LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PIG Archives


PIG Archives

PIG Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PIG Home

PIG Home

PIG  October 2006

PIG October 2006

Subject:

Re: AW: [PIG] Upcoming revision of the PREMIS Data Dictionary - call for participation

From:

Zhiwu Xie <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

PREMIS Implementors Group Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:07:09 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (74 lines)

Hello Georg,

Maybe the data dictionary section 4 page 4-4 to 4-5 answers your
question? In my opinion indeed a file should not contain other files. It
can contain bitstreams though. I think in PREMIS terms, the zip file
does not _contain_ files within it, rather it's a transformation of the
files being compressed.

Zhiwu Xie

On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 06:08, Georg Buechler wrote:
> We've just been discussing a similar question, so thank you Youn for
> bringing this up!
> 
> We decided to use PREMIS to record metadata in a digital preservation
> project with state archives in Switzerland. I should point out that
> this is really a very basic, pilot project, and that we are not using
> METS, which may be the cause of some of the problems we encountered.
> Namely, we are archiving data from a database-driven application. We
> plan to combine several plain-text data files, information about the
> data model, and other files into a zip-file. So we have a
> representation (the AIP in the current form) consisting of one file
> (the zip-file) which itself consists a couple of other files - there
> clearly is a hierarchy of files that is difficult to model in PREMIS.
> Example 3 in the PREMIS Data Dictionary (p. 3-34 sqq.) gives a hint of
> how to achieve this, namely through the use of the "relationship"
> semantic unit. However, this looks more like a workaround to me, as I
> understand a file cannot contain other files. Is this understanding
> correct? Or am I missing the actual point here?
> 
> Thanks for any kind of clarification.
> 
> Best,
> Georg
> 
> --
> Coordination Agency for the Preservation of Electronic Files
> c/o Swiss Federal Archives
> Archivstrasse 24      
> 3003 Berne
> Switzerland
> 
> T/ +41 31 322 82 18
> F/ +41 31 322 78 32
> E/ [log in to unmask]
> W/ http://kost-ceco.ch/
>  
> 
> > -----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: PREMIS Implementors Group Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Im 
> > Auftrag von Youn Noh
> > Gesendet: Samstag, 7. Oktober 2006 00:07
> > An: [log in to unmask]
> > Betreff: Re: [PIG] Upcoming revision of the PREMIS Data 
> > Dictionary - call for participation
> > 
> > For repositories that aren't using METS, I'm wondering if it 
> > might not be a good idea to make it possible to represent 
> > structural relationships in PREMIS hierarchically by revising 
> > the schema for the object entity so that relationship can be 
> > a child of relationship.
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > Youn
> > 
> > 
> > Youn Noh
> > Digital Resources Catalog Librarian
> > Catalog Department
> > Yale University Library
> > P.O. Box 208240
> > New Haven, CT 06520-8240
> > 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
May 2022
April 2022
January 2022
December 2021
October 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
April 2021
March 2021
January 2021
December 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
April 2020
February 2020
December 2019
November 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager