I second the update, please, request.  Also, could you make sure some archival collections are in there?  (That is, not codex manuscripts, but archival fonds?)

Thanks,

Kate

---------------

Kate Bowers
Collections Services Archivist
Harvard University Archives
Cambridge, MA 02138
[log in to unmask]
voice: (617) 384-7787 
fax: (617) 495-8011
web: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hul.eresource:archives
Twitter: @k8_bowers

-----Original Message-----
From: Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of stuart yeates
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 11:38 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [BIBFRAME] "A collection of Library of Congress MARC records representing the diversity of resources found at the Library"

At http://bibframe.org/demos/ there is a link said to be "A collection 
of Library of Congress MARC records representing the diversity of 
resources found at the Library".

Closer examination of the sample shows that all the resources appear to 
be physical resources. Examination of the Library of Congress website 
suggests if also holds a range of digital resources.

Could http://bibframe.org/demos/ please be updated to either remove the 
diversity claim or (preferably) with a more diverse sample. Ideally the 
more diverse sample would include (a) a digitised resource with a 
parallel physical resource (b) a born digital resource (c) a digital 
resource in a format with no equivalent physical format (an RDF data 
file; a global climate model dataset; etc).

If the Library of Congress doesn't generate MARC for such resources, I'm 
sure that members of the list can locate or generate suitable exemplars.

cheers
stuart
-- 
Stuart Yeates
Library Technology Services http://www.victoria.ac.nz/library/