It was downright irresponsible for that letter to be published in the Newsletter, at least by itself. The Editor of the Newsletter should have, at the very least, sent that letter to a few other ARSC members, and the ENTIRE ARSC Board, for peer review, inviting them to offer their own views for publication in the same issue. Publishing that letter by itself could give readers the impression that Kurt's view is a prevailing one at ARSC, which is certainly not the case (I believe he speaks for a miniscule minority in our organization, at least I hope so). I would encourage other members, including members of the Board, to submit letters for publication in the next Newsletter, in the interests of offering a more balanced perspective on this subject, and upholding ARSC's reputation as an inclusive and welcoming professional organization.
Audio Engineer Emeritus
The Crane School of Music
SUNY at Potsdam, NY 13676
"Great art presupposes the alert mind of the educated listener."
"A true artist doesn't want to be admired, he wants to be believed."
"If you design an audio system based on the premise that nothing is audible,
on that system nothing will be audible."
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Corey Bailey
Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2020 8:25 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [ARSCLIST] Comments on the open letter
This message did not originate from SUNY Potsdam or one of its trusted senders. Do not open attachments, click on links, or provide your credentials if the source is suspicious.
In the last newsletter, there was an open letter to the ARSC membership titled "Letters to the Editor" by Kurt Nauck.
Anyone care to comment on that letter?
Corey Bailey Audio Engineering