|
|
|
Size
|
FW: "Gray's anatomy" as access point
|
Ted P Gemberling |
Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:35:02 +0000 |
152 lines |
Re: "Gray's anatomy" as access point
|
Bothmann, Robert L |
Fri, 12 Sep 2014 16:15:35 +0000 |
194 lines |
Re: "Gray's anatomy" as access point
|
Ted P Gemberling |
Fri, 12 Sep 2014 16:50:29 +0000 |
237 lines |
Re: "Gray's anatomy" as access point
|
Bothmann, Robert L |
Wed, 17 Sep 2014 17:53:45 +0000 |
289 lines |
Re: "Gray's anatomy" as access point
|
Ted P Gemberling |
Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:19:55 +0000 |
125 lines |
(Prague, Czechoslovakia) as a qualifier
|
Adam L. Schiff |
Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:04:42 -0700 |
57 lines |
Re: (Prague, Czechoslovakia) as a qualifier
|
Robert J. Rendall |
Fri, 12 Sep 2014 17:30:46 -0400 |
152 lines |
Re: (Prague, Czechoslovakia) as a qualifier
|
Robert Maxwell |
Fri, 12 Sep 2014 21:43:51 +0000 |
212 lines |
ALCTS Ross Atkinson Lifetime Achievement Award Nominations Sought
|
Simpson, Betsy |
Fri, 12 Sep 2014 18:01:20 +0000 |
223 lines |
Articles, Books, Presentations on Resource Description and Access (RDA)
|
Salman Haider |
Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:46:00 +0530 |
47 lines |
Call for Nominations--Esther J. Piercy Awardr
|
Marta Conde |
Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:32:41 +0000 |
193 lines |
Chronological designation in series numbering
|
Adam L. Schiff |
Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:30:50 -0700 |
73 lines |
Re: Chronological designation in series numbering
|
Mark K. Ehlert |
Tue, 23 Sep 2014 18:02:52 -0500 |
65 lines |
FW: Class number for book on conjugal abuse
|
Michael Borries |
Fri, 29 Aug 2014 17:06:47 +0000 |
216 lines |
Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?
|
Stephen Early |
Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:22:53 +0000 |
177 lines |
Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?
|
Amy Turner |
Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:36:58 +0000 |
573 lines |
Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?
|
John Gordon Marr |
Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:43:45 +0000 |
250 lines |
Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?
|
OLIVARES, DIANA |
Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:51:57 -0600 |
337 lines |
Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?
|
John Gordon Marr |
Wed, 24 Sep 2014 19:32:08 +0000 |
598 lines |
Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?
|
Dickerson, Eugene H |
Wed, 24 Sep 2014 19:39:58 +0000 |
436 lines |
Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?
|
Rebecca Culbertson |
Wed, 24 Sep 2014 13:28:41 -0700 |
433 lines |
Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?
|
John Hostage |
Wed, 24 Sep 2014 21:10:25 +0000 |
541 lines |
Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?
|
Adam L. Schiff |
Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:28:04 -0700 |
162 lines |
Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?
|
Dickerson, Eugene H |
Wed, 24 Sep 2014 21:44:47 +0000 |
696 lines |
Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?
|
John Gordon Marr |
Wed, 24 Sep 2014 23:08:36 +0000 |
545 lines |
Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?
|
Robert Maxwell |
Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:02:32 +0000 |
681 lines |
Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?
|
Robert Maxwell |
Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:09:21 +0000 |
270 lines |
Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?
|
Carlton, Tim |
Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:44:17 -0400 |
663 lines |
Re: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?
|
Stephen Early |
Thu, 25 Sep 2014 15:03:01 +0000 |
1019 lines |
Establishing Certain Entities in the Name or Subject Authority File : RDA Cataloging
|
Salman Haider |
Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:48:10 +0530 |
43 lines |
Re: MARC encoding of AAPs for a libretto
|
Morris S Levy |
Wed, 3 Sep 2014 20:19:26 +0000 |
345 lines |
Re: MARC encoding of AAPs for a libretto
|
Weinberg, Valerie |
Thu, 4 Sep 2014 13:31:27 -0400 |
386 lines |
Re: MARC encoding of AAPs for a libretto
|
Morris S Levy |
Thu, 4 Sep 2014 18:35:39 +0000 |
442 lines |
Modify existing AAP to resolve a conflict?
|
Finnerty, Ryan |
Fri, 26 Sep 2014 21:45:19 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: Modify existing AAP to resolve a conflict?
|
Moore, Richard |
Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:06:36 +0000 |
73 lines |
Re: Modify existing AAP to resolve a conflict?
|
Robboy, William |
Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:22:48 -0400 |
71 lines |
Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities?
|
Shorten, Jay |
Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:24:13 +0000 |
153 lines |
Re: Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities?
|
Gary L Strawn |
Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:47:00 +0000 |
209 lines |
Re: Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities?
|
Adam L. Schiff |
Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:20:48 -0700 |
74 lines |
Re: Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities?
|
Moore, Richard |
Tue, 23 Sep 2014 06:19:53 +0000 |
92 lines |
Re: Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities?
|
Policy and Standards Division |
Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:15:38 -0400 |
147 lines |
Re: Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities?
|
Moore, Richard |
Wed, 24 Sep 2014 06:19:47 +0000 |
157 lines |
Re: Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities? - addendum
|
Moore, Richard |
Wed, 24 Sep 2014 06:28:32 +0000 |
164 lines |
Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities? - addendum
|
Ian Fairclough |
Thu, 25 Sep 2014 13:08:47 +0000 |
263 lines |
Re: Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities? - addendum
|
Moore, Richard |
Thu, 25 Sep 2014 13:32:16 +0000 |
50 lines |
Re: Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities? - addendum
|
Ian Fairclough |
Sat, 27 Sep 2014 19:34:55 +0000 |
369 lines |
Re: Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities? - addendum
|
Mark K. Ehlert |
Sat, 27 Sep 2014 15:43:49 -0500 |
96 lines |
Re: Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities? - addendum
|
Mark K. Ehlert |
Sat, 27 Sep 2014 17:39:15 -0500 |
67 lines |
Re: Must X00 $c be in parentheses in RDA authorities? - addendum
|
Moore, Richard |
Mon, 29 Sep 2014 07:31:56 +0000 |
635 lines |
NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752
|
Michael Borries |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:44:51 +0000 |
97 lines |
Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752
|
Herrold, Charles |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:48:31 +0000 |
163 lines |
Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752
|
Michael Borries |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:12:12 +0000 |
239 lines |
Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752
|
Stephen Hearn |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:36:25 -0500 |
368 lines |
Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752
|
Kevin M Randall |
Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:36:44 +0000 |
128 lines |
Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752
|
Stephen Early |
Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:00:11 +0000 |
191 lines |
Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752
|
Scharff, Mark |
Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:15:17 +0000 |
257 lines |
Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752
|
Stanley Elswick - NOAA Federal |
Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:18:25 -0400 |
310 lines |
Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752
|
Dickerson, Eugene H |
Thu, 11 Sep 2014 17:44:32 +0000 |
447 lines |
Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752
|
Adam L. Schiff |
Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:31:44 -0700 |
161 lines |
Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752
|
Dickerson, Eugene H |
Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:24:52 +0000 |
598 lines |
Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752
|
Christopher Thomas |
Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:56:31 +0000 |
446 lines |
Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752
|
Michael Chopey |
Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:59:10 -1000 |
679 lines |
Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752
|
Stephen Hearn |
Thu, 11 Sep 2014 17:07:07 -0500 |
811 lines |
Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752
|
Wilson, Pete |
Thu, 11 Sep 2014 22:12:37 +0000 |
837 lines |
Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752
|
Kevin M Randall |
Thu, 11 Sep 2014 22:15:34 +0000 |
311 lines |
Re: NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752
|
Christopher Thomas |
Thu, 11 Sep 2014 23:20:29 +0000 |
450 lines |
FW: New Cataloging Policy Statement for RDA 6.28.1.9.1: No more implied numbering for medium in authorized access points
|
Frank, Paul |
Mon, 15 Sep 2014 09:47:37 -0400 |
272 lines |
Re: FW: New Cataloging Policy Statement for RDA 6.28.1.9.1: No more implied numbering for medium in authorized access points
|
Keith R. Trimmer |
Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:25:23 -0700 |
140 lines |
Re: FW: New Cataloging Policy Statement for RDA 6.28.1.9.1: No more implied numbering for medium in authorized access points
|
JSC Secretary |
Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:46:29 -0400 |
371 lines |
OCLC-MARC Update 2014, Phase Two
|
Weitz,Jay |
Wed, 3 Sep 2014 14:44:00 +0000 |
262 lines |
Policy Statement for RDA 1.11
|
Beth Picknally Camden |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:55:41 -0400 |
523 lines |
Preferred access ponit for a translation
|
LISIUS, PETER |
Fri, 5 Sep 2014 20:48:11 +0000 |
114 lines |
RDA strategy consultation
|
JSC Secretary |
Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:50:01 -0400 |
150 lines |
Relation ship designator: corporate body
|
Annette Ingram |
Thu, 25 Sep 2014 10:19:44 +0200 |
33 lines |
Re: Relation ship designator: corporate body
|
Benjamin A Abrahamse |
Thu, 25 Sep 2014 13:38:59 +0000 |
62 lines |
Re: Relation ship designator: corporate body
|
Robert Maxwell |
Thu, 25 Sep 2014 15:47:33 +0000 |
63 lines |
Re: Relation ship designator: corporate body
|
Wilson, Pete |
Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:00:29 +0000 |
102 lines |
Re: Relation ship designator: corporate body
|
Mark K. Ehlert |
Thu, 25 Sep 2014 13:13:28 -0500 |
102 lines |
Re: Relation ship designator: corporate body
|
Wilson, Pete |
Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:25:29 +0000 |
180 lines |
Re: Relation ship designator: corporate body
|
John Hostage |
Thu, 25 Sep 2014 21:09:23 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: Relation ship designator: corporate body
|
Deborah J. Leslie |
Fri, 26 Sep 2014 18:36:00 +0000 |
235 lines |
Re: Relation ship designator: corporate body
|
Wilson, Pete |
Fri, 26 Sep 2014 19:04:33 +0000 |
272 lines |
Re: Relation ship designator: corporate body
|
John Hostage |
Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:05:12 +0000 |
425 lines |
Re: Relation ship designator: corporate body
|
Deborah J. Leslie |
Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:45:39 +0000 |
582 lines |
Re: relationship designator
|
Annette Ingram |
Fri, 26 Sep 2014 14:46:49 +0200 |
21 lines |
Repeating consecutive 100 $c's
|
Mark K. Ehlert |
Mon, 8 Sep 2014 12:49:23 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: Repeating consecutive 100 $c's
|
Amy Turner |
Mon, 8 Sep 2014 17:55:58 +0000 |
230 lines |
Re: Repeating consecutive 100 $c's
|
Mark K. Ehlert |
Mon, 8 Sep 2014 13:00:34 -0500 |
362 lines |
Re: Repeating consecutive 100 $c's
|
Moore, Richard |
Tue, 9 Sep 2014 06:15:43 +0000 |
241 lines |
SAVE THE DATE - NOTSL FALL MEETING, FRIDAY NOV. 21, 2014
|
Kathleen Lamantia |
Fri, 26 Sep 2014 17:23:16 +0000 |
251 lines |
Sin editor, distribuidor o fabricante / No publisher, distributor or manufacturer
|
=?utf-8?B?U2FuZHJhIEphbmV0dGUgVmljdG9yaWEgR3V0acOpcnJleg==?= |
Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:15:15 +0000 |
126 lines |
Re: Sin editor, distribuidor o fabricante / No publisher, distributor or manufacturer
|
Stewart, Richard |
Thu, 18 Sep 2014 11:00:58 -0500 |
155 lines |
Re: Sin editor, distribuidor o fabricante / No publisher, distributor or manufacturer
|
Ted P Gemberling |
Thu, 18 Sep 2014 16:07:11 +0000 |
154 lines |
Re: Sin editor, distribuidor o fabricante / No publisher, distributor or manufacturer
|
Still Thinking |
Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:22:07 -0400 |
149 lines |
Re: Sin editor, distribuidor o fabricante / No publisher, distributor or manufacturer
|
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Sandra_Janette_Victoria_Guti=E9rrez?= |
Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:21:19 +0000 |
13645 lines |
Re: Sin editor, distribuidor o fabricante / No publisher, distributor or manufacturer
|
Still Thinking |
Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:15:54 -0400 |
82 lines |
Thank you
|
Michael Borries |
Thu, 4 Sep 2014 19:25:06 +0000 |
128 lines |
FW: When a new edition is treated as a new work
|
Michael Borries |
Tue, 2 Sep 2014 15:16:53 +0000 |
441 lines |
Re: When a new edition is treated as a new work
|
Kevin M Randall |
Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:26:25 +0000 |
605 lines |
FW: [ACAT] Draft Policy Statement for RDA 1.11
|
Stephen Early |
Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:31:23 +0000 |
54 lines |
Re: [RDA-L] NARs no2011170134 and no2013027752
|
Mark K. Ehlert |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:29:13 -0500 |
90 lines |
Re: [RDA-L] Re: RE: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?
|
Robert Maxwell |
Thu, 25 Sep 2014 16:05:12 +0000 |
1181 lines |
Re: [RDA-L] RE: Re: RE: Copyright, RDA, MARC 264: both second indicator 1 and 4 or 1 only?
|
Benjamin A Abrahamse |
Thu, 25 Sep 2014 17:06:20 +0000 |
1367 lines |