Python is a transformation language? I thought XSLT was.
RDF is not native to Python in any way. Neither it is to XSLT, but
XSLT works on a tree data model and that is what you want to build -
either as MARCXML, or RDF(/XML), or (X)HTML5. So arguably RDF is more
native to XSLT.
XSLT processors exist on many deployed systems. Why would you want a
dependency on Python and ignore the MARCXML work that has been done?
Makes an open-source effort (which I think should work for libraries)
Looking forward to the paper.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Mark Baker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Martynas Jusevičius
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> XSLT stylesheet for MARCXML (if it is a loss-less representation of
>> MARC) would be orders of magnitude more reusable piece of code than
>> this Python script.
> Hey Martynas.
> It's a transformation language, yes, but is higher level than XSLT as
> it operates directly with resources and links, rather than with
> elements, attributes, and strings. That its rules are currently
> authored in Python rather than in a more apparently-declarative form
> like XML, JSON, or Markdown, is just a matter of expediency, really.
> We are working on a paper to describe this technology, and have just
> submitted a draft to Balisage. Stay tuned.