LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PCCLIST Archives


PCCLIST Archives

PCCLIST Archives


September 2014


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Gray's anatomy" as access point (5 messages)
(Prague, Czechoslovakia) as a qualifier (3 messages)
ALCTS Ross Atkinson Lifetime Achievement Award Nominations Sought (1 message)
Articles, Books, Presentations on Resource Description and Access (RDA) (1 message)
Call for Nominations--Esther J. Piercy Awardr (1 message)
Chronological designation in series numbering (2 messages)
Class number for book on conjugal abuse (1 message)
Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only? (15 messages)
Establishing Certain Entities in the Name or Subject Authority File : RDA Cataloging (1 message)
MARC encoding of AAPs for a libretto (3 messages)
Modify existing AAP to resolve a conflict? (3 messages)
Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities? (6 messages)
Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities? - addendum (7 messages)
NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752 (17 messages)
New Cataloging Policy Statement for RDA 6.28.1.9.1: No more implied numbering for medium in authorized access points (3 messages)
OCLC-MARC Update 2014, Phase Two (1 message)
Policy Statement for RDA 1.11 (1 message)
Preferred access ponit for a translation (1 message)
RDA strategy consultation (1 message)
Relation ship designator: corporate body (11 messages)
relationship designator (1 message)
Repeating consecutive 100 $c's (4 messages)
SAVE THE DATE - NOTSL FALL MEETING, FRIDAY NOV. 21, 2014 (1 message)
Sin editor, distribuidor o fabricante / No publisher, distributor or manufacturer (6 messages)
Thank you (1 message)
When a new edition is treated as a new work (2 messages)
[ACAT] Draft Policy Statement for RDA 1.11 (1 message)
[RDA-L] NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752 (1 message)
[RDA-L] Re: RE: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only? (1 message)
[RDA-L] RE: Re: RE: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only? (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PCCLIST Home

PCCLIST Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Gray's anatomy" as access point

Re: "Gray's anatomy" as access point

Ted P Gemberling

Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:19:55 +0000

125 lines

Re: "Gray's anatomy" as access point

Bothmann, Robert L

Wed, 17 Sep 2014 17:53:45 +0000

289 lines

Re: "Gray's anatomy" as access point

Ted P Gemberling

Fri, 12 Sep 2014 16:50:29 +0000

237 lines

Re: "Gray's anatomy" as access point

Bothmann, Robert L

Fri, 12 Sep 2014 16:15:35 +0000

194 lines

FW: "Gray's anatomy" as access point

Ted P Gemberling

Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:35:02 +0000

152 lines

New Thread

(Prague, Czechoslovakia) as a qualifier

Re: (Prague, Czechoslovakia) as a qualifier

Robert Maxwell

Fri, 12 Sep 2014 21:43:51 +0000

212 lines

Re: (Prague, Czechoslovakia) as a qualifier

Robert J. Rendall

Fri, 12 Sep 2014 17:30:46 -0400

152 lines

(Prague, Czechoslovakia) as a qualifier

Adam L. Schiff

Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:04:42 -0700

57 lines

New Thread

ALCTS Ross Atkinson Lifetime Achievement Award Nominations Sought

ALCTS Ross Atkinson Lifetime Achievement Award Nominations Sought

Simpson, Betsy

Fri, 12 Sep 2014 18:01:20 +0000

223 lines

New Thread

Articles, Books, Presentations on Resource Description and Access (RDA)

Articles, Books, Presentations on Resource Description and Access (RDA)

Salman Haider

Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:46:00 +0530

47 lines

New Thread

Call for Nominations--Esther J. Piercy Awardr

Call for Nominations--Esther J. Piercy Awardr

Marta Conde

Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:32:41 +0000

193 lines

New Thread

Chronological designation in series numbering

Re: Chronological designation in series numbering

Mark K. Ehlert

Tue, 23 Sep 2014 18:02:52 -0500

65 lines

Chronological designation in series numbering

Adam L. Schiff

Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:30:50 -0700

73 lines

New Thread

Class number for book on conjugal abuse

FW: Class number for book on conjugal abuse

Michael Borries

Fri, 29 Aug 2014 17:06:47 +0000

216 lines

New Thread

Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?

Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?

Stephen Early

Thu, 25 Sep 2014 15:03:01 +0000

1019 lines

Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?

Carlton, Tim

Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:44:17 -0400

663 lines

Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?

Robert Maxwell

Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:09:21 +0000

270 lines

Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?

Robert Maxwell

Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:02:32 +0000

681 lines

Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?

John Gordon Marr

Wed, 24 Sep 2014 23:08:36 +0000

545 lines

Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?

Dickerson, Eugene H

Wed, 24 Sep 2014 21:44:47 +0000

696 lines

Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?

Adam L. Schiff

Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:28:04 -0700

162 lines

Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?

John Hostage

Wed, 24 Sep 2014 21:10:25 +0000

541 lines

Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?

Rebecca Culbertson

Wed, 24 Sep 2014 13:28:41 -0700

433 lines

Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?

Dickerson, Eugene H

Wed, 24 Sep 2014 19:39:58 +0000

436 lines

Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?

John Gordon Marr

Wed, 24 Sep 2014 19:32:08 +0000

598 lines

Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?

OLIVARES, DIANA

Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:51:57 -0600

337 lines

Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?

John Gordon Marr

Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:43:45 +0000

250 lines

Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?

Amy Turner

Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:36:58 +0000

573 lines

Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?

Stephen Early

Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:22:53 +0000

177 lines

New Thread

Establishing Certain Entities in the Name or Subject Authority File : RDA Cataloging

Establishing Certain Entities in the Name or Subject Authority File : RDA Cataloging

Salman Haider

Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:48:10 +0530

43 lines

New Thread

MARC encoding of AAPs for a libretto

Re: MARC encoding of AAPs for a libretto

Morris S Levy

Thu, 4 Sep 2014 18:35:39 +0000

442 lines

Re: MARC encoding of AAPs for a libretto

Weinberg, Valerie

Thu, 4 Sep 2014 13:31:27 -0400

386 lines

Re: MARC encoding of AAPs for a libretto

Morris S Levy

Wed, 3 Sep 2014 20:19:26 +0000

345 lines

New Thread

Modify existing AAP to resolve a conflict?

Re: Modify existing AAP to resolve a conflict?

Robboy, William

Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:22:48 -0400

71 lines

Re: Modify existing AAP to resolve a conflict?

Moore, Richard

Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:06:36 +0000

73 lines

Modify existing AAP to resolve a conflict?

Finnerty, Ryan

Fri, 26 Sep 2014 21:45:19 +0000

37 lines

New Thread

Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities?

Re: Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities?

Moore, Richard

Wed, 24 Sep 2014 06:19:47 +0000

157 lines

Re: Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities?

Policy and Standards Division

Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:15:38 -0400

147 lines

Re: Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities?

Moore, Richard

Tue, 23 Sep 2014 06:19:53 +0000

92 lines

Re: Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities?

Adam L. Schiff

Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:20:48 -0700

74 lines

Re: Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities?

Gary L Strawn

Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:47:00 +0000

209 lines

Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities?

