> -----Original Message-----
> From: Metadata Object Description Schema List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Rebecca S. Guenther
> Sent: 20 September, 2005 09:42
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [MODS] MADS mapping draft
>
> Please note that we've made some changes to the draft MARC
> authorities to MADS mapping, since we discovered in writing
> the stylesheet for conversion that the authority attribute
> was missing. That became very complicated particularly
> because of LCSH coding rules. A revision is up at:
> http://www.loc.gov/standards/mads/mads-mapping.html
> Please let us know if you see and possible errors.
>
Looking at the mappings we noticed that there are no mappings for 180, 181, 182 and 185. In addition, after doing some queries with a recent copy of the LC authority file (2005-09-14), we noticed that there are 7 records coded with a tag of 111 which have an LCCN prefix of sh and there are 466 records coded with a tag of 130 which have an LCCN prefix of sh.
There doesn't appear to be any mappings that indicate 111 authority="lcsh" and 130 authority="lcsh". The only mappings for 111 and 130 are: 111, 130 and 008/11=a authority="naf".
BTW, for reference here are the LCCN's for the 111:
sh 85053891
sh 85053892
sh 85117102
sh 85018098
sh 85019367
sh 93010664
sh 93010136
BTW, for reference here are the LCCN's for the first 7, 130:
sh 85132126
sh 85132127
sh 85132128
sh 85132129
sh 85132130
sh 85132131
sh 85132132
Andy.
Andrew Houghton, OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.
http://www.oclc.org/about/
http://www.oclc.org/research/staff/houghton.htm
|