"This is part of the new GIG economy"
But if it's just the gig economy part, why are many other library field
positions not showing this trend as acutely? Is it a management decision?
It that librarian positions tend to have stronger organized labor
"Many of these grants, depended upon by libraries and museums, may go away
if Trump and the Republicans have their way with the budget request."
Libraries only seem to depend on many of these grants in certain areas,
such as technology and archival work. If they go away does that mean
libraries will be forced to broaden their positions for line items beyond
certain areas? Or will these jobs just not get done? or combination of
both? If this does come to pass people deciding budgets will have to make
these decisions and what does that mean for this work? Not enviable
positions to be in for sure.
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Paul Jackson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> This is part of the new GIG economy. That's where everyone is a
> contractor, and entities doing the hiring do not pay benefits. It's a
> consultancy world. Not too different than Adjunct professorships.
> Lots of grants are pretty much static, i.e., short term and limited $$
> at best. Once the money is spent, there may not be money to continue.
> One such project is at Columbus College, where they have a retired
> archivist volunteer doing much of the cataloging. I've had three of these
> (paid) projects since retirement; payment pretty much covers expenses.
> Many of these grants, depended upon by libraries and museums, may go
> away if Trump and the Republicans have their way with the budget request.
> Paul T. Jackson
> Trescott Research
> Steilacoom, WA 98388
> On 3/23/2017 10:39 AM, Nathan Coy wrote:
>> As an avid watcher of the job market in the A/V preservation world and the
>> library field at large I am curious on thoughts about why A/V centric jobs
>> seem to be primarily term positions while many other fields of library
>> aren't. If there truly is no shortage of work to be done in the same way
>> there is no shortage of work to be done in cataloging, why then are
>> significantly more (and more professional level) jobs that are permanent
>> the cataloging field as opposed to A/V preservation work? Is this
>> attributed to lack of advocacy on part of professional organizations?
>> Managers involved in financial decision making? Organizations able to get
>> grant money for A/V and thus creating a cycle of term funding and hoping
>> from project to project and institution to institution? I am genuinely
>> curious about perspectives from individuals working in several different
>> capacities. It seems this is a problem in the archival field (as I
>> understand it an issue raised at the SAA convention somewhat recently
>> generational advocacy) in general, but is even more acutely present in A/V
>> specific work as can be attested to through a survey of job
>> If this is the case, is promoting the field as a profession while not
>> supporting it organizationally problematic?
>> Nathan Coy
>> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.