When the authorized access point for Prague (Czechoslovakia) was changed
to Prague (Czech Republic), shouldn't all the corporate body and title
NARs that used the earlier form as a qualifier have been changed? I
noticed today numerous NARs that still have Prague, Czechoslovakia as a
qualifier.
Examples:
n 89632746 Art Centrum (Prague, Czechoslovakia)
n 93011956 Center for Theoretical Study (Prague, Czechoslovakia)
n 88088181 Colloquium C 52 $d (1988 : $c Prague, Czechoslovakia)
nr 91001187 Divadlo satiry (Prague, Czechoslovakia)
n 83733716 Albatros (Prague, Czechoslovakia)
n 90695394 Impuls (Prague, Czechoslovakia)
no 90023154 Tribuna (Prague, Czechoslovakia : 1919-1924)
Since Prague (Czechoslovakia) is a UF on the record Prague (Czech
Republic), shouldn't all of the records with the earlier name as a
qualifier be changed? And if so, I imagine that there are records with
other place qualifiers that may need changing as well. Such as:
n 84703943 Galeria (Bratislava, Czechoslovakia)
n 91048023 Historica (Bratislava, Czechoslovakia)
n 86708074 Litteraria (Bratislava, Czechoslovakia)
no 92021526 Sumava (Plzen, Czechoslovakia)
no 92024445 Centrum pre socialnu analyzu (Bratislava, Czechoslovakia)
Do we need a project to upgrade these records to the correct qualified
form?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adam L. Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University of Washington Libraries
Box 352900
Seattle, WA 98195-2900
(206) 543-8409
(206) 685-8782 fax
[log in to unmask]
http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|