LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  December 2006

ARSCLIST December 2006

Subject:

Re: Floor Load Capacity

From:

Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:23:23 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (87 lines)

Tom,
This arrangement your parents had sounds costly,and not one most people could  afford.I think you're saying they had a custom-built  room made ?

If you and I are thinking of the same kind of crates,the wood is very thin and the boards  split easily,when any weight is applied.They also tend to fall over,if they are stacked too high on their sides.


                                  Roger Kulp

Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]> wrote: For what it's worth, when my parents moved into the house I grew up in, a few years before I was 
born, they decided to consolidate their very large collection of records and tapes -- at least those 
not in my father's office at the studio. The basement was non-ideal because it's too wet and too 
dark/dank for my mother in any case. So they decided to put them all on a long wall, floor to 
ceiling, in their shared office room. The contractor planned out the shelves and then did weight 
estimates and promptly changed the plan so that first of all, the shelves were on a structural wall 
and second that there were new reinforcing columns added below. He did something where the weight is 
centered on a foundation wall (stone and morter) because the wall is where the original house meets 
a late 1800's expansion (the office is the ground floor of the expansion). The shelves have been 
chock full -- I mean full to the brim -- of records and tapes since 1964 and no problems thus far. 
I'd estimate the weight must be approaching a ton, spread down a 15' or 20' length. The shelves are 
hardwood, I think.

In my house, I have a similar shelf, but it's free-standing on the carpeted concrete slab 
downstairs. I just stacked up a wall's worth of those pine cubes you can find at AC Moore and other 
stores. AC Moore has a coupon in our pennysaver each week, so all were bought at 30 or 50 percent 
off sticker. There's another similar stack in the furnace room for my extensive collection of audio 
books and magazines.

By the way, at 128K MP3, the entire wall at my parents' house could fit in an 80-gig iPod, half a 
deck of cards. The quality would not be anywhere near the original, though.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roger and Allison Kulp" 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Floor Load Capacity


>I never had to worry about that,as mine have always bee in a ground-level area, witha a concrete 
>floor.I would not suggest anybody store a big collection any other way.
>
>
>                                 Roger Kulp
>
> Nicole Blain  wrote: Hello all,
>
> Does anyone know what the standards are for floor load capacity for stacks of 12" vinyl and 10" 
> shellac discs.
>
> The standard for library book stacks is ~150 pounds psf.  I tried and failed to find anything on 
> the internet that specifies vinyl and/or shellac.  I imagine it would be higher for the latter. 
> If there's an official document or study out there too, it would help convince the 
> architects/engineers that this is an important issue.
>
> I found an article in the Fall 1993 ARSC Journal: Storage of Sound Recordings by Richard Warren 
> Jr.  He has weight per linear foot, but not floor load capacity.
>
> Our collection houses ~175,000 12" vinyl and ~30,000 10" shellac discs.
>
> Merci,
> Nicole
>
> Nicole Blain
> Manager, Music Library/
> Chef, Musicothèque
> CBC/Radio-Canada
> P.O. Box 500, Station A
> Toronto, ON
> Canada  M5W 1E6
> Tel: 416.205.5901
> Fax: 416.205.8574
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> 


 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager