LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for EDUCAT Archives


EDUCAT Archives

EDUCAT Archives


EDUCAT@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EDUCAT Home

EDUCAT Home

EDUCAT  January 2009

EDUCAT January 2009

Subject:

Re: incorporating RDA into a Cataloging and Classification class

From:

Karen Weaver <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion List for issues related to cataloging & metadata education & training <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:33:43 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (135 lines)

*Jennifer P said:  "The trouble is, that rarely happens in library
catalog land; a working OPAC simply can't be built in a timely fashion by a
single person. ..."*

There was a recent posting on AUTOCAT about the need for not just the theory
but also the practical side for new graduates coming out of schools today,
this was also true in the past.
No matter what we may all teach in a course, it is very important to let
graduate students understand also what they will be working with on their
first professional job and in what type of a working environment aka
academic or other organizational structure.

 Catalogers will not very likely be immediately responsible for "building"
an OPAC system on their own obviously, nor should they.  It just does not
happen that way in libraries either.  I agree, understanding "code" or MARC,
metadata which ever one wishes to call it, catalogers all work with varying
types of "codes" these days and are on task forces with others too usually,
and will be expected to work across these areas day to day for both short
term and long term strategies.  I have found very often many students coming
from information organization courses and "blurring" much of the "online"
idea in terms of what and how collections are "managed" in libraries.  These
include the electronic resources, digital collections/ETDs, the print
collections, etc etc it's important for me to try to clarify this as much as
possible for students getting ready to graduate and interview for positions
in the next month, six months or next year,  in academic libraries
especially the structure of work in technical services units is not all
"lumped together" in organization and also in their work.  We have a wealth
of materials available online to use in our courses in illustrating examples
of work being done, and also links and guests from cataloging depts and
online resources available from OCLC and other vendors / open source tools
etc being developed.

For some, it can be extremely overwhelming if there is "too much" structure
or "code", what is important is for new graduates to be willing to learn,
ask/collaborate with others, and know where to find what they need, and
continue to move in the right directions, no matter what "code" one wishes
to use.  :-)   I'm going to be also including RDA discussions this Winter in
my cataloging courses, and have been posting webcasts and links from RDA
news last year, students are interested in what changes are in store for
them.

Best, Karen

Karen Weaver, MLS
Adjunct Instructor, Cataloging & Classification
The iSchool at Drexel University
College of Information Science & Technology
Philadelphia PA
email: [log in to unmask]

Electronic Resources Statistician
Duquesne University, Gumberg Library
Pittsburgh PA
email: [log in to unmask]




On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Jennifer Parsons <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Thanks, Richard.  While it can be effective to teach code in detail, I'll
> hazard a guess that it really only works with an approach where students
> can
> see the effects of their code directly-- sort of the way I see things done
> in programming classes.  The trouble is, that rarely happens in library
> catalog land; a working OPAC simply can't be built in a timely fashion by a
> single person.  The result of this is that you need catalogers and
> technical
> services staff with a good abstract knowledge of how code fits into the
> frame work of automated library software.
> I really like Shawne and UNT's method of having students build the
> structure
> in which the code is placed, in addition to detailed code.  Not only will
> this give students a better idea of how a catalog works, it will help them
> in working with vendors, since they're already aware of how database
> applications interact with software and can be used to collate many tables
> of records.
>
> -Jennifer Parsons
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Richard Stewart <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Doesn't sound so crazy to me. It's been a few years since I taught as an
> > adjunct at Dominican--I introduced a survey of the then-new FRBR in my
> last
> > few terms--but even then I was coming to the conclusion that teaching the
> > code in detail, or trying to, was impractical in Organization of
> Knowledge
> > (the introductory core course). Comparing the two codes (with reference
> to
> > FRBR) could be a good way of illuminating the underlying principles.
> >
> > Richard A. Stewart
> > Senior Cataloger
> > Indian Trails Public Library District
> > 355 South Schoenbeck Road
> > Wheeling, Illinois 60090-4499
> > USA
> >
> > Tel: 847-279-2214
> > Fax: 847-4760
> > [log in to unmask]
> > htpp://www.itpld.lib.il.us
> > >>> Jennifer Parsons <[log in to unmask]> 01/10/09 9:31 AM >>>
> > Well...I have a crazy idea, everyone.  Disclaimer: I'm a
> > wet-behind-the-ears
> > LIS school graduate; I have very little cataloging experience compared to
> > everyone else on this board.
> > Why not reverse the order when teaching coding to a Cataloging class--
> that
> > is, why not teach RDA, and then AACR2?  Or, better yet, why not start
> from
> > a
> > very general, basic concept of what coding is for, and then lead on into
> a
> > comparison of the two?  If students can grasp why these two standards
> exist
> > to begin with (i.e., to minimize differences between records and make
> them
> > easier to find across platforms), it will be easier for them to grasp
> > why changes
> > had to be made from one standard to the other.  By pointing out the
> > concepts
> > behind the change and the function of both sets, the large, contrasting
> > differences between RDA and AACR2 will help students learn how to display
> > their cataloging information, rather than providing confusion.
> >
> > -Jennifer Parsons
> >
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
April 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager