LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME Archives

BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME  August 2015

BIBFRAME August 2015

Subject:

Re: BIBFRAME Identifier, Role, and Authority Proposals

From:

Thomas Berger <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Wed, 26 Aug 2015 19:00:30 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (56 lines)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 26.08.2015 um 17:44 schrieb Steven Folsom:

> Re: the Identifiers proposal, Karen has said this before, but we
> shouldn’t conflate the role of URIs with string identifiers. When I re
ad
> the Authorities proposal, I interpret bf:identifiedBy as having the
> semantics:
> 
> <some thing> <is identified through an authority> <some authority reso
urce> .
> 
> **But** the identifier proposal says the bf:identifiedBy property is
> for an identifier string. That’s very different. I would recommend we 
be
> able to say the following through different properties:
> 
> <some bf:Resource> <is described by an authority> <some authority reso
urce> .
> <some authority resource> <is identified by an identifier> <some strin
g identifier> .

More and more I have the impression that a distinction between
authorities (I have to admit that I don't fully understand the
concept, there seems to be a cultural gap) and identifiers does
not make much sense.

If we just had a class bf:Identification (paralleling your previous
reasoning to turn bf:Contributor in bf:Contribution) then we
can interpret any authority control document as belonging to
that class. Combine that with the observeation that most authority
<s>control documents</s> records indeed contain a mention of their
string identifier as well as strings for authorized headings and
also express the RWO they describe as an URI we're probably done
(bf:Identification instances could fill the blanks, i.e.
noting the scheme the object belongs to: It seems that not all
RDF representations of authority records make this explicit).

viele Gruesse
Thomas Berger



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iJwEAQECAAYFAlXd8K0ACgkQYhMlmJ6W47NDxwP9E5Fmez74iehfuqcicYPXXa8b
VQT1sbp/0EG7ANS2eCkOq17mLofOMCmqCp919f5r2sIYEJxUG6Lsj02SeemubXTz
eGv9MeEUmvF8wAXBP/t3tPYwZWd8246NHumhtENLv77/uWWE96ux2JZO8WLrNtKO
KKHx5ICF95eJNZVQWL4=
=juBf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager