LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for EDUCAT Archives


EDUCAT Archives

EDUCAT Archives


EDUCAT@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EDUCAT Home

EDUCAT Home

EDUCAT  February 2011

EDUCAT February 2011

Subject:

Re: Discussion of cataloguing education and RDA

From:

"SALABA, ATHENA" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion List for issues related to cataloging & metadata education & training <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:41:08 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (94 lines)

Hello All,

I am teaching the core Organization of Information and the basic Cataloging & Classification courses at Kent State (we also have an advanced cataloging class for non-book materials) and I agree with most of you on the challenge to try fitting so many theories, processes, tools and practice in one semester.

Our core class is designed as an introduction to organizing information in different environments, so we cover most of the theory there and a number of metadata schemas in addition to AACR2/MARC combination (but it has a library bias). In my lecture on the future of library "cataloging" I discuss the changes FRBR brings in implementations, possibly user access to info, user interfaces, and cataloging and this then leads to RDA but we do not look at the rules.

I have started incorporating RDA in the Cataloging class; initially as future happening and more recently about half of a session of a 10-week class. I have students scan through the tool, look at some presentations available, and point to the different training materials available on the web if they would like to pursue it further. In the lecture I only point to pig picture differences (content-based, FRBR terminology, structure of RDA, importance of relationships) and some of the major differences in the rules (e.g. abbreviations, GMD vs. RDA vocabularies for the new elements for content, media, carrier, role in access points, more/richer authority info) - no practice from their part yet.

This summer, I plan to teach a workshop for students who have taken the Cataloging class or have AACR2 familiarity. I think for a while we need knowledge of both the old and the new. As a workshop, it  will look at the rules, incorporate some practice on RDA data creation and, hopefully, beyond (e.g. linked data).  After the decision to implement RDA is made, for fall or next spring semester the difficult decision will be on how much AACR2/ISBD one needs to cover in addition to RDA. I am trying to be realistic, even though I think the most important part of these classes are to learn the why we do things, and how to figure out the best ways to use these standards to create useful and usable data, eventually our graduates need to be able to do the work. The employers are willing to train them for local policies but they expect them do be able to catalog at some level. Providing access to the various tools is not a problem for our school; training them to do the jobs (looking at the job ads they need to know everything) they are applying for and making sure we train people who will be visionaries and will help shape the future within a not-so-lengthy program of study is the big challenge.

I would love to be able to cover topics Diane and others described but it looks to me like it may have to be in addition to "cataloging" and "metadata schemas." Maybe a class or workshop on Making Metadata Work, from modeling to standards, implementation, sharing, linking, and use and reuse.

Athena
--
Athena Salaba, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
School of Library & Information Science, Kent State University
314 Library, PO Box 5190, Kent, OH 44242-0001
[log in to unmask] | 330-672-0023 | Fax 330-672-7965


________________________________
Folks:

One point I'd like to make as this conversation continues is that
incorporating RDA into the curriculum must go beyond teaching RDA as
rules.  The real changes that RDA brings to the table are in the
potential for changes in the DATA we build and share, and that requires
looking at the RDA Vocabularies.  The course that Nerissa took with me
was about RDA as data, and we looked at the rules but talked very little
about them.

I'm happy to share my syllabus and materials with anyone who wants to
take a look.

Regards,
Diane

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Kathryn La Barre <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Greetings. Just a heads up about an interesting thread on RDA-L presently
> about the teaching of RDA in LIS schools. (Reposting one message with
> permission)
>
> GSLIS@UIUC is planning an educator's summit (for all instructors at our
> institution) in March to make plans for teaching RDA at GSLIS, and for a
> full discussion of the current curriculum. Marjorie Bloss has told us (on
> the RDA-L) about what Dominican has been doing. I'd love to hear from more
> of you about your plans to incorporate RDA, and how you envision your
> beginning and advanced cataloguing courses. I'm hoping Nerissa joins in the
> discussion here as well.
>
> repost:
> I felt like I had to give my two-cents about teaching RDA at MLS/MLIS
> programs:
>
> It is interesting to hear that RDA isn't being taught yet at many of these
> programs. I personally think that this is unfortunate, because even if RDA
> is not adopted I think all cataloging students should at least be learning
> the fundamentals so they know why it is even being considered as a
> replacement for AACR2. I can understand why people who have worked in the
> field for many years are 'tired' as Mr. Weinheimer has mentioned. However,
> graduates from MLS/MLIS programs are going to be shaping the futures of
> cataloging/metadata departments of all kinds, and I think that educating
> them in RDA is just as important as teaching AACR2. I just finished my MLIS
> in June '10 from the University of Washington, and last spring they offered
> a course called RDA and Metadata taught by Diane Hillman. I gained a lot of
> insight from auditing this course that I wouldn't have otherwise if I stuck
> with just the regular cataloging courses. I see a trend across libraries at
> least in the US where cataloging departments are changing their names to
> things like cataloging and metadata department or just metadata services. I
> even applied for a position with the title: Resource Description and Access
> manager after I had graduated. I have heard stories about libraries who are
> hiring metadata librarians and not planning on replacing their catalogers
> when they retire. I do not feel qualified to state whether I think RDA is
> the best option or not, but I do know that any student hoping to make it in
> this field after they graduate better have at least a solid educational
> foundation about RDA.
>
>
> Nerissa
>
> Cataloging Librarian
> Texas A&M International University
>
>
> --
> Kathryn La Barre
> Assistant Professor
> Graduate School of Library and Information Science
> University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
April 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager