What do you use to bring it back to the right speed in your computer? I've
never had much success with plugins. I always hear artifacts except on
material that need less than one semitone correction.
Louis Hone
2012/10/10 DAVID BURNHAM <[log in to unmask]>
> One thing you have to be careful of when transferring at the wrong speed
> is the playback characteristic. Since this is a frequency curve, playing
> the record at the slower speed will displace the frequencies on the curve.
> One way to get around this, if your amp and workstation can do it, is to
> record the disc flat, (no playback characteristic), and then generate the
> appropriate curve in the computer after the record has been brought back up
> to speed.
>
> db
>
>
>
> >________________________________
> > From: James Roth <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:18:06 AM
> >Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] What's the best way to remove surface noise on
> Columbia Shellac (1930)?
> >
> >Hello there, Mr. Clark,
> >
> >Thanks for your suggestion, but I transfer the records using a stereo
> cartridge so that I can delete the noisier channel.
> >That' sometimes gets rid of more than half the surface noise.
> >I don't think your idea would work in this case.
> >
> >I'm going to try the other suggestion - to transfer at 33 1/3 rpm, then
> increase the speed to the proper pitch.
> >That might help to decrease or eliminate the "wooh-wooh" noise.
> >
> >I'll still have to experiment to find the best stylus for the job
> (truncated, elliptical, conical, etc.).
> >
> >Regards,
> >Ben Roth
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List [mailto:
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mickey Clark
> >Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 4:00 PM
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] What's the best way to remove surface noise on
> Columbia Shellac (1930)?
> >
> >Just convert the .wav file to mono. The vertical will be
> eliminated-Mickey Follow me on Twitter https://twitter.com/MickeyRClarkM.C.Productions Vintage Recordings
> > 710 Westminster Ave. West
> > Penticton BC
> > V2A 1K8
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Ted Kendall" <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 11:30 AM
> >Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] What's the best way to remove surface noise on
> Columbia Shellac (1930)?
> >
> >
> >> On 09/10/2012 18:36, James Roth wrote:
> >>> PLEASE TELL ME
> >>> How does one cancel the vertical portion of the signal?
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Ben Roth
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> >>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steven Smolian
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 1:22 PM
> >>> To: [log in to unmask]
> >>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] What's the best way to remove surface noise
> >>> on Columbia Shellac (1930)?
> >>>
> >>> Are people not cancelling the vertical portion of the signal?
> >>>
> >>> Steve Smolian
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> >>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mickey Clark
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 1:11 PM
> >>> To: [log in to unmask]
> >>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] What's the best way to remove surface noise
> >>> on Columbia Shellac (1930)?
> >>>
> >>> Try a slow transfer at 33 1/3 - at the slower speed, your cartridge
> >>> will follow the irregularities - it should be all low frequency noise.
> >>> -cheers-Mickey Follow me on Twitter https://twitter.com/MickeyRClark
> >>> M.C.Productions Vintage Recordings
> >>> 710 Westminster Ave. West
> >>> Penticton BC
> >>> V2A 1K8
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "James Roth" <[log in to unmask]>
> >>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 9:07 AM
> >>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] What's the best way to remove surface noise
> >>> on Columbia Shellac (1930)?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Hello alls also.
> >>>>
> >>>> I had the same question about 1/2 year ago.
> >>>> I have hundreds of those woow-woow surface noise Columbias.
> >>>> I've tried 10 different styli - truncated/full conical, eliptical,
> etc.
> >>>> (Shure and Stanton) and the GE VRII cartridge with the 3 mil stylus.
> >>>> ...but no luck.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Ben Roth
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> >>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Raphaël PAREJO
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 11:01 AM
> >>>> To: [log in to unmask]
> >>>> Subject: [ARSCLIST] What's the best way to remove surface noise on
> >>>> Columbia Shellac (1930)?
> >>>>
> >>>> Hello alls!
> >>>>
> >>>> I've a lot difficulties to resolve a problem of surface noise and
> >>>> rumble on a Columbia shellac (circa 1930, electric recording) from
> >>>> San Sebastian (Basque country) factory.
> >>>>
> >>>> What's the best ways to attenuate or remove this persistant noise ?
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm working on a Macintosh computer with Peak Pro 7 Editor and
> >>>> several plugins as iZotope RX2, Oxford restoration suite, and also
> >>>> the discontinued SoundSoap Pro 2. The results are not good.
> >>>>
> >>>> A colleague have tried to use Cedar 3000, but without good results.
> >>>>
> >>>> Some suggestions?
> >>>>
> >>>> regards.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> R. Parejo-Coudert
> >>>>
> >>>> Ethnomusicologue / Ethnomusicologist / Etnomusicólogo
> >>>>
> >>>> Anthropologie visuelle et sonore
> >>>> Visual and Sound Anthropology
> >>>> Antropología visual y sonora
> >>>>
> >>>> Archives sonores - Archivos sonoros - Sound Archives Restauration
> >>>> audio - Restauración audio - Audio Restoration
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
> >>>> °°
> >>>> °°
> >>>>
> >> Connect left and right channels of the pickup in parallel. The wanted
> >> modulation is in the lateral direction, and all you are likely to get
> >> in the vertical is pinch effect and rumble.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
--
*sent from my ringing donkey*
|