Sent from my iPad
On May 30, 2012, at 5:42 PM, "Mark Ehlert" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Culbertson, Rebecca <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> At the PCC Ops meeting in 2011, there was strong preference to keep using
>> the provider-neutral model for the time being even when all else in a record
>> was RDA.
> Any word on non-electronic reproductions (photocopies, microfilm,
> facsimiles, etc.)?
> There was a paper issued by LC(?) a couple years ago on a proposed
> move away from LCRI 1.11A and toward AACR2/RDA practice. Though LC
> was supposed to have made a decision on this point either before their
> RDA Day One announcement or before the day itself, none has been
> forthcoming, at least up to now. Will PCC follow LC practice when
> it's made? Or forge their own path?
> Mark K. Ehlert Minitex
> Coordinator University of Minnesota
> Bibliographic & Technical 15 Andersen Library
> Services (BATS) Unit 222 21st Avenue South
> Phone: 612-624-0805 Minneapolis, MN 55455-0439