On 5/24/2011 8:34 PM, Elizabeth Perkes wrote:
> Is there a consensus yet about how to label a corporate, personal, or
>family name in a way that makes sense to both archivists and users? Since
>we are a government office collecting government records, traditionally we
> just call these names "agencies."
What about "Name of individual" and "Name of group" ? That makes it clear that
the one is single person, and the other is the name of a collective entity.
There is no substitute for good manners,
except, perhaps, fast reflexes.