Mar? (Was: Malcolm Chisolm ) (4 messages)
Telemetry Tapes (11 messages)
The person responds was Thin tape decay (7 messages)
Thin tape decay (20 messages)
This week's auction (1 message)
To bake or not to bake? (12 messages)
Transfer responsibility- was Podcasting--explained a bit... (8 messages)
UK sound-recording copyright term change... (1 message)
Use care with new-to-you tape machines (5 messages)
Video format preferences (5 messages)
WALKIE-RECORDALL {Re: [ARSCLIST] Beginner's question RE: digital recordings} (1 message)
Wattle Records (Australia) (1 message)
Which Stylus Size for 78's (if you could have only one) ? (6 messages)
WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do??? (was Podcasting of 78's) (9 messages)
X-Ray records (7 messages)
[ARSCLIST] Can 78s sound better than LPs? (1 message)
[ARSCLIST] Chinese copies- slang (1 message)
[eefc] California Gold website (1 message)
[MLA-L] Fw: JISC consultation: _Gramophone_ (1 message)
[music] 75th Birthday Special for/with Chris Strachwitz on KPFA (fwd) (1 message)
^ Can 78s sound better than LPs? (1 message)
^ Magnetic tape through the mail (1 message)
^ Re: [ARSCLIST] Telemetry Tapes (8 messages)
^ SP-15 turntable question (2 messages)
^ Telemetry Tapes (3 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Who Are You People?"

"Who Are You People?"

susannah cleveland

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:32:39 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

..and in this week's eBay listings, we have...

..and in this week's eBay listings, we have...

Steven Smolian

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:55:28 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

.BWF implementation

Re: .BWF implementation

Rob Poretti

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:29:46 -0400

29 lines

Re: .BWF implementation

Tom Fine

Sat, 12 Aug 2006 18:14:28 -0400

37 lines

Re: .BWF implementation

seva

Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:21:16 -0400

43 lines

Re: .BWF implementation

Bob Olhsson

Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:11:51 -0400

21 lines

Re: .BWF implementation

Steven Smolian

Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:46:32 -0400

54 lines

Re: .BWF implementation

Konrad Strauss

Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:18:03 -0400

65 lines

Re: .BWF implementation

Bob Olhsson

Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:12:21 -0400

22 lines

Re: .BWF implementation

seva

Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:06:52 -0400

70 lines

.BWF implementation

<>

Sat, 12 Aug 2006 09:18:44 -0400

24 lines

Re: .BWF implementation

Graeme Jaye

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 23:38:54 +0200

31 lines

Re: .BWF implementation

andy kolovos

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:06:50 -0400

45 lines

Re: .BWF implementation

Casey, Michael T

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:25:29 -0400

58 lines

Re: .BWF implementation

andy kolovos

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:49:29 -0400

33 lines

Re: .BWF implementation

Bob Olhsson

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:28:01 -0400

23 lines

Re: .BWF implementation

Casey, Michael T

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:31:20 -0400

72 lines

.BWF implementation

<>

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:19:04 -0400

22 lines

New Thread

2 GB file limit

Re: 2 GB file limit

Brandon Burke

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:22:02 -0700

62 lines

Re: 2 GB file limit

Konrad Strauss

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:26:22 -0400

38 lines

Re: 2 GB file limit

Brandon Burke

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:08:05 -0700

74 lines

Re: 2 GB file limit

Bob Olhsson

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 23:22:18 -0400

30 lines

Re: 2 GB file limit

Richard L. Hess

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 17:09:04 -0400

45 lines

2 GB file limit

Konrad Strauss

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:59:16 -0400

47 lines

New Thread

2007 ARSC Conference: Milwaukee, Wisconsin

2007 ARSC Conference: Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Bill Klinger

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:01:46 -0400

56 lines

New Thread

3M 996

Re: 3M 996

John Bondurant

Wed, 9 Aug 2006 15:13:54 -0400

38 lines

3M 996

David Lennick

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 22:24:07 -0400

19 lines

New Thread

5" discs more hardy than some think

Re: 5" discs more hardy than some think

George Brock-Nannestad

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 22:38:17 +0200

51 lines

New Thread

5" discs more hearty than some think

Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think

<>

Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:43:16 -0400

138 lines

Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think

Rod Stephens

Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:59:41 -0700

87 lines

Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think

David Breneman

Tue, 1 Aug 2006 16:52:14 -0700

31 lines

Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think

Mike Richter

Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:43:09 -0700

31 lines

Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think

David Breneman

Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:34:14 -0700

33 lines

Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think

Tom Fine

Tue, 1 Aug 2006 17:26:14 -0400

55 lines

Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think

Richard L. Hess

Tue, 1 Aug 2006 13:23:27 -0400

41 lines

Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think

Rod Stephens

Tue, 1 Aug 2006 07:29:39 -0700

32 lines

Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think

Trey Bunn

Tue, 1 Aug 2006 08:36:23 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

78s on eBay

Re: 78s on eBay

Lou Judson

Sun, 13 Aug 2006 05:42:08 -0700

27 lines

78s on eBay

Steven Smolian

Sun, 13 Aug 2006 07:32:37 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

Advice on cassette decks?

Re: Advice on cassette decks?

Parker Dinkins

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:19:01 -0500

76 lines

Re: Advice on cassette decks?

Parker Dinkins

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:14:44 -0500

67 lines

Re: Advice on cassette decks?

Gary

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:31:26 -0700

58 lines

Re: Advice on cassette decks?

Parker Dinkins

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 20:43:07 -0500

43 lines

Re: Advice on cassette decks?

Robert Hodge

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:09:58 -0400

51 lines

Re: Advice on cassette decks?

George Brock-Nannestad

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:35:07 +0200

39 lines

Re: Advice on cassette decks?

Steve Weiss

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:52:20 -0400

39 lines

Re: Advice on cassette decks?

Parker Dinkins

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:02:11 -0500

65 lines

Re: Advice on cassette decks?

Tommy =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F6berg?=

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:54:17 +0200

33 lines

Advice on cassette decks?

Craig Breaden

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:40:45 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

Advice on how to get the list in digest form?

Advice on how to get the list in digest form?

<>

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:01:24 EDT

15 lines

New Thread

Aol discs (was Podcasting)

Re: Aol discs (was Podcasting)

Matt Sohn

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:08:20 -0400

21 lines

New Thread

Apologies for wrong auction links

Apologies for wrong auction links

Dr. Rainer E. Lotz c/o Birgit Lotz Verlag

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:56:16 +0200

35 lines

New Thread

Archiving and Reformatting Digital Files

Re: Archiving and Reformatting Digital Files

Tom Fine

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:16:34 -0400

88 lines

Re: Archiving and Reformatting Digital Files

Richard L. Hess

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:12:11 -0400

74 lines

Re: Archiving and Reformatting Digital Files

Mike Richter

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:42:15 -0700

49 lines

Archiving and Reformatting Digital Files

McCormick, Kathleen

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:07:19 -0400

55 lines

New Thread

ARSC Awards Finalists 2006

ARSC Awards Finalists 2006

Bill Klinger

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 22:24:47 -0400

169 lines

New Thread

ARSC Preservation Grants: The First Awards

ARSC Preservation Grants: The First Awards

Bill Klinger

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:56:07 -0400

55 lines

New Thread

Article on Glenn Gould Archive and Forgery in today's WSJ

Article on Glenn Gould Archive and Forgery in today's WSJ

Steve Ramm

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:02:32 EDT

205 lines

New Thread

Audio for "free," but first a word from our sponsor...

Audio for "free," but first a word from our sponsor...

Karl Miller

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:34:24 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

Backward turntables?

Re: Backward turntables?

Graeme Jaye

Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:01:33 +0200

33 lines

Re: Backward turntables?

steven c

Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:14:03 -0400

24 lines

Re: Backward turntables?

Parker Dinkins

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:31:44 -0500

26 lines

Re: Backward turntables?

Mike Richter

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:18:44 -0700

32 lines

Re: Backward turntables?

Parker Dinkins

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:07:44 -0500

36 lines

Re: Backward turntables?

Roger and Allison Kulp

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:28:05 -0700

32 lines

Re: Backward turntables?

Rob Poretti

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:44:18 -0400

60 lines

Re: Backward turntables?

Charles Lawson

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:04:33 -0400

23 lines

Re: Backward turntables?

Charles Lawson

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:03:37 -0400

23 lines

Re: Backward turntables?

Steven Smolian

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:02:58 -0400

59 lines

Re: Backward turntables?

David Lennick

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:26:22 -0400

50 lines

Backward turntables?

Charles Lawson

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:08:37 -0400

41 lines

New Thread

Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Scott Phillips

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 21:20:44 -0500

66 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Tom Fine

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 21:39:51 -0400

46 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Richard L. Hess

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 21:23:51 -0400

51 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Matt Sohn

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 21:19:58 -0400

27 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Edward Falk

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:07:35 -0700

34 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Scott Phillips

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 19:47:03 -0500

133 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

<>

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 20:17:16 EDT

24 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Tom Fine

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 20:14:14 -0400

43 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Tom Fine

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 20:08:06 -0400

38 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Parker Dinkins

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:54:25 -0500

29 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Lisa NnNnNn

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:47:58 -0500

181 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Lisa NnNnNn

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:44:10 -0500

72 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Tom Fine

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 19:22:59 -0400

146 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

David Lewiston

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 12:51:19 -1000

58 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

David Lewiston

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:38:03 -1000

58 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Edward Falk

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:32:43 -0700

41 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Don Cox

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 22:16:58 +0000

31 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Steven Smolian

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:57:37 -0400

96 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Mark Durenberger

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:54:53 -0500

165 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Lisa NnNnNn

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:41:38 -0500

142 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Marie Azile O'Connell

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:39:46 -0700

123 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Tom Fine

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:26:21 -0400

144 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

David Lewiston

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:07:18 -1000

126 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Lisa NnNnNn

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:46:18 -0500

102 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

David Lewiston

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:35:18 -1000

80 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Lisa NnNnNn

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:57:35 -0500

112 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Tom Fine

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:26:17 -0400

82 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

David Lewiston

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 08:14:47 -1000

56 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Lisa NnNnNn

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:13:46 -0500

118 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Robert Hodge

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:39:31 -0400

101 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Lisa NnNnNn

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:07:17 -0500

75 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Eric Jacobs

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 08:52:42 -0700

70 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Steven Smolian

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:16:03 -0400

60 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

George Brock-Nannestad

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 17:00:15 +0200

43 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Lisa NnNnNn

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:03:43 -0500

65 lines

Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Richard L. Hess

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:50:39 -0400

39 lines

Beginner's question RE: digital recordings

Lisa NnNnNn

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:17:43 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

Bing v. Enrico--was: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Re: Bing v. Enrico--was: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Milan P. Milovanovic

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:59:13 +0200

40 lines

Bing v. Enrico--was: Podcasting--explained a bit...

steven c

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:29:34 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

steven c

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:40:25 -0400

39 lines

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Matt Sohn

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:01:16 -0400

27 lines

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

steven c

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:27:36 -0400

25 lines

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Lou Judson

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:27:50 -0700

24 lines

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Matt Sohn

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:53:56 -0400

34 lines

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Tom Fine

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:17:25 -0400

86 lines

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Roger and Allison Kulp

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:01:59 -0700

67 lines

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Don Cox

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:13:18 +0000

36 lines

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Mike Richter

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:59:31 -0700

44 lines

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Richard L. Hess

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 23:31:49 -0400

51 lines

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Mike Richter

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:12:52 -0700

35 lines

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Mike Richter

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:06:20 -0700

34 lines

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Scott Phillips

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:51:24 -0500

59 lines

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Jerome Hartke

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:42:00 -0400

77 lines

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Mike Richter

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:24:39 -0700

43 lines

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

steven c

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:05:05 -0400

58 lines

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Tom Fine

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:41:28 -0400

59 lines

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

<>

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:01:13 EDT

39 lines

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

George Brock-Nannestad

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:52:19 +0200

76 lines

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Scott Phillips

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:16:47 -0500

56 lines

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Mike Richter

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:04:43 -0700

48 lines

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Scott Phillips

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:00:20 -0500

59 lines

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Lou Judson

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 07:36:57 -0700

44 lines

Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Steven Smolian

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:29:43 -0400

72 lines

New Thread

Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Lou Judson

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:46:32 -0700

28 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Don Cox

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:18:18 +0000

48 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Don Cox

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:05:56 +0000

38 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Don Cox

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:22:41 +0000

38 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Lou Judson

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 07:26:11 -0700

29 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Bob Olhsson

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:58:35 -0400

30 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Jerome Hartke

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 07:31:29 -0400

29 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Don Cox

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:40:18 +0000

34 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Don Cox

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 08:38:22 +0000

41 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Don Cox

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 08:33:03 +0000

40 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

phillip holmes

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:55:52 -0500

62 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

steven c

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 02:48:11 -0400

45 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

phillip holmes

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:07:46 -0500

55 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

steven c

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:21:50 -0400

72 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

steven c

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:03:06 -0400

48 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

steven c

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:23:01 -0400

58 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Parker Dinkins

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 21:02:00 -0500

29 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

steven c

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:02:57 -0400

27 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Scott Phillips

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:49:18 -0500

33 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Richard L. Hess

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:08:28 -0400

65 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

George Brock-Nannestad

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 02:08:41 +0200

60 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

steven c

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:11:56 -0400

24 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

steven c

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:03:58 -0400

36 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

steven c

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:45:20 -0400

24 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

steven c

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:41:36 -0400

52 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

David Breneman

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 15:54:31 -0700

41 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

David Lennick

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:28:39 -0400

38 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Milan P. Milovanovic

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:04:52 +0200

34 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Roger and Allison Kulp

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:13:19 -0700

47 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

David Lennick

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:17:04 -0400

128 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Roger and Allison Kulp

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:01:08 -0700

58 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Roger and Allison Kulp

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:39:30 -0700

94 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

MD at Upsala

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:46:55 -0500

68 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

MD at Upsala

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:45:12 -0500

27 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Lou Judson

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 08:54:11 -0700

39 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Scott Phillips

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:38:12 -0500

107 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Tom Fine

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:22:16 -0400

74 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

David Lennick

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:03:13 -0400

56 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Don Cox

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 19:46:56 +0000

42 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Don Cox

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:35:49 +0000

77 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

steven c

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:50:03 -0400

37 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

steven c

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:24:52 -0400

29 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

steven c

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:16:35 -0400

34 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Dave Bradley

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:40:21 -0400

28 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Bob Olhsson

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:05:06 -0400

24 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Michael Shoshani

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:51:15 -0500

30 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Michael Shoshani

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:45:17 -0500

47 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Lou Judson

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:33:30 -0700

26 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Lou Judson

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:31:34 -0700

29 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

steven c

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:30:23 -0400

27 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

<>

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:45:46 EDT

25 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Tom Fine

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:22:52 -0400

51 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

steven c

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:01:48 -0400

27 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

steven c

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 16:46:00 -0400

84 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Mike Richter

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:30:16 -0700

44 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

George Brock-Nannestad

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:38:16 +0200

37 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Tom Fine

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 12:58:50 -0400

120 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Tom Fine

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 12:37:52 -0400

39 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Scott Phillips

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:31:43 -0500

102 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

phillip holmes

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:30:03 -0500

100 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

phillip holmes

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:25:49 -0500

27 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Scott Phillips

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:23:30 -0500

67 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

phillip holmes

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:23:24 -0500

35 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Scott Phillips

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:15:52 -0500

49 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Tom Fine

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:50:51 -0400

82 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Lou Judson

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 08:29:52 -0700

81 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Marcos Sueiro Bal

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 10:18:14 -0400

18 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

George Brock-Nannestad

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 15:33:22 +0200

53 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Bob Olhsson

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 09:15:33 -0400

32 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Don Cox

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:43:29 +0000

69 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Tom Fine

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 07:45:22 -0400

75 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Tom Fine

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 07:36:40 -0400

60 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Lou Judson

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:22:55 -0700

29 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Lou Judson

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:04:49 -0700

52 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

steven c

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 00:34:35 -0400

38 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

steven c

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 00:20:20 -0400

46 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

David Breneman

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:50:48 -0700

38 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Tom Fine

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:52:15 -0400

83 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

<>

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:42:35 EDT

31 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Michael Shoshani

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:34:58 -0500

31 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Milan P. Milovanovic

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:33:27 +0200

63 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Lou Judson

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:32:17 -0700

28 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Milan P. Milovanovic

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:20:10 +0200

41 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Tom Fine

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:56:21 -0400

60 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Lou Judson

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:39:03 -0700

57 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Roger and Allison Kulp

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:18:38 -0700

35 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Tom Fine

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:49:30 -0400

85 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Tom Fine

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:32:50 -0400

44 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Lou Judson

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:54:50 -0700

83 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Mike Richter

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 08:29:00 -0700

40 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Marcos Sueiro Bal

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:19:17 -0400

38 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Bob Olhsson

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:13:44 -0400

23 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Bob Olhsson

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:00:15 -0400

27 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Tom Fine

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:54:36 -0400

57 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Tom Fine

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:47:00 -0400

64 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

George Brock-Nannestad

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:47:37 +0200

63 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Steven Smolian

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:44:57 -0400

78 lines

Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Charles Lawson

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:39:25 -0400

37 lines

Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Marcos Sueiro Bal

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:05:23 -0400

25 lines

New Thread

Can anybody identhify this odd little piece?

Re: Can anybody identhify this odd little piece?

Tom Fine

Tue, 1 Aug 2006 17:27:44 -0400

31 lines

Can anybody identhify this odd little piece?

Roger and Allison Kulp

Tue, 1 Aug 2006 11:45:54 -0700

18 lines

New Thread

Cassette playback (was Can 78s sound better than LPs?)

Re: Cassette playback (was Can 78s sound better than LPs?)

Lou Judson

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 09:52:03 -0700

27 lines

Re: Cassette playback (was Can 78s sound better than LPs?)

Richard L. Hess

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:52:42 -0400

101 lines

New Thread

Cassette speeds, was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Re: Cassette speeds, was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Lou Judson

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:40:25 -0700

36 lines

Re: Cassette speeds, was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Mike Richter

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:00:13 -0700

30 lines

Re: Cassette speeds, was Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Steven Smolian

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:22:14 -0400

60 lines

New Thread

Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?

Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?

Karl Miller

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:52:18 -0500

43 lines

Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?

steven c

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:56:04 -0400

200 lines

Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?

Karl Miller

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:25:53 -0500

144 lines

Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?

steven c

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:12:29 -0400

225 lines

Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?

Karl Miller

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:28:52 -0500

103 lines

Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?

steven c

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:52:26 -0400

144 lines

Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?

Karl Miller

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:06:53 -0500

66 lines

Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?

steven c

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:58:26 -0400

77 lines

New Thread

Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing

Re: Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing

Karl Miller

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:25:47 -0500

31 lines

Re: Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing

Roger and Allison Kulp

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:07:11 -0700

22 lines

Re: Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing

Karl Miller

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:55:29 -0500

96 lines

Re: Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing

steven c

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:00:17 -0400

194 lines

Re: Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing

Karl Miller

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:43:49 -0500

44 lines

Re: Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing

George Brock-Nannestad

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:32:51 +0200

39 lines

Re: Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing

eugene hayhoe

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:49:24 -0700

139 lines

Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing

Karl Miller

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:21:12 -0500

130 lines

New Thread

Cataloguing again--was: LP RECORD STORAGE

Cataloguing again--was: LP RECORD STORAGE

steven c

Wed, 9 Aug 2006 21:01:47 -0400

65 lines

New Thread

Cataloguing still :-)--was: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?

Re: Cataloguing still :-)--was: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?

Mike Richter

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:59:22 -0700

49 lines

Re: Cataloguing still :-)--was: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?

Karl Miller

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:48:56 -0500

92 lines

Cataloguing still :-)--was: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?

steven c

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:18:16 -0400

90 lines

New Thread

centre speaker is sympathetically vibrating

centre speaker is sympathetically vibrating

phillip holmes

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:19:40 -0500

80 lines

New Thread

Cheap computer books -- final call

Cheap computer books -- final call

Tom Fine

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 12:04:28 -0400

26 lines

New Thread

Chinese copies- slang

Re: Chinese copies- slang

Aaron Z Snyder

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:30:32 -0400

35 lines

Re: Chinese copies- slang

Sam Brylawski

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:28:06 -0400

44 lines

Re: Chinese copies- slang

steven c

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:13:50 -0400

50 lines

Chinese copies- slang

Steven Smolian

Sun, 13 Aug 2006 22:59:09 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

Chinese recordings?

Re: Chinese recordings?

Dick Spottswood

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:37:13 -0400

50 lines

Chinese recordings?

Jonathan Wise

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:59:55 -0400

18 lines

New Thread

computer books cheap

computer books cheap

Tom Fine

Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:08:42 -0400

62 lines

New Thread

Concertape SSS?

Re: Concertape SSS?

Marcos Sueiro Bal

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 07:27:46 -0400

69 lines

Re: Concertape SSS?

David Lennick

Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:58:58 -0400

41 lines

Re: Concertape SSS?

David Breneman

Sun, 20 Aug 2006 07:31:46 -0700

41 lines

Re: Concertape SSS?

Dave Bradley

Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:57:45 -0400

29 lines

Re: Concertape SSS?

<>

Sat, 19 Aug 2006 11:09:58 EDT

27 lines

Re: Concertape SSS?

David Lennick

Sat, 19 Aug 2006 09:45:31 -0400

29 lines

Concertape SSS?

Marcos Sueiro Bal

Sat, 19 Aug 2006 09:24:25 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

Converter

Re: Converter

David Lewiston

Tue, 1 Aug 2006 17:34:17 -1000

45 lines

Converter

Steven Smolian

Tue, 1 Aug 2006 06:43:16 -0400

22 lines

New Thread

Damping (was: Can 78s sound better than LPs?)

Re: Damping (was: Can 78s sound better than LPs?)

steven c

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:32:31 -0400

52 lines

Re: Damping (was: Can 78s sound better than LPs?)

Lou Judson

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:24:36 -0700

44 lines

Damping (was: Can 78s sound better than LPs?)

Matt Sohn

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:54:11 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

DAT tapes

Re: DAT tapes

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:04:09 -0500

56 lines

Re: DAT tapes

David Lennick

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:02:01 -0400

38 lines

Re: DAT tapes

<>

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:55:12 EDT

31 lines

DAT tapes

David Lennick

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:27:39 -0400

25 lines

New Thread

Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

steven c

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:35:54 -0400

44 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

Mike Richter

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:38:39 -0700

40 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

steven c

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:25:29 -0400

56 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

Don Cox

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:01:59 +0000

47 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

steven c

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:05:49 -0400

27 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

Richard L. Hess

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:08:58 -0400

72 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

Scott Phillips

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:25:40 -0500

37 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

Tom Fine

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:30:20 -0400

68 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

Tom Fine

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:27:00 -0400

47 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

Richard L. Hess

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:55:51 -0400

55 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

David Lennick

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:59:31 -0400

36 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

phillip holmes

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 15:44:26 -0500

27 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

steven c

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:20:22 -0400

28 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

steven c

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:14:36 -0400

34 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

Tom Fine

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:54:47 -0400

177 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

Roger and Allison Kulp

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:33:31 -0700

153 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

Tom Fine

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:09:09 -0400

145 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

Roger and Allison Kulp

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:01:39 -0700

94 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

Tom Fine

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:38:14 -0400

83 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

David Lennick

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:07:57 -0400

32 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

Tom Fine

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:15:10 -0400

74 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

Tom Fine

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:08:37 -0400

61 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

<>

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:49:28 EDT

28 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

Steven Smolian

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:49:18 -0400

185 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

David Lennick

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:53:54 -0400

52 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

Mike Richter

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:31:42 -0700

36 lines

Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

Lou Judson

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:23:40 -0700

40 lines

Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?

Rob Bamberger

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:40:22 -0400

161 lines

New Thread

Figure 8, was Not using headphones

Re: Figure 8, was Not using headphones

Bob Olhsson

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:27:23 -0400

26 lines

Re: Figure 8, was Not using headphones

Lou Judson

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:15:08 -0700

27 lines

Re: Figure 8, was Not using headphones

Marcos Sueiro Bal

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:34:23 -0400

45 lines

New Thread

File Size Confusion

Re: File Size Confusion

Alec McLane

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:06:47 -0400

49 lines

Re: File Size Confusion

Rob Poretti

Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:30:50 -0400

120 lines

Re: File Size Confusion

<>

Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:01:06 EDT

30 lines

Re: File Size Confusion

Brandon Burke

Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:45:30 -0700

68 lines

Re: File Size Confusion

Mike Richter

Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:09:00 -0700

57 lines

Re: File Size Confusion

Rob Poretti

Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:26:36 -0400

97 lines

Re: File Size Confusion

Eugene Lew

Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:17:15 -0400

68 lines

File Size Confusion

Brandon Burke

Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:57:28 -0700

48 lines

New Thread

Folkways Records broadcasts

Re: Folkways Records broadcasts

Lou Judson

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:12:15 -0700

44 lines

Re: Folkways Records broadcasts

Alex Hartov

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:23:00 -0400

57 lines

Re: Folkways Records broadcasts

Lou Judson

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:06:38 -0700

46 lines

Folkways Records broadcasts

Alex Hartov

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 08:06:31 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

FOX HOLLOW folk LP's

Re: FOX HOLLOW folk LP's

John Ross

Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:40:47 -0700

31 lines

FOX HOLLOW folk LP's

Thomas Stern

Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:26:42 -0400

19 lines

New Thread

George Gaskin recording sought

Re: George Gaskin recording sought

Matthew Barton

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:52:35 -0400

47 lines

Re: George Gaskin recording sought

Susan Stinson

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:48:08 -0400

36 lines

George Gaskin recording sought

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Matthew_Barton?=

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:24:15 -0400

17 lines

New Thread

Glitchy dats

Re: Glitchy dats

David Lennick

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:26:17 -0400

52 lines

Re: Glitchy dats

Robert Hodge

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:12:17 -0400

76 lines

Re: Glitchy dats

Scott D. Smith

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:48:03 -0500

51 lines

Re: Glitchy dats

David Lennick

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 23:38:38 -0400

81 lines

Re: Glitchy dats

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 22:16:51 -0500

68 lines

Re: Glitchy dats

David Lennick

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 18:31:47 -0400

51 lines

Re: Glitchy dats

Watsky, Lance

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:19:59 -0700

85 lines

Re: Glitchy dats

Watsky, Lance

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:18:20 -0700

76 lines

Re: Glitchy dats

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:04:05 -0500

39 lines

Re: Glitchy dats

Richard L. Hess

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:12:00 -0400

48 lines

Re: Glitchy dats

David Lennick

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:22:33 -0400

37 lines

Re: Glitchy dats

Karl Miller

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:12:14 -0500

27 lines

Re: Glitchy dats

David Lewiston

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 07:09:46 -1000

45 lines

Re: Glitchy dats

David Lennick

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:08:36 -0400

53 lines

Re: Glitchy dats

Marie Azile O'Connell

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 11:58:26 -0500

47 lines

Re: Glitchy dats

Jeff Carroll

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:51:10 -0400

24 lines

Glitchy dats

David Lennick

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 11:41:51 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

help needed regarding sputnik documentary

Re: help needed regarding sputnik documentary

Mike Richter

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:21:37 -0700

46 lines

Re: help needed regarding sputnik documentary

John Ross

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:50:01 -0700

34 lines

Re: help needed regarding sputnik documentary

Roger and Allison Kulp

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:23:44 -0700

34 lines

Re: help needed regarding sputnik documentary

David Breneman

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:00:15 -0700

32 lines

Re: help needed regarding sputnik documentary

Lou Judson

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:20:57 -0700

49 lines

help needed regarding sputnik documentary

<>

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:35:15 EDT

23 lines

New Thread

How many 78's--was: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study

Re: How many 78's--was: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study

steven c

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:28:16 -0400

34 lines

Re: How many 78's--was: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study

Don Cox

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:33:42 +0000

52 lines

Re: How many 78's--was: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study

Tom Fine

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:26:00 -0400

68 lines

How many 78's--was: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study

steven c

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 01:17:23 -0400

48 lines

New Thread

IASA Conference

Re: IASA Conference

<>

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:21:15 EDT

27 lines

Re: IASA Conference

Roger and Allison Kulp

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:10:51 -0700

43 lines

IASA Conference

Kurt Nauck

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:38:16 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

IASA Conference and the Political Situation in Mexico

IASA Conference and the Political Situation in Mexico

Sam Brylawski

Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:46:48 -0400

67 lines

New Thread

IASA Conference in Mexico (re: Kurt Nauck's concerns)

Re: IASA Conference in Mexico (re: Kurt Nauck's concerns)

Jacqueline von Arb

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:49:33 +0200

21 lines

New Thread

IASA Mexico Conference

Fwd: IASA Mexico Conference

Sam Brylawski

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:24:19 -0400

70 lines

New Thread

Ives' Universe Symphony

Re: Ives' Universe Symphony

Brandon Burke

Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:09:41 -0700

80 lines

Re: Ives' Universe Symphony

David Lewis

Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:06:29 -0400

80 lines

Ives' Universe Symphony

Brandon Burke

Wed, 9 Aug 2006 10:53:51 -0700

37 lines

New Thread

J Folksay records label vs. Stinson records

Re: J Folksay records label vs. Stinson records

David Lennick

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 22:46:01 -0400

131 lines

Re: J Folksay records label vs. Stinson records

Thomas Stern

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:53:22 -0400

151 lines

Re: J Folksay records label vs. Stinson records

Steven Smolian

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 07:20:56 -0400

142 lines

Re: J Folksay records label vs. Stinson records

Thomas Stern

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:52:57 -0400

123 lines

New Thread

JOB POSTING: Audio Specialist - Gospel Music Restoration Project

JOB POSTING: Audio Specialist - Gospel Music Restoration Project

Sha_Towers

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:22:53 -0500

62 lines

New Thread

Josh White Langston Hughes Folksay records label Folksong and folksingers Stinson records

Re: Josh White Langston Hughes Folksay records label Folksong and folksingers Stinson records

Roger and Allison Kulp

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:00:58 -0700

57 lines

Josh White Langston Hughes Folksay records label Folksong and folksingers Stinson records

Thomas Stern

Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:32:45 -0400

89 lines

New Thread

Klaus Asher

Klaus Asher

Karl Miller

Wed, 2 Aug 2006 08:46:37 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Kostelanetz

Kostelanetz

Matthew Snyder

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:38:50 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

Kostelanetz, was [ARSCLIST] Transfer responsibility

Re: Kostelanetz, was [ARSCLIST] Transfer responsibility

David Lennick

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:00:57 -0400

84 lines

Re: Kostelanetz, was [ARSCLIST] Transfer responsibility

Steven Smolian

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:45:25 -0400

76 lines

Re: Kostelanetz, was [ARSCLIST] Transfer responsibility

David Lennick

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:51:04 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

link to ebay listings

Re: link to ebay listings

Lou Judson

Sun, 13 Aug 2006 07:33:04 -0700

29 lines

link to ebay listings

Steven Smolian

Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:09:27 -0400

18 lines

New Thread

Lomax The Songhunter

Re: Lomax The Songhunter

Steve Ramm

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:42:27 EDT

29 lines

Re: Lomax The Songhunter

Watsky, Lance

Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:04:46 -0700

28 lines

New Thread

Looking for Odeon recording

Re: Looking for Odeon recording

David Lennick

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:30:30 -0400

41 lines

Re: Looking for Odeon recording

Roger and Allison Kulp

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:09:33 -0700

36 lines

Looking for Odeon recording

Marcos Sueiro Bal

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:01:21 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

Lost Musical Treasure

Re: Fw: Lost Musical Treasure

Steve Ramm

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:04:03 EDT

29 lines

Re: Fw: Lost Musical Treasure

Roger and Allison Kulp

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:15:43 -0700

59 lines

Re: Fw: Lost Musical Treasure

Tom Fine

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:11:09 -0400

62 lines

Re: Fw: Lost Musical Treasure

Kurt Nauck

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:10:34 -0500

35 lines

Re: Fw: Lost Musical Treasure

Nelson-Strauss, Brenda

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:23:47 -0400

80 lines

Re: Fw: Lost Musical Treasure

Robert Hodge

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:11:51 -0400

65 lines

Fw: Lost Musical Treasure

Dick Spottswood

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:01:30 -0400

49 lines

New Thread

Lotz-Liste-23

Lotz-Liste-23

Dr. Rainer E. Lotz c/o Birgit Lotz Verlag

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:56:16 +0200

50 lines

New Thread

LP RECORD STORAGE

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

<>

Sat, 12 Aug 2006 09:13:57 EDT

39 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Roger and Allison Kulp

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:45:18 -0700

152 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Robert Hodge

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:14:29 -0400

143 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

<>

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:26:18 EDT

76 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Andes, Donald

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:00:48 -0700

211 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Dr. Cheryl Thurber

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:50:44 -0700

102 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

eugene hayhoe

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:53:45 -0700

86 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Roger and Allison Kulp

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:32:10 -0700

74 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Karl Miller

Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:45:32 -0500

36 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Tom Fine

Wed, 9 Aug 2006 06:31:49 -0400

61 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Cary Ginell

Wed, 9 Aug 2006 01:39:47 EDT

39 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Peter Hirsch

Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:42:33 -0400

85 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

steven c

Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:43:34 -0400

65 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

David Lennick

Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:25:41 -0400

32 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Cary Ginell

Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:13:11 EDT

43 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Tom Fine

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 20:41:02 -0400

40 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

steven c

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 20:40:38 -0400

27 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

David Lennick

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 20:39:29 -0400

34 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

steven c

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 20:34:35 -0400

27 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Bob Olhsson

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:57:55 -0400

22 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Robert Hodge

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:56:31 -0400

25 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

David Lennick

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:22:31 -0400

45 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Robert Hodge

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:04:49 -0400

36 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Richard L. Hess

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:15:11 -0400

53 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

David Lennick

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 15:43:27 -0400

37 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Andes, Donald

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:19:40 -0700

270 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

James L Wolf

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:49:22 -0400

96 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Steven Smolian

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:35:19 -0400

167 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Andes, Donald

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 11:19:53 -0700

178 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Erik Dix

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:00:44 -0400

99 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Steven Smolian

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 13:50:37 -0400

97 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Steven Smolian

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 13:22:59 -0400

82 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Andes, Donald

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:11:51 -0700

93 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

James L Wolf

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:58:47 -0400

68 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Dr. Cheryl Thurber

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:55:38 -0700

44 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Roger and Allison Kulp

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:42:00 -0700

117 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Roger and Allison Kulp

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:32:17 -0700

78 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Roger and Allison Kulp

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:29:27 -0700

55 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Roger and Allison Kulp

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:27:18 -0700

34 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

James L Wolf

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:23:42 -0400

114 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Robert Hodge

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 08:57:52 -0400

117 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Erik Dix

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 08:17:28 -0400

102 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Tom Fine

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 06:11:15 -0400

83 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

steven c

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 00:45:23 -0400

40 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Peter Hirsch

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 00:09:44 -0400

69 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

steven c

Mon, 7 Aug 2006 22:27:10 -0400

56 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Tom Fine

Mon, 7 Aug 2006 21:10:56 -0400

68 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

-=sVo=-

Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:53:40 -0400

52 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Tom Fine

Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:13:14 -0400

46 lines

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE

Bob Olhsson

Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:12:47 -0400

24 lines

LP RECORD STORAGE

Rod Smear

Mon, 7 Aug 2006 16:29:21 -0700

21 lines

New Thread

LP RECORD STORAGE - plywood/particle board

Re: LP RECORD STORAGE - plywood/particle board

eugene hayhoe

Sat, 12 Aug 2006 07:08:23 -0700

52 lines

New Thread

Magnetic tape through the mail

Re: Magnetic tape through the mail

Dave Bradley

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:04:12 -0400

22 lines

Re: Magnetic tape through the mail

steven c

Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:03:25 -0400

27 lines

Re: Magnetic tape through the mail

<>

Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:54:37 EDT

17 lines

Re: Magnetic tape through the mail

David Lennick

Wed, 23 Aug 2006 18:07:06 -0400

91 lines

Re: Magnetic tape through the mail

Scott Phillips

Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:54:19 -0500

86 lines

Re: Magnetic tape through the mail

Jerome Hartke

Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:22:56 -0400

79 lines

Re: Magnetic tape through the mail

Rob Poretti

Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:43:14 -0400

80 lines

Re: Magnetic tape through the mail

Jeff Willens

Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:29:29 -0400

60 lines

Re: Magnetic tape through the mail

Roger and Allison Kulp

Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:37:10 -0700

39 lines

Magnetic tape through the mail

Robert Hodge

Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:24:36 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

Mahler 4th: Konoye wanted

Re: Mahler 4th: Konoye wanted

Roger and Allison Kulp

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:20:06 -0700

32 lines

Mahler 4th: Konoye wanted

David Lennick

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:50:05 -0400

21 lines

New Thread

Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones)

Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones)

Tom Fine

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:41:13 -0400

51 lines

Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones)

steven c

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:24:06 -0400

31 lines

Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones)

Scott D. Smith

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:56:50 -0500

47 lines

Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones)

Marcos Sueiro Bal

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:49:41 -0400

59 lines

Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones)

Tom Fine

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 06:44:05 -0400

52 lines

Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones)

Tom Fine

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 06:30:10 -0400

45 lines

Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones)

Tom Fine

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:07:25 -0400

47 lines

Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones)

Tom Fine

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:50:12 -0400

42 lines

Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones)

Matt Sohn

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:04:39 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

Mellencamp

Re: Mellencamp

Robert Hodge

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:17:07 -0400

26 lines

Re: Mellencamp

Mahern, Paul Cantwell

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:00:35 -0400

19 lines

Re: Mellencamp

steven c

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:28:12 -0400

37 lines

Re: Mellencamp

David Lennick

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:13:33 -0400

41 lines

Re: Mellencamp

Tom Fine

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:57:44 -0400

37 lines

Mellencamp

Mahern, Paul Cantwell

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:16:39 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

Microcassettes

Microcassettes

Marcia Segal

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:41:17 -0400

22 lines

New Thread

Microphones--was: Not using headphones

Microphones--was: Not using headphones

steven c

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:14:59 -0400

31 lines

New Thread

Mitsubishi X-86 and ESM (was Glitchy dats)

Re: Mitsubishi X-86 and ESM (was Glitchy dats)

