This is 1.0 mil tape rather tha 1.5 mil.
As to your squeal, I suggest baking 1 mil longer than 1.5 mil of the same
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bridavsky, Michael G" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 11:27 AM
Subject: [ARSCLIST] scotch 227
I've been reading the list for while and appreciate the information and
knowledge that is shared here, and I have a question about a particular
brand/stock of tape.
Most of our recordings made in the mid-late 80's and easrly 90's was
recorded to Scotch 226. It's all pretty sticky, but bakes well. I have
just encountered a single reel of Scotch 227. It seems to be a thinner
tape than the 226, ad Im assuming it was an economy version of 226. It
is also sticky, however it does not respond to baking. While the amount
of deposit left on the heads and guides is minimal, and the tape passes
through the transport without slowing, the squeal and distortion is
audible in the transfer.
Does anyone have any experience with this tape? Any suggestions or other
treatments that might get it to run smoothly?
Digital Audio Archiving Project
Indiana University School of Music
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/296 - Release Date: 3/29/2006
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain
personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in
reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the
BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.