LISTSERV 16.0 - DATETIME Archives

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

DATETIME Archives

January 2011

View:

Show Contributor List | Hide Contributor List

		LISTSERV Archives
		DATETIME Home

Subject	From	Date	Size
Re: comments on EDTF Specification DRAFT FOR REVIEW #3	Syd Bauman	Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:38:00 -0500	20 lines
comments on EDTF Specification DRAFT FOR REVIEW #2	Syd Bauman	Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:03:42 -0500	55 lines
comments on EDTF Specification DRAFT FOR REVIEW #1	Syd Bauman	Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:40:14 -0500	68 lines
Re: Expanded years	Simon Grant	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:21:54 +0000	102 lines
essentials	Simon Grant	Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:47:17 +0000	376 lines
Re: dual representations	Simon Grant	Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:13:32 +0000	104 lines
separated vs. unseparated form	Ray Denenberg	Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:41:32 -0500	32 lines
Requirements	Ray Denenberg	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:55:57 -0500	29 lines
Orthogonality	Ray Denenberg	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:16:34 -0500	35 lines
Expanded years	Ray Denenberg	Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:33:44 -0500	41 lines
Re: Expanded years	Ray Denenberg	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:00:44 -0500	25 lines
Re: Expanded years	Ray Denenberg	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:35:21 -0500	345 lines
EDTF as a simple type	Ray Denenberg	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:53:27 -0500	49 lines
Re: dual representations	Ray Denenberg	Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:19:22 -0500	27 lines
Re: comments on EDTF Specification DRAFT FOR REVIEW #3	Ray Denenberg	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:21:53 -0500	38 lines
Re: comments on draft EDTF spec of 5 Nov 2011	Ray Denenberg	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:16:34 -0500	93 lines
uncertainty	Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress	Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:31:25 -0500	599 lines
Plans for standardization of this spec	Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:12:32 -0500	65 lines
Re: Expanded years	Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:11:51 -0500	260 lines
dual representations	Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress	Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:00:35 -0500	28 lines
Re: dual representations	Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress	Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:56:52 -0500	29 lines
Re: comments on EDTF Specification DRAFT FOR REVIEW #1	Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress	Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:43:05 -0500	23 lines
Re: Comments on draft edtf specification	Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress	Wed, 5 Jan 2011 18:08:29 -0500	139 lines
Re: BCE dates; metadata embedded in dates	Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress	Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:15:32 -0500	86 lines
Re: BCE dates; metadata embedded in dates	Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:00:44 -0500	23 lines
Re: Comments on draft edtf specification	John Hostage	Thu, 6 Jan 2011 13:06:23 -0500	122 lines
FW: Comments on use cases/requirements (was: RE: [DATETIME] comments on draft EDTF spec of 5 Nov 2011)	Guenther, Rebecca	Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:29:26 -0500	180 lines
Re: comments on draft EDTF spec of 5 Nov 2011	Gerard Ashton	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:03:54 -0500	36 lines
Re: BC note	Gerard Ashton	Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:40:24 -0500	20 lines
Re: BC note	Gerard Ashton	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:32:45 -0500	43 lines
"User input" (was dual representations)	Gerard Ashton	Thu, 20 Jan 2011 07:33:03 -0500	33 lines
Comments on draft edtf specification	Elizabeth McKelvey	Tue, 4 Jan 2011 13:02:49 -0500	258 lines
Re: User input vs. human readable	Edward C. Zimmermann	Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:51:51 +0100	102 lines
Re: Expanded years	Edward C. Zimmermann	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:01:31 +0100	44 lines
Re: Expanded years	Edward C. Zimmermann	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:07:46 +0100	35 lines
Re: Expanded years	Edward C. Zimmermann	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:42:26 +0100	462 lines
Re: dual representations	Edward C. Zimmermann	Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:47:31 +0100	55 lines
Re: dual representations	Edward C. Zimmermann	Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:00:05 +0100	79 lines
Re: dual representations	Edward C. Zimmermann	Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:46:26 +0100	49 lines
Re: dual representations	Edward C. Zimmermann	Mon, 24 Jan 2011 08:52:04 +0100	109 lines
Re: BCE dates; metadata embedded in dates	Edward C. Zimmermann	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:39:42 +0100	42 lines
Re: BC note	Edward C. Zimmermann	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:17:56 +0100	37 lines
Re: "User input" (was dual representations)	Edward C. Zimmermann	Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:33:43 +0100	65 lines
User input vs. human readable	Denenberg, Ray	Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:09:34 -0500	69 lines
Re: Expanded years	C. M. Sperberg-McQueen	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:28:38 -0700	46 lines
Re: dual representations	C. M. Sperberg-McQueen	Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:37:33 -0700	46 lines
Re: dual representations	C. M. Sperberg-McQueen	Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:57:46 -0700	46 lines
Re: dual representations	C. M. Sperberg-McQueen	Fri, 21 Jan 2011 22:28:08 -0700	64 lines
comments on draft EDTF spec of 5 Nov 2011	C. M. Sperberg-McQueen	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:13:34 -0700	304 lines
Re: comments on draft EDTF spec of 5 Nov 2011	C. M. Sperberg-McQueen	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:59:12 -0700	71 lines
Re: comments on draft EDTF spec of 5 Nov 2011	C. M. Sperberg-McQueen	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:02:41 -0700	50 lines
Re: comments on draft EDTF spec of 5 Nov 2011	C. M. Sperberg-McQueen	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:44:25 -0700	125 lines
Re: Requirements	Bruce D'Arcus	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:42:47 -0500	41 lines
Re: dual representations	Bruce D'Arcus	Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:32:37 -0500	91 lines
Re: dual representations	Bruce D'Arcus	Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:53:18 -0500	62 lines
Re: comments on draft EDTF spec of 5 Nov 2011	Bruce D'Arcus	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:34:08 -0500	33 lines
Re: comments on draft EDTF spec of 5 Nov 2011	Bruce D'Arcus	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:10:57 -0500	63 lines
Re: BCE dates; metadata embedded in dates	Bruce D'Arcus	Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:46:56 -0500	26 lines
BCE dates; metadata embedded in dates	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stephen_Davis?=	Wed, 5 Jan 2011 21:22:53 -0500	84 lines

Search Archives

Advanced Options

Options

		Log In
		Get Password

		Search Archives

		Subscribe or Unsubscribe

DATETIME Archives

January 2011

Subject

From

Date

Size

Search Archives

Options

Archives