LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  March 2006

ARSCLIST March 2006

Subject:

Re: Which U.S. Orchestra Recorded First?

From:

Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 28 Mar 2006 07:59:11 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (152 lines)

Gerorge, et al,

I responding from home without a copy of the magine to consult, but I hope I 
recall enough of the text to respond accurately below, wherever I start a 
sentence with "George,":  (what a puntctuation cluster!!)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "George Brock-Nannestad" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 7:37 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Which U.S. Orchestra Recorded First?


> From: Patent Tactics, George Brock-Nannestad
>
> Hello Steve and other readers
>
>> My just-published article referred to in the subject line expands and 
>> rewrites
>> the history of American orchestral recording.
>
> ----- congratulations, it was high time, and it spreads the message far
> beyond ARSClist!!
>
>>
>> Part one was retitled by the magazine, "Classic Record Collector" as 
>> "Strohs
>> in the Wind."  Even if you get the English magazine and glance at the 
>> table of
>> contents, you'd be hard pressed (cut?) to know this was the topic.
>
> ----- you were also shortchanged on the picture side. The Stroh 
> instruments
> that are shown in detail in no way resemble those that were used at
> orchestral sessions. Googling brings you much truer results (but perhaps
> reproduction rights to pay). Mauricio Kagel in his "1898" used an Austrian
> variety that also was a far cry from those used in recording orchestras.
>
> In 1986 I acoustically recorded an acoustic piano trio in period pieces 
> and
> with period Stroh instruments (the piano was an upright): a Stroh violin 
> and
> a normally stringed Stroh cello (both from the Musical History Museum in
> Copenhagen and restored by violin restorers Emil Hjorth & Sons in
> Copenhagen). At the ARSC annual meeting in New York in 1986 I showed 
> pictures
> of these. Just to complete the story I should report that the recording 
> horns
> were horns I had been able to borrow from the EMI Music Archives.
>
George, I sent them photos of real Strohs and referred them to the history 
published by, I think, Hill and Dale Magazine for better quality than I 
could supply.

>> This research brings the timeline back to the 1880s.  It changes the 
>> dates and
>> sequence of orchestras which made non-commercial and commercial 
>> recordings and
>> will untangle, in part 2, to appear this summer (?) a number of 
>> misascriptions
>> made for reasons not quite clear.
>
> ----- I am still a bit uncertain about your personal definition of an
> "orchestra". It seems that one criterion you use is "massed strings", but
> several criteria are imagineable. Another could be that at least one
> instrument per voice in the original score should be represented in the
> recording personnel. A third could be that the players are all chosen from 
> a
> well-known orchestra, albeit reduced, with corresponding arrangement, but
> under one of their regular conductors. What is an orchestra?
>
George,  It's the third- more than one string to a part, as I believe I 
implied, and not an ensemble assembled only for recording purposes.  I state 
that it is a group which charged admission for their performance.  Perhaps 
this was edited out and, me being too close to the text, didn't notice on 
the final draft they sent me.

> We do know for a fact that in the Victor Orchestra (conductor Walter 
> Rogers)
> in 1905, all the first and second violin & viola were Stroh instruments. A
> trombone for 'cello part and another trombone for the trombone part, and a
> Helicon bass for the bass part. Calvin Child said "We have been unable to 
> use
> the local musicians [i.e. musicians not from New York] to any advantage, 
> as
> their style is extremely loggy and heavy". For this reason I doubt that
> technical recording staff were mixed in with the proper musicians to 
> handle
> the Strohs.
>
George,  This is a difference of opinion between us.  I can't imagine the 
string players chosen for recording being asked to learn to play Strohs, at 
least without some anecdotal survival of that experience making it down the 
years.  The publishers of CRC also publish Strad and, I assume, infused that 
magazine's past content to filter my article.

> ----- you mention a mirror used by some of the players to see the 
> conductors.
> One may actually be seen in front of the French horn player in the 
> "manned"
> Ginn studio.
>
George,  That was one of the reasons I liked this picture.  Incidentally, 
the horn player is Bruno Jaenicke who remained first when the NY 
Philharmonic and the NY Symphony merged and into the late '30s, perhaps 
longer.  He's the soloist on the Brunswick Toscanini "Midsummer Night's 
Dream" Nocturne.  Labatte is the oboist (who made a solo disc for U.S. 
Pathe), Simon Barere the clarinetist, Guidi the first fiddle (he also 
recorded for Gennett), etc.

> The "von Beulow" cylinder mystery is solved
>> and some press reports whose subject is early recordings are degarbled.
>
> ----- incidentally, I also reported on one "igloo" situation in 1986. 
> However,
> that was in connection with a discussion of VTMC's remarkable DR recording
> setup. Is there any connection here?
>>
>> You can't download it, so you'll have to read all about it in the 
>> magazine.
>>
>> I'm hoping part two will be accompanied by examples posted on the 
>> magazine's
>> web site.  It's in England, where such early recordings are pd, unlike in
>> another country I could mention.
>
> ----- I was not aware that CRC made examples available in connection with
> their articles; do you have the web address for that? Also, may we hope 
> for a
> bibliography as well as a "black disc discography" at the end of part two?
>
George, Posting the examples will be a first for them, I believe.  I'm not 
sure how the footnotes and bibliography I supplied will be treated, as I 
appended them to the end of Part 2.

I'm not doing a discography.  The flat discs are covered in Father Arnold's 
book.  Some of the cylinders are so fugitive that I haven't enough data to 
put something together.

>
> Kind regards, and thanks,
>
>
> George
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.2/293 - Release Date: 3/26/2006
> 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager