LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for DATETIME Archives


DATETIME Archives

DATETIME Archives


January 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"User input" (was dual representations) (2 messages)
BC note (3 messages)
BCE dates; metadata embedded in dates (5 messages)
comments on draft EDTF spec of 5 Nov 2011 (8 messages)
Comments on draft edtf specification (3 messages)
comments on EDTF Specification DRAFT FOR REVIEW #1 (2 messages)
comments on EDTF Specification DRAFT FOR REVIEW #2 (1 message)
comments on EDTF Specification DRAFT FOR REVIEW #3 (2 messages)
Comments on use cases/requirements (was: RE: [DATETIME] comments on draft EDTF spec of 5 Nov 2011) (1 message)
dual representations (13 messages)
EDTF as a simple type (1 message)
essentials (1 message)
Expanded years (9 messages)
Orthogonality (1 message)
Plans for standardization of this spec (1 message)
Requirements (2 messages)
separated vs. unseparated form (1 message)
uncertainty (1 message)
User input vs. human readable (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATETIME Home

DATETIME Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Most Recent First

Date

Size

New Thread

"User input" (was dual representations)

"User input" (was dual representations)

Thu, 20 Jan 2011 07:33:03 -0500

33 lines

Re: "User input" (was dual representations)

Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:33:43 +0100

65 lines

New Thread

BC note

Re: BC note

Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:40:24 -0500

20 lines

Re: BC note

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:17:56 +0100

37 lines

Re: BC note

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:32:45 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

BCE dates; metadata embedded in dates

BCE dates; metadata embedded in dates

Wed, 5 Jan 2011 21:22:53 -0500

84 lines

Re: BCE dates; metadata embedded in dates

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:46:56 -0500

26 lines

Re: BCE dates; metadata embedded in dates

Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:15:32 -0500

86 lines

Re: BCE dates; metadata embedded in dates

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:39:42 +0100

42 lines

Re: BCE dates; metadata embedded in dates

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:00:44 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

comments on draft EDTF spec of 5 Nov 2011

comments on draft EDTF spec of 5 Nov 2011

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:13:34 -0700

304 lines

Re: comments on draft EDTF spec of 5 Nov 2011

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:34:08 -0500

33 lines

Re: comments on draft EDTF spec of 5 Nov 2011

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:03:54 -0500

36 lines

Re: comments on draft EDTF spec of 5 Nov 2011

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:59:12 -0700

71 lines

Re: comments on draft EDTF spec of 5 Nov 2011

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:02:41 -0700

50 lines

Re: comments on draft EDTF spec of 5 Nov 2011

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:10:57 -0500

63 lines

Re: comments on draft EDTF spec of 5 Nov 2011

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:44:25 -0700

125 lines

Re: comments on draft EDTF spec of 5 Nov 2011

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:16:34 -0500

93 lines

New Thread

Comments on draft edtf specification

Comments on draft edtf specification

Tue, 4 Jan 2011 13:02:49 -0500

258 lines

Re: Comments on draft edtf specification

Wed, 5 Jan 2011 18:08:29 -0500

139 lines

Re: Comments on draft edtf specification

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 13:06:23 -0500

122 lines

New Thread

comments on EDTF Specification DRAFT FOR REVIEW #1

comments on EDTF Specification DRAFT FOR REVIEW #1

Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:40:14 -0500

68 lines

Re: comments on EDTF Specification DRAFT FOR REVIEW #1

Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:43:05 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

comments on EDTF Specification DRAFT FOR REVIEW #2

comments on EDTF Specification DRAFT FOR REVIEW #2

Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:03:42 -0500

55 lines

New Thread

comments on EDTF Specification DRAFT FOR REVIEW #3

Re: comments on EDTF Specification DRAFT FOR REVIEW #3

Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:38:00 -0500

20 lines

Re: comments on EDTF Specification DRAFT FOR REVIEW #3

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:21:53 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Comments on use cases/requirements (was: RE: [DATETIME] comments on draft EDTF spec of 5 Nov 2011)

FW: Comments on use cases/requirements (was: RE: [DATETIME] comments on draft EDTF spec of 5 Nov 2011)

Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:29:26 -0500

180 lines

New Thread

dual representations

dual representations

Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:00:35 -0500

28 lines

Re: dual representations

Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:37:33 -0700

46 lines

Re: dual representations

Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:56:52 -0500

29 lines

Re: dual representations

Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:47:31 +0100

55 lines

Re: dual representations

Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:57:46 -0700

46 lines

Re: dual representations

Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:00:05 +0100

79 lines

Re: dual representations

Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:32:37 -0500

91 lines

Re: dual representations

Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:19:22 -0500

27 lines

Re: dual representations

Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:46:26 +0100

49 lines

Re: dual representations

Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:13:32 +0000

104 lines

Re: dual representations

Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:53:18 -0500

62 lines

Re: dual representations

Fri, 21 Jan 2011 22:28:08 -0700

64 lines

Re: dual representations

Mon, 24 Jan 2011 08:52:04 +0100

109 lines

New Thread

EDTF as a simple type

EDTF as a simple type

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:53:27 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

essentials

essentials

Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:47:17 +0000

376 lines

New Thread

Expanded years

Expanded years

Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:33:44 -0500

41 lines

Re: Expanded years

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:01:31 +0100

44 lines

Re: Expanded years

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:00:44 -0500

25 lines

Re: Expanded years

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:07:46 +0100

35 lines

Re: Expanded years

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:21:54 +0000

102 lines

Re: Expanded years

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:11:51 -0500

260 lines

Re: Expanded years

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:28:38 -0700

46 lines

Re: Expanded years

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:42:26 +0100

462 lines

Re: Expanded years

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:35:21 -0500

345 lines

New Thread

Orthogonality

Orthogonality

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:16:34 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

Plans for standardization of this spec

Plans for standardization of this spec

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:12:32 -0500

65 lines

New Thread

Requirements

Requirements

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:55:57 -0500

29 lines

Re: Requirements

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:42:47 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

separated vs. unseparated form

separated vs. unseparated form

Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:41:32 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

uncertainty

uncertainty

Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:31:25 -0500

599 lines

New Thread

User input vs. human readable

User input vs. human readable

Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:09:34 -0500

69 lines

Re: User input vs. human readable

Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:51:51 +0100

102 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2019
February 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
January 2018
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
August 2016
July 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
December 2014
November 2014
March 2014
September 2013
May 2013
February 2013
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
May 2012
March 2012
December 2011
November 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager