John Haley wrote:
"78 transfers as issued on old LPs rarely ever sound as good as the
original 78's themselves."
Perhaps, but here's a (trick) question: When (ever) did transfers onto
other media sound as good as the original 78s themselves?
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 2:11 PM, 6295LARGE . <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Yes, please run me thru the process!
> Thanks!
> ben
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Mickey Clark <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Ben-Another option is using the Shure but dub at 33 1/3 I can run you
> > though the process-Mickey
> >
> > -----Original Message----- From: 6295LARGE .
> > Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 7:24 AM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: [ARSCLIST] What am I doing wrong?
> >
> > Hello everybody.
> >
> > HELP!!
> > I have two 78's of Benny Goodman's "Bach Goes to Town" Circa 1938.
> > One is a US pressing and one is a UK pressing.
> > Both are in good condition and they both sound terrible.
> > I've listened to the reissue on a Camden LP.
> > WHAT A DIFFERENCE!!
> > I've tried many difference styli from Expert Stylus and I tried my GE
> VRII
> > with a 2.5mil.
> > The styli are nearly new.
> > No luck. How did Camden do it?!!
> > Can anyone suggest a stylus for my Shure M44-7 or M44-G, or Stanton 500?
> > I've got Shure 4.0 ET & CT, 3.5 ET & CT, 2.8 ET & CT, 3.5 FCR, and 2.7 C.
> > I also have a Stanton 3.3 ET.
> > They all sound muddy.
> >
> > Any suggestions?
> > Please email to my work: [log in to unmask]
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ben Roth
> >
>
|