Great post Mike. Almost fell from my chair laughing. Now I'm going to 
get one as well LOL :-D
Shai

On 3/14/2010 1:46 AM, Michael Biel wrote:
> Art Shifrin wrote:
>> I am reposting this because it was rejected by the evidently absurd 
>> criteria
>> of redundancy that 'rules' this list.
>> It happens (at least to me) too often.  IF it is again rejected, then 
>> I will desist from trying
>> tio share information with this list: instead
>> providing information only to specific posters.
>
> You are not paying attention. This has been explained on the list over 
> and over and over and over.
> EVERYBODY GETS THIS MESSAGE *EVERY* TIME AND EVERYTHING GETS POSTED 
> ANYWAY.
> I will get a message about this message.  And you will get another if 
> you post a reply.  It just happens and the Library of Congress seems 
> to be unable to fix the problem, so we live with it and keep telling 
> newbies and others who haven't been paying attention about the problem 
> again and again.
>
> Perhaps George Brock-Nannestad can give us the statistic on how many 
> times someone has told a poster about this problem.  Must be, what, 30 
> or 40 times at least.
>
> Mike Biel  [log in to unmask]
>