LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PIG Archives


PIG Archives

PIG Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PIG Home

PIG Home

PIG  July 2011

PIG July 2011

Subject:

Re: question about event date/time

From:

Evelyn McLellan <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

PREMIS Implementors Group Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 6 Jul 2011 12:05:20 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (54 lines)

Hi Priscilla,

FYI: in our case, the Archivematica system records the event data in real
time upon the completion of all automated events. We actually log the time
a task is assigned to a processor, the time that the task began and the
time it was completed. The difference between the three is often just
milliseconds. We use the task start time as the PREMIS event timestamp
value.

The one exception is when a user may opt to do a manual file format
normalization outside of the Archivematica pipeline (now possible btw in
0.7.1-alpha). In that case there is a delay between the actual event and
when the PREMIS event gets recorded. So I can see how it may be useful to
have a second timestamp value to distinguish between the two to meet
TRAC's requirement for contemporaneous logging. To be honest, however, we
see this as a somewhat academic discussion right now. Do you think it
would be sufficient (from a TRAC compliance standpoint) to have system
documentation describing how and when event metadata are generated during
SIP processing?

Evelyn McLellan
Archivematica Community Manager
www.archivematica.org


> My understanding is that there is considerable use of the PREMIS Event
description.   The semantic unit eventDateTime is defined as "The single
date and time, or date and time range, at or during which the event
occurred."  I'm wondering if any of you have felt a need to also have a
timestamp indicating when the Event description was written.  I can see
two use cases for this.
> The first case is widely applicable. Re-reading TRAC (Trustworthy
Repositories Audit and Certification), I noticed it gives a lot of
emphasis to records being contemporaneous.  That would indicate that the
smaller the time between the event happening and the event record being
recorded the better.  You could only tell, however, if there was an
indication of when the event record was written.
> The second case may only apply to us, I don't know.  We store multiple
copies of our AIP, each considered a master, in different storage pools.
 (We also take back-ups of our masters, but that's irrelevant to this.) 
  Programs continuously check the fixity of each storage pool, so we
know that every AIP in the pool is fixed.  However, we only record a
fixity Event for the AIP when another program verifies that all master
copies of an AIP have been fixity checked successfully.  The date of the
most recent check will vary from copy to copy, so we record in
> eventDateTime the earliest of the dates, which is the most recent date
we can be sure all copies were good.  That date can be days or even
weeks before the event record is written.
> Do any of you timestamp the time the event record is written, even
though there is no PREMIS element for it?
> Do any of you think an element for the timestamp of the recording of an
event would be useful?
> p

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

June 2023
March 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
May 2022
April 2022
January 2022
December 2021
October 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
April 2021
March 2021
January 2021
December 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
April 2020
February 2020
December 2019
November 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager