Like Keld, I too agree with Milicent

In message  <[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask] writes:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 07:59:10AM -0500, Milicent K Wewerka wrote:
> > We have a saying in the U.S.: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."
> It seems that having finite appointments adds administrative work.
> Is there a definite advantage to finite appointments that makes the
> extra work worthwhile? Has there been a problem with the current
> practice? Milicent Wewerka

It's simplest only to need to appoint if someody resigns, or fails to
be able to carry out the required duties. Have a mechanism only for
those circumstances, not just adding red tape.

Best regards

John Clews

--
John Clews,
Keytempo Limited (Information Management),
8 Avenue Rd, Harrogate, HG2 7PG
Email: [log in to unmask]
tel: +44 1423 888 432;

Committee Member of ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC22/WG20: Internationalization;
Committee Member of ISO/TC37/SC2/WG1: Language Codes