Shorten, Jay

Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:24:13 +0000

153 lines

New Thread

Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities? - addendum

Re: Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities? - addendum

Moore, Richard

Mon, 29 Sep 2014 07:31:56 +0000

635 lines

Re: Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities? - addendum

Mark K. Ehlert

Sat, 27 Sep 2014 17:39:15 -0500

67 lines

Re: Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities? - addendum

Mark K. Ehlert

Sat, 27 Sep 2014 15:43:49 -0500

96 lines

Re: Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities? - addendum

Ian Fairclough

Sat, 27 Sep 2014 19:34:55 +0000

369 lines

Re: Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities? - addendum

Moore, Richard

Thu, 25 Sep 2014 13:32:16 +0000

50 lines

Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities? - addendum

Ian Fairclough

Thu, 25 Sep 2014 13:08:47 +0000

263 lines

Re: Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities? - addendum

Moore, Richard

Wed, 24 Sep 2014 06:28:32 +0000

164 lines

New Thread

NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752

Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752

Christopher Thomas

Thu, 11 Sep 2014 23:20:29 +0000

450 lines

Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752

Kevin M Randall

Thu, 11 Sep 2014 22:15:34 +0000

311 lines

Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752

Wilson, Pete

Thu, 11 Sep 2014 22:12:37 +0000

837 lines

Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752

Stephen Hearn

Thu, 11 Sep 2014 17:07:07 -0500

811 lines

Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752

Michael Chopey

Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:59:10 -1000

679 lines

Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752

Christopher Thomas

Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:56:31 +0000

446 lines

Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752

Dickerson, Eugene H

Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:24:52 +0000

598 lines

Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752

Adam L. Schiff

Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:31:44 -0700

161 lines

Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752

Dickerson, Eugene H

Thu, 11 Sep 2014 17:44:32 +0000

447 lines

Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752

Stanley Elswick - NOAA Federal

Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:18:25 -0400

310 lines

Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752

Scharff, Mark

Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:15:17 +0000

257 lines

Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752

Stephen Early

Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:00:11 +0000

191 lines

Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752

Kevin M Randall

Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:36:44 +0000

128 lines

Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752

Stephen Hearn

Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:36:25 -0500

368 lines

Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752

Michael Borries

Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:12:12 +0000

239 lines

Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752

Herrold, Charles

Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:48:31 +0000

163 lines

NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752

Michael Borries

Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:44:51 +0000

97 lines

New Thread

New Cataloging Policy Statement for RDA 6.28.1.9.1: No more implied numbering for medium in authorized access points

Re: FW: New Cataloging Policy Statement for RDA 6.28.1.9.1: No more implied numbering for medium in authorized access points

JSC Secretary

Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:46:29 -0400

371 lines

Re: FW: New Cataloging Policy Statement for RDA 6.28.1.9.1: No more implied numbering for medium in authorized access points

Keith R. Trimmer

Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:25:23 -0700

140 lines

FW: New Cataloging Policy Statement for RDA 6.28.1.9.1: No more implied numbering for medium in authorized access points

Frank, Paul

Mon, 15 Sep 2014 09:47:37 -0400

272 lines

New Thread

OCLC-MARC Update 2014, Phase Two

OCLC-MARC Update 2014, Phase Two

Weitz,Jay

Wed, 3 Sep 2014 14:44:00 +0000

262 lines

New Thread

Policy Statement for RDA 1.11

Policy Statement for RDA 1.11

Beth Picknally Camden

Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:55:41 -0400

523 lines

New Thread

Preferred access ponit for a translation

Preferred access ponit for a translation

LISIUS, PETER

Fri, 5 Sep 2014 20:48:11 +0000

114 lines

New Thread

RDA strategy consultation

RDA strategy consultation

JSC Secretary

Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:50:01 -0400

150 lines

New Thread

Relation ship designator: corporate body

Re: Relation ship designator: corporate body

Deborah J. Leslie

Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:45:39 +0000

582 lines

Re: Relation ship designator: corporate body

John Hostage

Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:05:12 +0000

425 lines

Re: Relation ship designator: corporate body

Wilson, Pete

Fri, 26 Sep 2014 19:04:33 +0000

272 lines

Re: Relation ship designator: corporate body

Deborah J. Leslie

Fri, 26 Sep 2014 18:36:00 +0000

235 lines

Re: Relation ship designator: corporate body

John Hostage

Thu, 25 Sep 2014 21:09:23 +0000

47 lines

Re: Relation ship designator: corporate body

Wilson, Pete

Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:25:29 +0000

180 lines

Re: Relation ship designator: corporate body

Mark K. Ehlert

Thu, 25 Sep 2014 13:13:28 -0500

102 lines

Re: Relation ship designator: corporate body

Wilson, Pete

Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:00:29 +0000

102 lines

Re: Relation ship designator: corporate body

Robert Maxwell

Thu, 25 Sep 2014 15:47:33 +0000

63 lines

Re: Relation ship designator: corporate body

Benjamin A Abrahamse

Thu, 25 Sep 2014 13:38:59 +0000

62 lines

Relation ship designator: corporate body

Annette Ingram

Thu, 25 Sep 2014 10:19:44 +0200

33 lines

New Thread

relationship designator

Re: relationship designator

Annette Ingram

Fri, 26 Sep 2014 14:46:49 +0200

21 lines

New Thread

Repeating consecutive 100 $c's

Re: Repeating consecutive 100 $c's

Moore, Richard

Tue, 9 Sep 2014 06:15:43 +0000

241 lines

Re: Repeating consecutive 100 $c's

Mark K. Ehlert

Mon, 8 Sep 2014 13:00:34 -0500

362 lines

Re: Repeating consecutive 100 $c's

Amy Turner

Mon, 8 Sep 2014 17:55:58 +0000

230 lines

Repeating consecutive 100 $c's

Mark K. Ehlert

Mon, 8 Sep 2014 12:49:23 -0500

61 lines

New Thread

SAVE THE DATE - NOTSL FALL MEETING, FRIDAY NOV. 21, 2014

SAVE THE DATE - NOTSL FALL MEETING, FRIDAY NOV. 21, 2014

Kathleen Lamantia

Fri, 26 Sep 2014 17:23:16 +0000

251 lines

New Thread

Sin editor, distribuidor o fabricante / No publisher, distributor or manufacturer

Re: Sin editor, distribuidor o fabricante / No publisher, distributor or manufacturer

Still Thinking

Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:15:54 -0400

82 lines

Re: Sin editor, distribuidor o fabricante / No publisher, distributor or manufacturer

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Sandra_Janette_Victoria_Guti=E9rrez?=

Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:21:19 +0000

13645 lines

Re: Sin editor, distribuidor o fabricante / No publisher, distributor or manufacturer

Still Thinking

Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:22:07 -0400

149 lines

Re: Sin editor, distribuidor o fabricante / No publisher, distributor or manufacturer

Ted P Gemberling

Thu, 18 Sep 2014 16:07:11 +0000

154 lines

Re: Sin editor, distribuidor o fabricante / No publisher, distributor or manufacturer

Stewart, Richard

Thu, 18 Sep 2014 11:00:58 -0500

155 lines

Sin editor, distribuidor o fabricante / No publisher, distributor or manufacturer

=?utf-8?B?U2FuZHJhIEphbmV0dGUgVmljdG9yaWEgR3V0acOpcnJleg==?=

Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:15:15 +0000

126 lines

New Thread

Thank you

Thank you

Michael Borries

Thu, 4 Sep 2014 19:25:06 +0000

128 lines

New Thread

When a new edition is treated as a new work

Re: When a new edition is treated as a new work

Kevin M Randall

Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:26:25 +0000

605 lines

FW: When a new edition is treated as a new work

Michael Borries

Tue, 2 Sep 2014 15:16:53 +0000

441 lines

New Thread

[ACAT] Draft Policy Statement for RDA 1.11

FW: [ACAT] Draft Policy Statement for RDA 1.11

Stephen Early

Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:31:23 +0000

54 lines

New Thread

[RDA-L] NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752

Re: [RDA-L] NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752

Mark K. Ehlert

Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:29:13 -0500

90 lines

New Thread

[RDA-L] Re: RE: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?

Re: [RDA-L] Re: RE: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?

Robert Maxwell

Thu, 25 Sep 2014 16:05:12 +0000

1181 lines

New Thread

[RDA-L] RE: Re: RE: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?

Re: [RDA-L] RE: Re: RE: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?

Benjamin A Abrahamse

Thu, 25 Sep 2014 17:06:20 +0000

1367 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager