LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  May 2007

ARSCLIST May 2007

Subject:

Re: Discographical files

From:

"Steven C. Barr(x)" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 21 May 2007 21:35:41 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (50 lines)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "D P Ingram" <[log in to unmask]>
> On 20 maj 2007, at 05.26, Steven C. Barr(x) wrote:
> > That would be MOST definitely appreciated! Aside from anything else, I
> > have a large box containing auction lists (which I bought cheaply from
> > Bill Frase's list...!). However, most of the "privately-published"
> > listings are British (the homeland of [Sir - IMHO] Brian Rust) and  
> > never
> > existed in more than a handful of copies; as well, any OCR attempts  
> > may
> > be foiled by the inherent inaccuracy of mimeography...?!
> 
> I have also written to you now off list, but if any other list  
> members have some "desires" it would be good to hear about them to  
> assist in the fine tuning. My project is not just for 78s (even  
> though I love them a lot!) but obviously should be tuneable dependent  
> on the media in question.
> 
> I doubt it will ever have every known recording and variant thereof,  
> but one can dream.  As long as I don't have to type in every entry !
> 
But...therein lies a problem! The number of 78rpm phonodiscs started to
multiply significantly after WWII, when a profusion of new mastering
studios and record-pressing operations made it possible for almost
anyone who wished to "issue a phonograph record" to do so! I'm not
absolutely sure of the applicable numbers...but, starting in 1946
(and lasting a couple of years, until they were overhhelmed by the
size of the task...) Billboard magazine used to put out a special
issue on a yearly basis which listed all the record labels/firms
of which they were aware...which usually ran well into the THOUSANDS!

In fact, I have run across (and usually NOT purchased) countless
examples of "indie-label" 78's from the forties and fifties! I've
always said that my RAREST record (in a literal sense of the term)
is a c&w record made in (IIRC) East Chicago, Indiana and issued on
the Okie label. Probably a hundred or so of these were pressed, and
the artist probably sold them at his gigs in the steel-plant area
of Gary, et al. My copy MAY be the only surviving one...?!

Now, consider that computer/digital technology has made possible for
anyone with a reasonable amount of hardware and skill to record their
own "magnum opus" and burn copies onto CD-R, which than then be sold
as "CD's!" I have NO idea to what extent these are tracked...or,
indeed, if they are at all...but I have myself had two such "records"
issued...and, as well, have received a fair number for Internet
"broadcast" as a blues deejay on a local school's web-based "radio"
facility...

Steven C. Barr

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Error during command authentication.

Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager