Yes, we did discuss this and Millie is correct in her recollection. We
will just have to test how this works over time-- it was said at the
meeting that the 50 documents should be no problem for any of the
languages being requested for addition to 639-1.

Rebecca

On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Milicent K Wewerka wrote:

> As John Clews pointed out, the Criteria sections of document N3R do
> not match.  However, as I recall, this was discussed at the meeting
> with the conclusion that the criteria for the two parts of the
> standard would continue to differ--especially regarding the "50
> documents" and "significant (or substantial?) body of existing
> documents."
>
> Milicent Wewerka
>