Thank you Amy. That was my understanding as well, but I am glad you confirmed it.
>>> Amy Turner <[log in to unmask]> 2014/08/27 12:49 PM >>>
In RDA, anything that is not designated as a "core element" is optional. 22.214.171.124 Recording Relationship Designators does not have this designation. The associated LC/PCC PS reads "LC practice: Provide an authorized access point in the bibliographic record for an illustrator in all cases of resources intended for children. Give the RDA appendix I designator "illustrator" in MARC 700 subfield $e."
In the BIBCO training materials, slide 9 in Module four, captioned "Relationship designators" says "LC policy: decisions in some LCPS; otherwise, cataloger judgment to use."
On OCLC, you will see a wide range of practices in using relationship designators. At Duke, we use them only for special collections.
Hope this helps,
Monographic Cataloger and Authority Control Coordinator
Duke University Libraries
[log in to unmask]
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Annette Ingram
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 5:24 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [PCCLIST] Relator codes
We are implementing RDA original cataloguing soon and I would like to know whether the usage of relator codes (#e) with authors, editors, corporate bodies, etc. is mandatory in RDA? We feel that it is sometimes superfluous (like #eauthor) but would not like to contravene mandatory RDA guidelines. If it is mandatory, could I please have a reference to present to my "critical" colleagues. I have been unsuccessful in finding a clear guideline thus far.
Thank you and kind regards.
Annette Ingram (Cataloguer & trainer, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa)