|
|
|
Size
|
Re: "RDA Worldwide" at ALA Annual
|
Karen Coyle |
Thu, 31 May 2012 08:36:59 -0700 |
98 lines |
Re: "RDA Worldwide" at ALA Annual
|
Bernhard Eversberg |
Thu, 31 May 2012 16:24:53 +0200 |
48 lines |
Re: "RDA Worldwide" at ALA Annual
|
Michael Hopwood |
Thu, 31 May 2012 15:15:17 +0100 |
181 lines |
Re: "RDA Worldwide" at ALA Annual
|
Karen Coyle |
Thu, 31 May 2012 06:59:44 -0700 |
103 lines |
Re: "RDA Worldwide" at ALA Annual
|
Michael Hopwood |
Thu, 31 May 2012 14:22:34 +0100 |
103 lines |
Re: "RDA Worldwide" at ALA Annual
|
Karen Coyle |
Thu, 31 May 2012 06:15:02 -0700 |
77 lines |
Re: "RDA Worldwide" at ALA Annual
|
Diane Hillmann |
Thu, 31 May 2012 08:54:34 -0400 |
155 lines |
Re: "RDA Worldwide" at ALA Annual
|
Bernhard Eversberg |
Thu, 31 May 2012 07:48:16 +0200 |
45 lines |
Re: "RDA Worldwide" at ALA Annual
|
Karen Coyle |
Wed, 30 May 2012 07:49:51 -0700 |
58 lines |
Re: "RDA Worldwide" at ALA Annual
|
Bernhard Eversberg |
Wed, 30 May 2012 09:04:56 +0200 |
80 lines |
"RDA Worldwide" at ALA Annual
|
Miller, David |
Tue, 29 May 2012 09:40:33 -0400 |
236 lines |
Are RDA, MARC data, and Bibliographic concepts compatible with Relational database principles or systems? (Was: Re: [RDA-L] RDA, DBMS and RDF)
|
Simon Spero |
Fri, 18 May 2012 15:33:25 -0400 |
457 lines |
IFLA Functional Requirements namespaces published
|
Riva Patricia |
Sat, 26 May 2012 19:33:43 -0400 |
185 lines |
Library of Congress Announces Modeling Initiative
|
McCallum, Sally |
Tue, 22 May 2012 13:55:04 -0400 |
188 lines |
Part 1: Order of records Re: [RDA-L] [BIBFRAME] RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Simon Spero |
Mon, 14 May 2012 12:33:01 -0400 |
79 lines |
Part 2: Efficiency of DBMS operations Re: [RDA-L] [BIBFRAME] RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Simon Spero |
Mon, 14 May 2012 15:50:34 -0400 |
213 lines |
Re: RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Karen Coyle |
Wed, 16 May 2012 11:33:50 -0700 |
108 lines |
Re: RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Mark Ehlert |
Wed, 16 May 2012 12:48:50 -0500 |
102 lines |
Re: RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Karen Coyle |
Wed, 16 May 2012 09:38:48 -0700 |
57 lines |
Re: RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Karen Coyle |
Wed, 16 May 2012 09:22:01 -0700 |
276 lines |
Re: RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Hickey,Thom |
Wed, 16 May 2012 17:49:36 +0200 |
227 lines |
Re: RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Mark Ehlert |
Wed, 16 May 2012 08:45:37 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Karen Coyle |
Wed, 16 May 2012 03:42:15 -0700 |
189 lines |
Re: RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Kevin M Randall |
Tue, 15 May 2012 21:29:30 +0000 |
58 lines |
Re: RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
John Espley |
Tue, 15 May 2012 09:39:15 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Bernhard Eversberg |
Tue, 15 May 2012 12:48:57 +0200 |
44 lines |
Re: RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Karen Coyle |
Mon, 14 May 2012 11:31:02 -0700 |
403 lines |
Re: RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Myers, John F. |
Mon, 14 May 2012 17:54:41 +0000 |
68 lines |
Re: RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Elizabeth O'Keefe |
Mon, 14 May 2012 13:04:42 -0400 |
141 lines |
Re: RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Michael Hopwood |
Mon, 14 May 2012 17:18:02 +0100 |
292 lines |
Re: RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Jeffrey Trimble |
Mon, 14 May 2012 11:34:08 -0400 |
173 lines |
Re: RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Karen Coyle |
Mon, 14 May 2012 07:45:51 -0700 |
103 lines |
Re: RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Michael Hopwood |
Mon, 14 May 2012 10:42:29 +0100 |
90 lines |
Re: RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Bernhard Eversberg |
Mon, 14 May 2012 11:29:24 +0200 |
60 lines |
RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Karen Coyle |
Sun, 13 May 2012 10:49:20 -0700 |
41 lines |
Re: RDA, DBMS and RDF - Community Contributed Tags
|
Amanda Xu |
Wed, 16 May 2012 21:42:12 -0700 |
374 lines |
Re: [RDA-L] Are RDA, MARC data, and Bibliographic concepts compatible with Relational database principles or systems?
|
Simon Spero |
Mon, 21 May 2012 23:13:28 -0400 |
197 lines |
Re: [RDA-L] Are RDA, MARC data, and Bibliographic concepts compatible with Relational database principles or systems? (Was: Re: [RDA-L] RDA, DBMS and RDF)
|
Karen Coyle |
Mon, 21 May 2012 14:07:26 -0700 |
157 lines |
Re: [RDA-L] Are RDA, MARC data, and Bibliographic concepts compatible with Relational database principles or systems? (Was: Re: [RDA-L] RDA, DBMS and RDF)
|
Stephen Hearn |
Mon, 21 May 2012 13:52:39 -0500 |
104 lines |
Re: [RDA-L] Are RDA, MARC data, and Bibliographic concepts compatible with Relational database principles or systems? (Was: Re: [RDA-L] RDA, DBMS and RDF)
|
Stephen Hearn |
Mon, 21 May 2012 13:50:31 -0500 |
131 lines |
Re: [RDA-L] Are RDA, MARC data, and Bibliographic concepts compatible with Relational database principles or systems? (Was: Re: [RDA-L] RDA, DBMS and RDF)
|
Kevin M Randall |
Mon, 21 May 2012 18:11:09 +0000 |
93 lines |
Re: [RDA-L] Are RDA, MARC data, and Bibliographic concepts compatible with Relational database principles or systems? (Was: Re: [RDA-L] RDA, DBMS and RDF)
|
Mitchell, Michael |
Mon, 21 May 2012 11:21:21 -0500 |
290 lines |
Re: [RDA-L] Are RDA, MARC data, and Bibliographic concepts compatible with Relational database principles or systems? (Was: Re: [RDA-L] RDA, DBMS and RDF)
|
Mitchell, Michael |
Mon, 21 May 2012 10:28:10 -0500 |
255 lines |
Re: [RDA-L] Are RDA, MARC data, and Bibliographic concepts compatible with Relational database principles or systems? (Was: Re: [RDA-L] RDA, DBMS and RDF)
|
Michael Hopwood |
Mon, 21 May 2012 15:44:55 +0100 |
246 lines |
Re: [RDA-L] Are RDA, MARC data, and Bibliographic concepts compatible with Relational database principles or systems? (Was: Re: [RDA-L] RDA, DBMS and RDF)
|
Huwig,Steve |
Mon, 21 May 2012 10:30:07 -0400 |
208 lines |
Re: [RDA-L] Are RDA, MARC data, and Bibliographic concepts compatible with Relational database principles or systems? (Was: Re: [RDA-L] RDA, DBMS and RDF)
|
Mitchell, Michael |
Mon, 21 May 2012 08:13:43 -0500 |
101 lines |
Re: [RDA-L] Are RDA, MARC data, and Bibliographic concepts compatible with Relational database principles or systems? (Was: Re: [RDA-L] RDA, DBMS and RDF)
|
Huwig,Steve |
Mon, 21 May 2012 07:36:55 -0400 |
64 lines |
Re: [RDA-L] Are RDA, MARC data, and Bibliographic concepts compatible with Relational database principles or systems? (Was: Re: [RDA-L] RDA, DBMS and RDF)
|
Bernhard Eversberg |
Mon, 21 May 2012 08:48:19 +0200 |
42 lines |
Re: [RDA-L] Are RDA, MARC data, and Bibliographic concepts compatible with Relational database principles or systems? (Was: Re: [RDA-L] RDA, DBMS and RDF)
|
Simon Spero |
Fri, 18 May 2012 21:28:00 -0400 |
108 lines |
Re: [RDA-L] Part 1: Order of records Re: [RDA-L] [BIBFRAME] RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Cindy Wolff |
Tue, 15 May 2012 14:30:27 +0000 |
197 lines |
Re: [RDA-L] Part 1: Order of records Re: [RDA-L] [BIBFRAME] RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Simon Spero |
Mon, 14 May 2012 16:15:21 -0400 |
180 lines |
Re: [RDA-L] RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Cindy Wolff |
Thu, 17 May 2012 14:23:13 -0400 |
834 lines |
Re: [RDA-L] RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Karen Coyle |
Thu, 17 May 2012 10:27:39 -0700 |
735 lines |
Re: [RDA-L] RDA, DBMS and RDF
|
Simon Spero |
Thu, 17 May 2012 13:10:51 -0400 |
633 lines |