LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for DATETIME Archives


DATETIME Archives

DATETIME Archives


May 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

A three level suggestion (2 messages)
BNF dateAndTime (2 messages)
BNF interval (1 message)
BNF list (5 messages)
century (4 messages)
century in periods (4 messages)
features 321 and 322 (4 messages)
internal uncertain/approximate LAST CALL (1 message)
longYear and y (1 message)
months duration (3 messages)
New approach about question marks - a suggestion (15 messages)
proposed direction for uncertain and approximate (5 messages)
Question marks (1 message)
Question marks (part 1) (1 message)
Question marks (part 2) (1 message)
Reconsidering internal uncertainly/approximation (4 messages)
Rereading the EDTF specification (4 messages)
Some comments about the BNF (1 message)
uncertain/approximate (2 messages)
volatile and dynamic dates // was: Rereading the EDTF specification (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATETIME Home

DATETIME Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

Date

Size

New Thread

A three level suggestion

Re: A three level suggestion

Wed, 25 May 2011 09:06:45 -0400

59 lines

A three level suggestion

Wed, 25 May 2011 14:38:53 +0200

46 lines

New Thread

BNF dateAndTime

Re: BNF dateAndTime

Mon, 23 May 2011 09:43:40 -0400

46 lines

BNF dateAndTime

Mon, 23 May 2011 12:10:31 +0200

48 lines

New Thread

BNF interval

BNF interval

Mon, 23 May 2011 11:49:58 +0200

30 lines

New Thread

BNF list

Re: BNF list

Fri, 27 May 2011 14:27:53 +0200

19 lines

Re: BNF list

Thu, 26 May 2011 16:44:50 -0400

24 lines

Re: BNF list

Wed, 25 May 2011 16:19:19 +0200

74 lines

Re: BNF list

Tue, 24 May 2011 11:05:48 -0400

80 lines

BNF list

Mon, 23 May 2011 19:30:35 +0200

81 lines

New Thread

century

Re: century

Wed, 11 May 2011 09:36:53 -0400

36 lines

Re: century

Mon, 9 May 2011 15:11:15 -0400

25 lines

Re: century

Mon, 9 May 2011 21:03:31 +0200

28 lines

century

Thu, 5 May 2011 11:37:53 -0400

75 lines

New Thread

century in periods

Re: century in periods

Tue, 24 May 2011 17:49:07 -0400

30 lines

Re: century in periods

Sun, 22 May 2011 20:51:12 +0200

31 lines

Re: century in periods

Thu, 19 May 2011 10:21:28 -0400

41 lines

Re: century in periods

Fri, 13 May 2011 08:43:54 +0200

59 lines

New Thread

features 321 and 322

Re: features 321 and 322

Wed, 25 May 2011 13:54:47 +0200

38 lines

Re: features 321 and 322

Tue, 24 May 2011 11:56:34 -0400

70 lines

Re: features 321 and 322

Mon, 23 May 2011 15:54:31 -0400

43 lines

features 321 and 322

Mon, 23 May 2011 15:40:50 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

internal uncertain/approximate LAST CALL

Re: internal uncertain/approximate LAST CALL

Tue, 10 May 2011 09:46:23 -0400

100 lines

New Thread

longYear and y

longYear and y

Fri, 27 May 2011 14:28:31 +0200

20 lines

New Thread

months duration

Re: months duration

Thu, 12 May 2011 14:59:42 -0400

33 lines

Re: months duration

Thu, 12 May 2011 12:39:36 +0200

54 lines

months duration

Wed, 11 May 2011 09:13:45 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

New approach about question marks - a suggestion

Re: New approach about question marks - a suggestion

Sun, 22 May 2011 16:25:33 -0400

40 lines

Re: New approach about question marks - a suggestion

Sun, 22 May 2011 16:05:01 -0400

58 lines

Re: New approach about question marks - a suggestion

Sun, 22 May 2011 15:43:01 -0400

60 lines

Re: New approach about question marks - a suggestion

Sun, 22 May 2011 15:13:30 -0400

61 lines

Re: New approach about question marks - a suggestion

Sun, 22 May 2011 21:03:59 +0200

79 lines

Re: New approach about question marks - a suggestion

Sun, 22 May 2011 21:00:21 +0200

21 lines

Re: New approach about question marks - a suggestion

Fri, 13 May 2011 08:24:39 +0200

100 lines

Re: New approach about question marks - a suggestion

Thu, 12 May 2011 17:57:47 -0400

50 lines

Re: New approach about question marks - a suggestion

Thu, 12 May 2011 17:46:56 -0400

63 lines

Re: New approach about question marks - a suggestion

Thu, 12 May 2011 23:08:18 +0200

74 lines

Re: New approach about question marks - a suggestion

Tue, 10 May 2011 09:33:51 -0400

24 lines

Re: New approach about question marks - a suggestion

Tue, 10 May 2011 08:17:11 -0400

55 lines

Re: New approach about question marks - a suggestion

Tue, 10 May 2011 10:09:01 +0200

145 lines

Re: New approach about question marks - a suggestion

Mon, 9 May 2011 16:11:32 -0400

85 lines

New approach about question marks - a suggestion

Mon, 9 May 2011 21:31:13 +0200

68 lines

New Thread

proposed direction for uncertain and approximate

Re: proposed direction for uncertain and approximate

Mon, 23 May 2011 15:48:58 -0400

40 lines

Re: proposed direction for uncertain and approximate

Mon, 23 May 2011 15:35:34 -0400

31 lines

Re: proposed direction for uncertain and approximate

Mon, 23 May 2011 15:20:58 -0400

21 lines

Re: proposed direction for uncertain and approximate

Mon, 23 May 2011 19:21:00 +0200

41 lines

proposed direction for uncertain and approximate

Mon, 23 May 2011 09:30:24 -0400

114 lines

New Thread

Question marks

Re: Question marks

Mon, 9 May 2011 21:25:54 +0200

76 lines

New Thread

Question marks (part 1)

Question marks (part 1)

Thu, 5 May 2011 12:38:47 -0400

73 lines

New Thread

Question marks (part 2)

Question marks (part 2)

Thu, 5 May 2011 13:09:49 -0400

37 lines

New Thread

Reconsidering internal uncertainly/approximation

Re: Reconsidering internal uncertainly/approximation

Sun, 22 May 2011 15:16:46 -0400

40 lines

Re: Reconsidering internal uncertainly/approximation

Sun, 22 May 2011 20:58:02 +0200

31 lines

Re: Reconsidering internal uncertainly/approximation

Thu, 19 May 2011 11:31:17 -0400

41 lines

Reconsidering internal uncertainly/approximation

Thu, 19 May 2011 11:13:26 -0400

47 lines

New Thread

Rereading the EDTF specification

Re: Rereading the EDTF specification

Sun, 22 May 2011 20:45:56 +0200

25 lines

Re: Rereading the EDTF specification

Thu, 19 May 2011 13:12:12 -0400

47 lines

Re: Rereading the EDTF specification

Fri, 13 May 2011 15:41:19 -0400

105 lines

Rereading the EDTF specification

Fri, 13 May 2011 20:24:08 +0200

86 lines

New Thread

Some comments about the BNF

Re: Some comments about the BNF

Thu, 5 May 2011 16:56:40 +0200

169 lines

New Thread

uncertain/approximate

Re: uncertain/approximate

Fri, 27 May 2011 14:26:57 +0200

49 lines

uncertain/approximate

Thu, 26 May 2011 16:29:28 -0400

56 lines

New Thread

volatile and dynamic dates // was: Rereading the EDTF specification

Re: volatile and dynamic dates // was: Rereading the EDTF specification

Mon, 23 May 2011 09:49:14 -0400

41 lines

Re: volatile and dynamic dates // was: Rereading the EDTF specification

Mon, 16 May 2011 12:03:00 +0200

56 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2019
February 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
January 2018
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
August 2016
July 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
December 2014
November 2014
March 2014
September 2013
May 2013
February 2013
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
May 2012
March 2012
December 2011
November 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager