LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME Archives

BIBFRAME Archives


November 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

Date

Size

Chris Oliver Selected Copy Editor

Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:58:21 -0500

122 lines

Re: Goals

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 15:32:31 -0800

192 lines

Re: Goals

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 20:44:51 +0000

128 lines

Re: Goals

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:14:22 -0500

135 lines

Re: Goals

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:02:20 +0100

24 lines

Re: Goals

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 15:49:57 -0700

86 lines

Re: Goals

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 13:18:41 -0800

61 lines

Goals

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 11:11:30 -0700

83 lines

Re: International basis for development of a future bibliographic format

Tue, 8 Nov 2011 03:56:19 +0000

226 lines

International basis for development of a future bibliographic format

Thu, 3 Nov 2011 17:46:10 +0100

157 lines

Re: Introduction (@W3C)

Sun, 13 Nov 2011 02:56:10 +0000

87 lines

Re: Introduction (@W3C)

Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:49:21 -0500

161 lines

Re: Introduction (@W3C)

Fri, 11 Nov 2011 23:34:12 -0500

113 lines

Re: Introduction (@W3C)

Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:40:20 -0500

85 lines

Re: Introduction (@W3C)

Thu, 10 Nov 2011 07:30:34 -0800

49 lines

Re: Introduction (@W3C)

Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:59:01 +0100

48 lines

Re: Introduction (@W3C)

Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:55:35 -0500

21 lines

Re: Introduction (@W3C)

Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:46:25 -0500

230 lines

Re: Introduction (@W3C)

Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:23:24 +0100

114 lines

Re: Introduction (@W3C)

Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:54:41 +0000

97 lines

Re: Introduction (@W3C)

Thu, 10 Nov 2011 10:03:39 -0000

208 lines

Re: Introduction (@W3C)

Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:09:23 +0100

129 lines

Re: Introduction (@W3C)

Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:06:41 +0100

104 lines

Re: Introduction (@W3C)

Thu, 10 Nov 2011 10:33:29 +0100

41 lines

Re: Introduction (@W3C)

Thu, 10 Nov 2011 10:05:13 +0100

176 lines

Re: Introduction (@W3C)

Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:41:59 +0100

111 lines

Re: Introduction (@W3C)

Thu, 10 Nov 2011 02:56:40 +0000

62 lines

Re: Introduction (@W3C)

Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:01:40 +0000

31 lines

Re: Introduction (@W3C)

Wed, 9 Nov 2011 16:31:18 -0500

48 lines

Re: Introduction (@W3C)

Wed, 9 Nov 2011 13:26:06 -0800

99 lines

Re: Introduction (@W3C)

Wed, 9 Nov 2011 20:39:00 +0000

96 lines

Introduction (@W3C)

Wed, 9 Nov 2011 18:31:25 +0100

72 lines

Library and Archives Canada supports the Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 19:03:26 +0000

132 lines

Re: My own introduction

Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:26:59 -0500

61 lines

My own introduction

Thu, 10 Nov 2011 10:39:18 -0500

118 lines

Re: NISO offers itself as the standards body for future format

Thu, 3 Nov 2011 14:36:54 -0700

154 lines

Re: NISO offers itself as the standards body for future format

Thu, 3 Nov 2011 14:21:01 -0400

104 lines

NISO offers itself as the standards body for future format

Wed, 2 Nov 2011 12:20:47 -0700

55 lines

Re: Offlist reactions to LC BIBFRAME statement

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 12:04:11 +0100

37 lines

Re: Offlist reactions to LC BIBFRAME statement

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:19:55 +0100

59 lines

Offlist reactions to LC BIBFRAME statement

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 09:26:30 +0100

140 lines

Re: Offlist reactions to the LC Bibliographic Framework statement

Tue, 8 Nov 2011 11:42:53 -0800

59 lines

Offlist reactions to the LC Bibliographic Framework statement

Thu, 3 Nov 2011 09:14:05 -0800

185 lines

Re: post-MARC design principles

Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:53:04 +0100

85 lines

post-MARC design principles

Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:10:24 -0500

46 lines

Re: Top-down or bottom-up? Example for a simple web service

Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:23:44 -0800

104 lines

Re: Top-down or bottom-up? Example for a simple web service

Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:19:31 +0100

76 lines

Re: Top-down or bottom-up? Example for a simple web service

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 08:14:44 -0800

41 lines

Top-down or bottom-up? Example for a simple web service

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:28:31 +0100

182 lines

Re: What the data tells us

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 15:58:33 -0800

602 lines

Re: What the data tells us

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:50:00 -0500

271 lines

Re: What the data tells us

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:53:38 -0800

549 lines

Re: What the data tells us

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:48:01 -0600

33 lines

Re: What the data tells us

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 12:02:48 -0500

724 lines

Re: What the data tells us

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 08:24:06 -0800

271 lines

Re: What the data tells us

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 08:47:46 -0500

350 lines

Re: What the data tells us

Sun, 6 Nov 2011 16:42:27 -0800

35 lines

Re: What the data tells us

Sun, 6 Nov 2011 20:50:00 +0000

26 lines

Re: What the data tells us

Sun, 6 Nov 2011 20:48:41 +0000

221 lines

Re: What the data tells us

Sun, 6 Nov 2011 15:22:57 -0500

92 lines

Re: What the data tells us

Sun, 6 Nov 2011 12:00:11 -0800

194 lines

Re: What the data tells us

Sun, 6 Nov 2011 11:17:15 -0700

153 lines

Re: What the data tells us

Sat, 5 Nov 2011 13:24:03 -0700

131 lines

Re: What the data tells us

Sat, 5 Nov 2011 08:59:29 -0700

46 lines

Re: What the data tells us

Sat, 5 Nov 2011 06:51:24 -0800

26 lines

Re: What the data tells us

Sat, 5 Nov 2011 05:42:46 +0000

59 lines

Re: What the data tells us

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 21:41:34 -0800

30 lines

Re: What the data tells us

Sat, 5 Nov 2011 00:35:05 -0400

114 lines

Re: What the data tells us

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 15:41:02 -0700

42 lines

Re: What the data tells us -> Dublin Core application profiles

Tue, 8 Nov 2011 12:47:11 -0500

237 lines

Re: [RDA-L] Offlist reactions to the LC Bibliographic Framework statement

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:34:04 -0300

79 lines

Re: [RDA-L] Offlist reactions to the LC Bibliographic Framework statement

Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:51:02 +1100

227 lines

Re: [RDA-L] Offlist reactions to the LC Bibliographic Framework statement

Wed, 9 Nov 2011 01:34:01 -0500

139 lines

Re: [RDA-L] Offlist reactions to the LC Bibliographic Framework statement

Tue, 8 Nov 2011 18:59:50 +0000

91 lines

Advanced Options