LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for EAD Archives


EAD Archives

EAD Archives


EAD@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EAD Home

EAD Home

EAD  October 1996

EAD October 1996

Subject:

Re: wordperfect 7 sgml

From:

"W. Eliot Kimber" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Encoded Archival Description List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 23 Oct 1996 10:00:14 -0900

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (131 lines)

At 05:58 PM 10/22/96 -0400, Peter D. Verheyen wrote:
>I have the WP7 Suite, couldn't compile the lgc file because of character
>sets, got an alpha based lgc file from David Clough at Yale and have been
>practicing with that. There are still many questions which plague me in
all this
>
>My questions are these.
>I looked at the .sgm file which passed validation and noticed that there are
>no declarations at the top saying what dtd this is based on... Is this a
>result of going straight to a lgc and not compiling my own? One problem I
>noticed and which David helped me with is that some of the character sets
>are missing in the eadchars.ent and one needs another entities file or
>something? Is that correct? Is saving a file as .sgm enough, or does it need
>to be manually tweeked

By "declarations" do you mean "<!DOCTYPE"? There should be one (it's a
required part of an SGML document)--when you save the document and specify
"SGML" as the file type, make sure the "Include Document Type Declaration"
box is checked. The beginning of your document should then look something
like this:

<!DOCTYPE TEI.2 PUBLIC "-//TEI//DTD TEI Lite 1.6 //EN" "teilite.dtd">
<TEI.2>...

>When working in the layout "module" it saves by default as a .lsi file, but
>I can save to text. When I do that there are no declarations at the top
>saying what this is. Do I need to imput that manually or does Panorama read
>.lsi files?

Panorama does not read .lsi files--they are unique to Wordperfect and only
define Wordperfect's formatting for a particular document type.  You
shouldn't have to worry about how they are saved.

>How do I get the sgm file to reference the lsi (ssh) file?

For Wordperfect, you associate "layouts" (lsi) files with a document type
by selecting SGML->Document Types from the menu bar.  This brings up the
Document Types dialog.  From there, select the document type you want to
apply an LSI to and press the Edit button.  This brings up the Document
Type Entries dialog.  From here you can associate one or more layouts with
the document.

For Panorama, style sheets are associated with documents through any of
three possible methods:

1. Default style sheets and navigators.

   Panorama will look in the document's directory for a style sheet and
   navigator whose names are the same as the DTD's name.  For example,
   if the DTD is "teilite.dtd" then Panorama will look for "teilite.ssh"
   and "teilite.nav".

2. Processing instructions in the document (or external DTD subset).
   For example, you can have something like this:

   <!DOCTYPE TEI PUBLIC "..." [
     <?STYLESPEC "Main View" "teilite.ssh" >
  ]>

  "<?" starts a processing instruction (PI). The keyword "STYLESPEC" is
  defined by Panorama (the SGML standard does not define anything about
  what might go inside PIs). The first quoted string is a title for the
  style sheet (which shows up in Panorama's Style menu).  The second
  string is the location of the actual style sheet.  This can be either
  a PC filename or a URL (for Web-delivered documents).

  For Panorama navigators, you use a similar PI:

  <?NAVIGATOR "Toc" "teilite.ssh" >

3. Entries in the Panorama ENTITYRC file.  One of Panorama's configuration
   files is called ENTITYRC, normally in the /panorama/entityrc directory.
   One of the things it does is map the public identifiers of style sheets
   to their location on a machine or in the network.  This file is updated
   whenever you use the "Attach style sheet" or "Attach navigator" features.
   You can also edit it yourself (the format is pretty obvious).

I recommend option 2 for documents that will be delivered to others.

>When we went through our training at the Fast workshops, we were given a
>good understanding of working in EAD and doing markup, something I am
>discovering to be the easy part. What was seriously lacking was instruction
>in actually mounting the sgml files, making sure that everything was there,
>that the files all connected. Am I the only one feeling frustrated?

No, this is a common problem with SGML.  It results in part from SGML's
strengths, which are flexibility and generality, which have the side effect
of making it possible for different tools to do things different ways.  In
other words, SGML, as an enabling technology, can't say "there is exactly
one way to do things."  This puts the burden on tools to provide easy and
convenient ways to configure the SGML setup.  Unfortunately, most tools
have failed to make it easy enough for casual users to do the sorts of
things you're trying to do.

Most existing SGML tools were designed for environments where an expert
configures the system and then authors just use what they're given.
Obviously, that world is changing and tools need to do better.  Using SGML
can be as convenient and easy as using Word or HTML editors if tool vendors
put in the effort to make it so.  The SGML Open consortium is making
progress in that direction by defining industry standards for aspects of
SGML use that the standards themselves leave open.

I urge you to provide feedback to the vendors of the tools you're using
telling them precisely what you found difficult or confusing and providing
suggestions for things that would make it easier.  Only with that soft of
feedback will vendors get the message and make improvements.  My experience
is that most vendors are hungry for user feedback and, in the abscense of
it, tend to make design decisions based on their own limited experience or
that of their biggest customers.  Most SGML tool vendors are small and easy
to reach.

Another problem is the lack of standards for SGML style sheets.  Today,
almost all products have their own way of defining styles with no good
interchange mechanism.  The newly-published DSSSL Standard, ISO/IEC 10179,
provides a standard for SGML-related style sheets, but it will take a while
for vendors to add support for it to their products.

Cheers,

Eliot
--
W. Eliot Kimber ([log in to unmask])
Senior SGML Consultant and HyTime Specialist
Passage Systems, Inc., (512)339-1400
10596 N. Tantau Ave., Cupertino, CA 95014-3535 (408) 366-0300, (408)
366-0320 (fax)
2608 Pinewood Terrace, Austin, TX 78757 (512) 339-1400 (fone/fax)
http://www.passage.com (work) http://www.drmacro.com (home)
"If I never had existed, would you still remember me?..."
                                   --Austin Lounge Lizards, "1984 Blues"

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
December 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager