LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME Archives

BIBFRAME Archives


March 2013


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

BIBFRAME Digest - 12 Mar 2013 to 13 Mar 2013 (#2013-49) (1 message)
Bibframe ontology requires OWL Full (is not OWL-DL compatible) (1 message)
lanyrd site for NISO roadmap meeting (1 message)
MARC Usage in WorldCat (16 messages)
MARC Usage: Additional report available (8 messages)
NISO hosting in-person meeting on Bibliographic Roadmap project, April 15-16 in Baltimore (1 message)
Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies (37 messages)
The Bibframe ontology uses multiple domains in a probably unintended way. (10 messages)
W3C Linked Data Platform 1.0 draft published (1 message)
Webcast of the January Bibliographic Framework Initiative Forum during ALA available (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

BIBFRAME Digest - 12 Mar 2013 to 13 Mar 2013 (#2013-49)

Re: BIBFRAME Digest - 12 Mar 2013 to 13 Mar 2013 (#2013-49)

Carol Bream

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 07:28:02 +0000

5143 lines

New Thread

Bibframe ontology requires OWL Full (is not OWL-DL compatible)

Bibframe ontology requires OWL Full (is not OWL-DL compatible)

Simon Spero

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:51:00 -0400

68 lines

New Thread

lanyrd site for NISO roadmap meeting

lanyrd site for NISO roadmap meeting

Karen Coyle

Fri, 22 Mar 2013 12:19:22 -0700

33 lines

New Thread

MARC Usage in WorldCat

Re: MARC Usage in WorldCat

Tennant,Roy

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 12:29:46 -0800

42 lines

Re: MARC Usage in WorldCat

Ford, Kevin

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 10:51:55 -0500

81 lines

Re: MARC Usage in WorldCat

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hal_Cain?=

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 01:53:43 -0500

60 lines

Re: MARC Usage in WorldCat

Tennant,Roy

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 15:11:24 -0800

33 lines

Re: MARC Usage in WorldCat

Frank Newton

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 22:59:25 +0000

76 lines

Re: MARC Usage in WorldCat

Tennant,Roy

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 14:15:15 -0800

26 lines

Re: MARC Usage in WorldCat

J. McRee Elrod

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 13:32:42 -0800

31 lines

Re: MARC Usage in WorldCat

Tennant,Roy

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 12:07:11 -0800

41 lines

Re: MARC Usage in WorldCat

Mitchell, Michael

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 07:37:43 -0600

32 lines

Re: MARC Usage in WorldCat

Tennant,Roy

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 15:21:38 -0800

39 lines

Re: MARC Usage in WorldCat

J. McRee Elrod

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 15:09:05 -0800

25 lines

Re: MARC Usage in WorldCat

Stephen Hearn

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 15:09:22 -0600

85 lines

Re: MARC Usage in WorldCat

Tennant,Roy

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 11:32:44 -0800

91 lines

Re: MARC Usage in WorldCat

Dana Pearson

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 13:00:31 -0600

101 lines

Re: MARC Usage in WorldCat

Dana Pearson

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 12:58:20 -0600

100 lines

MARC Usage in WorldCat

Tennant,Roy

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 10:09:27 -0800

80 lines

New Thread

MARC Usage: Additional report available

Re: MARC Usage: Additional report available

Tennant,Roy

Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:48:38 -0400

26 lines

Re: MARC Usage: Additional report available

Simon Spero

Sat, 9 Mar 2013 12:54:46 -0500

109 lines

Re: MARC Usage: Additional report available

Karen Coyle

Sat, 9 Mar 2013 08:56:58 -0800

79 lines

Re: MARC Usage: Additional report available

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hal_Cain?=

Sat, 9 Mar 2013 00:20:36 -0500

49 lines

Re: MARC Usage: Additional report available

Simon Spero

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 16:12:48 -0500

214 lines

Re: MARC Usage: Additional report available

Tennant,Roy

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 19:11:00 -0800

123 lines

Re: MARC Usage: Additional report available

Karen Coyle

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 18:47:14 -0800

89 lines

MARC Usage: Additional report available

Tennant,Roy

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 16:33:33 -0800

50 lines

New Thread

NISO hosting in-person meeting on Bibliographic Roadmap project, April 15-16 in Baltimore

Re: NISO hosting in-person meeting on Bibliographic Roadmap project, April 15-16 in Baltimore

Nettie Lagace

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:59:05 -0400

180 lines

New Thread

Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

McCallum, Sally

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:30:40 -0400

207 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Young,Jeff (OR)

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:36:26 -0400

198 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Karen Coyle

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 11:06:11 -0700

136 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Young,Jeff (OR)

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:29:20 -0400

115 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Karen Coyle

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 07:54:04 -0700

70 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Eric Miller

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:24:37 -0400

44 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Cindy Wolff

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:21:00 -0400

382 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Adrian Pohl

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:09:56 +0100

34 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Ford, Kevin

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:02:50 -0400

50 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Ed Summers

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 06:39:10 -0400

31 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Owen Stephens

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:43:26 +0000

70 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Shlomo Sanders

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 06:00:16 +0000

41 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Karen Coyle

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:55:14 -0700

275 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Young,Jeff (OR)

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 22:08:32 -0400

188 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Ross Singer

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:59:40 -0400

175 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Wallis,Richard

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:27:20 +0000

51 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Simon Spero

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:18:33 -0400

89 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Eric Miller

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:13:00 -0400

178 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Karen Coyle

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:13:30 -0700

175 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Karen Coyle

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:00:39 -0700

242 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

J. McRee Elrod

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:25:06 -0800

38 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Diane Hillmann

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:47:29 -0400

110 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Michael Hopwood

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:26:34 +0000

137 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Tom Emerson

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:26:28 -0400

29 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Akerman, Laura

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:11:17 +0000

667 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Karen Coyle

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:55:12 -0700

600 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Michael Hopwood

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:53:13 +0000

183 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Shlomo Sanders

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:32:39 +0000

479 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Ross Singer

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:55:30 -0400

300 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Shlomo Sanders

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:36:36 +0000

245 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Ross Singer

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:47:22 -0400

174 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Robert Sanderson

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:51:42 +0000

80 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Owen Stephens

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:39:05 +0000

142 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Meehan, Thomas

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:49:01 +0000

50 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

=?UTF-8?B?SsO2cmcgUHJhbnRl?=

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:23:42 +0100

46 lines

Re: Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Shlomo Sanders

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 07:26:59 +0000

174 lines

Reuse (or not) of existing ontologies

Owen Stephens

Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:04:04 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

The Bibframe ontology uses multiple domains in a probably unintended way.

Re: The Bibframe ontology uses multiple domains in a probably unintended way.

Simon Spero

Sat, 23 Mar 2013 18:41:08 -0400

263 lines

Re: The Bibframe ontology uses multiple domains in a probably unintended way.

Young,Jeff (OR)

Sat, 23 Mar 2013 15:49:59 -0400

241 lines

Re: The Bibframe ontology uses multiple domains in a probably unintended way.

Ford, Kevin

Sat, 23 Mar 2013 15:24:13 -0400

194 lines

Re: The Bibframe ontology uses multiple domains in a probably unintended way.

Young,Jeff (OR)

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:52:09 -0400

74 lines

Re: The Bibframe ontology uses multiple domains in a probably unintended way.

Simon Spero

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:39:25 -0400

77 lines

Re: The Bibframe ontology uses multiple domains in a probably unintended way.

Ford, Kevin

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:35:55 -0400

273 lines

Re: The Bibframe ontology uses multiple domains in a probably unintended way.

Panzer,Michael

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 02:48:31 -0000

66 lines

Re: The Bibframe ontology uses multiple domains in a probably unintended way.

Simon Spero

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:26:55 -0400

108 lines

Re: The Bibframe ontology uses multiple domains in a probably unintended way.

Panzer,Michael

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:20:05 -0000

26 lines

The Bibframe ontology uses multiple domains in a probably unintended way.

Simon Spero

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:47:53 -0400

113 lines

New Thread

W3C Linked Data Platform 1.0 draft published

W3C Linked Data Platform 1.0 draft published

Tom Emerson

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:01:48 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

Webcast of the January Bibliographic Framework Initiative Forum during ALA available

Webcast of the January Bibliographic Framework Initiative Forum during ALA available

McCallum, Sally

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 18:24:32 -0500

112 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager