LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  March 2003

ARSCLIST March 2003

Subject:

WP: R.I.P., CRI: Labels Peel and Fade, but the Music Plays On

From:

Premise Checker <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 2 Mar 2003 10:56:46 -0600

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (137 lines)

R.I.P., CRI: Labels Peel and Fade, but the Music Plays On
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A17168-2003Feb28

   By Philip Kennicott
   Washington Post Staff Writer
   Sunday, March 2, 2003; Page G11

   When Composers Recordings Inc. decided to shut down in January, there
   were obituaries, lamentations and the usual muttering about the
   malaise of the recording industry. There was also a palpable sense of
   battle fatigue from those who have watched helplessly as the classical
   music recording industry tanked over the past decade: Major labels cut
   classical and new music releases, artists were summarily dumped from
   their recording contracts, and American orchestras (which had once
   enjoyed lucrative and prestigious recording gigs) were priced out of
   the market and mostly into oblivion by increasingly
   bottom-line-oriented corporations.

   And yet, with the loss of CRI, which after almost 50 years had become
   a beloved and venerable fixture of the new music world, there was also
   a just barely audible sense of something new in the air. When things
   can't get any worse, then perhaps they may begin to get a little bit
   better. The story of CRI's closure supports all these readings, gloom
   and optimism alike.

   "I've written a number of obituaries in these pages, but none so sad
   as this," wrote Kyle Gann of the Village Voice. Gann's obituary was,
   in part, a personal reminiscence of the music he discovered on CRI. In
   the music business, anything -- a record label, a singer, a string
   quartet -- that lasts 50 years is cherished as an inviolable part of
   one's personal musical landscape. Hence the mix of both rancor and
   sadness when that landscape inevitably changes. CRI, for many
   listeners, was not just an entree into new music but appealed to an
   anarchic way of listening: adventurously, without expectations, and
   individually, as an explorer of sound unfettered by what authorities
   (critics, professors, pompous friends) dictate.

   Susan Sontag once called for replacing the old habits of interpreting,
   classifying and systematizing art with something she called "an
   erotics of art," a love of the real and tangible surface. CRI made
   possible an erotics of American music, because it was wildly eclectic
   and it subscribed to a policy of keeping its large catalogue in print.
   Young listeners, tired of whatever music they were weaned on, could
   find music on CRI that was, by virtue of being the forgotten
   avant-garde of 20 years before, far more foreign and fascinating than
   the newest of the new.

   The label went through various cycles of history during its five
   decades of recording -- it put out a lot of academic music in the
   1970s, and then took a turn toward the more raucously spirited
   "downtown" sound in the 1990s -- and it kept it all there, jangling
   together with stylistic discord in the same archive.

   "Major labels delete titles," says Joe Dalton, the head of CRI during
   the 1990s. "There's a certain half-life for a new release, and then
   it's gone. The composers who founded CRI in 1954 had already had that
   problem, so they instituted the In Print policy."

   This meant CRI not only made available the music of American composers
   but also strived to keep it permanently available. Composers who
   recorded with CRI were not likely to enjoy the marketing and
   distribution advantages that came with a large label, but they could
   rest assured that they wouldn't see their recordings disappear into
   the corporate vaults once the large label had moved on to the latest
   flavor of the month. And unlike the myriad small labels founded over
   the years to promote new music, CRI was a reliable brand name.

   "When composers talked to me, I'd say one reason to go with CRI is
   that we're still here, while the entrepreneur down the road is going
   to own your master tapes when he decides to get out of the business in
   five years," says Dalton. The death of a brand name is about more than
   nostalgia; good brands take with them a legacy of trust and affection.

   In 1976 CRI reorganized as a nonprofit record label. It raised funds
   to cover costs and expected composers to bring money to the table as
   well. It was never a vanity label, and its board was filled with
   composers, which helped give credibility to the release schedule. As
   the market changed, however, being a small nonprofit record label
   began to be a double liability. Because it was small, it was
   hard-squeezed by changes in the retail business, especially Tower
   Records' policy of paying labels only on a yearly basis for product
   sold. And larger commercial labels started asking composers to front
   money to fund projects as well -- reducing the pool of funds available
   for making difficult-to-sell projects for all involved.

   "For-profit companies are now playing the nonprofit game," says Paul
   Marotta, managing director of New World Records, another small
   nonprofit American label (specializing in the entire history of
   American music back to the colonial era).

   Unfortunately, CRI's policy of maintaining its recordings in print was
   not just the intellectual substance of the company but also a drag on
   its resources.

   "I had approximately 15,000 CDs in a warehouse in Texas," says John
   Schultz, the most recent and now former executive director of CRI. "We
   would do a run of 2,000 CDs. Some would sell 200 copies and some would
   sell 400. Over 20 years, those unsold CDs accumulate, and the costs to
   house them. That was over $1,000 a month."

   Schultz and his board of directors have attempted to close the company
   gracefully. CRI will liquidate its stock, with composers having first
   crack at their own CDs. It is also attempting to get legal permission
   to transfer its invaluable master tapes to Marotta's New World label,
   which has promised to keep them available in some fashion. Marotta
   says his company is looking at the possibility of purchasing equipment
   to produce individual disks on demand. It may also create an archive
   that can be digitally downloaded. One idea is a database service that
   would be made available to libraries for a fee.

   At a Library of Congress news conference in January, talk of
   preserving the library's vast archive of recorded music included
   discussion of a new frontier in which sound is preserved not on any
   particular physical medium -- LP or compact disc -- but as computer
   files that act as a master source as new media and new ways of
   accessing music come and go. CRI died at a moment when the music
   business is trying to sort out its future, and at a time when
   consumers are facing a future in which the idea of physically owning a
   musical recording may be outdated.

   "I believe that CRI may have outlived its usefulness," says Schultz.
   "Technology catches up, composers are either selling their own CDs on
   their Web sites or going to major labels. There is no shortage of
   market out there."

   The test of this benign assessment of CRI's death will be the future
   of its music in the ethereal digitized new age. New World can keep it
   available somewhere on a computer, but without a presence in retail
   stores, consumers may not know what's available. The future of CRI's
   treasure house of American sound requires not just new technology and
   new forms of access but also a newly aggressive curiosity about music
   on the part of listeners. Purchasing a physical recording used to be a
   way of committing oneself to the act of listening; in the future,
   consumers may theoretically have more access to this music than they
   did in the waning days of the retail economy, but only if they develop
   a new "erotics" of listening.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager