LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


May 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

Date

Size

Re: "Duplicates?!"...??

Sat, 16 May 2009 22:19:16 -0700

43 lines

Re: "Duplicates?!"...??

Sat, 16 May 2009 21:56:52 -0700

34 lines

"Duplicates?!"...??

Sun, 17 May 2009 00:42:12 -0400

20 lines

Re: "Oneida Song for the Ages: Oneida’s Voice Lives Through Edison Recor ding"

Thu, 21 May 2009 16:40:15 -0400

28 lines

"Oneida Song for the Ages: Oneida’s Voice Lives Through Edison Recording"

Thu, 21 May 2009 16:11:10 -0400

19 lines

Re: "Oneida Song for the Ages: Oneida's Voice Lives Through Edison Recording"

Thu, 21 May 2009 15:41:18 -0500

36 lines

Re: 30 vs 15 IPS EQ - was One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Thu, 28 May 2009 16:47:58 -0500

53 lines

Re: 30 vs 15 IPS EQ - was One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Wed, 27 May 2009 20:01:06 -0700

38 lines

Re: 30 vs 15 IPS EQ - was One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Wed, 27 May 2009 21:53:25 -0500

108 lines

Re: 30 vs 15 IPS EQ - was One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Wed, 27 May 2009 19:14:32 -0700

80 lines

Re: 30 vs 15 IPS EQ - was One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Wed, 27 May 2009 21:27:51 -0400

83 lines

30 vs 15 IPS EQ - was One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Wed, 27 May 2009 16:29:05 -0700

54 lines

Re: another URL for DC slide show

Fri, 15 May 2009 13:56:35 EDT

27 lines

Re: ARChive featured in today's New York Times

Sat, 9 May 2009 16:56:35 -0700

42 lines

Re: ARChive featured in today's New York Times

Thu, 7 May 2009 23:29:41 -0400

37 lines

Re: ARChive featured in today's New York Times

Thu, 7 May 2009 18:28:40 -0400

43 lines

ARChive featured in today's New York Times

Thu, 7 May 2009 16:16:13 -0400

27 lines

ARSC Conference 2009 - Wed. NAVCC Tour photos

Thu, 28 May 2009 00:23:55 -0400

30 lines

Re: ARSC Conference was GREAT - Photos coming soon!

Sun, 31 May 2009 23:25:11 -0400

20 lines

ARSC Conference was GREAT - Photos coming soon!

Sun, 31 May 2009 22:43:11 EDT

45 lines

ATR Lore

Wed, 27 May 2009 18:54:06 -0400

25 lines

Re: Balkanton Records - Still In Existence?

Sat, 9 May 2009 11:57:41 -0700

46 lines

Re: Balkanton Records - Still In Existence?

Thu, 7 May 2009 09:15:24 +0100

67 lines

Re: Balkanton Records - Still In Existence?

Wed, 6 May 2009 17:30:49 -0700

56 lines

Balkanton Records - Still In Existence?

Wed, 6 May 2009 15:53:05 -0700

27 lines

Re: British & Irish Sound Archives (BISA)

Tue, 26 May 2009 18:15:15 +0700

78 lines

Re: British & Irish Sound Archives (BISA)

Tue, 26 May 2009 18:13:21 +0700

69 lines

British & Irish Sound Archives (BISA)

Fri, 22 May 2009 17:50:45 +0100

62 lines

civil rights audio collections/collectors

Fri, 15 May 2009 08:57:45 -0400

30 lines

Classic National Lampoon cd box

Thu, 14 May 2009 15:05:39 -0400

17 lines

Commercial - new record auction now available

Wed, 20 May 2009 20:49:06 -0700

77 lines

Commercial - new record auction now available

Wed, 20 May 2009 19:57:19 -0700

78 lines

Copyright Reform Takes Center Stage at ARSC Conference

Tue, 19 May 2009 23:29:06 -0400

81 lines

Re: DBX for playback of 78s

Sat, 23 May 2009 14:37:08 -0400

110 lines

Re: DBX for playback of 78s

Sat, 23 May 2009 07:10:24 -0400

90 lines

Re: DBX for playback of 78s

Fri, 22 May 2009 22:55:12 -0400

51 lines

Re: DBX for playback of 78s

Fri, 22 May 2009 09:39:10 EDT

65 lines

Re: DBX noise reduction for playback of 78's?

Sat, 23 May 2009 17:27:07 -0700

36 lines

Digital Preservation – The Planets Way: 22-24 June 2009, Royal Library Copenhagen, Denmark

Mon, 18 May 2009 11:20:51 GMT

79 lines

disc pressings from old stampers

Sat, 16 May 2009 10:36:12 -0400

17 lines

Re: Equaliser for playback of 78's

Sat, 23 May 2009 14:16:05 -0500

20 lines

Equaliser for playback of 78's

Sat, 23 May 2009 20:22:32 +0200

177 lines

Re: Extended Hours Felix E. Grant Jazz Archive

Sat, 16 May 2009 16:38:19 -0700

44 lines

Extended Hours Felix E. Grant Jazz Archive

Sat, 16 May 2009 12:10:41 EDT

34 lines

Re: external hard drive for a start for archiving audio files

Thu, 28 May 2009 15:26:37 +0200

90 lines

Re: external hard drive for a start for archiving audio files

Wed, 27 May 2009 20:51:22 -0400

58 lines

Re: external hard drive for a start for archiving audio files

Wed, 27 May 2009 17:14:38 -0700

46 lines

Re: external hard drive for a start for archiving audio files

Wed, 27 May 2009 19:59:11 -0400

61 lines

Re: external hard drive for a start for archiving audio files

Wed, 27 May 2009 19:49:27 -0400

42 lines

Re: external hard drive for a start for archiving audio files

Wed, 27 May 2009 18:41:12 -0500

41 lines

Re: external hard drive for a start for archiving audio files

Wed, 27 May 2009 18:09:10 -0400

59 lines

Re: external hard drive for a start for archiving audio files

Wed, 27 May 2009 15:15:02 -0500

42 lines

Re: external hard drive for a start for archiving audio files

Wed, 27 May 2009 15:26:40 -0400

39 lines

Re: external hard drive for a start for archiving audio files

Wed, 27 May 2009 12:09:46 -0700

48 lines

Re: external hard drive for a start for archiving audio files

Wed, 27 May 2009 15:04:45 -0400

43 lines

Re: external hard drive for a start for archiving audio files

Wed, 27 May 2009 12:00:16 -0700

27 lines

external hard drive for a start for archiving audio files

Wed, 27 May 2009 11:41:11 -0700

33 lines

Re: Felix E. Grant Jaza archive

Sun, 17 May 2009 20:50:17 -0400

81 lines

Re: Felix E. Grant Jaza archive

Sat, 16 May 2009 16:10:57 -0700

99 lines

Re: Felix E. Grant Jaza archive

Sat, 16 May 2009 09:54:04 -0400

76 lines

Re: Felix E. Grant Jaza archive

Sat, 16 May 2009 00:36:56 -0400

57 lines

Re: Felix E. Grant Jaza archive

Fri, 15 May 2009 23:10:19 EDT

39 lines

FLORA MOLTON recordings

Mon, 18 May 2009 13:39:47 -0400

230 lines

Re: For those coming to ARSC Conference in DC - a slide show

Fri, 15 May 2009 12:42:55 -0700

26 lines

Re: For those coming to ARSC Conference in DC - a slide show

Fri, 15 May 2009 12:21:48 -0700

25 lines

For those coming to ARSC Conference in DC - a slide show

Fri, 15 May 2009 10:54:44 EDT

32 lines

Re: For those coming to ARSC Conference in DC - Felix E. Grant Jazz Archives

Fri, 15 May 2009 12:42:30 -0700

95 lines

Gerald Fabris is out of the office.

Wed, 27 May 2009 04:00:32 -0400

15 lines

Re: German reading skills needed

Mon, 4 May 2009 00:32:01 -0400

28 lines

German reading skills needed

Sun, 3 May 2009 17:56:23 -0400

20 lines

Re: Hearing history: Thompson explores sound technology

Mon, 4 May 2009 19:51:07 -0400

57 lines

Re: Hearing history: Thompson explores sound technology

Mon, 4 May 2009 19:10:22 EDT

28 lines

Re: Hearing history: Thompson explores sound technology

Mon, 4 May 2009 18:46:23 -0400

44 lines

Re: Hearing history: Thompson explores sound technology

Tue, 5 May 2009 00:24:53 +0200

62 lines

Re: Hearing history: Thompson explores sound technology

Mon, 4 May 2009 14:58:05 -0700

34 lines

Re: Hearing history: Thompson explores sound technology

Mon, 4 May 2009 23:10:55 +0200

46 lines

Hearing history: Thompson explores sound technology

Mon, 4 May 2009 16:38:05 -0400

17 lines

Hotel Rooms Still Available for the ARSC Conference

Fri, 8 May 2009 10:29:54 -0400

23 lines

How about holidays

Wed, 6 May 2009 17:02:14 +0900

11 lines

HOW TO MAKE A PHONOGRAPH (Jun, 1917)

Sat, 9 May 2009 21:02:03 -0700

19 lines

ISO 1943 episode of radio series The Better Half

Sat, 16 May 2009 18:54:09 -0400

36 lines

Re: Jan Myren asks about using DBX to playback 78s

Fri, 22 May 2009 23:15:38 -0400

19 lines

Jan Myren asks about using DBX to playback 78s

Fri, 22 May 2009 10:03:39 EDT

85 lines

Jan Myren asks about using DBX to playback 78s

Fri, 22 May 2009 10:03:39 EDT

85 lines

Last minute ride from Brooklyn

Tue, 26 May 2009 18:03:05 -0700

20 lines

Late Dinner?

Tue, 26 May 2009 20:35:54 -0400

16 lines

Re: Les Urnes de l'Opéra (1907- 2007)

Fri, 22 May 2009 16:34:15 -0400

47 lines

Re: Les Urnes de l'Opéra (1907- 2007)

Fri, 22 May 2009 12:35:58 -0700

53 lines

Re: Les Urnes de l'Opéra (1907-200 7)

Fri, 22 May 2009 14:57:28 -0700

35 lines

Re: Les Urnes de l'Opéra (1907-200 7)

Fri, 22 May 2009 14:28:27 -0700

50 lines

Les Urnes de l'Opéra (1907-2007)

Tue, 19 May 2009 07:59:19 -0700

19 lines

Re: Looking for vintage open reel tape machine

Fri, 22 May 2009 18:05:52 -0700

39 lines

LP cover copier gone

Fri, 15 May 2009 10:17:51 -0400

14 lines

LP cover-size scanner

Fri, 15 May 2009 09:22:49 -0400

23 lines

May Issue of Black Grooves

Wed, 13 May 2009 14:06:49 -0400

39 lines

Music Autographs

Fri, 8 May 2009 09:02:22 -0700

20 lines

Re: New CD Test software

Sun, 31 May 2009 22:39:16 -0400

69 lines

New CD Test software

Fri, 29 May 2009 09:03:27 -0400

24 lines

Re: New CD Test software

Thu, 28 May 2009 16:20:05 -0400

45 lines

New CD Test software

Thu, 28 May 2009 10:28:19 -0400

19 lines

Re: Obituary for John Ross

Thu, 28 May 2009 12:44:33 -0400

42 lines

Re: Obituary for John Ross

Thu, 28 May 2009 09:21:59 -0700

72 lines

Obituary for John Ross

Thu, 28 May 2009 08:35:30 -0700

56 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Thu, 28 May 2009 19:10:08 -0700

257 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Thu, 28 May 2009 18:46:43 -0400

183 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Thu, 28 May 2009 07:12:13 -0700

283 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Thu, 28 May 2009 07:56:23 -0400

226 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Thu, 28 May 2009 07:05:26 -0400

255 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Thu, 28 May 2009 06:13:00 -0400

182 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Wed, 27 May 2009 20:33:03 -0700

191 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Wed, 27 May 2009 22:07:20 -0400

188 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Wed, 27 May 2009 21:52:19 -0400

150 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Wed, 27 May 2009 21:40:06 -0400

50 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Wed, 27 May 2009 21:05:36 -0400

158 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Wed, 27 May 2009 16:55:50 -0700

110 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Wed, 27 May 2009 17:24:12 -0400