Richard L. Hess

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 17:19:12 -0400

50 lines

New Thread

My Tape Covers

Re: My Tape Covers

Rod Stephens

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 01:10:53 -0700

21 lines

New Thread

NASA

Re: NASA

Don Cox

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:41:36 +0000

84 lines

Re: NASA

Roger and Allison Kulp

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:05:08 -0700

43 lines

Re: NASA

Don Cox

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:06:00 +0000

43 lines

Re: NASA

Richard L. Hess

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 00:33:12 -0400

84 lines

Re: NASA

steven c

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:08:59 -0400

32 lines

Re: NASA

David Breneman

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:34:11 -0700

36 lines

Re: NASA

David Breneman

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:30:25 -0700

31 lines

Re: NASA

Lou Judson

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:58:36 -0700

23 lines

Re: NASA

John Ross

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:26:57 -0700

30 lines

Re: NASA

Mike Richter

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:59:26 -0700

45 lines

Re: NASA

Watsky, Lance

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:47:03 -0700

81 lines

Re: NASA

David Lennick

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:43:22 -0400

60 lines

Re: NASA

Tom Fine

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:34:34 -0400

56 lines

Re: NASA

David Breneman

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:07:42 -0700

46 lines

Re: NASA

Tom Fine

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:52:14 -0400

53 lines

Re: NASA

Tom Fine

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:43:01 -0400

162 lines

Re: NASA

Lou Judson

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:16:43 -0700

35 lines

Re: NASA

David Breneman

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:45:15 -0700

52 lines

Re: NASA

David Lewis

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:21:04 -0400

169 lines

Re: NASA

Tom Fine

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:07:48 -0400

113 lines

Re: NASA

Robert Hodge

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:50:18 -0400

84 lines

Re: NASA

Tom Fine

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:31:13 -0400

63 lines

Re: NASA

<>

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:54:01 EDT

29 lines

NASA

Mahern, Paul Cantwell

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:36:20 -0400

21 lines

New Thread

NASA (and beyond, far beyond!)

Re: NASA (and beyond, far beyond!)

Lou Judson

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:05:14 -0700

102 lines

New Thread

National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study

Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study

steven c

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:09:32 -0400

38 lines

Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study

Karl Miller

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:42:06 -0500

24 lines

Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study

Tom Fine

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:19:40 -0400

95 lines

Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study

steven c

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 00:42:21 -0400

74 lines

Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study

steven c

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 00:07:06 -0400

40 lines

Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study

David Lennick

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:42:21 -0400

40 lines

Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study

Lou Judson

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:28:16 -0700

37 lines

Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study

David Lennick

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:06:41 -0400

27 lines

Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study

steven c

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:02:10 -0400

31 lines

New Thread

Need help understanding how to get an Important Folk Music collection Accessible

Need help understanding how to get an Important Folk Music collection Accessible

Steve Ramm

Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:39:47 EDT

42 lines

New Thread

New History Page available

New History Page available

Richard L. Hess

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 02:08:19 -0400

31 lines

New Thread

Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders

Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders

Karl Miller

Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:44:37 -0500

22 lines

Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders

steven c

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:14:27 -0400

39 lines

Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders

Tom Fine

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:44:23 -0400

58 lines

Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders

Richard L. Hess

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:21:42 -0400

48 lines

Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders

Lou Judson

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:52:03 -0700

45 lines

Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders

Matt Sohn

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:43:53 -0400

23 lines

Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders

Eugene Lew

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:44:26 -0400

55 lines

Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders

Lou Judson

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:36:34 -0700

33 lines

Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders

Mike Richter

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:00:13 -0700

41 lines

Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders

Steve Ramm

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:48:10 EDT

32 lines

New Thread

Non-RIAA preamp

Re: Non-RIAA preamp

Charles Lawson

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:04:50 -0400

79 lines

New Thread

Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)

Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)

Parker Dinkins

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:20:40 -0500

26 lines

Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)

Roger and Allison Kulp

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:12:03 -0700

35 lines

Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)

Doug Pomeroy

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:46:32 +0000

80 lines

Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)

Charles Lawson

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:24:22 -0400

47 lines

Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)

Charles Lawson

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:02:28 -0400

36 lines

Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)

Parker Dinkins

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:15:33 -0500

53 lines

Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)

Bob Olhsson

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:38:30 -0400

22 lines

Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)

Lou Judson

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:46:59 -0700

29 lines

Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)

Charles Lawson

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:00:28 -0400

24 lines

Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)

Charles Lawson

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:48:29 -0400

33 lines

Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)

Steven Smolian

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:34:33 -0400

62 lines

Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)

seva

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:18:55 -0400

39 lines

Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)

Bob Olhsson

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:53:41 -0400

27 lines

Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)

Tom Fine

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:04:28 -0400

82 lines

Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)

Tom Fine

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:01:45 -0400

78 lines

Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)

Steven Smolian

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 09:16:41 -0400

70 lines

Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)

Parker Dinkins

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:01:01 -0500

48 lines

Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)

Matt Sohn

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:07:20 -0400

31 lines

Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)

Lou Judson

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:36:13 -0700

34 lines

Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)

Parker Dinkins

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:06:58 -0500

27 lines

Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)

Tom Fine

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:01:36 -0400

40 lines

Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)

Matt Sohn

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 17:16:38 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

Not using headphones

Re: Not using headphones

Marcos Sueiro Bal

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:59:17 -0400

117 lines

Re: Not using headphones

steven c

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:26:31 -0400

32 lines

Re: Not using headphones

steven c

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:39:05 -0400

27 lines

Re: Not using headphones

steven c

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:12:30 -0400

41 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Tom Fine

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:07:13 -0400

77 lines

Re: Not using headphones

steven c

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:41:10 -0400

41 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Angie Dickinson Mickle

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:20:27 -0600

74 lines

Re: Not using headphones

steven c

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:25:46 -0400

46 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Tom Fine

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:09:37 -0400

83 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Tom Fine

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:09:11 -0400

93 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Tom Fine

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:55:47 -0400

101 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Lou Judson

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:32:05 -0700

40 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Lou Judson

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:25:47 -0700

24 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Angie Dickinson Mickle

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:45:01 -0600

75 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Don Cox

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:03:31 +0000

41 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Aaron Levinson

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:37:02 -0400

80 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Matthew Barton

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:45:27 -0400

99 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Marcos Sueiro Bal

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:37:06 -0400

49 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Steven Smolian

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 00:45:28 -0400

47 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Bob Olhsson

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:31:42 -0400

24 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Bob Olhsson

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:22:21 -0400

23 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Tom Fine

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:06:22 -0400

53 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Lou Judson

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:55:44 -0700

35 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Lou Judson

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:57:07 -0700

110 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Bob Olhsson

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:53:19 -0400

22 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Matt Sohn

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:45:12 -0400

25 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Tom Fine

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:14:22 -0400

72 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Tom Fine

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:48:42 -0400

75 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Marcos Sueiro Bal

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:51:33 -0400

56 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Lou Judson

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:15:09 -0700

32 lines

Re: Not using headphones

George Brock-Nannestad

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:13:32 +0200

68 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Marcos Sueiro Bal

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:26:16 -0400

18 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Don Cox

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:13:10 +0000

49 lines

Re: Not using headphones

steven c

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:15:41 -0400

45 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Tom Fine

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 07:55:10 -0400

103 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Michael Shoshani

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:55:40 -0500

55 lines

Re: Not using headphones

steven c

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:16:57 -0400

39 lines

Re: Not using headphones

steven c

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:00:41 -0400

33 lines

Re: Not using headphones

steven c

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:45:27 -0400

44 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Bob Olhsson

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:16:22 -0400

23 lines

Re: Not using headphones

George Brock-Nannestad

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:49:21 +0200

85 lines

Re: Not using headphones

MD at Upsala

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 16:13:36 -0500

57 lines

Re: Not using headphones

Bob Olhsson

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 15:32:56 -0400

29 lines

Re: Not using headphones

<>

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 15:15:07 EDT

57 lines

Re: Not using headphones

George Brock-Nannestad

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:31:21 +0200

47 lines

Not using headphones

Dave Bradley

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:47:39 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

Oistrakh at The Fair

Oistrakh at The Fair

Roger and Allison Kulp

Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:24:15 -0700

19 lines

New Thread

Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers

Re: Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers

Richard L. Hess

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 20:00:19 -0400

22 lines

Re: Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers

phillip holmes

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:01:38 -0500

91 lines

Re: Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers

phillip holmes

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 17:57:34 -0500

96 lines

Re: Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers

Rod Stephens

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:35:50 -0700

85 lines

Re: Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers

Bruce Maddocks

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:38:18 -0700

58 lines

Re: Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers

Marie Azile O'Connell

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:09:01 -0700

37 lines

Re: Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers

Rod Stephens

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:38:39 -0700

27 lines

Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers

<>

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:15:04 EDT

17 lines

New Thread

Overtone Records

Re: Overtone Records

Susan Stinson

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:50:45 -0400

77 lines

Re: Overtone Records

Roger and Allison Kulp

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:38:15 -0700

57 lines

Overtone Records

Robert Hodge

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:58:06 -0400

49 lines

New Thread

Peter Copeland

Re: Peter Copeland

Jonathan Wise

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:39:51 -0400

141 lines

Re: Peter Copeland

Tom Fine

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 18:20:54 -0400

77 lines

Re: Peter Copeland

Rod Stephens

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 15:08:04 -0700

83 lines

Re: Peter Copeland

Marie Azile O'Connell

Wed, 2 Aug 2006 18:35:26 -0500

89 lines

Peter Copeland

Bewley, Nigel

Wed, 2 Aug 2006 16:00:45 +0100

72 lines

New Thread

Podcasting--explained a bit...

