>>> [log in to unmask] 10-08-2005 0:29 >>>
>However, others may have a different view (e.g. Mike wasn't too happy
>with the record, rec example I gave). If we do need to be able to
>aggregate schemas then as Ray indicated, I believe we need to revise
>parameters for requesting recordSchemas rather than overload the
Agreed. Let's formulate a proposal but only add it to a new SRU version
when it is actually being implemented by someone.
I would propose for the request to have space or plus sign separated
recordSchema's. For a generic wrapper there are lots of possibilities. I
give some suggestions but there may be better ones. I also like Bill's
RDF suggestion, but only if the server is allowed to choose between RDF
and a generic wrapper.
Suggestion 2 :