32 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Wed, 27 May 2009 15:22:00 -0400

15 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Wed, 27 May 2009 08:36:25 -0700

36 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Wed, 27 May 2009 07:20:32 -0700

22 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Wed, 27 May 2009 09:40:14 -0400

33 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Wed, 27 May 2009 08:37:46 -0400

50 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Wed, 27 May 2009 06:53:20 -0400

33 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Wed, 27 May 2009 06:52:33 -0400

28 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Wed, 27 May 2009 06:02:52 -0400

69 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Tue, 26 May 2009 21:21:23 -0700

25 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Tue, 26 May 2009 21:20:01 -0700

78 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Tue, 26 May 2009 19:59:36 -0700

24 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Tue, 26 May 2009 22:58:54 -0400

72 lines

Re: One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Tue, 26 May 2009 18:04:58 -0700

61 lines

One Inch, two track master tapes- 15 or 30 IPS

Tue, 26 May 2009 20:43:49 -0400

39 lines

Re: Oxide Binder Failure

Mon, 11 May 2009 08:47:37 -0500

91 lines

Oxide Binder Failure

Fri, 8 May 2009 11:12:52 -0700

70 lines

Re: PACKBURN 323A

Sat, 2 May 2009 08:15:48 -0700

50 lines

Re: Pest Control

Fri, 22 May 2009 19:27:10 +1000

162 lines

Re: Pest Control

Fri, 22 May 2009 09:55:37 +0300

45 lines

Re: Pest Control

Fri, 22 May 2009 16:16:08 +1200

104 lines

Re: Pest Control

Thu, 21 May 2009 23:32:34 -0400

49 lines

Re: Pest Control

Thu, 21 May 2009 17:18:21 -0700

38 lines

Re: Pest Control

Fri, 22 May 2009 01:06:00 +0200

73 lines

Re: Pest Control

Thu, 21 May 2009 15:18:51 -0700

67 lines

Pest Control

Fri, 22 May 2009 08:55:11 +1200

40 lines

Re: playback curves for some 78s

Sun, 17 May 2009 21:55:14 -0400

48 lines

Re: playback curves for some 78s

Sun, 17 May 2009 09:11:11 +0200

122 lines

Re: playback curves for some 78s

Sat, 16 May 2009 22:44:58 -0700

97 lines

Re: playback curves for some 78s

Sat, 16 May 2009 23:12:06 -0400

60 lines

playback curves for some 78s

Sat, 16 May 2009 07:45:52 -0400

29 lines

Playback of European 78 rpm and Hit Of The Weeks

Sun, 31 May 2009 17:41:18 +0200

46 lines

Playing European 78 rpm records and Hit Of The Week records

Sun, 31 May 2009 18:02:24 +0200

45 lines

Re: Preview Leah's Documentary NOW!

Sat, 23 May 2009 14:02:49 -0400

62 lines

Re: Preview Leah's Documentary NOW!

Sat, 23 May 2009 12:04:07 -0400

67 lines

Preview Leah's Documentary NOW!

Sat, 23 May 2009 08:23:59 -0700

49 lines

Fwd: Re: Prices of early high-quality phonographs

Thu, 14 May 2009 09:49:06 -0400

27 lines

Re: Prices of early high-quality phonographs

Thu, 14 May 2009 08:58:31 -0400

28 lines

Re: Prices of early high-quality phonographs

Thu, 14 May 2009 08:21:01 -0400

29 lines

Re: Prices of early high-quality phonographs

Wed, 13 May 2009 14:41:08 EDT

31 lines

Re: Prices of early high-quality phonographs

Wed, 13 May 2009 13:25:13 -0400

51 lines

Re: Prices of early high-quality phonographs

Tue, 12 May 2009 22:30:32 -0400

52 lines

Prices of early high-quality phonographs

Sun, 10 May 2009 16:05:25 -0400

26 lines

Re: Proper Box UK

Wed, 27 May 2009 12:53:34 -0400

57 lines

Re: Proper Box UK

Wed, 27 May 2009 06:30:29 -1000

61 lines

Re: Proper Box UK

Wed, 27 May 2009 11:26:35 -0400

34 lines

Proper Box UK

Tue, 26 May 2009 19:48:33 -0400

22 lines

Recent Correspondence - Packburn Electronics

Wed, 13 May 2009 19:35:09 -0400

50 lines

Re: Record Diameter (was: playback curves for some 78s)

Wed, 20 May 2009 21:02:44 -0700

43 lines

Re: Record Diameter (was: playback curves for some 78s)

Wed, 20 May 2009 19:04:40 -0700

92 lines

Re: Record Diameter (was: playback curves for some 78s)

Wed, 20 May 2009 14:55:42 -0700

36 lines

Re: Record Diameter (was: playback curves for some 78s)

Tue, 19 May 2009 19:44:53 +1000

126 lines

Re: Record Diameter (was: playback curves for some 78s)

Mon, 18 May 2009 19:28:47 -0400

30 lines

Re: Record Diameter (was: playback curves for some 78s)

Mon, 18 May 2009 17:42:42 -0400

66 lines

Record Diameter (was: playback curves for some 78s)

Mon, 18 May 2009 13:05:16 -0700

51 lines

Re: FW: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Fri, 15 May 2009 22:50:06 -0400

29 lines

Re: FW: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Fri, 15 May 2009 16:46:04 -0700

35 lines

Re: FW: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Fri, 15 May 2009 16:27:20 -0700

33 lines

Re: FW: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Fri, 15 May 2009 07:45:32 -0400

20 lines

Re: FW: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Thu, 14 May 2009 16:30:32 -0700

33 lines

Re: FW: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Thu, 14 May 2009 16:15:52 -0400

35 lines

Re: FW: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Thu, 14 May 2009 15:15:29 -0500

66 lines

Re: FW: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Thu, 14 May 2009 21:04:39 +0100

36 lines

Re: FW: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Thu, 14 May 2009 13:01:36 -0700

16 lines

FW: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Thu, 14 May 2009 15:56:07 -0400

89 lines

Remind me time, please

Wed, 6 May 2009 17:39:04 +0300

11 lines

Re: Robert Johnson RPM debate

Sun, 31 May 2009 22:15:12 -0400

37 lines

Re: Robert Johnson RPM debate

Sun, 31 May 2009 18:28:59 -0400

86 lines

Re: Robert Johnson RPM debate

Tue, 26 May 2009 10:53:13 -0700

112 lines

Re: Robert Johnson RPM debate

Tue, 26 May 2009 10:13:01 -0400

89 lines

Re: Robert Johnson RPM debate

Tue, 26 May 2009 08:53:42 -0400

92 lines

Re: Robert Johnson RPM debate

Tue, 26 May 2009 13:25:43 +0200

103 lines

Re: Robert Johnson RPM debate

Tue, 26 May 2009 06:45:21 -0400

75 lines

Re: Robert Johnson RPM debate

Mon, 25 May 2009 11:18:13 -1000

56 lines

Robert Johnson RPM debate

Mon, 25 May 2009 11:30:07 -0700

21 lines

Re: seeking International Classical Record Collector articles

Fri, 29 May 2009 13:28:36 -0700

80 lines

Re: seeking International Classical Record Collector articles

Fri, 29 May 2009 15:44:14 -0400

59 lines

Re: seeking International Classical Record Collector articles

Fri, 29 May 2009 08:20:22 -0700

42 lines

seeking International Classical Record Collector articles

Fri, 29 May 2009 07:28:56 -0400

25 lines

Sizes of styli for European 78's

Fri, 22 May 2009 03:17:06 +0200

38 lines

Re: Sizes of styli for playback of European 78 rpm records

Fri, 22 May 2009 18:25:54 -0700

58 lines

Sizes of styli for playback of European 78 rpm records

Fri, 22 May 2009 21:30:24 +0200

45 lines

Sizes of styli for playback of European 78's

Fri, 22 May 2009 21:01:35 +0200

38 lines

Stan Cornyn

Fri, 8 May 2009 18:37:26 -0400

17 lines

Re: SV: [ARSCLIST] DBX for playback of 78s

Sat, 23 May 2009 23:05:18 -0400

50 lines

SV: [ARSCLIST] DBX for playback of 78s

Sat, 23 May 2009 17:59:23 +0200

175 lines

SV: [ARSCLIST] Equaliser for playback of 78's

Sun, 24 May 2009 02:00:51 +0200

193 lines

Re: SV: [ARSCLIST] PACKBURN 323A

Fri, 22 May 2009 06:12:31 +0100

63 lines

SV: [ARSCLIST] PACKBURN 323A

Thu, 21 May 2009 22:48:03 +0200

40 lines

SV: [ARSCLIST] Proper Box UK

Wed, 27 May 2009 17:41:51 +0200

69 lines

SV: [ARSCLIST] VS: Call for Papers JTS 2010

Thu, 21 May 2009 22:37:57 +0200

74 lines

Re: Technics SP-15 to computer nightmare

Fri, 15 May 2009 18:50:29 -0400

136 lines

Re: Technics SP-15 to computer nightmare

Fri, 15 May 2009 18:51:22 +0100

132 lines

Re: Technics SP-15 to computer nightmare

Fri, 15 May 2009 12:06:23 -0500

60 lines

Re: Technics SP-15 to computer nightmare

Fri, 15 May 2009 03:31:16 +0100

235 lines

Re: Technics SP-15 to computer nightmare

Thu, 14 May 2009 18:01:51 -0400

119 lines

Re: Technics SP-15 to computer nightmare

Thu, 14 May 2009 13:49:01 -0500

117 lines

Re: Technics SP-15 to computer nightmare

Thu, 14 May 2009 14:28:43 -0400

73 lines

Re: Technics SP-15 to computer nightmare

Thu, 14 May 2009 19:56:36 +0200

74 lines

Re: Technics SP-15 to computer nightmare

Thu, 14 May 2009 07:18:36 -1000

47 lines

Re: Technics SP-15 to computer nightmare

Thu, 14 May 2009 09:49:51 -0700

41 lines

Re: Technics SP-15 to computer nightmare

Thu, 14 May 2009 06:38:46 -1000

116 lines

Re: Technics SP-15 to computer nightmare

Thu, 14 May 2009 09:35:18 -0700

33 lines

Re: Technics SP-15 to computer nightmare

Thu, 14 May 2009 06:10:29 -1000

55 lines

Re: Technics SP-15 to computer nightmare

Thu, 14 May 2009 11:37:52 +0100

129 lines

Re: Technics SP-15 to computer nightmare

Thu, 14 May 2009 06:22:29 -0400

77 lines

Re: Technics SP-15 to computer nightmare

Thu, 14 May 2009 10:48:07 +0100

57 lines

Re: Technics SP-15 to computer nightmare

Thu, 14 May 2009 10:23:44 +0100

61 lines

Re: Technics SP-15 to computer nightmare - Now I can sleep.

Thu, 14 May 2009 21:43:53 +0100

158 lines

test

Fri, 15 May 2009 09:38:11 -0400

14 lines

test again

Fri, 15 May 2009 10:21:54 -0400

14 lines

Re: Test, please ignore.

Fri, 15 May 2009 23:51:54 -0400

24 lines

Re: Test, please ignore.

Fri, 15 May 2009 07:27:50 -0700

21 lines

Test, please ignore.

Fri, 15 May 2009 09:35:08 -0400

13 lines

This just in from NARAS...

Fri, 15 May 2009 22:09:44 -0400

43 lines

Re: This just in from NARAS... ;-(

Sat, 16 May 2009 21:32:50 -0400

34 lines

Re: This just in from NARAS... ;-(

Sat, 16 May 2009 00:33:26 -0400

42 lines

Re: This just in from NARAS... ;-(

Fri, 15 May 2009 23:15:51 EDT

28 lines

Re: vinegar reel to reel - is it safe to play?

Tue, 12 May 2009 08:23:50 -0400

61 lines

Re: vinegar reel to reel - is it safe to play?

Mon, 11 May 2009 22:21:55 -0400

63 lines

Re: vinegar reel to reel - is it safe to play?

Tue, 12 May 2009 13:12:41 +1200

109 lines

Re: vinegar reel to reel - is it safe to play?

Mon, 11 May 2009 19:01:41 -0400

38 lines

Re: vinegar reel to reel - is it safe to play?