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Don Cox

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:32:32 +0000

44 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Roger and Allison Kulp

Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:42:58 -0700

32 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Mike Richter

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:14:22 -0700

49 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

steven c

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:59:01 -0400

33 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Tom Fine

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:25:51 -0400

57 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

steven c

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:19:48 -0400

41 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

steven c

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:51:48 -0400

51 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Bob Olhsson

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 10:39:33 -0400

25 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

steven c

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:46:44 -0400

29 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Matt Sohn

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 21:55:00 -0400

25 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Lou Judson

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:49:16 -0700

50 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Tom Fine

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:53:46 -0400

38 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Roger and Allison Kulp

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:28:32 -0700

25 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Lou Judson

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:43:23 -0700

31 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Tom Fine

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:13:29 -0400

53 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Tom Fine

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:03:25 -0400

140 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Roger and Allison Kulp

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:20:27 -0700

41 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Roger and Allison Kulp

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:15:43 -0700

87 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Roger and Allison Kulp

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:06:30 -0700

51 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Lou Judson

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:37:55 -0700

33 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

steven c

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:37:25 -0400

57 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

steven c

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:30:28 -0400

35 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

steven c

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:28:14 -0400

32 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

steven c

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:43:22 -0400

48 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

steven c

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:13:50 -0400

111 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

steven c

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:25:47 -0400

42 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Tom Fine

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:41:52 -0400

62 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

David Breneman

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:32:14 -0700

39 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Mike Richter

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:26:30 -0700

50 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

David Breneman

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:02:26 -0700

45 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Dave Bradley

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:57:20 -0400

31 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Tom Fine

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:29:14 -0400

84 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

<>

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:00:28 EDT

38 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Tom Fine

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 06:10:52 -0400

61 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Tom Fine

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 06:08:51 -0400

78 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

steven c

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:32:30 -0400

77 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Dave Bradley

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:03:14 -0400

35 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Lou Judson

Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:16:10 -0700

44 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Mike Richter

Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:06:05 -0700

51 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

steven c

Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:20:14 -0400

84 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Tom Fine

Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:15:50 -0400

100 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Lou Judson

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:43:29 -0700

44 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Mike Richter

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:23:16 -0700

76 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

steven c

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:00:55 -0400

115 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Charles Lawson

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 22:10:45 -0400

39 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Tom Fine

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 22:00:02 -0400

65 lines

Re: Podcasting--explained a bit...

Lou Judson

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:44:46 -0700

91 lines

Podcasting--explained a bit...

steven c

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 21:29:17 -0400

39 lines

New Thread

Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion

Re: Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion

Tom Fine

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:38:49 -0400

44 lines

Re: Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion

Russ Hamm

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:04:47 -0700

34 lines

Re: Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion

Tom Fine

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 07:43:05 -0400

56 lines

Re: Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion

Mike Richter

Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:54:38 -0700

31 lines

Re: Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion

Marie Azile O'Connell

Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:42:30 -0700

44 lines

Re: Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion

Charles Lawson

Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:28:03 -0400

28 lines

Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion

steven c

Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:17:25 -0400

26 lines

New Thread

Presonus 1394

Presonus 1394

Steven Smolian

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:26:20 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

Professional courtesy: Looking for "The Lake Song"

Re: Professional courtesy: Looking for "The Lake Song"

DSL FODA01

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:05:36 -0400

81 lines

Professional courtesy: Looking for "The Lake Song"

andy Kolovos

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 17:39:03 -0400

63 lines

New Thread

RCA Metal Parts in Camden.

Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.

Robert Hodge

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:31:50 -0400

51 lines

Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.

steven c

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:12:02 -0400

35 lines

Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.

<>

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:37:40 EDT

25 lines

Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.

Lou Judson

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:33:51 -0700

28 lines

Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.

David Lennick

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:17:48 -0400

32 lines

Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.

Lou Judson

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:49:44 -0700

28 lines

Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.

John Ross

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:19:48 -0700

20 lines

Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.

Karl Miller

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:11:44 -0500

29 lines

Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.

Pete Tinker

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:35:54 -0700

90 lines

Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.

Tom Fine

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:27:39 -0400

62 lines

Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.

Robert Hodge

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:18:53 -0400

46 lines

Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.

Lou Judson

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:49:18 -0700

40 lines

Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.

Rod Stephens

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:36:56 -0700

124 lines

Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.

Robert Hodge

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:43:04 -0400

74 lines

Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.

John Spencer

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:44:10 -0500

55 lines

Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.

George Brock-Nannestad

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:44:45 +0200

49 lines

Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden.

Steve Ramm

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:43:38 EDT

30 lines

New Thread

Recall: [ARSCLIST] Glitchy dats

Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] Glitchy dats

steven c

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 22:57:44 -0400

22 lines

Recall: [ARSCLIST] Glitchy dats

Watsky, Lance

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:21:19 -0700

14 lines

New Thread

Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE

Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE

Roger and Allison Kulp

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:12:09 -0700

37 lines

Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE

David Breneman

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:48:43 -0700

30 lines

Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE

Roger and Allison Kulp

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:39:07 -0700

61 lines

Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE

David Breneman

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:05:00 -0700

32 lines

Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE

steven c

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:47:42 -0400

35 lines

Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE

<>

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:12:02 EDT

30 lines

Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE

Lou Judson

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:22:50 -0700

54 lines

Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE

Andes, Donald

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:03:07 -0700

39 lines

New Thread

Recall: ^ [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE

Re: Recall: ^ [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE

Lou Judson

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:00:00 -0700

28 lines

Re: Recall: ^ [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE

Robert Hodge

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:19:32 -0400

35 lines

Re: Recall: ^ [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE

steven c

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:40:23 -0400

26 lines

New Thread

rejoining the flock

Re: rejoining the flock

Jacqueline von Arb

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:54:41 +0200

55 lines

Re: rejoining the flock

David Lennick

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:23:58 -0400

35 lines

Re: rejoining the flock

Mike Richter

Wed, 9 Aug 2006 21:14:50 -0700

28 lines

Re: rejoining the flock

David Lennick

Wed, 9 Aug 2006 23:43:40 -0400

29 lines

Re: rejoining the flock

steven c

Wed, 9 Aug 2006 23:35:56 -0400

21 lines

rejoining the flock

David Lennick

Wed, 9 Aug 2006 23:15:15 -0400

15 lines

New Thread

Scotch 200 box photograph

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph

eugene hayhoe

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:45:12 -0700

26 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph

Marcos Sueiro Bal

Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:21:29 -0400

15 lines

New Thread

Scotch 200 box photograph -- update

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -- update

Marcos Sueiro Bal

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:31:27 -0400

38 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -- update

Richard L. Hess

Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:31:10 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

Scott D. Smith

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:38:18 -0500

101 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

Lou Judson

Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:23:18 -0700

29 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

Marcos Sueiro Bal

Wed, 2 Aug 2006 15:11:57 -0400

74 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

Roger and Allison Kulp

Wed, 2 Aug 2006 12:09:57 -0700

33 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

Lou Judson

Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:15:26 -0700

33 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

Richard L. Hess

Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:01:55 -0400

98 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

Angie Dickinson Mickle

Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:36:02 -0600

79 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

Roger and Allison Kulp

Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:34:38 -0700

63 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

Roger and Allison Kulp

Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:32:34 -0700

43 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

Richard L. Hess

Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:53:56 -0400

53 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

Lou Judson

Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:02:53 -0700

45 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

David Lennick

Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:51:29 -0400

35 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

Angie Dickinson Mickle

Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:30:39 -0600

33 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

Robert Hodge

Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:09:37 -0400

64 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

Roger and Allison Kulp

Wed, 2 Aug 2006 08:05:49 -0700

57 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

Angie Dickinson Mickle

Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:04:26 -0600

43 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

Roger and Allison Kulp

Wed, 2 Aug 2006 07:58:43 -0700

47 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

Rod Stephens

Tue, 1 Aug 2006 23:13:10 -0700

77 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

David Lennick

Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:36:38 -0400

60 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

Tom Fine

Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:17:20 -0400

47 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

steven c

Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:15:22 -0400

33 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

Lou Judson

Tue, 1 Aug 2006 18:43:14 -0700

38 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

Aaron Z Snyder

Tue, 1 Aug 2006 21:19:17 -0400

22 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

David Lennick

Tue, 1 Aug 2006 20:39:13 -0400

48 lines

Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response

Scott D. Smith

Tue, 1 Aug 2006 18:45:44 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

Searching For Ethnomusic Footage

Re: Searching For Ethnomusic Footage

Tom Fine

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 19:17:18 -0400

31 lines

Re: Searching For Ethnomusic Footage

Dr. Cheryl Thurber

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:31:23 -0700

35 lines

Re: Searching For Ethnomusic Footage

Watsky, Lance

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:08:07 -0700

21 lines

New Thread

seeking a semi-obscure article

Re: seeking a semi-obscure article

Tom Fine

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:50:13 -0400

49 lines

Re: seeking a semi-obscure article

Alec McLane

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:45:51 -0400

39 lines

seeking a semi-obscure article

Tom Fine

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:26:19 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

seeking another Murrow LP set

seeking another Murrow LP set

Tom Fine

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:40:08 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

shelving

Re: shelving

steven c

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 19:46:40 -0400

90 lines

shelving

Steven Smolian

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 07:49:49 -0400

63 lines

New Thread

Some advice on cassette decks?

Re: Some advice on cassette decks?

Tom Fine

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:29:34 -0400

97 lines

Re: Some advice on cassette decks?

Richard L. Hess

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:58:16 -0400

65 lines

Re: Some advice on cassette decks?

Tom Fine

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:55:26 -0400

92 lines

Some advice on cassette decks?

Craig Breaden

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:56:49 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

soundscape DAW

Re: soundscape DAW

seva

Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:45:08 -0400

31 lines

Re: soundscape DAW

Matt Sohn

Thu, 7 Sep 2006 23:19:36 -0400

46 lines

soundscape DAW

seva

Mon, 7 Aug 2006 22:26:50 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

Soundtrack Pro help...

Re: Soundtrack Pro help...

andy kolovos

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:19:14 -0400

114 lines

Re: Soundtrack Pro help...

Moser, Dennis

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:17:00 -0400

84 lines

Re: Soundtrack Pro help...

Aaron Coe

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:05:09 -0400

92 lines

Re: Soundtrack Pro help...

Lou Judson

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:22:43 -0700

84 lines

Soundtrack Pro help...

andy kolovos

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:06:26 -0400

57 lines

New Thread

SP-15 turntable question

Re: SP-15 turntable question

Graham Newton

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:15:25 -0400

34 lines

Re: SP-15 turntable question

David Breneman

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:43:42 -0700

32 lines

Re: SP-15 turntable question

Cary Ginell

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:35:04 -0400

61 lines

Re: SP-15 turntable question

Steven Smolian

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:00:02 -0400

50 lines

Re: SP-15 turntable question

Robert Hodge

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:47:49 -0400

53 lines

Re: SP-15 turntable question

Charles Lawson

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:22:44 -0400

27 lines

SP-15 turntable question

Doug Pomeroy

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:24:51 +0000

22 lines

New Thread

Speed correction, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Speed correction, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Can 78s sound better than LPs?

Parker Dinkins

Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:41:35 -0500

53 lines

New Thread

stereo or double mono

Re: stereo or double mono

Michael Shoshani

Sat, 19 Aug 2006 21:40:38 -0500

32 lines

Re: stereo or double mono

Tom Fine

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:19:18 -0400

59 lines

Re: stereo or double mono

Mike Richter

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:42:46 -0700

35 lines

Re: stereo or double mono

David Lennick

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:39:26 -0400

47 lines

Re: stereo or double mono

Mike Richter

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:52:26 -0700

41 lines

Re: stereo or double mono

Mike Richter

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:30:27 -0700

48 lines

Re: stereo or double mono

Aaron Z Snyder

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:12:29 -0400

57 lines

Re: stereo or double mono

Angie Dickinson Mickle

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:47:54 -0600

55 lines

Re: stereo or double mono

Mew, Peter

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:41:37 +0100

77 lines

Re: stereo or double mono

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:40:07 -0500

56 lines

Re: stereo or double mono

David Lennick

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:42:18 -0400

42 lines

stereo or double mono

Dave Rice

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:28:10 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

Strage blue amberol

Re: Strage blue amberol

Susan Stinson

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:09:47 -0400

45 lines

Strage blue amberol

Steven Smolian

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:21:59 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

tape eaten by 112mkII

Re: tape eaten by 112mkII

Peter Mosher

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:44:35 -0400

28 lines

Re: tape eaten by 112mkII

Robert Hodge

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:57:01 -0400

69 lines

Re: tape eaten by 112mkII

Richard L. Hess

Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:19:52 -0400

68 lines

tape eaten by 112mkII

Brandon Burke

Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:53:08 -0700

38 lines

New Thread

tape op

Re: tape op

Rod Stephens

Sat, 19 Aug 2006 09:38:45 -0700

34 lines

Re: tape op

Steven Smolian

Sat, 19 Aug 2006 09:29:25 -0400

65 lines

Re: tape op

andy Kolovos

Sat, 19 Aug 2006 08:23:38 -0400

45 lines

tape op

phillip holmes

Fri, 18 Aug 2006 22:47:19 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

Tel-Mar or Ter-Mar? (Was: Malcolm Chisolm )

Re: Tel-Mar or Ter-Mar? (Was: Malcolm Chisolm )

Bob Olhsson

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:27:59 -0400

25 lines

Re: Tel-Mar or Ter-Mar? (Was: Malcolm Chisolm )

Matt Sohn

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:02:14 -0400

54 lines

Re: Tel-Mar or Ter-Mar? (Was: Malcolm Chisolm )

Tom Fine

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:29:51 -0400

52 lines

Tel-Mar or Ter-Mar? (Was: Malcolm Chisolm )

Matt Sohn

Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:14:16 -0400

43 lines

New Thread

Telemetry Tapes

Re: Telemetry Tapes

steven c

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 00:35:13 -0400

45 lines

Re: Telemetry Tapes

Mike Richter

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:31:47 -0700

30 lines

Re: Telemetry Tapes

steven c

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:13:33 -0400

35 lines

Re: Telemetry Tapes

Lou Judson

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:46:49 -0700

30 lines

Re: Telemetry Tapes

Tom Fine

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:45:45 -0400

37 lines

Re: Telemetry Tapes

Mike Richter

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:43:53 -0700

43 lines

Re: Telemetry Tapes

David Breneman

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:16:09 -0700

30 lines

Re: Telemetry Tapes

Lou Judson

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:55:14 -0700

92 lines

Re: Telemetry Tapes

David Breneman

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:38:21 -0700

25 lines

Re: Telemetry Tapes

Eugene DeAnna

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:18:03 -0400

79 lines

Re: Telemetry Tapes

David Lewis

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:41:23 -0400

72 lines

New Thread