|
|
|
|
Size
|
Error in Backus Naur Form (BNF) in CQL Specification?
|
Matthias Hess |
Thu, 21 May 2009 06:42:00 +0200 |
39 lines |
Re: Error in Backus Naur Form (BNF) in CQL Specification?
|
Dr R. Sanderson |
Thu, 21 May 2009 08:34:17 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: Error in Backus Naur Form (BNF) in CQL Specification?
|
Ashley Sanders |
Thu, 21 May 2009 09:35:29 +0100 |
25 lines |
Error in Backus Naur Form (BNF) in CQL Specification?
|
Mike Taylor |
Thu, 21 May 2009 10:46:22 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: Error in Backus Naur Form (BNF) in CQL Specification?
|
Thomas G. Habing |
Fri, 22 May 2009 10:33:04 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: Error in Backus Naur Form (BNF) in CQL Specification?
|
=?windows-1252?Q?Roger_Wallin?= |
Mon, 25 May 2009 06:27:50 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: Error in Backus Naur Form (BNF) in CQL Specification?
|
Thomas G. Habing |
Tue, 26 May 2009 10:56:33 -0500 |
50 lines |
Re: Error in Backus Naur Form (BNF) in CQL Specification?
|
=?windows-1252?Q?Roger_Wallin?= |
Wed, 27 May 2009 04:04:34 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: One Data Format Identifier (and Registry) to Rule Them All
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 19 May 2009 15:52:07 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: One Data Format Identifier (and Registry) to Rule Them All
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 19 May 2009 16:18:51 -0400 |
139 lines |
Re: One Data Format Identifier (and Registry) to Rule Them All
|
Dr R. Sanderson |
Tue, 19 May 2009 21:39:39 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: One Data Format Identifier (and Registry) to Rule Them All
|
Ray Denenberg |
Tue, 19 May 2009 17:19:29 -0400 |
21 lines |
Re: One Data Format Identifier (and Registry) to Rule Them All
|
Dr R. Sanderson |
Tue, 19 May 2009 23:46:43 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: One Data Format Identifier (and Registry) to Rule Them All
|
Ross Singer |
Tue, 19 May 2009 21:44:37 -0400 |
103 lines |
Re: One Data Format Identifier (and Registry) to Rule Them All
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 20 May 2009 14:06:37 +0100 |
60 lines |
Re: One Data Format Identifier (and Registry) to Rule Them All
|
Hammond, Tony |
Wed, 20 May 2009 14:36:55 +0100 |
119 lines |
Re: One Data Format Identifier (and Registry) to Rule Them All
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 20 May 2009 10:04:16 -0400 |
54 lines |
Re: One Data Format Identifier (and Registry) to Rule Them All
|
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress |
Wed, 20 May 2009 10:30:17 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: One Data Format Identifier (and Registry) to Rule Them All
|
Mike Taylor |
Wed, 20 May 2009 15:34:18 +0100 |
60 lines |
Re: One Data Format Identifier (and Registry) to Rule Them All
|
Rob Sanderson |
Wed, 20 May 2009 15:52:50 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: One Data Format Identifier (and Registry) to Rule Them All
|
Hammond, Tony |
Wed, 20 May 2009 16:17:00 +0100 |
79 lines |
Re: One Data Format Identifier (and Registry) to Rule Them All
|
Rob Sanderson |
Wed, 20 May 2009 16:35:26 +0100 |
76 lines |
Re: One Data Format Identifier (and Registry) to Rule Them All
|
Ray Denenberg |
Wed, 20 May 2009 11:45:43 -0400 |
116 lines |
Re: One Data Format Identifier (and Registry) to Rule Them All
|
Thomas G. Habing |
Wed, 20 May 2009 11:22:44 -0500 |
54 lines |
Re: One Data Format Identifier (and Registry) to Rule Them All
|
Rob Sanderson |
Wed, 20 May 2009 17:24:36 +0100 |
138 lines |
Re: One Data Format Identifier (and Registry) to Rule Them All
|
Ross Singer |
Wed, 20 May 2009 13:32:38 -0400 |
21 lines |
Re: [CODE4LIB] One Data Format Identifier (and Registry) to Rule Them All
|
Mike Taylor |
Fri, 1 May 2009 11:02:27 +0100 |
86 lines |