Mon, 11 May 2009 18:54:37 -0400

55 lines

Re: vinegar reel to reel - is it safe to play?

Mon, 11 May 2009 15:43:26 -0700

103 lines

Re: vinegar reel to reel - is it safe to play?

Mon, 11 May 2009 15:18:10 -0700

50 lines

Re: vinegar reel to reel - is it safe to play?

Mon, 11 May 2009 16:44:29 -0500

65 lines

Re: vinegar reel to reel - is it safe to play?

Mon, 11 May 2009 14:14:43 -0700

39 lines

Re: vinegar reel to reel - is it safe to play?

Mon, 11 May 2009 14:09:47 -0700

21 lines

Re: vinegar reel to reel - is it safe to play?

Mon, 11 May 2009 21:30:33 +0100

71 lines

vinegar reel to reel - is it safe to play?

Mon, 11 May 2009 13:13:07 -0700

47 lines

Re: Vinyl Recorder

Mon, 4 May 2009 13:52:28 -0400

38 lines

VS: Call for Papers JTS 2010

Mon, 18 May 2009 11:06:50 +0200

46 lines

VS: [ARSCLIST] Proper Box UK

Wed, 27 May 2009 20:05:02 +0200

65 lines

What about using DBX noise recuction boxes for playback of 78's?

Sat, 23 May 2009 16:34:46 EDT

37 lines

Re: What about using DBX noise recuction boxes for playback of 78's?

Sat, 23 May 2009 10:38:27 -0700

25 lines

Re: What about using DBX noise recuction boxes for playback of 78's?

Thu, 21 May 2009 19:14:39 -0700

46 lines

Re: What about using DBX noise recuction boxes for playback of 78's?

Thu, 21 May 2009 18:52:56 -0700

22 lines

Re: What about using DBX noise recuction boxes for playback of 78's?

Thu, 21 May 2009 16:57:37 -0500

36 lines

What about using DBX noise recuction boxes for playback of 78's?

Thu, 21 May 2009 22:41:20 +0200

20 lines

Re: Why you can't find those copies of Vocalion 1113?

Fri, 29 May 2009 23:10:46 +0000

34 lines

Re: Why you can't find those copies of Vocalion 1113?

Fri, 29 May 2009 15:44:22 -0700

50 lines

Re: Why you can't find those copies of Vocalion 1113?

Fri, 29 May 2009 08:23:10 +0200

35 lines

Re: Why you can't find those copies of Vocalion 1113?

Thu, 28 May 2009 21:12:56 -0400

59 lines

Re: Why you can't find those copies of Vocalion 1113?

Thu, 28 May 2009 20:59:08 -0400

45 lines

Re: Why you can't find those copies of Vocalion 1113?

Thu, 28 May 2009 18:37:35 -0400

36 lines

Why you can't find those copies of Vocalion 1113?

Thu, 28 May 2009 18:27:19 -0400

23 lines

Re: wire recordings - archival storage

Fri, 8 May 2009 14:08:36 -0600

33 lines

Re: wire recordings - archival storage

Fri, 8 May 2009 13:07:38 -0500

65 lines

Re: wire recordings - archival storage

Fri, 8 May 2009 12:37:08 -0500

141 lines

Re: wire recordings - archival storage

Wed, 6 May 2009 08:45:39 -0600

34 lines

Re: wire recordings - archival storage

Tue, 5 May 2009 20:42:06 -0400

120 lines

Re: wire recordings - archival storage

Tue, 5 May 2009 17:48:40 -0500

110 lines

Re: wire recordings - archival storage

Sun, 3 May 2009 15:12:48 -0600

46 lines

Re: wire recordings - archival storage

Fri, 1 May 2009 16:49:47 -0500

150 lines

Re: wire recordings - archival storage

Fri, 1 May 2009 09:04:38 -0500

122 lines

Re: wire recordings - archival storage/aluminum ?

Thu, 7 May 2009 10:32:16 -0400

113 lines

Re: wire recordings - archival storage/aluminum ?

Wed, 6 May 2009 18:15:18 -0600

66 lines

Re: wire recordings - archival storage/aluminum ?

Wed, 6 May 2009 14:34:34 -0700

30 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager