Hello!
> the main proponents of the features are prone to disagreement?
I do not consider that this is a disagreement. Rather, I think this shows
that there is a need for clarifications.
> {1950..1959} means the set (all of) dates 1959 through 1959.
I assume you mean: "dates 1950 through 1959."
> decade (10 years) is just the expression "195x".
Do you mean we should introduce the concept of "decade"? I remember that
we rejected the concept of "century" and chose to express such concepts as
intervals. Thus, we could suggest formulations like
1950-01-01/P10Y
and skip
195x
> even "1999-02-08"--- compared to "1999-02008T12:12Z"
I assume that you mean
"1999-02-08"--- compared to "1999-02-08T12:12Z"
> Wildcards never really interested me except in queries.
I wonder what you think about my suggestion to move the "x"-concept away
from the EDTF specification and place it on the "list of proposals for CQL
improvement" and discuss this question in the context of CQL.
Regards!
SaaĊĦha,
|
